The LOOP Trial in Treatment of Skin Abscesses
Primary Purpose
Abscess
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LOOP Technique
Standard incision and drainage
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Abscess focused on measuring soft tissue infection, MRSA
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage
Exclusion Criteria:
- Abscess was on the hand, foot, or face
- Requiring admission or operative intervention
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
LOOP Technique
Incision and Drainage
Arm Description
Placement of subcutaneous loop drain
Standard Incision and Drainage Technique
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Treatment Failure
Need for admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up derived from descriptive nature
Secondary Outcome Measures
Procedure Pain
Procedure Pain using Likert scale 1-10
Ease of procedure
Ease of procedure using Likert 1-10 scale
Ease of care
Ease of care using 1-10 Likert scale
Pain on follow-up
Pain on follow-up using 1-10 Likert scale
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction using Patient derived Likert scale
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03398746
First Posted
January 3, 2018
Last Updated
January 6, 2018
Sponsor
Orlando Regional Medical Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03398746
Brief Title
The LOOP Trial in Treatment of Skin Abscesses
Official Title
The LOOP Trial: A Study Comparing the Use of the LOOP Technique Versus Standard Incision and Drainage in the Treatment of Skin Abscesses in a Level I Emergency Department
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 22, 2009 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 5, 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 5, 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Orlando Regional Medical Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled a convenience sample of adults and children presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12-months with subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage. Two methods of drainage were compared: 1) the LOOP technique or 2) standard packing technique.
Detailed Description
This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled a convenience sample of adults and children presenting to two Level 1 trauma centers over 12-months with subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage. Patients were excluded if the abscess was on the hand, foot, or face or if it required admission or operative intervention. Patients were followed over 10 days to determine the primary outcome of treatment failure defined by need for admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up. The secondary outcomes included ease of procedure, ease of care, pain after insertion and patient satisfaction using a 10-point numeric rating.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Abscess
Keywords
soft tissue infection, MRSA
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
217 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
LOOP Technique
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Placement of subcutaneous loop drain
Arm Title
Incision and Drainage
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard Incision and Drainage Technique
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
LOOP Technique
Intervention Description
Placement of subcutaneous loop drain
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Standard incision and drainage
Intervention Description
Incise and drain with placement of packing
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Treatment Failure
Description
Need for admission, IV antibiotics, or repeat drainage within 10-day follow-up derived from descriptive nature
Time Frame
10 Days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Procedure Pain
Description
Procedure Pain using Likert scale 1-10
Time Frame
At time of procedure
Title
Ease of procedure
Description
Ease of procedure using Likert 1-10 scale
Time Frame
At time of procedure
Title
Ease of care
Description
Ease of care using 1-10 Likert scale
Time Frame
During 10 days
Title
Pain on follow-up
Description
Pain on follow-up using 1-10 Likert scale
Time Frame
10 days
Title
Patient satisfaction
Description
Patient satisfaction using Patient derived Likert scale
Time Frame
During 10 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subcutaneous skin abscesses necessitating drainage
Exclusion Criteria:
Abscess was on the hand, foot, or face
Requiring admission or operative intervention
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25435407
Citation
Ladde JG, Baker S, Rodgers CN, Papa L. The LOOP technique: a novel incision and drainage technique in the treatment of skin abscesses in a pediatric ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;33(2):271-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32770686
Citation
Ladde J, Baker S, Lilburn N, Wan M, Papa L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Novel Loop Drainage Technique Versus Standard Incision and Drainage in the Treatment of Skin Abscesses. Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;27(12):1229-1240. doi: 10.1111/acem.14106. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=25435407
Description
Link to PubMed Article
Learn more about this trial
The LOOP Trial in Treatment of Skin Abscesses
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs