search
Back to results

Early Feasibility Study of the RelayBranch Thoracic Stent-Graft System (RelayBranch)

Primary Purpose

Thoracic Aorta Aneurysm, Aneurysm, Ruptured, Aortic Aneurysm

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, aorta branch cardiovascular implant
Sponsored by
Bolton Medical
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Thoracic Aorta Aneurysm

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Anatomy that would require coverage of the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) and/or left carotid arteries if a non-branch endograft were implanted
  • At least one of the following:

    a. Aneurysm of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or proximal descending aorta that meets at least one of the following: i. ≥ 5.5 cm in diameter ii. ≥ 4.0 cm in diameter that has increased in size by 0.5 cm in the last 6 months iii. Measures twice the size of the normal aorta diameter iv. Is saccular in configuration

    b. PAU within the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or proximal descending thoracic aorta (DTA) with or without intramural hematoma (IMH)

    c. Chronic, uncomplicated aortic dissection distal to the BCT (type B), with either aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm or ≥4.0 cm with an increase in size by 0.5 cm in the last 6 months d. IMH distal to the BCT with recurrent symptoms, i.e. hypertension or intractable pain, despite best medical therapy.

  • A non-aneurysmal proximal aortic neck diameter ranging between 28 mm and 43 mm and a non-aneurysmal distal aortic neck diameter ranging between 19 mm and 43 mm.
  • A proximal attachment zone of the arch graft, meeting the oversizing requirement, must be a minimum of 25mm in length when measured on the inner curve of the ascending aorta, proximal to the BCT.
  • Total length from the coronaries to the proximal edge of the BCT must be a minimum of 70mm.
  • The length of the distal landing zone should be 20mm minimum.
  • Coverage of the left subclavian artery is permitted. Revascularization of the left subclavian artery may be considered in all cases by the treating physician and, especially, in anatomies where revascularization is determined to be clinically necessary
  • The distal landing zone must contain a straight segment (non-tapered, non-reverse tapered; defined by < 10% diameter change) with length equal to or greater than the required attachment length of the intended device
  • Non-aneurysmal BCT and left common carotid arteries with diameters ranging > 6.0mm across the entire length of the treatment zone.
  • Distal branch landing zone must be <20.0 mm in diameter and a minimum of 25.0 mm in length.
  • Adequate arterial access for introduction and delivery of the Relay Branch System. Note: Alternative methods to gain proper access can be utilized (e.g., iliac conduit)
  • Considered high risk or prohibitive risk for conventional surgery by treating physician or aortic team
  • Must be willing to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule
  • Subject or legally authorized representative must sign the informed consent form prior to implant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant stenosis, calcification, thrombus, or tortuosity of intended fixation sites that would compromise fixation or seal of the device
  • Aortic angulations (radius) less than 15mm at intended proximal landing zone.
  • Ascending aortas that would require the arch graft to be deployed less than 15mm distal to the coronaries
  • Pre-procedure occlusion or planned coverage of both subclavian arteries
  • Anatomic variants which would compromise circulation to both vertebral arteries after placement of the stent-graft
  • Prior endovascular repair in the ascending/descending thoracic aorta or aortic arch. The device may not be placed within any prior endovascular graft
  • Concomitant aneurysm/disease of the abdominal aorta requiring repair
  • Prior abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (endovascular or surgical) that was performed less than 6 months prior to the planned stent implant procedure
  • Prior mechanical aortic valve replacement except for hybrid valves with biological leaflets.
  • Major surgical or medical procedure within 45 days prior to the planned procedure or is scheduled for a major surgical or medical procedure within 60 days post implantation. Except for any planned procedures for the prospective stent-graft placement, e.g., left subclavian artery bypass or transposition
  • Untreatable allergy or sensitivity to contrast media or device components
  • Blood coagulation disorder or bleeding diathesis in which the treatment cannot be suspended for one week pre and post repair
  • Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) including unstable angina
  • Severe Congestive Heart Failure (New York Heart Association functional class IV)
  • Stroke within 12 months of the planned treatment date
  • Myocardial infarction within 3 months of the planned treatment date.
  • Chronic atrial fibrillation or other hypercoagulable condition that requires treatment with anticoagulants or presence of left atrial appendage thrombus
  • Severe pulmonary disease (documented FEVI <30% or as assessed by the study physician) at screening
  • Acute renal failure (defined as serum creatinine > 2.5mg/dL Note: Patients that have chronic renal failure and are managed medically or through hemodialysis, and can tolerate the follow-up imaging schedule can be included.
  • Significant carotid bifurcation disease (>70% diameter reduction by duplex ultrasound or angiography)
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Active systemic infection at the time of treatment
  • Morbid obesity or other condition that may compromise or prevent the necessary imaging requirements
  • Connective tissue disorders, mycotic aneurysms, or infected aorta
  • Less than two-year life expectancy
  • Current or planned participation in an investigational drug or device study that has not completed primary endpoint evaluation
  • Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Medical, social, or psychological issues that the Investigator believes may interfere with treatment or follow-up

Sites / Locations

  • University of Southern CaliforniaRecruiting
  • University of FloridaRecruiting
  • Emory UniversityRecruiting
  • University of MarylandRecruiting
  • Massachusetts General HospitalRecruiting
  • Barnes Jewish Hospital at Washington UniversityRecruiting
  • Columbia University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Duke UniversityRecruiting
  • Cleveland ClinicRecruiting
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania/Penn PresbyterianRecruiting
  • Baylor College of MedicineRecruiting
  • Baylor Scott and White Research InstituteRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Relay Branch System

Arm Description

Subjects who receive the Relay Branch System for repair which includes those with aneurysmal disease, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU), and chronic uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Composite of Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
The primary safety outcome determined by the rate of MAEs, including All-cause mortality Disabling stroke: a Modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 2 or more at 90 days and an increase in at least one mRS category from an individual's pre-stroke baseline Permanent Paralysis/Paraparesis Spontaneous Myocardial Infarction according to the SCAI definition Renal Failure Procedural Blood Loss >1,000mL

Secondary Outcome Measures

Composite of the following Criteria
Acute technical success evaluation, beginning with the insertion of the introducer sheath and as a composite of the following: Success is defined as a successful delivery of the device through (i.e. ability to deliver the implant to the intended implantation site, without the need for unanticipated corrective intervention related to delivery): Successful deployment of the device as defined as i. Deployment of the endovascular stent-graft at the intended implantation site; ii. Patency (<50%) of all components of the implant with absence of device deformations requiring unplanned placement of an additional device within the endovascular stent-graft; and iii. absence of inadvertent covering of aortic branch vessels; and c. Successful withdrawal of the delivery system Patency of all endograft components at 30 days

Full Information

First Posted
June 25, 2017
Last Updated
August 17, 2023
Sponsor
Bolton Medical
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03214601
Brief Title
Early Feasibility Study of the RelayBranch Thoracic Stent-Graft System
Acronym
RelayBranch
Official Title
A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Blinded, Non-Randomized Early Feasibility Study of the Relay Branch Thoracic Stent-Graft System in Subjects With Thoracic Aortic Pathologies Requiring Treatment Proximal to the Origin of the Innominate Artery
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
December 4, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Bolton Medical

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to conduct an early clinical evaluation of the Relay Branch System, which will provide initial insight into the clinical safety and function of the device. This Early Feasibility Study (EFS) will assess the safety and effectiveness of the device at the index procedure and at 30-day follow-up. The study will evaluate the delivery and deployment of the device, patency of branches and branch vessels, and exclusion of the aortic pathology. The data will help determine if modifications need to be made to the device, the procedural steps, operator technique, or the indications for use.
Detailed Description
This Early Feasibility Study (EFS) protocol describes the clinical study requirements for the Relay Branch System; a device designed to provide an option for patients with arch and proximal descending chronic thoracic aortic pathologies. As an EFS, this investigation is intended to provide proof of principle and initial clinical safety data on the Relay Branch System. The study is planned as an initial investigation of the device for aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aortic aneurysmal disease, PAU (including IMH) and uncomplicated chronic Type B aortic dissection (including IMH). The study will yield information on procedural techniques; assessing the safety and effectiveness of the device at the index procedure and at 30 days, focusing on device delivery and deployment, and circulatory exclusion of the pathologic process. As a branched device, patency of the endograft branches will also be assessed. The study will evaluate three-dimensional (3D) imaging data, both at baseline and through follow-up. Baseline 3D anatomy will augment information on the precise anatomic configuration of patients presenting aortic arch pathology treatable with the device. Follow-up imaging will provide information on the effectiveness of the device with respect to endoleaks in patients with aneurysms, sealing of dissections, PAU and IMH, and stability of the device at the deployed position, response, endograft patency, and short-term device integrity. The data from this EFS will yield insights into the following aspects of the device, preceding a traditional feasibility or pivotal study: The clinical safety of the device-specific aspects of the procedure, Determination of delivery and deployment of the device, Operator-dependent aspects of device use, Human factors associated with the design and use of the device, Safety of the device as assessed by device-related adverse events, Effectiveness of the device in performing its intended purpose over short-term follow-up. Observations from the study will guide the instructions for use (IFU) for the device. Finally, the study will collect imaging data to augment the current use conditions data set. It is anticipated that information collected will be used to make applicable design changes, or be combined with a prospective, investigational device exemption (IDE) study for submission of an original premarket approval application (PMA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approval to commercially distribute the system.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Thoracic Aorta Aneurysm, Aneurysm, Ruptured, Aortic Aneurysm

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
The Relay Branch System is intended for treating thoracic aortic arch pathologies requiring coverage of the innominate and left common carotid arteries. The system includes a graft with a proximal landing zone in the proximal aorta and branch grafts that extend into the innominate and left common carotid arteries. The arch graft and branch grafts are composed of self-expanding nitinol stents sutured to polyester vascular graft fabric, creating an exoskeleton
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Relay Branch System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects who receive the Relay Branch System for repair which includes those with aneurysmal disease, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (PAU), and chronic uncomplicated Type B aortic dissection.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, aorta branch cardiovascular implant
Other Intervention Name(s)
Relay Branch System, system, endovascular graft, aortic aneurysm treatment
Intervention Description
The Relay Branch System is intended to provide an option for patients with arch and proximal descending chronic thoracic aortic pathologies.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite of Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Description
The primary safety outcome determined by the rate of MAEs, including All-cause mortality Disabling stroke: a Modified Rankin Score (mRS) of 2 or more at 90 days and an increase in at least one mRS category from an individual's pre-stroke baseline Permanent Paralysis/Paraparesis Spontaneous Myocardial Infarction according to the SCAI definition Renal Failure Procedural Blood Loss >1,000mL
Time Frame
30 days after the index procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite of the following Criteria
Description
Acute technical success evaluation, beginning with the insertion of the introducer sheath and as a composite of the following: Success is defined as a successful delivery of the device through (i.e. ability to deliver the implant to the intended implantation site, without the need for unanticipated corrective intervention related to delivery): Successful deployment of the device as defined as i. Deployment of the endovascular stent-graft at the intended implantation site; ii. Patency (<50%) of all components of the implant with absence of device deformations requiring unplanned placement of an additional device within the endovascular stent-graft; and iii. absence of inadvertent covering of aortic branch vessels; and c. Successful withdrawal of the delivery system Patency of all endograft components at 30 days
Time Frame
Technical success will be evaluated in 2 stages; the first evaluation occurs during the implant procedure. Technical success is then re-evaluated again 30 days post operation to ensure the graft placement was successful as outlined above

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥18 years Anatomy that would require coverage of the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT) and/or left carotid arteries if a non-branch endograft were implanted At least one of the following: a. Aneurysm of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or proximal descending aorta that meets at least one of the following: i. ≥ 5.5 cm in diameter ii. ≥ 4.0 cm in diameter that has increased in size by 0.5 cm in the last 6 months iii. Measures twice the size of the normal aorta diameter iv. Is saccular in configuration b. PAU within the ascending aorta, aortic arch, or proximal descending thoracic aorta (DTA) with or without intramural hematoma (IMH) c. Chronic, uncomplicated aortic dissection distal to the BCT (type B), with either aortic diameter ≥5.5 cm or ≥4.0 cm with an increase in size by 0.5 cm in the last 6 months d. IMH distal to the BCT with recurrent symptoms, i.e. hypertension or intractable pain, despite best medical therapy. A non-aneurysmal proximal aortic neck diameter ranging between 28 mm and 43 mm and a non-aneurysmal distal aortic neck diameter ranging between 19 mm and 43 mm. A proximal attachment zone of the arch graft, meeting the oversizing requirement, must be a minimum of 25mm in length when measured on the inner curve of the ascending aorta, proximal to the BCT. Total length from the coronaries to the proximal edge of the BCT must be a minimum of 70mm. The length of the distal landing zone should be 20mm minimum. Coverage of the left subclavian artery is permitted. Revascularization of the left subclavian artery may be considered in all cases by the treating physician and, especially, in anatomies where revascularization is determined to be clinically necessary The distal landing zone must contain a straight segment (non-tapered, non-reverse tapered; defined by < 10% diameter change) with length equal to or greater than the required attachment length of the intended device Non-aneurysmal BCT and left common carotid arteries with diameters ranging > 6.0mm across the entire length of the treatment zone. Distal branch landing zone must be <20.0 mm in diameter and a minimum of 25.0 mm in length. Adequate arterial access for introduction and delivery of the Relay Branch System. Note: Alternative methods to gain proper access can be utilized (e.g., iliac conduit) Considered high risk or prohibitive risk for conventional surgery by treating physician or aortic team Must be willing to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule Subject or legally authorized representative must sign the informed consent form prior to implant. Exclusion Criteria: Significant stenosis, calcification, thrombus, or tortuosity of intended fixation sites that would compromise fixation or seal of the device Aortic angulations (radius) less than 15mm at intended proximal landing zone. Ascending aortas that would require the arch graft to be deployed less than 15mm distal to the coronaries Pre-procedure occlusion or planned coverage of both subclavian arteries Anatomic variants which would compromise circulation to both vertebral arteries after placement of the stent-graft Prior endovascular repair in the ascending/descending thoracic aorta or aortic arch. The device may not be placed within any prior endovascular graft Concomitant aneurysm/disease of the abdominal aorta requiring repair Prior abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (endovascular or surgical) that was performed less than 6 months prior to the planned stent implant procedure Prior mechanical aortic valve replacement except for hybrid valves with biological leaflets. Major surgical or medical procedure within 45 days prior to the planned procedure or is scheduled for a major surgical or medical procedure within 60 days post implantation. Except for any planned procedures for the prospective stent-graft placement, e.g., left subclavian artery bypass or transposition Untreatable allergy or sensitivity to contrast media or device components Blood coagulation disorder or bleeding diathesis in which the treatment cannot be suspended for one week pre and post repair Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) including unstable angina Severe Congestive Heart Failure (New York Heart Association functional class IV) Stroke within 12 months of the planned treatment date Myocardial infarction within 3 months of the planned treatment date. Chronic atrial fibrillation or other hypercoagulable condition that requires treatment with anticoagulants or presence of left atrial appendage thrombus Severe pulmonary disease (documented FEVI <30% or as assessed by the study physician) at screening Acute renal failure (defined as serum creatinine > 2.5mg/dL Note: Patients that have chronic renal failure and are managed medically or through hemodialysis, and can tolerate the follow-up imaging schedule can be included. Significant carotid bifurcation disease (>70% diameter reduction by duplex ultrasound or angiography) Hemodynamic instability Active systemic infection at the time of treatment Morbid obesity or other condition that may compromise or prevent the necessary imaging requirements Connective tissue disorders, mycotic aneurysms, or infected aorta Less than two-year life expectancy Current or planned participation in an investigational drug or device study that has not completed primary endpoint evaluation Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study Medical, social, or psychological issues that the Investigator believes may interfere with treatment or follow-up
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Valerie DePetrillo
Phone
209-607-7566
Email
v.depetrillo@terumoaortic.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Gretchen Wild
Phone
954-838-9699
Email
g.wild@terumoaortic.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luis Sanchez, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Barnes Jewish Hospital, Washington Univ
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wilson Szeto, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Southern California
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janet Luong
Phone
323-865-1251
Email
Janet.Luong@med.usc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sukgu Han, MD
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32608
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jessica Cobb, PhD
Phone
352-273-7837
Email
jessica.cobb@surgery.ufl.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deepal Shah
Email
Deepal.Shah@surgery.ufl.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
George Arnaoutakis, MD
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jayne Thompson, RN, CCRC
Phone
404-778-4920
Email
sjdanle@emory.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bradley Leshnower, MD
Facility Name
University of Maryland
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew Audette
Phone
410-328-8149
Email
maudette@som.umaryland.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bradley Taylor, MD
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tara Bresnahan, RN,BSN, CCRC
Phone
617-643-2731
Email
TBRESNAHAN2@mgh.harvard.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amanda Kirshkain, MS
Phone
617-726-2264
Email
ajkirshkaln@mgh.harvard.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Matthew Eagleton, MD
Facility Name
Barnes Jewish Hospital at Washington University
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julie Wilson, RN
Phone
314-362-6257
Email
wilsonj@wustl.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Luis Sanchez, MD
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claudia Musat
Phone
212-342-4102
Email
cm2065@cumc.columbia.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hiroo Takayama, MD
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hillary Hood
Phone
919-613-6569
Email
hillary.hood@duke.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chad Hughes, MD
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carmen Czich, RN, BSN
Phone
216-444-5390
Email
czichc@ccf.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric Roselli, MD
Facility Name
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania/Penn Presbyterian
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marisa Konig, RN, MSN
Phone
215-662-8456
Email
Marisa.Konig@uphs.upenn.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wilson Szeto, MD
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zaida Bisbal, MD, CCRP
Phone
713-798-5568
Email
Zaida.Bisbal2@bcm.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jospeh Coselli, MD
Facility Name
Baylor Scott and White Research Institute
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75093
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kathryn Shinn
Phone
469-814-4981
Email
Kathryn.Shinn@BSWHealth.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William Brinkman, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Early Feasibility Study of the RelayBranch Thoracic Stent-Graft System

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs