search
Back to results

Semilunar and Conventional Coronally Positioned Flap for the Treatment Gingival Recession

Primary Purpose

Gingival Recession, Root Coverage

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Syrian Arab Republic
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
semilunar coronally positioned flap
coronally advanced flap
Sponsored by
Damascus University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Gingival Recession focused on measuring gingival recession, semilunar coronally flap, coronally advanced flap

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients are in general good health.
  • The patient is non-smoker (less than 10 cigarettes per day) and non-alcoholic.
  • Female participants must not be pregnant and not at menstrual period during surgery.
  • The patient is committed to the oral care, and has a healthy periodontium.
  • Absence of severe oral habits.
  • They have not taken medication known to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing in the preceding 6 months.
  • Presence of bilateral buccal Miller class I gingival recessions (≤5 mm) in maxillary incisors, canines, or premolars.
  • Presence width of keratinized tissue (WKT) ≥2 mm.
  • The tooth is vital and absence of caries or restorations in the areas that will be treated.
  • Pocket depth less than 3 mm without bleeding on probing (BOP).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients less than 18 years old
  2. Patients with untreated periodontal disease.
  3. Smokers.
  4. Immunosuppressive systemic diseases (like cancer, AIDS, diabetes…)
  5. Miller's class II, III or IV gingival recession defects.
  6. Presence of apical radiolucency or root surface restoration or caries at the defect site
  7. Medications influence on the health of the gingival tissue (like calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressive systemic diseases (like cancer, AIDS, diabetes…) or Long-term steroid use

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Periodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

semilunar coronally positioned flap

coronally advanced flap

Arm Description

A semilunar incision will be done following the curvature of the gingival margin and ending about 2 to 3 mm short of the tip of the papillae. The most apical distance of this incision to the gingival margin will be obtained by adding the bone sounding measurement to the recession height. Perform a split-thickness dissection coronally from the incision, and connect it to an intrasulcular incision. The tissue will be collapsed coronally, covering the denuded root. The coronally repositioned gingival margin will be stabilized by coronally anchored suture with composite stops on the buccal surface of the tooth using flowable composite. Finally, the area will be covered with a periodontal dressing. This is called semilunar coronally positioned flap.

Coronally positioned flap will be initiated with two vertical incisions, extending from a mesial and distal linear angle at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and go beyond the mucogingival junction. A split thickness flap will be prepared by sharp dissection mesial and distal to the recession and connected with an intra crevicular incision. On the facial aspect of the tooth, a full thickness flap, approximately 3-4 mm apical to crest of alveolar bone. Then, the flap will be returned and sutured it at 1 mm coronal to the CEJ after de-epithelize the papillae. The coronally repositioned gingival margin will be stabilized by coronally anchored suture with composite stops on the buccal surface of the tooth using flowable composite and sutured in the papilla region and releasing incision. Finally, the area will be covered with a periodontal dressing.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in the amount of root coverage
this will be measured as a change of gingival recession height GRH (the distance from the cemento-enamel junction CEJ to the gingival margin GM by using an endodontic finger spreader attached to a rubber stopper and after removing the spreader, penetration depth was measured with a caliper of 0.01-mm resolution) from baseline and follow-up period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in visible plaque index
Score 0 - No plaque Score 1 - Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth Score 2 - A thin continuous band of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth Score 3 - A band of plaque wider then 1mm covering less than 1/3rd of the crown of the tooth Score 4 - Plaque covering at least 1/3rd but less than 2/3rd of the crown of the tooth Score 5 - Plaque covering 2/3rd or more of the crown of the tooth
Change in sulcus bleeding index
will be evaluated visually (using an UNC-15 mm "University of North Carolina" periodontal probe) Score 0 - health looking papillary and marginal gingiva no bleeding on probing; Score 1 - healthy looking gingiva, bleeding on probing; Score 2 - bleeding on probing, change in color, no edema; Score 3 - bleeding on probing, change in color, slight edema; Score 4 -bleeding on probing, change in color, obvious edema; Score 5 -spontaneous bleeding, change in color, marked edema
Change in probing depth
Probing depth will be measured as the distance from the gingival margin GM to the bottom of the gingival sulcus by using a periodontal probe (UNC 15 "University of North Carolina") with a rubber stopper.
Change in the clinical attachment level
clinical attachment level will be calculated as the sum of the gingival recession height and the probing depth (mentioned above).
Change in the gingival recession width
Gingival recession width will be measured from one border of the recession to another at the CEJ by using an endodontic finger spreader attached to a rubber stopper and after removing the spreader, penetration depth was measured with a caliper of 0.01-mm resolution
Change in the width of keratinized tissue
The width of the keratinized tissue will be measured as the distance between the most apical point of the GM and the MGJ by using an endodontic finger spreader attached to a rubber stopper and after removing the spreader, penetration depth was measured with a caliper of 0.01-mm resolution.
Change in the thickness of the keratinized tissue
Change in the position of the mucogingival junction
The distance between the incisal edge and the mucogingival junction will be measured using an endodontic finger spreader attached to a rubber stopper and after removing the spreader, penetration depth was measured with a caliper of 0.01-mm resolution
Change in the wound healing index
Wound healing index will be recorded after surgery using the following criteria: score 1 = uneventful healing with no gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, patient discomfort, or flap dehiscence score 2 = uneventful healing with slight gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, or flap dehiscence, but no suppuration score 3 = poor wound healing with significant gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, flap dehiscence, or any suppuration
Change in post-operative pain level
Using a 10 cm-visual analog scale
Patients' satisfaction with aesthetics
Using a 10 cm-visual analog scale (VAS), patients' satisfaction with the aesthetic result will be recorded with 0 indicating very bad, 5 indicating average feelings and 10 indicating excellent result.
Change in root sensitivity
Using a 10 cm-visual analog scale (VAS), patients' perception of root sensitivity will be recorded with zero indicating no pain or sensitivity, 5 indicating moderate pain or sensitivity and 10 indicating worst pain or sensitivity possible.

Full Information

First Posted
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
July 16, 2019
Sponsor
Damascus University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03391947
Brief Title
Semilunar and Conventional Coronally Positioned Flap for the Treatment Gingival Recession
Official Title
Comparison of a Semilunar Coronally Positioned Flap and Conventional Coronally Advanced Flap for the Treatment of Gingival Recession- A Split-mouth, Randomized Prospective Comparative Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 20, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Damascus University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A clinical evaluation of using the semilunar coronally position flap (SCPF) compared to the conventional coronally advanced flap (CAF) with modification to treat class I Miller gingival recession. The coronally repositioned gingival margin will be stabilized by coronally anchored suture with composite stops on the buccal surface of the tooth using flowable composite. The sample size will be ten patients. Each patient has bilateral Miller Class I gingival recessions; one will be treated with SCPF, while the other will be treated with CAF
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to clinically compare between the semilunar coronally positioned flap (SCPF) and the conventional coronally advanced flap (CAF) after applying modification in both techniques to treat class I Miller gingival recession. Coronally repositioned gingival margin will be stabilized by coronally anchored suture with composite stops on the buccal surface of tooth using flowable composite for the treatment of gingival recession. Ten patients who have bilateral maxillary buccal Miller Class I gingival recession defects will be enrolled in this study. These defects will be distributed randomly into two groups: the test group (SCPF) and control group (CAF). Clinical parameters will be evaluated: visible plaque index (VPI), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), probing depth (PD), gingival recession height (GRH), gingival recession width (GRW), clinical attachment level (CAL), width of keratinized tissue (WKT), thickness of keratinized tissue (TKT), change in the position of muco-gingival junction, vestibular depth, wound healing index (WHI), the percentage of root coverage (RC) and root coverage esthetic score (RES) system. A questionnaire will be given to each patient, which includes evaluation of the pain intensity, root sensitivity, and satisfaction with aesthetic by using the visual analog scale (VAS) and questions about the number of analgesic pills consumed per day.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gingival Recession, Root Coverage
Keywords
gingival recession, semilunar coronally flap, coronally advanced flap

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Split-mouth design, i.e. the right side will receive the first intervention, whereas the other side (the left side) will receive the second intervention.
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
semilunar coronally positioned flap
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A semilunar incision will be done following the curvature of the gingival margin and ending about 2 to 3 mm short of the tip of the papillae. The most apical distance of this incision to the gingival margin will be obtained by adding the bone sounding measurement to the recession height. Perform a split-thickness dissection coronally from the incision, and connect it to an intrasulcular incision. The tissue will be collapsed coronally, covering the denuded root. The coronally repositioned gingival margin will be stabilized by coronally anchored suture with composite stops on the buccal surface of the tooth using flowable composite. Finally, the area will be covered with a periodontal dressing. This is called semilunar coronally positioned flap.
Arm Title
coronally advanced flap
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Coronally positioned flap will be initiated with two vertical incisions, extending from a mesial and distal linear angle at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and go beyond the mucogingival junction. A split thickness flap will be prepared by sharp dissection mesial and distal to the recession and connected with an intra crevicular incision. On the facial aspect of the tooth, a full thickness flap, approximately 3-4 mm apical to crest of alveolar bone. Then, the flap will be returned and sutured it at 1 mm coronal to the CEJ after de-epithelize the papillae. The coronally repositioned gingival margin will be stabilized by coronally anchored suture with composite stops on the buccal surface of the tooth using flowable composite and sutured in the papilla region and releasing incision. Finally, the area will be covered with a periodontal dressing.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
semilunar coronally positioned flap
Intervention Description
The description of this intervention has been already given before
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
coronally advanced flap
Intervention Description
The description of this intervention has been already given before
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the amount of root coverage
Description
this will be measured as a change of gingival recession height GRH (the distance from the cemento-enamel junction CEJ to the gingival margin GM by using an endodontic finger spreader attached to a rubber stopper and after removing the spreader, penetration depth was measured with a caliper of 0.01-mm resolution) from baseline and follow-up period.
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) at 2 weeks post-surgery, (3) at 1 month post-surgery, (4) and at 3 months post-surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in visible plaque index
Description
Score 0 - No plaque Score 1 - Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth Score 2 - A thin continuous band of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth Score 3 - A band of plaque wider then 1mm covering less than 1/3rd of the crown of the tooth Score 4 - Plaque covering at least 1/3rd but less than 2/3rd of the crown of the tooth Score 5 - Plaque covering 2/3rd or more of the crown of the tooth
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) at 2 weeks post-surgery, (3) at 1 month post-surgery, (4) and at 3 months post-surgery
Title
Change in sulcus bleeding index
Description
will be evaluated visually (using an UNC-15 mm "University of North Carolina" periodontal probe) Score 0 - health looking papillary and marginal gingiva no bleeding on probing; Score 1 - healthy looking gingiva, bleeding on probing; Score 2 - bleeding on probing, change in color, no edema; Score 3 - bleeding on probing, change in color, slight edema; Score 4 -bleeding on probing, change in color, obvious edema; Score 5 -spontaneous bleeding, change in color, marked edema
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) and at 3 months post-surgery
Title
Change in probing depth
Description
Probing depth will be measured as the distance from the gingival margin GM to the bottom of the gingival sulcus by using a periodontal probe (UNC 15 "University of North Carolina") with a rubber stopper.
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) and at 3 months post-surgery
Title
Change in the clinical attachment level
Description
clinical attachment level will be calculated as the sum of the gingival recession height and the probing depth (mentioned above).
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) and at 3 months post-surgery
Title
Change in the gingival recession width
Description
Gingival recession width will be measured from one border of the recession to another at the CEJ by using an endodontic finger spreader attached to a rubber stopper and after removing the spreader, penetration depth was measured with a caliper of 0.01-mm resolution
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) at 2 weeks post-surgery, (3) at 1 month post-surgery, (4) and at 3 months post-surgery
Title
Change in the width of keratinized tissue
Description
The width of the keratinized tissue will be measured as the distance between the most apical point of the GM and the MGJ by using an endodontic finger spreader attached to a rubber stopper and after removing the spreader, penetration depth was measured with a caliper of 0.01-mm resolution.
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) at 2 weeks post-surgery, (3) at 1 month post-surgery, (4) and at 3 months post-surgery
Title
Change in the thickness of the keratinized tissue
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) and at 3 months post-surgery
Title
Change in the position of the mucogingival junction
Description
The distance between the incisal edge and the mucogingival junction will be measured using an endodontic finger spreader attached to a rubber stopper and after removing the spreader, penetration depth was measured with a caliper of 0.01-mm resolution
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) at 2 weeks post-surgery, (3) at 1 month post-surgery, (4) and at 3 months post-surgery
Title
Change in the wound healing index
Description
Wound healing index will be recorded after surgery using the following criteria: score 1 = uneventful healing with no gingival edema, erythema, suppuration, patient discomfort, or flap dehiscence score 2 = uneventful healing with slight gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, or flap dehiscence, but no suppuration score 3 = poor wound healing with significant gingival edema, erythema, patient discomfort, flap dehiscence, or any suppuration
Time Frame
(1) at two weeks following surgery and (2) at one month following surgery.
Title
Change in post-operative pain level
Description
Using a 10 cm-visual analog scale
Time Frame
at 2 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours following surgery and at 1-week after surgery
Title
Patients' satisfaction with aesthetics
Description
Using a 10 cm-visual analog scale (VAS), patients' satisfaction with the aesthetic result will be recorded with 0 indicating very bad, 5 indicating average feelings and 10 indicating excellent result.
Time Frame
at three months post-surgery
Title
Change in root sensitivity
Description
Using a 10 cm-visual analog scale (VAS), patients' perception of root sensitivity will be recorded with zero indicating no pain or sensitivity, 5 indicating moderate pain or sensitivity and 10 indicating worst pain or sensitivity possible.
Time Frame
(1) one day before the surgery, (2) at 2 weeks post-surgery, (3) at 1 month post-surgery, (4) and at 3 months post-surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients are in general good health. The patient is non-smoker (less than 10 cigarettes per day) and non-alcoholic. Female participants must not be pregnant and not at menstrual period during surgery. The patient is committed to the oral care, and has a healthy periodontium. Absence of severe oral habits. They have not taken medication known to interfere with periodontal tissue health or healing in the preceding 6 months. Presence of bilateral buccal Miller class I gingival recessions (≤5 mm) in maxillary incisors, canines, or premolars. Presence width of keratinized tissue (WKT) ≥2 mm. The tooth is vital and absence of caries or restorations in the areas that will be treated. Pocket depth less than 3 mm without bleeding on probing (BOP). Exclusion Criteria: Patients less than 18 years old Patients with untreated periodontal disease. Smokers. Immunosuppressive systemic diseases (like cancer, AIDS, diabetes…) Miller's class II, III or IV gingival recession defects. Presence of apical radiolucency or root surface restoration or caries at the defect site Medications influence on the health of the gingival tissue (like calcium channel blockers, immunosuppressive systemic diseases (like cancer, AIDS, diabetes…) or Long-term steroid use
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hala Mohammad Walid Hala Mohammad Walid, DDS
Organizational Affiliation
MSc student in Periodontics, Periodontology Department, University of Damascus Dental School
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Suleiman Dayoub, DDS MSc PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Professor of Periodontics, Department of Periodontology, University of Damascus Dental School
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Periodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
City
Damascus
ZIP/Postal Code
DM20AM18
Country
Syrian Arab Republic

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20528963
Citation
Santana RB, Mattos CM, Dibart S. A clinical comparison of two flap designs for coronal advancement of the gingival margin: semilunar versus coronally advanced flap. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Jul;37(7):651-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01582.x. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16460241
Citation
Bittencourt S, Del Peloso Ribeiro E, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH Jr, Casati MZ. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a semilunar coronally positioned flap and subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2006 Feb;77(2):174-81. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050114.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17760538
Citation
Bittencourt S, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH Jr, Casati MZ. Root surface biomodification with EDTA for the treatment of gingival recession with a semilunar coronally repositioned flap. J Periodontol. 2007 Sep;78(9):1695-701. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060507.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26888240
Citation
Bhandari R, Uppal RS, Kahlon KS. Comparison of semilunar coronally advanced flap alone and in combination with button technique in the treatment of Miller's Class I and II gingival recessions: A pilot study. Indian J Dent Res. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(6):609-12. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.176925.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19563287
Citation
Bittencourt S, Ribeiro Edel P, Sallum EA, Sallum AW, Nociti FH, Casati MZ. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study. J Periodontol. 2009 Jul;80(7):1076-82. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080498.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21443557
Citation
Ozcelik O, Haytac MC, Seydaoglu G. Treatment of multiple gingival recessions using a coronally advanced flap procedure combined with button application. J Clin Periodontol. 2011 Jun;38(6):572-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01724.x. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23725027
Citation
Kaval B, Renaud DE, Scott DA, Buduneli N. The role of smoking and gingival crevicular fluid markers on coronally advanced flap outcomes. J Periodontol. 2014 Mar;85(3):395-405. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120685. Epub 2013 May 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10505810
Citation
Pini-Prato G, Baldi C, Pagliaro U, Nieri M, Saletta D, Rotundo R, Cortellini P. Coronally advanced flap procedure for root coverage. Treatment of root surface: root planning versus polishing. J Periodontol. 1999 Sep;70(9):1064-76. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.9.1064.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16253095
Citation
Huang LH, Neiva RE, Wang HL. Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure. J Periodontol. 2005 Oct;76(10):1729-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.10.1729.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19335093
Citation
Cairo F, Rotundo R, Miller PD, Pini Prato GP. Root coverage esthetic score: a system to evaluate the esthetic outcome of the treatment of gingival recession through evaluation of clinical cases. J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):705-10. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080565.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Semilunar and Conventional Coronally Positioned Flap for the Treatment Gingival Recession

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs