search
Back to results

Robotic Walking Device to Improve Mobility in Parkinson's Disease

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Training with HWA device
Usual Care
Sponsored by
Ohio State University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring Parkinson, Exoskeleton, Honda, Walking Assist, Walking, Gait, Mobility, Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • Age 50-80 years
  • Able to ambulate without assistance (Hoehn & Yahr stages 1-3)
  • On stable doses of Parkinson's medications for at least 4 weeks prior to the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other significant cardiac, neurological or orthopedic problems that affect gait
  • Weight more than 220 pounds and height greater than 6'8"
  • Electronic medical devices embedded in the body
  • Participating in any physical therapy
  • Inability to understand instructions required by the study.

Sites / Locations

  • The Ohio State University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Walking Training with the HWA Device

Usual Care

Arm Description

Training with HWA device

Usual Care

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Gait Velocity
Walking speed in meters per second

Secondary Outcome Measures

6-Minute Walk Test
Distance walked in 6 minutes, reported in meters
Stride Length
Stride length in centimeters
Double Support Time
Double support time in seconds
Swing Time - Right Leg
Swing time in seconds of right leg
Swing Time - Left Leg
Swing time in seconds of left leg
Double Support Time Coefficient of Variation
The double support time coefficient of variation was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the double support time for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variation were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the double support time coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the double support time coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the double support time coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of central tendency reported in the data table.
Swing Time Coefficient of Variation of Right Leg
The swing time coefficient of variation of right leg was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the swing time of the right leg for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the swing time of right leg coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the swing time of right leg coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the swing time of the right leg coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of central tendency reported in the data table.
Swing Time Coefficient of Variation of Left Leg
The swing time coefficient of variation of left leg was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the swing time of the left leg for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the swing time of left leg coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the swing time of left leg coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the swing time of the left leg coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of central tendency reported in the data table.
Stride Length Coefficient of Variation
The stride length coefficient of variation was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the stride length for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the stride length coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the stride length coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the stride length coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of central tendency reported in the data table.
Participants' Perceived Ease of Walking
Indicated on a visual analog scale (line with demarcations of 0-10 spaced evenly and with anchors "Not at all easy" at 0 on the left end, moderately easy at 5, and "Extremely easy" at 10 on the right end). Participants are asked to rate where on line it indicates how easy it felt for them to walk during the six minute walk test.
Self-Efficacy for Measuring Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale
Questionnaire to measure participants' confidence (I.e., self-efficacy) in performing daily activities. The score for the scale is the mean of the 6 items with a range of possible scores from 1 to 10. Higher number (10) indicates higher self-efficacy.
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire assesses Freezing of Gait (FOG) severity unrelated to falls in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), FOG frequency, disturbances in gait, and relationship to clinical features conceptually associated with gait and motor aspects. Six items are scored on 0-4 scale for a total score range of 0-24, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Number of Participants With Falls
Number of participants who recorded falls in a log during the 8-week intervention

Full Information

First Posted
November 11, 2018
Last Updated
May 24, 2023
Sponsor
Ohio State University
Collaborators
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, Honda Research and Development Americas, Inc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03751371
Brief Title
Robotic Walking Device to Improve Mobility in Parkinson's Disease
Official Title
Use of a Robotic Walking Device to Improve Home and Community Mobility in People With Parkinson's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 27, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 27, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ohio State University
Collaborators
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, Honda Research and Development Americas, Inc

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This Phase II randomized controlled trial proposes to examine the impact of long-term use of a novel light-weight and wearable assistive robotic device, called the Honda Walking Assist (HWA) device, to improve mobility in the home and community in individuals with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease (PD). Specific aims of the project are to: 1) determine the short-term impact of mechanical gait assistance on efficiency and ease of walking in individuals with PD, and 2) determine the effect of long-term HWA device usage on the ease and ability to walk unassisted in the home and community in individuals with PD.
Detailed Description
Difficulties with walking in people with Parkinson's disease contribute to injurious falls and decreased quality of life. The Honda Walking Assist (HWA) robotic device is designed to assist individuals with gait impairments to take longer strides and walk faster. This study will investigate the impact of HWA usage on mobility in the home and community in individuals with PD. It will also examine feasibility and safety of HWA usage in the PD population. Specific Aim 1: Determine the short-term impact of mechanical gait assistance on efficiency and ease of walking in individuals with PD. With disease progression, individuals with PD develop gait impairments (e.g., slower gait velocity, shorter step lengths, increased step-to-step variability, and freezing of gait), that interfere with their abilities to perform daily living tasks and participate in work, home, and social activities and predispose them to falls. The investigators hypothesize that wearing the HWA device will improve gait efficiency, gait parameters, and perceived ease of walking in individuals with PD compared to unassisted walking over a one session period. Specific Aim 2: Determine the effect of long-term HWA device usage on the ease and ability to walk unassisted in the home and community in individuals with PD. Angular sensors embedded in the HWA monitor the cadence, angular velocity, and degree of hip extension and flexion of the device user. When the user initiates walking, the HWA automatically adjusts leg movements to reach target walk ratios (step length/cadence) by increasing the amount of hip flexion and/or extension using power supplied by the device. Thus, the HWA applies continuous, step-by-step cueing to individuals with PD to take bigger and more symmetrical steps, thereby producing a faster and more efficient walking pattern. By wearing the HWA device over an extended period of time, individuals with PD will repetitively practice walking with a more "normal" gait pattern, possibly driving neuroplastic changes that will translate to improve unassisted walking. The investigators hypothesize that an 8-week intervention of HWA device usage will improve gait efficiency, gait parameters, perceived ease of walking, self-confidence, and daily physical activity in the home and community in individuals with PD with and without the use of the device.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease
Keywords
Parkinson, Exoskeleton, Honda, Walking Assist, Walking, Gait, Mobility, Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
45 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Walking Training with the HWA Device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Training with HWA device
Arm Title
Usual Care
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Usual Care
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Training with HWA device
Intervention Description
Gait assessments will be conducted on participants randomized to the Trained group first during unassisted walking followed by HWA-assisted walking. Participants randomized to the Trained group will receive physical therapist supervised home and community-based walking training wearing the HWA device 2 times per week for 45-60 minutes for 8 weeks. Training will consist of walking in and outside of the home while encouraging larger and more symmetrical steps with practice of activities that challenge the person's balance and motor control. Rest breaks will be allowed as needed. If the therapist is unable to adjust the HWA to provide a safe gait pattern, the session will be ended and the device removed.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Usual Care
Intervention Description
The Untrained group will continue their usual daily activities including any exercise regimen that they typically perform. However, they will be asked not to start any new exercise program during the study period.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Gait Velocity
Description
Walking speed in meters per second
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
6-Minute Walk Test
Description
Distance walked in 6 minutes, reported in meters
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Stride Length
Description
Stride length in centimeters
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Double Support Time
Description
Double support time in seconds
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Swing Time - Right Leg
Description
Swing time in seconds of right leg
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Swing Time - Left Leg
Description
Swing time in seconds of left leg
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Double Support Time Coefficient of Variation
Description
The double support time coefficient of variation was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the double support time for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variation were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the double support time coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the double support time coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the double support time coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of central tendency reported in the data table.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Swing Time Coefficient of Variation of Right Leg
Description
The swing time coefficient of variation of right leg was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the swing time of the right leg for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the swing time of right leg coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the swing time of right leg coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the swing time of the right leg coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of central tendency reported in the data table.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Swing Time Coefficient of Variation of Left Leg
Description
The swing time coefficient of variation of left leg was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the swing time of the left leg for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the swing time of left leg coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the swing time of left leg coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the swing time of the left leg coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of central tendency reported in the data table.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Stride Length Coefficient of Variation
Description
The stride length coefficient of variation was calculated by first calculating the mean and SD of the stride length for each of the participants. The calculation of the coefficient of variations were done by taking the standard deviations and dividing them by the mean. Thus calculation of the stride length coefficient of variation required multiple measures for each participant. After calculating the stride length coefficients of variation for each participant, we then calculated the mean and SD of the stride length coefficients of variation. This explains the data value with the measure of central tendency reported in the data table.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Participants' Perceived Ease of Walking
Description
Indicated on a visual analog scale (line with demarcations of 0-10 spaced evenly and with anchors "Not at all easy" at 0 on the left end, moderately easy at 5, and "Extremely easy" at 10 on the right end). Participants are asked to rate where on line it indicates how easy it felt for them to walk during the six minute walk test.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Self-Efficacy for Measuring Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale
Description
Questionnaire to measure participants' confidence (I.e., self-efficacy) in performing daily activities. The score for the scale is the mean of the 6 items with a range of possible scores from 1 to 10. Higher number (10) indicates higher self-efficacy.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
Description
The Freezing of Gait Questionnaire assesses Freezing of Gait (FOG) severity unrelated to falls in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), FOG frequency, disturbances in gait, and relationship to clinical features conceptually associated with gait and motor aspects. Six items are scored on 0-4 scale for a total score range of 0-24, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Falls
Description
Number of participants who recorded falls in a log during the 8-week intervention
Time Frame
8 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease Age 50-80 years Able to ambulate without assistance (Hoehn & Yahr stages 1-3) On stable doses of Parkinson's medications for at least 4 weeks prior to the study. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of other significant cardiac, neurological or orthopedic problems that affect gait Weight more than 220 pounds and height greater than 6'8" Electronic medical devices embedded in the body Participating in any physical therapy Inability to understand instructions required by the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne Kloos
Organizational Affiliation
Ohio State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deb Kegelmeyer
Organizational Affiliation
Ohio State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Robotic Walking Device to Improve Mobility in Parkinson's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs