Manidipine Versus Amlodipine in Patients With Hypertension
Primary Purpose
Hypertension
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Manidipine 20mg
Amlodipine 10mg
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hypertension focused on measuring Peripheral Edema, Bioimpedance Analysis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female outpatients between the ages of 20 and 80 years with uncomplicated essential hypertension are eligible.
- Inclusion criteria requires that patients have either stage I or stage II hypertension (mean sitting systolic Blood Pressure (BP) 140-179 mmHg, diastolic BP 90-109 mmHg).
- The patients are newly diagnosed or known hypertensive subjects who were not taking antihypertensive agents for more than the last 4 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients are excluded from the study if they have any evidence of clinically significant concurrent medical conditions including cardiac, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, or endocrinologic disease.
- Patients are also excluded if they have known hypersensitivity or serious drug reactions to Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs), any evidence of prior deep vein thrombosis, lymphatic disease, or concurrent requirement for medications that could affect Blood Pressure (BP) or salt and water retention (e.g, nonsteroidal antinflammatory drugs, estrogen containing drugs).
Sites / Locations
- Yonsei University Severance Hospital
- Korea University Guro Hospital
- Yonsei University Wonju Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Manidipine 20mg
Amlodipine 10mg
Arm Description
50 patients will be administered orally manidipine 20mg/day after 1~2 week run-in period
50 patients will be administered orally amlodipine 10mg/day after 1~2 week run-in period
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in leg edema score (Extracellular Water(ECW) to Total Body Water(TBW))
Secondary Outcome Measures
Changes in segmental (each arm/leg, trunk) edema score
Changes in Blood Pressure (BP)
Incidences of AEs
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03106597
First Posted
March 29, 2017
Last Updated
September 2, 2020
Sponsor
Korea University Guro Hospital
Collaborators
Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03106597
Brief Title
Manidipine Versus Amlodipine in Patients With Hypertension
Official Title
Manidipine Versus Amlodipine in Patients With Hypertension: Effects on Peripheral Edema Evaluated by Bioimpedance Analysis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Difficulty in enrolling subjects
Study Start Date
August 20, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 15, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 14, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Korea University Guro Hospital
Collaborators
Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a third-generation Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB), manidipine, compared with second-generation Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB), amlodipine, on the development of peripheral edema using Direct Segmental Multi-Frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (DSM-BIA) method in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Investigator expects this study could show more objective evidence of better safety of manidipine compared with amlodipine for peripheral edema.
Detailed Description
Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs) are one of the most commonly used potent antihypertensive agents. Their vasodilatory effects are associated with Adverse Effects (AEs) such as peripheral edema, headache and flushing.
The incidence of peripheral edema with Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB) is 6% in a recent systematic review and is clearly dose-dependent and more common in women, in obese and in elderly hypertensives. Peripheral edema could be a cause for poor persistence with therapy or antihypertensive treatment withdrawal and has a deleterious impact on health-related quality of life.
A recent meta-analysis of head-to-head trials to compare the efficacy and safety profile of manidipine and amlodipine showed significantly better safety of manidipine: the Relative Risk (RR) for adverse event was 0.69 (0.56-0.85), and particularly for ankle edema Relative Risk (RR) was 0.35 (0.22-0.54).
Although peripheral edema is an important issue in Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB) treatment, techniques (e.g, ankle-foot volume using a water displacement measurement, plethysmography, and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure) for the objective measurement are not generally available in a clinical setting. Most clinical studies relied on self-report of peripheral edema that is not a reliable objective method.
Recently, Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) has become increasingly popular for estimating body composition, including Extracellular Water (ECW) and Intracellular Water (ICW), fat mass and fat-free mass. Mechanistically, the Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB)-related peripheral edema is likely due to distal arteriolar dilatation with capillary leak to tissue spaces. Because BIA method can measure the edema as the ratio of Extracellular Water (ECW) to Total Body Water (TBW), it may reflect the Calcium Channel Blocker (CCB)-related edema. Moreover, the Direct Segmental Multi-frequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (DSM-BIA) has been validated to assess segmental body (i.e., trunk, arms and legs) composition in addition to total body composition and can provide segmental edema score as well as total edema score. This new, previously not reported method is expected to provide more objective and precise data for peripheral edema.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hypertension
Keywords
Peripheral Edema, Bioimpedance Analysis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Manidipine 20mg/day, Amlodipine 10mg/day
Sealed envelope method randomization according to gender and age
25 males under 55 years old
25 males more than 55 years old
25 females under 55 years old
25 females more than 55 years old
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Blinded-endpoint
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
46 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Manidipine 20mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
50 patients will be administered orally manidipine 20mg/day after 1~2 week run-in period
Arm Title
Amlodipine 10mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
50 patients will be administered orally amlodipine 10mg/day after 1~2 week run-in period
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Manidipine 20mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Madipine Tab(Manidipine Hydrochloride) 20mg (CJ)
Intervention Description
After a 1~2-week run-in period, patents will be randomized to receive manidipine (20 mg/day; n=50) for a 8-week open-labeled phase. Study drugs will be administered orally and once daily between 8:00am and 10:00am.
BP, heart rate, adverse events and concomitant therapy are assessed and a physical examination is performed at each visit. A 12-lead standard ECG is obtained and hematology, clinical biochemistry and urine analysis investigations performed at the screening visit. A Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is undertaken at the screening visit and at the end of the 8-week treatment course. Patients have to attend the clinic visit every 4 weeks during the treatment period.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Amlodipine 10mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Amlodipine Pfizer 10mg (Pfizer)
Intervention Description
After a 1~2-week run-in period, patents will be randomized to receive amlodipine (10 mg/day; n=50) for a 8-week open-labeled phase. Study drugs will be administered orally and once daily between 8:00am and 10:00am.
BP, heart rate, adverse events and concomitant therapy are assessed and a physical examination is performed at each visit. A 12-lead standard ECG is obtained and hematology, clinical biochemistry and urine analysis investigations performed at the screening visit. A Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) is undertaken at the screening visit and at the end of the 8-week treatment course. Patients have to attend the clinic visit every 4 weeks during the treatment period.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in leg edema score (Extracellular Water(ECW) to Total Body Water(TBW))
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in segmental (each arm/leg, trunk) edema score
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks
Title
Changes in Blood Pressure (BP)
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks
Title
Incidences of AEs
Time Frame
Up to 8 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male and female outpatients between the ages of 20 and 80 years with uncomplicated essential hypertension are eligible.
Inclusion criteria requires that patients have either stage I or stage II hypertension (mean sitting systolic Blood Pressure (BP) 140-179 mmHg, diastolic BP 90-109 mmHg).
The patients are newly diagnosed or known hypertensive subjects who were not taking antihypertensive agents for more than the last 4 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients are excluded from the study if they have any evidence of clinically significant concurrent medical conditions including cardiac, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal, or endocrinologic disease.
Patients are also excluded if they have known hypersensitivity or serious drug reactions to Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs), any evidence of prior deep vein thrombosis, lymphatic disease, or concurrent requirement for medications that could affect Blood Pressure (BP) or salt and water retention (e.g, nonsteroidal antinflammatory drugs, estrogen containing drugs).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eung Ju Kim, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Professor
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Yonsei University Severance Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
03722
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Korea University Guro Hospital
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
08308
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Yonsei University Wonju Hospital
City
Wonju
ZIP/Postal Code
26426
Country
Korea, Republic of
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20945994
Citation
Richy FF, Laurent S. Efficacy and safety profiles of manidipine compared with amlodipine: a meta-analysis of head-to-head trials. Blood Press. 2011 Feb;20(1):54-9. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2010.518670. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
3154704
Citation
Opie LH. Calcium channel antagonists. Part IV: Side effects and contraindications drug interactions and combinations. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988 Jul;2(2):177-89. doi: 10.1007/BF00051233.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21295192
Citation
Makani H, Bangalore S, Romero J, Wever-Pinzon O, Messerli FH. Effect of renin-angiotensin system blockade on calcium channel blocker-associated peripheral edema. Am J Med. 2011 Feb;124(2):128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.08.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11090788
Citation
Messerli FH, Oparil S, Feng Z. Comparison of efficacy and side effects of combination therapy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (benazepril) with calcium antagonist (either nifedipine or amlodipine) versus high-dose calcium antagonist monotherapy for systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Dec 1;86(11):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01199-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16398059
Citation
Fogari R. Ankle oedema and sympathetic activation. Drugs. 2005;65 Suppl 2:21-7. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565002-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11587165
Citation
Weir MR, Rosenberger C, Fink JC. Pilot study to evaluate a water displacement technique to compare effects of diuretics and ACE inhibitors to alleviate lower extremity edema due to dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. Am J Hypertens. 2001 Sep;14(9 Pt 1):963-8. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02167-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17577462
Citation
Fogari R, Malamani G, Zoppi A, Mugellini A, Rinaldi A, Fogari E, Perrone T. Effect on the development of ankle edema of adding delapril to manidipine in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: a three-way crossover study. Clin Ther. 2007 Mar;29(3):413-8. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(07)80079-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23842617
Citation
Seo HS, Kim EJ, Kim SW, Im SI, Na JO, Choi CU, Lim HE, Won Kim J, Rha SW, Park CG. Extracellular fluid adjusted for body size is contracted in hypertension. Hypertens Res. 2013 Oct;36(10):916-21. doi: 10.1038/hr.2013.68. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21555168
Citation
Ling CH, de Craen AJ, Slagboom PE, Gunn DA, Stokkel MP, Westendorp RG, Maier AB. Accuracy of direct segmental multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis in the assessment of total body and segmental body composition in middle-aged adult population. Clin Nutr. 2011 Oct;30(5):610-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 May 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22385927
Citation
Schoeller DA, Alon A, Manekas D, Mixson LA, Lasseter KC, Noonan GP, Bolognese JA, Heymsfield SB, Beals CR, Nunes I. Segmental bioimpedance for measuring amlodipine-induced pedal edema: a placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther. 2012 Mar;34(3):580-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.01.018. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Manidipine Versus Amlodipine in Patients With Hypertension
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs