Comparison of Next Generation Laser Techniques of Myopia Correction: iDesign vs. SMILE
Primary Purpose
Myopia
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
India
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
iDesign
SMILE
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Myopia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients should be between 18 to 50 years of age.
- Patient must have stable myopia for a minimum period of one year (a change of 0.25D or less) as documented by prior clinical records or current spectacle correction.
- Patient must have a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/25 or better,
- Patient must have a spherical equivalent refraction less than -10D
- Patient must have refractive astigmatism less than 3D.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient must not have a central corneal thickness (CCT) less than 480 micrometer
- Patient must not have a calculated residual stromal bed thickness of less than 250 micrometer after the surgery
- Patient must not have symptoms or signs of keratoconus, diabetes, collagen vascular disease, pregnancy, breastfeeding and any prior ocular surgery.
- Patient must not have an inter-ocular difference of more than 1.00 diopter (D) of spherical or 0.50 D of cylindrical refractive error.
- Patient must not be on chronic systemic steroids or other medication that can affect wound healing.
- Patient must not be allergic to primary or alternative medications.
- Patient must not be using rigid contact lenses for the last three weeks or soft contact lenses for at least 1 week before the preoperative evaluation.
Sites / Locations
- Narayana NethralayaRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
iDesign
SMILE
Arm Description
Eyes will under LASIK using iDesign platform for treatment of sphere and cylinder power
Eyes will under SMILE using Visumax platform for treatment of sphere and cylinder power
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in visual acuity measured as Logarithm of manifest refraction
Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Corneal curvature in Diopter
Optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging of the cornea will be performed
Change in deformation of the cornea
Air-puff applanation of the cornea will be used to asses deformation
Change in ocular surface dryness and/or pain
Assessed by ocular surface discomfort score
Change in wavefront aberrations described by Zernike Polynomials
Corneal and ocular aberrations
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03001401
First Posted
December 15, 2016
Last Updated
December 19, 2016
Sponsor
Narayana Nethralaya
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03001401
Brief Title
Comparison of Next Generation Laser Techniques of Myopia Correction: iDesign vs. SMILE
Official Title
Comparison of Next Generation Laser Techniques of Myopia Correction: iDesign vs. SMILE
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Narayana Nethralaya
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The proposed study seeks to compare visual acuity, tomographic outcomes, biomechanical changes and inflammatory profile of normal eyes (matched for age, refraction and corneal thickness) undergoing iDesign and SMILE procedure. The hypothesis is that iDesign may deliver equivalent or better clinical outcomes than SMILE, by removing less tissue and correcting for higher order aberrations.
Detailed Description
iDesign is a promising new technique to treat myopia with astigmatism using ocular aberrations measured with a high resolution wavefront sensor.[1,2] Early studies with iDesign platform has established its safety and efficacy in correction of myopia with fewer patients reporting night vision problems.[1,2] In keratoconus, iDesign has also provided excellent outcomes following collagen crosslinking.3 SMILE is a recent technique that eliminates creation of flap and appears to achieve similar refractive outcomes as conventional LASIK but with less dryness, less inflammation and faster wound healing.[4,5] SMILE corrects lower order aberrations only.[4,5] Thus, a comparative assessment of iDesign and SMILE is necessary since iDesign can potentially give better visual outcomes with lower volume of tissue removal. If lower volume of tissue is removed, it is also hypothesized that the corneal would be more stable biomechanically.[5] Further, SMILE does not provide any correction of higher order aberrations. With the inclusion of higher order aberrations in the iDesign treatment plan, it is hypothesized that both short and long term outcomes will be better with iDesign than with SMILE.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myopia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
iDesign
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Eyes will under LASIK using iDesign platform for treatment of sphere and cylinder power
Arm Title
SMILE
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Eyes will under SMILE using Visumax platform for treatment of sphere and cylinder power
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
iDesign
Intervention Description
One group will under go standard LASIK using iDesign platform (J&J, USA). Visual acuity, tomography outcomes, biomechanical outcomes and inflammation in myopic eyes treated with iDesign and SMILE are proposed to be evaluated under the study.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
SMILE
Intervention Description
The other group will undergo SMILE for treatment refractive error (Carl Zeiss, Germany). isual acuity, tomography outcomes, biomechanical outcomes and inflammation in myopic eyes treated with iDesign and SMILE are proposed to be evaluated under the study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in visual acuity measured as Logarithm of manifest refraction
Description
Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity
Time Frame
Post surgery over a period of 1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Corneal curvature in Diopter
Description
Optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug imaging of the cornea will be performed
Time Frame
Post surgery over a period of 1 year
Title
Change in deformation of the cornea
Description
Air-puff applanation of the cornea will be used to asses deformation
Time Frame
Post surgery over a period of 1 year
Title
Change in ocular surface dryness and/or pain
Description
Assessed by ocular surface discomfort score
Time Frame
Post surgery over a period of 1 year
Title
Change in wavefront aberrations described by Zernike Polynomials
Description
Corneal and ocular aberrations
Time Frame
Post surgery over a period of 1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients should be between 18 to 50 years of age.
Patient must have stable myopia for a minimum period of one year (a change of 0.25D or less) as documented by prior clinical records or current spectacle correction.
Patient must have a corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 20/25 or better,
Patient must have a spherical equivalent refraction less than -10D
Patient must have refractive astigmatism less than 3D.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient must not have a central corneal thickness (CCT) less than 480 micrometer
Patient must not have a calculated residual stromal bed thickness of less than 250 micrometer after the surgery
Patient must not have symptoms or signs of keratoconus, diabetes, collagen vascular disease, pregnancy, breastfeeding and any prior ocular surgery.
Patient must not have an inter-ocular difference of more than 1.00 diopter (D) of spherical or 0.50 D of cylindrical refractive error.
Patient must not be on chronic systemic steroids or other medication that can affect wound healing.
Patient must not be allergic to primary or alternative medications.
Patient must not be using rigid contact lenses for the last three weeks or soft contact lenses for at least 1 week before the preoperative evaluation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Abhijit Sinha Roy, PhD
Phone
+919740566833
Email
asroy27@yahoo.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rohit Shetty, MD, PHD
Organizational Affiliation
Narayana Nethralaya
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Narayana Nethralaya
City
Bangalore
State/Province
Karnataka
ZIP/Postal Code
560010
Country
India
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rohit Shetty, MD, PhD
Phone
+919611102568
Email
drrohitshetty@yahoo.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26603388
Citation
Schallhorn SC, Venter JA, Hannan SJ, Hettinger KA. Outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using a new-generation Hartmann-Shack aberrometer in patients with high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Sep;41(9):1810-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26504595
Citation
Schallhorn SC, Venter JA, Hannan SJ, Hettinger KA. Wavefront-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy with the Use of a New Hartmann-Shack Aberrometer in Patients with Myopia and Compound Myopic Astigmatism. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:514837. doi: 10.1155/2015/514837. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27191671
Citation
Shaheen MS, Shalaby Bardan A, Pinero DP, Ezzeldin H, El-Kateb M, Helaly H, Khalifa MA. Wave Front-Guided Photorefractive Keratectomy Using a High-Resolution Aberrometer After Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Keratoconus. Cornea. 2016 Jul;35(7):946-53. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000888.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25458707
Citation
Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L, Faure JF, Auclin F, Baudouin C. Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):669-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26605350
Citation
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) history, fundamentals of a new refractive surgery technique and clinical outcomes. Eye Vis (Lond). 2014 Oct 16;1:3. doi: 10.1186/s40662-014-0003-1. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25487424
Citation
McNabb RP, Farsiu S, Stinnett SS, Izatt JA, Kuo AN. Optical coherence tomography accurately measures corneal power change from laser refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):677-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27400081
Citation
Matalia J, Francis M, Tejwani S, Dudeja G, Rajappa N, Sinha Roy A. Role of Age and Myopia in Simultaneous Assessment of Corneal and Extraocular Tissue Stiffness by Air-Puff Applanation. J Refract Surg. 2016 Jul 1;32(7):486-93. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160512-02.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25955559
Citation
Sinha Roy A, Kurian M, Matalia H, Shetty R. Air-puff associated quantification of non-linear biomechanical properties of the human cornea in vivo. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Aug;48:173-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Comparison of Next Generation Laser Techniques of Myopia Correction: iDesign vs. SMILE
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs