search
Back to results

SubArachnoid Hemorrhage HEadache Treated by Lumbar Puncture (SAH-HELP)

Primary Purpose

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Headache

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lumbar puncture
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Toulouse
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage focused on measuring Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, lumbar puncture, headache

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • Low grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (WFNS score between 1 and 3)
  • Aneurysmal rupture ≤ 5 days
  • Ruptured aneurysm secured by coiling since at least 48 h
  • Headache with a mean numeric verbal scale ≥ 4/10 during the last 24 hours
  • No contraindication for lumbar puncture
  • Affiliation to french social security
  • Person able to express her consent and to assess own headache intensity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Minor,
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage without aneurysm
  • Ruptured aneurysm not secured
  • High grade (WFNS 4 and 5) subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Efficient anticoagulation
  • External ventricular drain placed before randomisation
  • People under legal protection
  • Participation to another research study with an ongoing disqualification period

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital Toulouse

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Lumbar puncture

Sham lumbar puncture

Arm Description

Lumbar puncture in addition to a predefined analgesic protocol Patients will be randomized between the 3rd and 5th days following aneurismal rupture.

Sham lumbar puncture in addition to a predefined analgesic protocol Patients will be randomized between the 3rd and 5th days following aneurismal rupture.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference of headache mean intensity variation measured after a lumbar puncture or a sham LP.
The mean intensity will be assessed using the verbal rating scales (VRS). It is a scale administered by the medical team, which brings together the score given by the patient between 0 and 10 (0 = absence of pain; 10 = maximum of conceivable pain)Headache mean intensity variation will be calculated by the difference between these scores evaluated 24 hours before and the 24 hours after the procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Difference of variation in the mean intensity of headache
Difference of variation in the mean intensity of headache measured by the nurse in charge of the patients every 4 h between the 24 hours before and the 24 hours after the procedure. Difference of variation will be assessed using the verbal rating scales (VRS). It is a scale administered by the medical team, which brings together the score given by the patient between 0 and 10 (0 = absence of pain; 10 = maximum of conceivable pain). Headache mean intensity variation will be calculated by the difference between these scores evaluated 24 hours before and the 24 hours after the procedure.
Difference of maximal headache intensity
Difference of maximal headache intensity will be assessed using the verbal rating scales (VRS). It is a scale administered by the medical team, which brings together the score given by the patient between 0 and 10 (0 = absence of pain; 10 = maximum of conceivable pain). Headache maximal intensity variation will be calculated by the difference of maximal headache intensity measured during 24 hours before and 24 hours after the procedure by the nurse in charge of the patients every 4 hours.
Kinetic of headache intensity
Kinetic of headache intensity during the 7 days following the procedure (global assesment by the patient and mean/max of measurement every 4 hours). The headache intensity will be assessed using the verbal rating scales (VRS). It is a scale administered by the medical team, which brings together the score given by the patient between 0 and 10 (0 = absence of pain; 10 = maximum of conceivable pain).
Difference of responding patients
Difference of responding patients defined by patients with a decreased of the mean intensity of 30 % and 50 %, 24 hours after the procedure and daily during the 7 days following the procedure.
Occurrence of a clinical deterioration
Related to the other complication of subarachnoid hemorrhage : Occurrence of a clinical deterioration related to delayed cerebral ischemia assessed by NIHSS and GCS) and the occurrence of a new infarction on follow-up MRI.
Persistence of Chronic hydrocephalus
Rate of chronic hydrocephalus defined by the modification of the ventricle size between the post interventional MRI and the follow-up MRI at 3 months.
Improvement of the clinical global impression
Disability and Quality of life : Improvement of the "Clinical Global Impression -Improvement" (CGI-I) at 24 hours, day 7 and 3 months (clinical improvement defined by a score of 1 or 2). The CGI-I is used by clinicians to rate improvement in a subject's condition (benefits) since baseline. It is a 7-point scale with 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=not changed, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse; and 7=very much worse.

Full Information

First Posted
November 19, 2018
Last Updated
February 10, 2023
Sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03754335
Brief Title
SubArachnoid Hemorrhage HEadache Treated by Lumbar Puncture
Acronym
SAH-HELP
Official Title
SubArachnoid Hemorrhage HEadache Treated by Lumbar Puncture
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 28, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Headache control is one of the major challenges in patients who suffered an acute aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Headache affects 90% of the patient and is resistant to the major pain medication. It results from the increased intracranial pressure and the inflammation caused by the accumulation of arterial blood in the subarachnoid space. Hemorrhagic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) removal by a lumbar puncture (LP), is well tolerated, reduces intracranial pressure and accelerates the clearance of the blood products from CSF. Nonetheless it has never been tested in a randomized trial. The investigators aim to compare in patients who experienced a low grade aSAH, the variation of headache intensity after CSF removal by LP vs. Sham LP in addition to predefined analgesic protocol management.
Detailed Description
After aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) almost 90 % of patients experience a severe headache during their hospital stay. Pain control often requires high doses of opioid drugs and sedation that remain only partially efficacious. In addition, there is to the investigator's knowledge currently no recommendation or consensus on aSAH related headache management. aSAH related headache results from the prolonged increased intracranial pressure and meningeal inflammation related to the accumulation of blood products in the subarachnoid space. Preliminary studies, suggest that hemorrhagic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) removal by lumbar puncture (LP) or lumbar drain, is safe and decreases intracranial pressure. However its impact on headache control has never been tested. A reliable headache evaluation has to be performed among conscious patients experiencing a "low-grade" aSAH. The objective of the study is to evaluate in patients experiencing low-grade acute aSAH (WFNS 1-3), the efficacy of CSF removal by LP vs. sham LP, on headache control. 74 patients with secured aneurysm by coiling, will be randomized (1:1) between day 3 and day 5 after aneurysmal rupture. The procedure will be performed in addition to a pre-specified antalgic protocol. Mean headache intensity will be measured with the numeric verbal scale during the 24 hours before and the 24 hours after the procedure. The variation of mean intensity will be compared between the 2 groups. The investigators hypothesize that this treatment may significantly decrease headache intensity after an aSAH. If this hypothesis is confirmed CSF removal by LP could be a simple cost effective and worldwide available strategy to improve

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Headache
Keywords
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, lumbar puncture, headache

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized, double blind, prospective monocentric trial evaluating in parallel groups
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
This procedure is to be able to easily randomize half of the patients into a "sham" LP arm passed by independent practitioners of the investigators in charge of the patient, which allows a good double-blind study.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
74 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lumbar puncture
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Lumbar puncture in addition to a predefined analgesic protocol Patients will be randomized between the 3rd and 5th days following aneurismal rupture.
Arm Title
Sham lumbar puncture
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Sham lumbar puncture in addition to a predefined analgesic protocol Patients will be randomized between the 3rd and 5th days following aneurismal rupture.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Lumbar puncture
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sham Lumbar Puncture
Intervention Description
Patient will be managed according to the current international recommendations in the Toulouse acute stroke center. In the absence of clear recommendation in the literature headache will be treated according to our local predefined analgesic protocol: paracetamol 1g/6 h, and if the numerical scale ≥ 4 : continuous intravenous morphine starting at 1mg/h and increased per 0.5 mg/h every hour if numerical scale remains ≥ 4. Lumbar puncture will be performed between day 3 and day 5 after subarachnoid hemorrhage onset by an independent scientist from our clinical investigator center. 30-mL CSF will be removed by LP. Sham LP consisting in superficial skin puncture by a subcutaneous needle (27 gauge needle) during the usual procedure will be performed at the same time point.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference of headache mean intensity variation measured after a lumbar puncture or a sham LP.
Description
The mean intensity will be assessed using the verbal rating scales (VRS). It is a scale administered by the medical team, which brings together the score given by the patient between 0 and 10 (0 = absence of pain; 10 = maximum of conceivable pain)Headache mean intensity variation will be calculated by the difference between these scores evaluated 24 hours before and the 24 hours after the procedure.
Time Frame
24 hours after the inclusion
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference of variation in the mean intensity of headache
Description
Difference of variation in the mean intensity of headache measured by the nurse in charge of the patients every 4 h between the 24 hours before and the 24 hours after the procedure. Difference of variation will be assessed using the verbal rating scales (VRS). It is a scale administered by the medical team, which brings together the score given by the patient between 0 and 10 (0 = absence of pain; 10 = maximum of conceivable pain). Headache mean intensity variation will be calculated by the difference between these scores evaluated 24 hours before and the 24 hours after the procedure.
Time Frame
48 hours
Title
Difference of maximal headache intensity
Description
Difference of maximal headache intensity will be assessed using the verbal rating scales (VRS). It is a scale administered by the medical team, which brings together the score given by the patient between 0 and 10 (0 = absence of pain; 10 = maximum of conceivable pain). Headache maximal intensity variation will be calculated by the difference of maximal headache intensity measured during 24 hours before and 24 hours after the procedure by the nurse in charge of the patients every 4 hours.
Time Frame
48 hours
Title
Kinetic of headache intensity
Description
Kinetic of headache intensity during the 7 days following the procedure (global assesment by the patient and mean/max of measurement every 4 hours). The headache intensity will be assessed using the verbal rating scales (VRS). It is a scale administered by the medical team, which brings together the score given by the patient between 0 and 10 (0 = absence of pain; 10 = maximum of conceivable pain).
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Difference of responding patients
Description
Difference of responding patients defined by patients with a decreased of the mean intensity of 30 % and 50 %, 24 hours after the procedure and daily during the 7 days following the procedure.
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Occurrence of a clinical deterioration
Description
Related to the other complication of subarachnoid hemorrhage : Occurrence of a clinical deterioration related to delayed cerebral ischemia assessed by NIHSS and GCS) and the occurrence of a new infarction on follow-up MRI.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Persistence of Chronic hydrocephalus
Description
Rate of chronic hydrocephalus defined by the modification of the ventricle size between the post interventional MRI and the follow-up MRI at 3 months.
Time Frame
3 month
Title
Improvement of the clinical global impression
Description
Disability and Quality of life : Improvement of the "Clinical Global Impression -Improvement" (CGI-I) at 24 hours, day 7 and 3 months (clinical improvement defined by a score of 1 or 2). The CGI-I is used by clinicians to rate improvement in a subject's condition (benefits) since baseline. It is a 7-point scale with 1=very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=not changed, 5=minimally worse, 6=much worse; and 7=very much worse.
Time Frame
3 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age >18 years Low grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (WFNS score between 1 and 3) Aneurysmal rupture ≤ 5 days Ruptured aneurysm secured by coiling since at least 48 h Headache with a mean numeric verbal scale ≥ 4/10 during the last 24 hours No contraindication for lumbar puncture Affiliation to french social security Person able to express her consent and to assess own headache intensity Exclusion Criteria: Minor, Pregnancy, breastfeeding Subarachnoid hemorrhage without aneurysm Ruptured aneurysm not secured High grade (WFNS 4 and 5) subarachnoid hemorrhage Efficient anticoagulation External ventricular drain placed before randomisation People under legal protection Participation to another research study with an ongoing disqualification period
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lionel Calvière, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Toulouse
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital Toulouse
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

SubArachnoid Hemorrhage HEadache Treated by Lumbar Puncture

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs