search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ExAblate Subthalomotomy for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Motor Features

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exablate Subthalamotomy
Sham Exablate Subthalamotomy
Sponsored by
InSightec
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson's Disease, ExAblate, MRgFUS, Sub-Thalamotomy

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women age 30 years or older
  2. Subjects who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits.
  3. Subjects with a diagnosis of PD by UK Brain Bank Criteria as confirmed by a movement disorder neurologist at the site.
  4. Predominant motor features/disability from one side of the body (i.e asymmetry index > 1.5) as determined by a movement disorders neurologist.
  5. Motor clinical features non-optimally controlled by an adequate medical treatment prescription. An adequate medication prescription is defined as a therapeutic dose of each medication or the development of side effects as the medication dose is titrated.
  6. No major changes in pharmacological regime for PD should be done for the 30 days prior to procedure.
  7. Topographic coordinates of the subthalamic nucleus are localizable on MRI so that it can be targeted by the ExAblate device.
  8. Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate MRgFUS treatment Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been agreed upon by two members of the medical team

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hoehn and Yahr stage in the ON medication state of 2.5 or greater
  2. Presence of severe dyskinesia as noted by a score of 3 or 4 on questions 4.1 and 4.2 of the MDS-UPDRS.
  3. Presence of other central neurodegenerative disease suspected on neurological examination. These include: multisystem atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Alzheimer's disease.
  4. Any suspicion that Parkinsonian symptoms are a side effect from neuroleptic medications.
  5. Subjects who have had deep brain stimulation or a prior stereotactic ablation of the basal ganglia
  6. Presence of significant cognitive impairment defined as score ≀ 21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or Mattis Dementia Rating Scale of 120 or lower.
  7. Unstable psychiatric disease, defined as active uncontrolled depressive symptoms, psychosis, delusions, hallucinations, or suicidal ideation. Subjects with stable, chronic anxiety or depressive disorders may be included provided their medications have been stable for at least 60 days prior to study entry and if deemed appropriately managed by the site neuropsychologist
  8. Subjects with significant depression as determined following a comprehensive assessment by a neuropsychologist. Significant depression is being defined quantitatively as a score of greater than 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory.
  9. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity as determined by the neuropsychologist
  10. Subjects exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse as defined by the criteria outlined in the DSM-IV as manifested by one
  11. Subjects with unstable cardiac status including
  12. Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication).
  13. History of or current medical condition resulting in abnormal bleeding and/or coagulopathy.
  14. Receiving anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage (e.g. Avastin) within one month of focused ultrasound procedure
  15. Subjects with risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding as indicated by: platelet count less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter, a documented clinical coagulopathy, or INR coagulation studies exceeding the institution's laboratory standard
  16. Patient with severely impaired renal function with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30mL/min/1.73m2 (or per local standards should that be more restrictive) and/or who is on dialysis;
  17. Subjects with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc.
  18. Significant claustrophobia that cannot be managed with mild medication.
  19. Subject who weight more than the upper weight limit of the MR table and who cannot fit into the MR scanner
  20. Subjects who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment.
  21. History of intracranial hemorrhage
  22. History of multiple strokes, or a stroke within past 6 months
  23. Subjects with a history of seizures within the past year
  24. Subjects with malignant brain tumors
  25. Subjects with intracranial aneurysms requiring treatment or arterial venous malformations (AVMs) requiring treatment.
  26. Any illness that in the investigator's opinion preclude participation in this study.
  27. Subjects unable to communicate with the investigator and staff.
  28. Pregnancy or lactation.
  29. Subjects who have an Overall Skull Density Ratio lower than 0.35 as calculated from the screening CT.

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Universitario HM Puerta Del Sur. CINAC

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Exablate Subthalamotomy

Sham ExAblate Subthalamotomy

Arm Description

Exablate treatment for Parkinson's Disease Motor Features

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Efficacy - MDS-UPDRS
between-group differences in the mean change (from baseline to 4 months) in the motor MDS-UPDRS score for the side contralateral to subthalamotomy (in the treated group) as compared with mean change in the MDS-UPDRS score for the side contralateral to the alleged subthalamotomy (in the sham-procedure group) in the off-medication condition
Safety - Adverse Events
To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE/AEs) associated with ExAblate subthalamotomy for the treatment of PD motor features.

Secondary Outcome Measures

MDS-UPDRS III ON-medication
MDS-UPDRS III score in the contralateral body side ON-medication condition as measured by the BLINDED assessor
MDS-UPDRS III OFF-medication
MDS-UPDRS III score in the contralateral body side OFF-medication condition as measured by the UNBLINDED assessor
MDS-UPDRS III- Contralateral ON-medication
MDS-UPDRS III score in the contralateral body side ON-medication condition as measured by the UNBLINDED assessor
MDS-UPDRS III
Specific PD motor features sub-scores (rigidity, bradykinesia, tremor) of MDS- UPDRS III in the contralateral body side by visit for the following: OFF and ON-medication condition as measured by the BLINDED assessor
MDS-UPDRS II
Total score of MDS-UPDRS II
MDS-UPDRS III Blinded assessor
Total score of MDS-UPDRS III as measured by the BLINDED assessor OFF- and ON-medication
MDS-UPDRS IV
Total score of MDS-UPDRS IV and separated by each type of motor complication
PDG39
Quality of life assessment with the PDQ39.
GIC
Patient global impression of change from Baseline to Month 4 FU.
Levodopa
Levodopa equivalent medication change usage (mg).
MDS-UPDRS
Durability of the reduction in the contralateral motor MDS-UPDRS at 12 months in the treated group (measured only by the UNBLINDED assessor)
MDS-UPDRS
Change in the total MDS-UPDRS III according to disease severity at baseline (as defined by the MDS-UPDRS III score).

Full Information

First Posted
February 27, 2018
Last Updated
August 2, 2022
Sponsor
InSightec
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03454425
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ExAblate Subthalomotomy for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Motor Features
Official Title
A Prospective, Randomized, Sham Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ExAblate Subthalomotomy for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Motor Features
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 27, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
InSightec

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to test the efficacy and safety of unilateral subthalamotomy performed using the ExAblate System for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) motor features.
Detailed Description
A Prospective, Randomized, Sham Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ExAblate Subthalomotomy for the treatment of Parkinson's disease motor features. The objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind (to subjects, examining neurologists and external video-based examination by Movement Disorders neurologist), two-arm study (ExAblate treated arm Vs ExAblate Sham treated control arm) is to confirm the efficacy of ExAblate Model 4000 Type 1 System for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) motor features and to further demonstrate safety.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease
Keywords
Parkinson's Disease, ExAblate, MRgFUS, Sub-Thalamotomy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Exablate Subthalamotomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Exablate treatment for Parkinson's Disease Motor Features
Arm Title
Sham ExAblate Subthalamotomy
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Exablate Subthalamotomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
MRgFUS, Subthalamotomy
Intervention Description
ExAblate Subthalomotomy for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Motor Features
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Exablate Subthalamotomy
Intervention Description
Sham ExAblate Subthalomotomy for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Motor Features
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy - MDS-UPDRS
Description
between-group differences in the mean change (from baseline to 4 months) in the motor MDS-UPDRS score for the side contralateral to subthalamotomy (in the treated group) as compared with mean change in the MDS-UPDRS score for the side contralateral to the alleged subthalamotomy (in the sham-procedure group) in the off-medication condition
Time Frame
Baseline to 4 months post treatment
Title
Safety - Adverse Events
Description
To evaluate the incidence and severity of adverse events (AE/AEs) associated with ExAblate subthalamotomy for the treatment of PD motor features.
Time Frame
Baseline to 4 Months post treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
MDS-UPDRS III ON-medication
Description
MDS-UPDRS III score in the contralateral body side ON-medication condition as measured by the BLINDED assessor
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 4 post treatment
Title
MDS-UPDRS III OFF-medication
Description
MDS-UPDRS III score in the contralateral body side OFF-medication condition as measured by the UNBLINDED assessor
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 4 post treatment
Title
MDS-UPDRS III- Contralateral ON-medication
Description
MDS-UPDRS III score in the contralateral body side ON-medication condition as measured by the UNBLINDED assessor
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 4 post treatment
Title
MDS-UPDRS III
Description
Specific PD motor features sub-scores (rigidity, bradykinesia, tremor) of MDS- UPDRS III in the contralateral body side by visit for the following: OFF and ON-medication condition as measured by the BLINDED assessor
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 4 post treatment
Title
MDS-UPDRS II
Description
Total score of MDS-UPDRS II
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 4 post treatment
Title
MDS-UPDRS III Blinded assessor
Description
Total score of MDS-UPDRS III as measured by the BLINDED assessor OFF- and ON-medication
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 4 post treatment
Title
MDS-UPDRS IV
Description
Total score of MDS-UPDRS IV and separated by each type of motor complication
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 4 post treatment
Title
PDG39
Description
Quality of life assessment with the PDQ39.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 12 post treatment
Title
GIC
Description
Patient global impression of change from Baseline to Month 4 FU.
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 4 post treatment
Title
Levodopa
Description
Levodopa equivalent medication change usage (mg).
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 12 post treatment
Title
MDS-UPDRS
Description
Durability of the reduction in the contralateral motor MDS-UPDRS at 12 months in the treated group (measured only by the UNBLINDED assessor)
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 12 post treatment
Title
MDS-UPDRS
Description
Change in the total MDS-UPDRS III according to disease severity at baseline (as defined by the MDS-UPDRS III score).
Time Frame
Baseline to Month 12 post treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Men and women age 30 years or older Subjects who are able and willing to give consent and able to attend all study visits. Subjects with a diagnosis of PD by UK Brain Bank Criteria as confirmed by a movement disorder neurologist at the site. Predominant motor features/disability from one side of the body (i.e asymmetry index > 1.5) as determined by a movement disorders neurologist. Motor clinical features non-optimally controlled by an adequate medical treatment prescription. An adequate medication prescription is defined as a therapeutic dose of each medication or the development of side effects as the medication dose is titrated. No major changes in pharmacological regime for PD should be done for the 30 days prior to procedure. Topographic coordinates of the subthalamic nucleus are localizable on MRI so that it can be targeted by the ExAblate device. Able to communicate sensations during the ExAblate MRgFUS treatment Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been agreed upon by two members of the medical team Exclusion Criteria: Hoehn and Yahr stage in the ON medication state of 2.5 or greater Presence of severe dyskinesia as noted by a score of 3 or 4 on questions 4.1 and 4.2 of the MDS-UPDRS. Presence of other central neurodegenerative disease suspected on neurological examination. These include: multisystem atrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal syndrome, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Alzheimer's disease. Any suspicion that Parkinsonian symptoms are a side effect from neuroleptic medications. Subjects who have had deep brain stimulation or a prior stereotactic ablation of the basal ganglia Presence of significant cognitive impairment defined as score ≀ 21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or Mattis Dementia Rating Scale of 120 or lower. Unstable psychiatric disease, defined as active uncontrolled depressive symptoms, psychosis, delusions, hallucinations, or suicidal ideation. Subjects with stable, chronic anxiety or depressive disorders may be included provided their medications have been stable for at least 60 days prior to study entry and if deemed appropriately managed by the site neuropsychologist Subjects with significant depression as determined following a comprehensive assessment by a neuropsychologist. Significant depression is being defined quantitatively as a score of greater than 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory. Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity as determined by the neuropsychologist Subjects exhibiting any behavior(s) consistent with ethanol or substance abuse as defined by the criteria outlined in the DSM-IV as manifested by one Subjects with unstable cardiac status including Severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication). History of or current medical condition resulting in abnormal bleeding and/or coagulopathy. Receiving anticoagulant (e.g. warfarin) or antiplatelet (e.g. aspirin) therapy within one week of focused ultrasound procedure or drugs known to increase risk or hemorrhage (e.g. Avastin) within one month of focused ultrasound procedure Subjects with risk factors for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding as indicated by: platelet count less than 100,000 per cubic millimeter, a documented clinical coagulopathy, or INR coagulation studies exceeding the institution's laboratory standard Patient with severely impaired renal function with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30mL/min/1.73m2 (or per local standards should that be more restrictive) and/or who is on dialysis; Subjects with standard contraindications for MR imaging such as non-MRI compatible implanted metallic devices including cardiac pacemakers, size limitations, etc. Significant claustrophobia that cannot be managed with mild medication. Subject who weight more than the upper weight limit of the MR table and who cannot fit into the MR scanner Subjects who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary supine position during treatment. History of intracranial hemorrhage History of multiple strokes, or a stroke within past 6 months Subjects with a history of seizures within the past year Subjects with malignant brain tumors Subjects with intracranial aneurysms requiring treatment or arterial venous malformations (AVMs) requiring treatment. Any illness that in the investigator's opinion preclude participation in this study. Subjects unable to communicate with the investigator and staff. Pregnancy or lactation. Subjects who have an Overall Skull Density Ratio lower than 0.35 as calculated from the screening CT.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario HM Puerta Del Sur. CINAC
City
MΓ³stoles
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28938
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34859498
Citation
Rodriguez-Rojas R, Pineda-Pardo JA, Manez-Miro J, Sanchez-Turel A, Martinez-Fernandez R, Del Alamo M, DeLong M, Obeso JA. Functional Topography of the Human Subthalamic Nucleus: Relevance for Subthalamotomy in Parkinson's Disease. Mov Disord. 2022 Feb;37(2):279-290. doi: 10.1002/mds.28862. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33369354
Citation
Martinez-Fernandez R, Manez-Miro JU, Rodriguez-Rojas R, Del Alamo M, Shah BB, Hernandez-Fernandez F, Pineda-Pardo JA, Monje MHG, Fernandez-Rodriguez B, Sperling SA, Mata-Marin D, Guida P, Alonso-Frech F, Obeso I, Gasca-Salas C, Vela-Desojo L, Elias WJ, Obeso JA. Randomized Trial of Focused Ultrasound Subthalamotomy for Parkinson's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2501-2513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2016311.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ExAblate Subthalomotomy for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease Motor Features

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs