Computer-Based Treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder
Primary Purpose
Social Anxiety Disorder
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
computer-based treatment
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Social Anxiety Disorder focused on measuring SAD, Social Anxiety, Social Phobia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males and females between the ages of 18 and 60
- Current primary diagnosis of SAD
- Score of at least 50 on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (Self-rated version)
- Fluent in English and willing and able to give informed written consent and participate responsibly in the protocol
- Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
Exclusion Criteria:
- Present or past psychotic episode, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder
- Current severe depression
- Suicidal ideation or behavior
- Current diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, manic episode or tic disorder
- Current or past organic mental disorder, seizure disorder, epilepsy or brain injury
- Current unstable or untreated medical illness
- Severe alcohol use disorder, severe cannabis use disorder, and any severity of other substance use disorder (except nicotine use disorders allowed)
- Use of psychiatric medication in the past month other than a stable dose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for a least 3 months
- Any concurrent cognitive behavioral therapy; other psychotherapy that was initiated in the past 3 months
- Pregnancy, or plans to become pregnant during the period of the study - will be assessed by urine
- Contraindication to MRI scanning:
- Paramagnetic metallic implants or devices contraindicating magnetic resonance imaging or any other non-removable paramagnetic metal in the body (e.g. pacemaker, paramagnetic metallic prosthesis, surgical clips, shrapnel, necessity for constant medicinal patch, some tattoos)
- Being unable to tolerate the scanning procedures (i.e., severe obesity, claustrophobia)
Sites / Locations
- New York State Psychiatric Institute
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
4-week computer-based treatment
8-week computer-based treatment
Arm Description
A 4-week (8-sessions) course of computer-based treatment. Participants will receive treatment twice a week for four weeks.
An 8-week (12-sessions) course of computer-based treatment. Participants will receive treatment twice a week for four weeks, and then once a week for the subsequent four weeks.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in Percent Dwell Time on Threat Faces
Percent dwell time on threat faces was computed as the ratio of gaze dwell time on threat faces to total dwell time on all faces as measured by eye tracking during treatment sessions. Change in percent dwell time is the value at week 8 minus value at baseline.
Change in Total Score of Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)
Clinician-rated scale scoring anxiety (0, none to 3, severe) and avoidance (0,none to 3, severe) in 24 social situations for a total score of 0 to 144. Higher scores indicate greater social anxiety.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Total Score of Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN)
The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) is a self-rated questionnaire used to assess severity of social anxiety disorder. 17 items related to social anxiety each rated on a score of 0 to 4, with a minimum total score of 0 (least social anxiety), and a maximum total score of 68 (most social anxiety).
Change in Total Score of Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire
Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q): self-rated assessment of quality of life. 16 items related to life quality, each rated on a score of 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good), with a minimum total score of 16, and a maximum total score of 80.
Change in Total Score of the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale
40-item self-rated social anhedonia scale. Items are comprised of statements that participants agree or disagree with, by answering "yes"(1), or "no"(0), with some items reverse-coded. The minimum score is 0 (least social anhedonia); maximum score is 40 (most social anhedonia)
Change in Total Score of the Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). Fourteen-item self-rated anhedonia scale. Items are comprised of statements that participants rate as "strongly disagree" (1), "disagree" (2), "agree" (3), or "strongly agree" (4). The lowest possible score was 14, the highest possible score was 56 (greatest anhedonia)
Change in Total Score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression - 17 Item Version
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression -17 item version. This standard scale will be used to assess severity of depression, minimum score is 0 (least depression); maximum score is 50 (greatest depression).
Clinical Global Impression-Change Scale
Clinical Global Impression-Change Scale: An observer rating of overall clinical change, with rating from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Responder category is defined by a score of 1 or 2.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03415022
First Posted
January 22, 2018
Last Updated
March 31, 2022
Sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03415022
Brief Title
Computer-Based Treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder
Official Title
A Novel Computer-Based Treatment for Social Anxiety: Target Engagement
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 30, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The present study is an open trial that seeks to examine the feasibility, acceptability, mechanism, and efficacy of a recently developed computer-based therapy in individuals with social anxiety disorder (SAD)
Detailed Description
This randomized clinical trial examines the feasibility, acceptability, mechanism, and relative efficacy of two "doses" (standard 4-week/8 session vs. extended 8-week/12-session) of a recently developed computer-based therapy in individuals with social anxiety disorder (SAD). The purpose of this study is to assess whether a brief computer-based research treatment, provided in 30 minutes sessions, helps improve social anxiety symptoms, and by what mechanism. The study will also assess the effect of research treatments on brain activity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Social Anxiety Disorder
Keywords
SAD, Social Anxiety, Social Phobia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Computer-based task involving free viewing of faces and listening to music
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Outcomes assessor will not be informed as to whether a participant is randomized to 4 or 8 weeks of treatment.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
41 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
4-week computer-based treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A 4-week (8-sessions) course of computer-based treatment. Participants will receive treatment twice a week for four weeks.
Arm Title
8-week computer-based treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
An 8-week (12-sessions) course of computer-based treatment. Participants will receive treatment twice a week for four weeks, and then once a week for the subsequent four weeks.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
computer-based treatment
Intervention Description
30 minute sessions of free viewing of faces and listening to music
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Percent Dwell Time on Threat Faces
Description
Percent dwell time on threat faces was computed as the ratio of gaze dwell time on threat faces to total dwell time on all faces as measured by eye tracking during treatment sessions. Change in percent dwell time is the value at week 8 minus value at baseline.
Time Frame
baseline to week 8
Title
Change in Total Score of Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS)
Description
Clinician-rated scale scoring anxiety (0, none to 3, severe) and avoidance (0,none to 3, severe) in 24 social situations for a total score of 0 to 144. Higher scores indicate greater social anxiety.
Time Frame
Baseline to week 8
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Total Score of Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN)
Description
The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) is a self-rated questionnaire used to assess severity of social anxiety disorder. 17 items related to social anxiety each rated on a score of 0 to 4, with a minimum total score of 0 (least social anxiety), and a maximum total score of 68 (most social anxiety).
Time Frame
baseline to week 8
Title
Change in Total Score of Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire
Description
Quality of Life Enjoyment & Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q): self-rated assessment of quality of life. 16 items related to life quality, each rated on a score of 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good), with a minimum total score of 16, and a maximum total score of 80.
Time Frame
baseline to week 8
Title
Change in Total Score of the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale
Description
40-item self-rated social anhedonia scale. Items are comprised of statements that participants agree or disagree with, by answering "yes"(1), or "no"(0), with some items reverse-coded. The minimum score is 0 (least social anhedonia); maximum score is 40 (most social anhedonia)
Time Frame
baseline to week 8
Title
Change in Total Score of the Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Description
Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). Fourteen-item self-rated anhedonia scale. Items are comprised of statements that participants rate as "strongly disagree" (1), "disagree" (2), "agree" (3), or "strongly agree" (4). The lowest possible score was 14, the highest possible score was 56 (greatest anhedonia)
Time Frame
baseline to week 8
Title
Change in Total Score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression - 17 Item Version
Description
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression -17 item version. This standard scale will be used to assess severity of depression, minimum score is 0 (least depression); maximum score is 50 (greatest depression).
Time Frame
baseline to week 8
Title
Clinical Global Impression-Change Scale
Description
Clinical Global Impression-Change Scale: An observer rating of overall clinical change, with rating from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Responder category is defined by a score of 1 or 2.
Time Frame
week 8
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Males and females between the ages of 18 and 60
Current primary diagnosis of SAD
Score of at least 50 on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (Self-rated version)
Fluent in English and willing and able to give informed written consent and participate responsibly in the protocol
Normal or corrected-to-normal vision
Exclusion Criteria:
Present or past psychotic episode, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder
Current severe depression
Suicidal ideation or behavior
Current diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, manic episode or tic disorder
Current or past organic mental disorder, seizure disorder, epilepsy or brain injury
Current unstable or untreated medical illness
Severe alcohol use disorder, severe cannabis use disorder, and any severity of other substance use disorder (except nicotine use disorders allowed)
Use of psychiatric medication in the past month other than a stable dose of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for a least 3 months
Any concurrent cognitive behavioral therapy; other psychotherapy that was initiated in the past 3 months
Pregnancy, or plans to become pregnant during the period of the study - will be assessed by urine
Contraindication to MRI scanning:
Paramagnetic metallic implants or devices contraindicating magnetic resonance imaging or any other non-removable paramagnetic metal in the body (e.g. pacemaker, paramagnetic metallic prosthesis, surgical clips, shrapnel, necessity for constant medicinal patch, some tattoos)
Being unable to tolerate the scanning procedures (i.e., severe obesity, claustrophobia)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Franklin Schneier, MD
Organizational Affiliation
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
New York State Psychiatric Institute
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data will be shared through the National Database for Clinical Trials related to Mental Illness (NDCT). We will generate a Global Unique Identifier (GUID) for each participant. The key clinical rating scale measures (LSAS, SPIN, QLESQ, HRSD) are all included.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Raw data will be submitted semi-annually every January 15 and July 15.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
see URL below for criteria
IPD Sharing URL
https://nda.nih.gov/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27907025
Citation
Chevallier C, Tonge N, Safra L, Kahn D, Kohls G, Miller J, Schultz RT. Measuring Social Motivation Using Signal Detection and Reward Responsiveness. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 1;11(12):e0167024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167024. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20005616
Citation
Cisler JM, Koster EH. Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar;30(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12169250
Citation
Gur RC, Schroeder L, Turner T, McGrath C, Chan RM, Turetsky BI, Alsop D, Maldjian J, Gur RE. Brain activation during facial emotion processing. Neuroimage. 2002 Jul;16(3 Pt 1):651-62. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1097.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26080314
Citation
Heeren A, Mogoase C, Philippot P, McNally RJ. Attention bias modification for social anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015 Aug;40:76-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22425719
Citation
Klumpp H, Angstadt M, Phan KL. Shifting the focus of attention modulates amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex reactivity to emotional faces. Neurosci Lett. 2012 Apr 18;514(2):210-3. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23547713
Citation
Klumpp H, Post D, Angstadt M, Fitzgerald DA, Phan KL. Anterior cingulate cortex and insula response during indirect and direct processing of emotional faces in generalized social anxiety disorder. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2013 Apr 2;3:7. doi: 10.1186/2045-5380-3-7. eCollection 2013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26774515
Citation
Lazarov A, Abend R, Bar-Haim Y. Social anxiety is related to increased dwell time on socially threatening faces. J Affect Disord. 2016 Mar 15;193:282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28103714
Citation
Lazarov A, Pine DS, Bar-Haim Y. Gaze-Contingent Music Reward Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;174(7):649-656. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16080894. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25708991
Citation
Linetzky M, Pergamin-Hight L, Pine DS, Bar-Haim Y. Quantitative evaluation of the clinical efficacy of attention bias modification treatment for anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety. 2015 Jun;32(6):383-91. doi: 10.1002/da.22344. Epub 2015 Feb 24. Erratum In: Depress Anxiety. 2018 Jan;35(1):111-112.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24652823
Citation
Mogoase C, David D, Koster EH. Clinical efficacy of attentional bias modification procedures: an updated meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;70(12):1133-57. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22081. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23537485
Citation
Morrison AS, Heimberg RG. Social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:249-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185631.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23223206
Citation
Richey JA, Rittenberg A, Hughes L, Damiano CR, Sabatino A, Miller S, Hanna E, Bodfish JW, Dichter GS. Common and distinct neural features of social and non-social reward processing in autism and social anxiety disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Mar;9(3):367-77. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss146. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19174537
Citation
Spreckelmeyer KN, Krach S, Kohls G, Rademacher L, Irmak A, Konrad K, Kircher T, Grunder G. Anticipation of monetary and social reward differently activates mesolimbic brain structures in men and women. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009 Jun;4(2):158-65. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsn051. Epub 2009 Jan 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24188418
Citation
Van Bockstaele B, Verschuere B, Tibboel H, De Houwer J, Crombez G, Koster EH. A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychol Bull. 2014 May;140(3):682-721. doi: 10.1037/a0034834. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Computer-Based Treatment for Social Anxiety Disorder
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs