search
Back to results

Helping Empower Liver and Kidney Patients (Project HELP)

Primary Purpose

Hepatitis C, Chronic Kidney Diseases, Patient Education

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Decision Aid
Sponsored by
Washington University School of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Hepatitis C focused on measuring Patient Centered, Pre-Post Design, Decision Support, Health Literacy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must read and understand English AND
  • Must have Hepatitis C (any genotype) and Chronic Kidney Disease (any stage)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Developed jaundice, ascites, variceal hemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy also known as Decompensated cirrhosis; or
  • Currently has or had liver cancer (Hepatocellular carcinoma); or
  • Received a liver transplant

Sites / Locations

  • Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Decision Aid

Arm Description

A decision supports tool that guides patients with Hepatitis C and Chronic Kidney Disease through choices about whether, when, and how to treat each illness.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Knowledge
The percent correct out of eight questions created by the research team based on information that is considered vital to making treatment decisions, including understanding HCV and CKD, the health effects of both diseases, and understanding factors that differentiate treatment options. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores demonstrate more knowledge.
Change in Decisional Conflict Scale
The validated, 4-item SURE Test for clinical practice will be used. This scale measures whether individuals feel they have enough information to make a choice, are clear about their values for risks and benefits of their choice and feel they have enough support to make a choice. Scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate more confidence in their choice.
Change in Decision Self-Efficacy Scale
The validated decision self-efficacy scale will be used. This 11-item scale measures an individual's self-confidence or belief in their ability to make a decision. Individuals will be asked to rate how confident they feel taking actions involved in making an informed choice (e.g., gathering information, asking questions, and expressing opinions). Scores can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more confidence in participants ability to make a treatment choice.

Secondary Outcome Measures

System Usability Scale
A 10-item scale that evaluates the website's usability level. Scores can range from 0 to 100. An average score of 68 is considered a usable/adequate tool per measure guidelines. Higher scores represent better usability level for the tool.

Full Information

First Posted
January 21, 2018
Last Updated
September 2, 2019
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03426787
Brief Title
Helping Empower Liver and Kidney Patients
Acronym
Project HELP
Official Title
Development and Validation of a Shared-decision Making Tool for Initiation of Treatment in Patients With Hepatitis C Infection and Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 26, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 15, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 30, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The overall purpose of this study is to develop and test a web-based decision aid (DA) to support patients with Hepatitis C and Chronic Kidney Disease during decisions about whether, when, and how to treat each illness. Patients will have the opportunity to learn about their hepatitis C and kidney disease, initiate thought about what matters most to them and choose a treatment plan for their liver and kidney disease that works best for them. Investigators will evaluate the tool's efficacy, usability, and the likelihood of using it in clinical practice. There are three (3) primary aims of this project: (1) to develop the DA; (2) to pilot-test the DA to determine efficacy, usability and likelihood of using it in routine practice; (3) to explore stakeholders feedback on the usefulness of the DA and likelihood of implementing the tool.
Detailed Description
First, for Aim 1, Investigators along with direction from a diverse expert advisory group of nephrologists, hepatologists, and patient partners developed a decision aid based upon International Patient Decision Aids Standards guidelines, literature reviews, and expert advisory reviews. It includes plain language education, interactive learning modules personalized tailored information to help individuals use and consider information appropriate to their values and needs, and guidance on discussions with clinicians about treatment goals. Second, for Aim 2, Investigators will pilot-test the decision aid with 70 individuals in a pre-post within-subjects study design to evaluate the tool's efficacy, usability, and the likelihood of using it in clinical practice. Lastly, for Aim 3, Investigators will conduct 30 semi-structured qualitative interviews with both clinicians and participants after the pilot evaluation of the decision aid to gather feedback about implementing the tool into clinical practice.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatitis C, Chronic Kidney Diseases, Patient Education
Keywords
Patient Centered, Pre-Post Design, Decision Support, Health Literacy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
pre-post within subjects design
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
70 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Decision Aid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A decision supports tool that guides patients with Hepatitis C and Chronic Kidney Disease through choices about whether, when, and how to treat each illness.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Decision Aid
Intervention Description
Participants will have the option to view a web or paper-based version of the decision aid.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Knowledge
Description
The percent correct out of eight questions created by the research team based on information that is considered vital to making treatment decisions, including understanding HCV and CKD, the health effects of both diseases, and understanding factors that differentiate treatment options. Scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores demonstrate more knowledge.
Time Frame
At baseline and immediately after viewing the intervention, within 30 minutes.
Title
Change in Decisional Conflict Scale
Description
The validated, 4-item SURE Test for clinical practice will be used. This scale measures whether individuals feel they have enough information to make a choice, are clear about their values for risks and benefits of their choice and feel they have enough support to make a choice. Scores range from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate more confidence in their choice.
Time Frame
At baseline and immediately after viewing the intervention, within 30 minutes.
Title
Change in Decision Self-Efficacy Scale
Description
The validated decision self-efficacy scale will be used. This 11-item scale measures an individual's self-confidence or belief in their ability to make a decision. Individuals will be asked to rate how confident they feel taking actions involved in making an informed choice (e.g., gathering information, asking questions, and expressing opinions). Scores can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more confidence in participants ability to make a treatment choice.
Time Frame
At baseline and immediately after viewing the intervention, within 30 minutes.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
System Usability Scale
Description
A 10-item scale that evaluates the website's usability level. Scores can range from 0 to 100. An average score of 68 is considered a usable/adequate tool per measure guidelines. Higher scores represent better usability level for the tool.
Time Frame
Completed immediately after viewing the intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Must read and understand English AND Must have Hepatitis C (any genotype) and Chronic Kidney Disease (any stage) Exclusion Criteria: Developed jaundice, ascites, variceal hemorrhage, or hepatic encephalopathy also known as Decompensated cirrhosis; or Currently has or had liver cancer (Hepatocellular carcinoma); or Received a liver transplant
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mary C Politi, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Washington University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32734200
Citation
George N, Liapakis A, Korenblat KM, Li T, Roth D, Yee J, Fowler KJ, Howard L, Liu J, Politi MC. A Patient Decision Support Tool for Hepatitis C Virus and CKD Treatment. Kidney Med. 2019 Jul 11;1(4):200-206. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.06.003. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval_dcs.html
Description
Decisional Conflict Scale Measure
URL
https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decision_SelfEfficacy.pdf
Description
Decision Self-Efficacy Scale Measure
URL
https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html
Description
Usability Scale Measure

Learn more about this trial

Helping Empower Liver and Kidney Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs