search
Back to results

Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution at 0.125% vs Placebo for the Healing of Grade IIB Ulcers of Diabetic Foot

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Foot

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Mexico
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Chlorhexidine gluconate at 0.125%
Placebo Comparator with physiological saline sterile solution
Sponsored by
Universidad de Guanajuato
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Foot focused on measuring Chlorhexidine gluconate, Diabetic foot ulcer syndrome, Wound healing

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory patients of both sex over age of 18 years old with diabetes mellitus that present an ulcer caused by diabetic foot syndrome with an extension from skin to tendon or join capsule and infected, classified as Texas IIB.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients lost to follow up and those that voluntary leave the study.

Sites / Locations

  • Universidad de GuanajuatoRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Standard management and Chlorhexidine gluconate at 0.125%

Standard management and physiological saline sterile solution

Arm Description

Application every 24 hours, six weeks Intervention: Procedure: chlorhexidine gluconate

Application every 24 hours, six weeks Intervention: Other: physiological saline sterile solution

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ulcerated area
area of diabetic foot ulcer measured with photographic register using a visual control of dimensions and a dedicated software for measurements.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
July 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 13, 2019
Sponsor
Universidad de Guanajuato
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03209466
Brief Title
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution at 0.125% vs Placebo for the Healing of Grade IIB Ulcers of Diabetic Foot
Official Title
Standard Management and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution at 0.125% Versus Standard Management and Physiological Saline Sterile Solution for Healing Grade IIB Ulcers in Diabetic Foot Syndrome: Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 11, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 15, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad de Guanajuato

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
There is controversy regarding the utility of antiseptics in wound management for diabetic foot ulcer syndrome. The aim of this study is to assess chlorhexidine gluconate at 0.125% vs. saline solution to reduce the ulcerated area in patients with diabetic ulcer syndrome. A clinical trial model to evaluate modifications in size and area is proposed. Patients to be included will be those with diabetic foot ulcers Graded II accordingly to the University of Texas wound classification system.
Detailed Description
This study will be done in Hospital General de Leon Population: People with diabetic foot syndrome grade IIb in Guanajuato Mexico Universe: People with diabetes mellitus and diabetic foot syndrome in Guanajuato Sample: Patients with diabetes mellitus over age of 18 years old, that present to the wound´s clinic of Hospital General Leon with diabetic foot ulcers classified as Texas IIB. This clinic provides services to patients in Guanajuato with diabetic foot syndrome, including them in a multidisciplinary management program. Sample size calculation: A minimal sample of 35 patients for each arm of the study was calculated. Each study arm will be balanced considering the size. Potency was calculated at 0.8 and alpha value at 0-5, to detect a difference of 25% on the ulcer size. Methodology: Will be invited to participate in the study consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus presented with diabetic foot ulcers Graded II accordingly to the University of Texas wound classification system, in the area of Clinical wounds of Hospital General Leon between May and December 2017. After explaining the study information and check it is understandable, the investigators provide the sheet to signed the informed consent. Subsequently selected patients will be measure the ankle brachial index and determine the absence of vascular compromise. Medical history with emphasis on analyzing clinical data, including the characteristics of the ulcer (type of exudate, measured surface area affected , type of tissue involved in the ulcer to its depth ) and biochemical parameters will be made. Patients will be weighed and measured at the first visit and those who don't have biochemical data will be requested to collect this information in subsequent follow-up visits. The participants will be then treated with the principles of the standard treatment, under the following criteria: Remove the ulcer exudate by spraying one of the two ingredients making mechanical drive for 5 minutes, or until completely negative to the visual evidence of exudate. Completely remove hyperkeratosis and devitalized tissue from the periphery of the ulcer with cutting material dissection with sterile dressing and drag, until visually eliminate the exudate. The treated area is dried. Two photographs at a distance of 20 cm perpendicular to the ulcer will be taken, covering a 1 square centimeter reference for measuring the area affected by diabetic foot ulcer syndrome. The solution will be applied in a blinded way to the ulcer and covered with sterile gauze for 24 hours. The patient will be instructed to continue treatment every 24 hours as follows: Sterile gauze will be removed and continuously irrigate for 5 seconds with the ingredient that was assigned. Undiscovered for 24 hours, until the next day irrigation gauze area will be placed. Also need to avoid contact with any surface over the affected area until the next assessment. Perform the same strategy for 24 hours, and on day 7 must go to the wound clinic to clinical evaluation. Every 7 days until complete 6 views, clinical evaluation is performed, irrigation with the selected ingredient and it will take 2 pictures at a distance of 20 cm perpendicular to the ulcer again, covering a reference of 1 square centimeter to measure the area affected by the diabetic foot ulcer syndrome. Every week during the following 6 weeks, in the wound clinic consultation, it will be measured and gather information of the following elements: Ulcer area in square millimeters. Color of the ulcer. Type of exudate; turbid, serous. Type of tissue involved in the ulcer to its depth. If any patients have increased intensity of the signs and symptoms of diabetic foot syndrome, classified as a major step on the scale of ulcers Classification System of the University of Texas, perform analysis and comprehensive treatment will be redefined according to the suggestions of ulcer classification system of the University of Texas. Cleaning material for the ulcer: Ingredient 1: Preparation of spray application of chlorhexidine gluconate 0.125%. Ingredient 2: Preparation of spray application of physiological saline sterile solution. Method of application of ingredients as described previously. Method of randomization: will be effected since the fabrication of the ingredient by assigning a code number to each of the bottles that contained. Those bottles will have identical presentations, and will balance for the sample size. The code will not be known by the patient, observer and analyst. Only be known by one of the advisors. Statistical methods: The description of the data, in the case of non-numerical variables will be performed by reporting proportions and confidence interval of 95 % (95 %) in the case of numerical variables, the description will be made based on averages and standard deviation or medians and Q1- Q3 range, depending on the result of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to evaluate the Gaussian distribution of the data. Comparison of numerical variables were not performed by Chi square test. Comparison of the rates of reduction in the size of ulcers of diabetic foot syndrome for both treatments will be based on the t test for independent samples or by Kruskal- Wallis test, depending on data distribution. In all cases be considered as the significance level alpha value <0.05.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Foot
Keywords
Chlorhexidine gluconate, Diabetic foot ulcer syndrome, Wound healing

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
35 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard management and Chlorhexidine gluconate at 0.125%
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Application every 24 hours, six weeks Intervention: Procedure: chlorhexidine gluconate
Arm Title
Standard management and physiological saline sterile solution
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Application every 24 hours, six weeks Intervention: Other: physiological saline sterile solution
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorhexidine gluconate at 0.125%
Intervention Description
Application every 24 hours, six weeks Intervention: Procedure: chlorhexidine gluconate
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo Comparator with physiological saline sterile solution
Intervention Description
Standard management and physiological saline sterile solution with application every 24 hours, six weeks Intervention.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ulcerated area
Description
area of diabetic foot ulcer measured with photographic register using a visual control of dimensions and a dedicated software for measurements.
Time Frame
Up to 6 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ambulatory patients of both sex over age of 18 years old with diabetes mellitus that present an ulcer caused by diabetic foot syndrome with an extension from skin to tendon or join capsule and infected, classified as Texas IIB. Exclusion Criteria: Patients lost to follow up and those that voluntary leave the study.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jose A Alvarez, PhD
Phone
52 477 2674900
Ext
4643
Email
alvarez_ja@me.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alejandro E Macias, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Universidad de Guanajuato
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Universidad de Guanajuato
City
Leon
State/Province
Guanajuato
ZIP/Postal Code
37320
Country
Mexico
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juan M Muñoz, MD
Email
jmunozb@me.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
None IPD will be share; only group data analyzed
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17280936
Citation
Frykberg RG, Zgonis T, Armstrong DG, Driver VR, Giurini JM, Kravitz SR, Landsman AS, Lavery LA, Moore JC, Schuberth JM, Wukich DK, Andersen C, Vanore JV; American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Diabetic foot disorders. A clinical practice guideline (2006 revision). J Foot Ankle Surg. 2006 Sep-Oct;45(5 Suppl):S1-66. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(07)60001-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16291066
Citation
Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet. 2005 Nov 12;366(9498):1719-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67698-2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
11463434
Citation
Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet. 2001 Jul 14;358(9276):135-8. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05321-1.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution at 0.125% vs Placebo for the Healing of Grade IIB Ulcers of Diabetic Foot

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs