search
Back to results

Reflexology and Quality of Life

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Foot

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
reflexology
self-care guidelines with feet
Sponsored by
Universidade do Vale do Sapucai
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Diabetic Foot focused on measuring Reflexology,diabetes, quality of life

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology

Sites / Locations

  • Diabetes Education Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Control Group

Treatment Group

Arm Description

Control Group will receive self-care guidelines with feet

Treatment will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Quality of Life Questionnaire SF-36
measure of quality of life

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
September 7, 2017
Last Updated
February 27, 2018
Sponsor
Universidade do Vale do Sapucai
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03280524
Brief Title
Reflexology and Quality of Life
Official Title
Reflexology and Quality of Life in Diabetic Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidade do Vale do Sapucai

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with 60 type 2 diabetes patients divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline.
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of reflexology on the quality of life and functional capacity of patients at risk for diabetic neuropathy. This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with type 2 diabetes patients. The eligibility criteria are 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. As exclusion criteria, it will be considered the presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology. For the calculation of the sample size, a pilot test will be conducted with 8 diabetic patients. It will be used the statistical software Biostat® 5.3. The sample found was of 60 patients who were divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline. For the evaluations, it will be applied the instrument for quality of life (SF-36) and for functional capacity, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. This research will follow the standards set by resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, for research with human beings and will be conducted in accordance with the ethical recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Foot
Keywords
Reflexology,diabetes, quality of life

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The patients will be taken to a room reserved for the procedure. First, the patients answer the research instruments and then they will be asked to lie supine on a stretcher. The feet of the patients will be cleaned with water (37ºC) and mild soap and then will be dry with paper towels. The next phase consists in the application of foot massage, that will follow the Lourenço's Protocol (2012), which consists of 14 steps of relaxation massage. Each step will have duration of 1 minute, 3 procedures by week, by 4 consecutive weeks. The research instruments, SF-36 and Stanford Health Assessment Questionnarie will be applied before the first and after the last procedure.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
To ensure the blinding, the study included an interventionist enabled for application of foot reflexology.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Control Group will receive self-care guidelines with feet
Arm Title
Treatment Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Treatment will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
reflexology
Other Intervention Name(s)
massage
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
self-care guidelines with feet
Other Intervention Name(s)
education
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of Life Questionnaire SF-36
Description
measure of quality of life
Time Frame
An average of 1 year
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire
Description
measure of functional capacity
Time Frame
An average of 1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Exclusion Criteria: presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Beatriz Ms Martínez, doctor
Organizational Affiliation
Universidade do Vale do Sapucai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Diabetes Education Center
City
Pouso Alegre
State/Province
Minas Gerais
ZIP/Postal Code
37550000
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18820804
Citation
Aguiar CC, Vieira AP, Carvalho AF, Montenegro-Junior RM. [Assessment instruments for a Health-Related Quality of Life in diabetes mellitus]. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2008 Aug;52(6):931-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302008000600004. Portuguese.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23393665
Citation
Kaul K, Tarr JM, Ahmad SI, Kohner EM, Chibber R. Introduction to diabetes mellitus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;771:1-11. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5441-0_1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15984227
Citation
Tiran D, Chummun H. The physiological basis of reflexology and its use as a potential diagnostic tool. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005 Feb;11(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ctnm.2004.07.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21806735
Citation
Armstrong AR, Thiebaut SP, Brown LJ, Nepal B. Australian adults use complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of chronic illness: a national study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Aug;35(4):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00745.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18489444
Citation
Wang MY, Tsai PS, Lee PH, Chang WY, Yang CM. The efficacy of reflexology: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jun;62(5):512-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04606.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1593914
Citation
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
5349366
Citation
Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Reflexology and Quality of Life

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs