A Proactive Health Monitoring Intervention for Dementia Caregivers
Primary Purpose
Dementia, Alzheimer Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Remote activity monitoring system
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Dementia
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION
- The person with ADRD must be English speaking;
- The person with ADRD must have a physician diagnosis of ADRD (Alzheimer's disease, Lewy Body disease, fronto-temporal dementia, or stroke/vascular dementia; mild cognitive impairment only)
- The person with ADRD must not be currently receiving care or case management services;
- The person with ADRD must be 55 years of age and over;
- The caregiver of persons with ADRD must be English speaking;
- The caregiver of persons with ADRD must be 21 years of age and over;
- The caregiver of persons with ADRD must self-identify as someone who provides help to the person with ADRD because of their cognitive impairments;
- The caregiver of persons with ADRD must self-identify as the person most responsible for providing hands-on care to the person with ADRD;
- The caregiver of persons with ADRD must plan to remain in the area for at least 18 months in order to reduce possible loss to follow-up; and
- The caregiver of persons with ADRD must indicate a willingness to use eNeighbor.
EXCLUSION
● Those who do not meet the above inclusion criteria.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Remote activity monitoring
Control
Arm Description
Receive the remote activity monitoring system (i.e., "eNeighbor;" see intervention description) over an 18-month period.
Control participants do not receive the remote activity monitoring intervention.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Nursing home utilization at 18 months for the person with ADRD
Caregiver report of nursing home use at 18 months.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Perceptions of change in caregiver self-efficacy
An 8-item survey measure of caregiver self-efficacy. Item responses range from 1 "very unconfident" to 5 "very confident." Scores are summed and can range from a score of 1 (low self-efficacy) to 40 (high self-efficacy).
Perceptions of change in caregiver competence
The 7-item Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ), which assesses individuals' sense of capability in providing assistance to a relative with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias via survey report. Item responses range from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Item responses are summed, with a total score range of 5 to 35.
Perceptions of change in caregiver burden
The 22-item Zarit Burden Interview self-report survey measure. Item responses range from 0 "never" to 4 "nearly always." Scores are summed and can range from a score of 0 (no burden) to 88 (high burden).
Perceptions of change in caregiver role captivity
The 4-item role captivity measure assesses the involuntary aspects of the caregiving role. Item responses range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much." The total role captivity score is the sum of item responses with a range of 4 (no role captivity) to 16 (high role captivity).
Change in caregiver role overload
The 3-item role overload survey measure ascertains caregivers' feelings of emotional and physical fatigue. Item responses range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much." The total role overload score is the sum iof item responses with a range of 4 (no role overload) to 16 (high role overload).
Change in frequency/perceptions caregiver depressive symptom severity
The 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) survey measure is used to assess caregivers' depressive symptoms. Item responses range from 1 = "Rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day)" to 5 = "Most of the time (5-7 days)." The total CES-D score is summed, with a range of 20 (little to no depressive symptoms) to 100 (frequent depressive symptoms).
Perceived acceptability/utility of remote activity monitoring at 6-, 12-, and 18-months
The Remote Activity Monitoring Review Checklist is administered to caregiving participants in the treatment condition at the 6-month, 12-month and 18-month follow-up survey intervals. The checklist consists of 21 self-report survey Likert scale items. Item responses range from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The total checklist score is averaged, with a score of 1 = the remote activity monitoring system was not well-received/accepted to 5 = the remote activity monitoring system was very well received/accepted.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03665909
First Posted
September 4, 2018
Last Updated
October 2, 2023
Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03665909
Brief Title
A Proactive Health Monitoring Intervention for Dementia Caregivers
Official Title
A Proactive Health Monitoring Intervention for Dementia Caregivers: The eNeighbor
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 1, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 8, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Collaborators
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this 5-year demonstration project is to build on the work of The Lutheran Home Association (TLHA) and conduct an embedded experimental mixed methods evaluation to determine the efficacy of the eNeighbor technology in improving outcomes among persons with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias (ADRD) living in the community and their family caregivers. The Specific Aims are as follows: 1) To compare 100 ADRD caregivers randomly assigned to an attention control with 100 ADRD caregivers who utilize eNeighbor over an 18-month period to determine if the use of the remote sensor technology results in a) significant (p < .05) increases in caregiver self-efficacy and sense of competence, b) significant decreases in caregiver distress (subjective stress, depressive symptoms), c) significant delays of or reductions in negative health transitions (falls, wandering events) and service utilization (residential care placement, hospitalizations) for persons with ADRD; and d) greater cost-effectiveness; 2) To determine through "embedded" qualitative data collection components how eNeighbor is successfully utilized and why this health monitoring technology benefits persons with ADRD and their family caregivers; and 3) To engage stakeholders on a quarterly basis throughout this 5-year demonstration project in order to enhance the utility and stakeholder-relevance of health monitoring technology for families who care for persons with ADRD. The investigators anticipate that the successful completion of the project aims will position the eNeighbor as an innovative, stakeholder-centric service that offers robust support for family caregivers of persons with ADRD in the community.
Detailed Description
In collaboration with a 15-member Community Advisory Board that includes community care providers, healthcare organizations, and ADRD caregivers themselves, the proposed 5-year project will build on the current efforts of The Lutheran Home Association (TLHA) to evaluate eNeighbor remote monitoring technology for persons with ADRD living in the community and their family caregivers. The Specific Aims are as follows:
To determine the efficacy of remote sensor technology over an 18-month period for 100 persons with ADRD and their caregivers randomly assigned to an eNeighbor treatment condition when compared to 100 usual care controls. The investigators hypothesize:
Hx. 1) Significant (p < .05) improvements in caregiver self-efficacy and sense of competence in managing a relative's ADRD; Hx. 2) Significant reductions in caregiver distress (e.g., subjective stress, or feelings of emotional fatigue and role entrapment; depressive symptoms); Hx. 3) Significant delay of or reductions in health transitions (falls, wandering) and service utilization (hospitalizations, nursing home admission) for persons with ADRD; and Hx. 4) Greater cost-effectiveness associated with a person with ADRD's health service use.
To "embed" evaluation components: a) during the randomized controlled evaluation through the administration of open-ended survey items to all ADRD caregivers in the eNeighbor treatment condition every 6 months to examine the utility of the remote health monitoring technology; and b) at the conclusion of the 18-month evaluation by purposively sampling 15 ADRD caregivers who reported positive acceptance on the embedded qualitative and quantitative 6-, 12-, and 18-month system reviews and 15 ADRD caregivers who reported low acceptance on the embedded qualitative and quantitative 6-, 12-, and 18-month system reviews to participate in semi-structured interviews. The interviews will help the research team determine why the health monitoring intervention was or was not efficacious; and
To engage stakeholders on a quarterly basis throughout the 5-year project with the goal of enhancing the utility (via community-based participatory approaches) and stakeholder-relevance of eNeighbor implementation and evaluation for family caregivers of persons with ADRD.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dementia, Alzheimer Disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
179 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Remote activity monitoring
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Receive the remote activity monitoring system (i.e., "eNeighbor;" see intervention description) over an 18-month period.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Control participants do not receive the remote activity monitoring intervention.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Remote activity monitoring system
Other Intervention Name(s)
eNeighbor
Intervention Description
The home-based sensor technology of eNeighbor relies on multiple, non-invasive and safe remote monitors (up to 6 sensors) that can alert family caregivers and/or health professionals to potentially negative situations that lead to adverse outcomes (e.g., wandering, falls, incomplete activity of daily living tasks). The technology platform of eNeighbor relies on wireless infrastructure that allows for remote monitoring via alerts that are communicated to the family caregiver's or nurse care manager's personal computers or handheld devices. The Alerts that are generated from the sensors detected abnormal motion or activity are sent to the family caregiver as well as a nurse care manager that monitors the real-time information generated by the eNeighbor sensors.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Nursing home utilization at 18 months for the person with ADRD
Description
Caregiver report of nursing home use at 18 months.
Time Frame
18-months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Perceptions of change in caregiver self-efficacy
Description
An 8-item survey measure of caregiver self-efficacy. Item responses range from 1 "very unconfident" to 5 "very confident." Scores are summed and can range from a score of 1 (low self-efficacy) to 40 (high self-efficacy).
Time Frame
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months
Title
Perceptions of change in caregiver competence
Description
The 7-item Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ), which assesses individuals' sense of capability in providing assistance to a relative with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias via survey report. Item responses range from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Item responses are summed, with a total score range of 5 to 35.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months
Title
Perceptions of change in caregiver burden
Description
The 22-item Zarit Burden Interview self-report survey measure. Item responses range from 0 "never" to 4 "nearly always." Scores are summed and can range from a score of 0 (no burden) to 88 (high burden).
Time Frame
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months
Title
Perceptions of change in caregiver role captivity
Description
The 4-item role captivity measure assesses the involuntary aspects of the caregiving role. Item responses range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much." The total role captivity score is the sum of item responses with a range of 4 (no role captivity) to 16 (high role captivity).
Time Frame
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months
Title
Change in caregiver role overload
Description
The 3-item role overload survey measure ascertains caregivers' feelings of emotional and physical fatigue. Item responses range from 1 = "not at all" to 4 = "very much." The total role overload score is the sum iof item responses with a range of 4 (no role overload) to 16 (high role overload).
Time Frame
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months
Title
Change in frequency/perceptions caregiver depressive symptom severity
Description
The 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) survey measure is used to assess caregivers' depressive symptoms. Item responses range from 1 = "Rarely or none of the time (less than 1 day)" to 5 = "Most of the time (5-7 days)." The total CES-D score is summed, with a range of 20 (little to no depressive symptoms) to 100 (frequent depressive symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, 6-months, 12-months, 18-months
Title
Perceived acceptability/utility of remote activity monitoring at 6-, 12-, and 18-months
Description
The Remote Activity Monitoring Review Checklist is administered to caregiving participants in the treatment condition at the 6-month, 12-month and 18-month follow-up survey intervals. The checklist consists of 21 self-report survey Likert scale items. Item responses range from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. The total checklist score is averaged, with a score of 1 = the remote activity monitoring system was not well-received/accepted to 5 = the remote activity monitoring system was very well received/accepted.
Time Frame
6-months, 12-months, 18-months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION
The person with ADRD must be English speaking;
The person with ADRD must have a physician diagnosis of ADRD (Alzheimer's disease, Lewy Body disease, fronto-temporal dementia, or stroke/vascular dementia; mild cognitive impairment only)
The person with ADRD must not be currently receiving care or case management services;
The person with ADRD must be 55 years of age and over;
The caregiver of persons with ADRD must be English speaking;
The caregiver of persons with ADRD must be 21 years of age and over;
The caregiver of persons with ADRD must self-identify as someone who provides help to the person with ADRD because of their cognitive impairments;
The caregiver of persons with ADRD must self-identify as the person most responsible for providing hands-on care to the person with ADRD;
The caregiver of persons with ADRD must plan to remain in the area for at least 18 months in order to reduce possible loss to follow-up; and
The caregiver of persons with ADRD must indicate a willingness to use eNeighbor.
EXCLUSION
● Those who do not meet the above inclusion criteria.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29504488
Citation
Mitchell LL, Peterson CM, Rud SR, Jutkowitz E, Sarkinen A, Trost S, Porta CM, Finlay JM, Gaugler JE. "It's Like a Cyber-Security Blanket": The Utility of Remote Activity Monitoring in Family Dementia Care. J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jan;39(1):86-98. doi: 10.1177/0733464818760238. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33377980
Citation
Zmora R, Mitchell LL, Bustamante G, Finlay J, Nkimbeng M, Gaugler JE. Dementia Caregivers' Experiences and Reactions to Remote Activity Monitoring System Alerts. J Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Jan 1;47(1):13-20. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20201208-03. Erratum In: J Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Jan 1;47(2):6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29982413
Citation
Gaugler JE, Zmora R, Mitchell LL, Finlay JM, Peterson CM, McCarron H, Jutkowitz E. Six-Month Effectiveness of Remote Activity Monitoring for Persons Living With Dementia and Their Family Caregivers: An Experimental Mixed Methods Study. Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):78-89. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny078.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34922475
Citation
Gaugler JE, Zmora R, Mitchell LL, Finlay J, Rosebush CE, Nkimbeng M, Baker ZG, Albers EA, Peterson CM. Remote activity monitoring for family caregivers of persons living with dementia: a mixed methods, randomized controlled evaluation. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02634-8.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
A Proactive Health Monitoring Intervention for Dementia Caregivers
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs