search
Back to results

Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of Utilizing a Hydraulically Adjustable Walker in the Treatment of Hip Fracture

Primary Purpose

Mobility Limitation

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hydraulic Adjustable Walker
Conventional Walker
Sponsored by
MaineHealth
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Mobility Limitation

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - 90 Years (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. 40 consecutive mentally competent patients (as determined by a score of 22 or higher on the mini mental state exam.) 2. Patients age 65-90 who suffer an acute hip fracture from a fall and will be assigned to the use of a walker. The patient will be given and instructed on the use of the Waldo County General Hospital standard walker or the HAW.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Patients who are deemed cognitively impaired (scores less than 22 on mini mental state exam).

    2. Patients who are unable to lift a walker up onto steps. 3. Patients who have upper extremity weakness or injury due to fall and unsafe to use a standard walker as intended.

    4. Patient who are shorter than five foot two inches tall or patients six foot three inches or taller as height limitations are based on prototypes available at this time.

Early withdrawal can be done at any time by a patient for any reason especially if the patient feels unsafe with the assigned walker or if surgery is indicated for a non-union of the fracture or failure of the implanted TFN.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Conventional Walker Group

    HAW Group

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of Participants with improved balance using the HAW assessed by Berg Balance Scale
    Berg Balance Scale About: This scale measures balance in older adults. Items: 14 Equipment: Yardstick One standard chair with arm rests One standard chair without arm rests Footstool/step Stopwatch or wristwatch 15 foot walkway Reliability: Cronbach's alphas were greater than 0.83 for stroke patients and 0.97 for elderly residents. Scoring: A five-point scale, a range of 0-4. 0 = lowest level of function 4 = highest level of function. Highest possible score = 56 Score of < 45 indicates a greater risk of falling 41-56 = low fall risk 21-40 = medium fall risk 0 -20 = high fall risk Reference: Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Maki, B (1992). Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can. J. Pub. Health July/August supplement 2:S7-11 Norms: Lusardi, M.M. (2004). Functional Performance in Community Living Older Adults. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 26(3), 14-22.
    Number of Participants with improved mobility using the HAW assessed by Lower Extremity Functional Scale
    The Lower Extremity Functional scale (LFES) is a self-administered set of 20 questions with answers ranging from 0-4 to assess the function of one or both lower extremities. The rating scale is as follows: 0. Extreme difficulty, including inability to perform an activity Quite a bit of difficulty Moderate difficulty A little bit of difficulty No difficulty The totals are summed at the bottom of the table. The minimum important change on the scale is 9 points, which means that a clinical change exists with a change of 9 points on the scale. The LEFS has a margin of error of +/- 5 points, which means that a patient's tabulated score is within 5 points of his "true" score.
    Number of participants with accelerated recovery
    Using data that is collected by the study coordinator from patients involved in the study, and their scores on the functional outcome measures in the tables below, the study aim is to show an accelerated recovery and return to a prior level of function among use of the HAW faster than the control group using a conventional walker. This data, along with patient testimonials, will hopefully show that the HAW can be used for a wide variety of patients to improve their level of mobility and safety during ambulation on stairs and uneven ground.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Number of participants with reduced costs associated with the HAW
    The HAW will reduce the need for costly home repairs, while improving a patient's fear of falling on stairs, improve their community ambulation, decrease medical bills, and lower the need for assistance from outside people within the home.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 30, 2019
    Last Updated
    September 22, 2021
    Sponsor
    MaineHealth
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03829163
    Brief Title
    Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of Utilizing a Hydraulically Adjustable Walker in the Treatment of Hip Fracture
    Official Title
    Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of Utilizing a Hydraulically Adjustable Walker in the Treatment of Hip Fracture
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    IRB -- need to reframe study as a feasibility study before it being a RCT.
    Study Start Date
    March 1, 2019 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    March 1, 2021 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    MaineHealth

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy of a new walker with hydraulically adjustable legs (HAW) in increasing patients' mobility, especially over uneven terrains such as stairs. An attempt will be made to determine patients' satisfaction with this new instrument as well as comparing it to current walkers' effects on mobility, patient confidence, safety and security. In addition, an estimate of financial advantages/savings will be reviewed. Patient using the HAW should benefit from increased mobility, increased freedom home and in the community, as well as decreased medical costs and need for home modifications along with burden on family members caring for them after the injury.
    Detailed Description
    Assistive walking devices are well known and come in various forms, such as canes, crutches, and walkers. Their primary purpose has been to allow someone to be more functional, safe, and independent after a sudden or gradual decline in some aspect of their health. Even with vast changes in all areas of human development the standard walking devices still have their limitations especially when it comes to stairs. The HAW takes one of the most common and dependable devices, a conventional walker, and upgrades its functionality to handle stairs and uneven ground. A walker consists primarily of a metal frame with four legs which are stabilized by crossbars. These walker frames come in a variety of shapes and sizes; many consist primarily of two inverted U-shaped leg modules connected by crossbars. Regardless of the shape or form of the leg modules, each walker frame forms a 3-sided box with an opening in which the user may stand (See Figure 1). The frame often includes two handles located on each side of the user at the upper region of each inverted U-shaped member. The height is matched to each individual's height by keeping the handles at the height of their inner wrist (See Figure 1). Most basic walkers include mechanical means to allow the length of the legs to be increased or decreased. Push button locking pins that fit into pre-drilled holes in the legs are used to secure the walkers height to match the person [HO10] using it. The adjustment is also a time-consuming process requiring significant dexterity, and if a patient is trying to do it themselves, this can lead to falls or injury. The US spends over $30 billion on health care-related to falls each year. 1 There are over 1,000,000 hip and knee surgeries performed each year. 1 In the US, the National Institute of Health (NIH) estimates that there are 6.9 million assistive device users (crutches, canes, or walker) in the US patient that are over the age of 65. 1 Currently there is an estimated 2 million walker users. It is estimated that of those 2 million, 62% of them have to use a walker to navigate stairs on a daily basis.1 This means that conservatively 1.24 million elderly people would benefit from a walker that negotiates stairs optimally. This number of elderly people will undoubtedly be increasing as the elderly population is estimated to more than double by the year 2050, reaching an astounding 89,000,000. 1 The HAW is the only known device that would allow its user the safety of a standard walker as well as protection on stairs while maintaining or improving their muscle strength, balance and endurance. 1 The HAW is a based on a conventional walker but has innovative telescoping legs with a leg adjustment assembly that includes at least one valve and at least one tube that delivers hydraulic fluid into the legs and allows a user to control the length of each leg. The legs of the walker are hydraulically adjustable, so that the front legs may be shortened and the back legs extended, or two side legs shortened and the two opposing side legs extended, so as to allow the walker to be securely placed on two different steps. This allows the user to be able to stand on a stair without worrying about sharing the same stair with the device. It also ensures that the height of the walker continues to be the right height for the user to minimize loss of balance. The design has been tested to be able to withstand 300 pounds of force per leg without failure, so a conservative maximum load would be 600 lbs. Hydraulics were used instead of a mechanical designed to allow for infinite number of adjustments for varying stair heights. A standard stair is 8.25 inches tall, but can range from 6 inches up to 9 inches in some homes. The HAW allows for a wide variety of stairs to be able to be fit with a single adjustment instead of the multiple adjustments required with a conventional walker or crutch. Dwaine Philbrook, PT, and Director of Rehab for Coastal Health Care Alliance of Maine, commented on the HAW: "In 32 years of clinical practice this is one of the most innovative medical products that I have ever seen. The biggest obstacle for patients returning home from a hospital stay, that require a walker, is how to negotiate stairs. Many are unable to use crutches due to balance issues or general weakness. The hydraulic walker will enable those patients to safely use stairs and enjoy a higher level of functional mobility" (May, 2016 personal communication to author). It is anticipated that the study should confirm that patients using the HAW on stairs and for general mobility should improve the patient's satisfaction after the initial injury, improve their fear of falling again, and give them the confidence and ability to become an active member in their community earlier than those with a convention walker. Daily logs completed by the patients should show improved ambulation distances as compared to the control group which will improve the patients recovery and decrease need for further healthcare costs. The use of the HAW for patients with an acute hip fracture should improve the patient's recovery and possibly decrease time spent in the hospital following the injury. The HAW will reduce the need for costly home repairs while improving a patient's fear of falling on stairs, improve their community ambulation, decrease medical bills, and lower the need for assistance from outside people within the home. Using data that is collected by the study coordinator from the patient themselves, and their scores on the functional outcome measures in the tables below, the studies aim is to show an accelerated recovery and return to a prior level of function faster than the control group. This data along with the patient's testimonials will hopefully show that the HAW can be used for a wide variety of patients to improve their level of mobility and safety during ambulation on stairs along with uneven ground. Conventional walkers are not well suited or functionally intended for use on stairways or uneven surfaces. The inability of conventional walkers to allow patients to properly balance on such surfaces limits their usefulness and may introduce significant risk to the user. There exists a need for a walker that allows its user to have safety, stability, control, and ease of use for navigating inclined, declined or uneven surfaces. Thus, the Hydraulically Adjustable Stair Climbing Walker (HAW) was developed.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Mobility Limitation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    This study is a randomized prospective, parallel, voluntary study to test the effectiveness of a newly designed stair-climbing walker on post-acute care patients with hip fractures. Consecutive patients participating in the study will be given participant numbers 1- 40 (odd numbered participant numbers = conventional walker, even numbered participant numbers = HAW) to protect their privacy and to eliminate selection bias. They each will receive training on each assistive device via their assigned inpatient physical therapist. The HAW should not be kept in a vehicle overnight or in temperatures below 45 degrees due to possible hydraulic system failures. A standard walker will be offered along with the HAW to the even numbered patients to ensure that the patient will have an assistive device after the study is completed or if there was an issue with the HAW during the study and needed to be discontinued.
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Conventional Walker Group
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Title
    HAW Group
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Hydraulic Adjustable Walker
    Intervention Description
    The HAW is a based on a conventional walker but has innovative telescoping legs with a leg adjustment assembly that includes at least one valve and at least one tube that delivers hydraulic fluid into the legs and allows a user to control the length of each leg. The legs of the walker are hydraulically adjustable, so that the front legs may be shortened and the back legs extended, or two side legs shortened and the two opposing side legs extended, so as to allow the walker to be securely placed on two different steps. This allows the user to be able to stand on a stair without worrying about sharing the same stair with the device. It also ensures that the height of the walker continues to be the right height for the user to minimize loss of balance.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Conventional Walker
    Intervention Description
    A walker consists primarily of a metal frame with four legs which are stabilized by crossbars. These walker frames come in a variety of shapes and sizes; many consist primarily of two inverted U-shaped leg modules connected by crossbars. Regardless of the shape or form of the leg modules, each walker frame forms a 3-sided box with an opening in which the user may stand.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of Participants with improved balance using the HAW assessed by Berg Balance Scale
    Description
    Berg Balance Scale About: This scale measures balance in older adults. Items: 14 Equipment: Yardstick One standard chair with arm rests One standard chair without arm rests Footstool/step Stopwatch or wristwatch 15 foot walkway Reliability: Cronbach's alphas were greater than 0.83 for stroke patients and 0.97 for elderly residents. Scoring: A five-point scale, a range of 0-4. 0 = lowest level of function 4 = highest level of function. Highest possible score = 56 Score of < 45 indicates a greater risk of falling 41-56 = low fall risk 21-40 = medium fall risk 0 -20 = high fall risk Reference: Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Maki, B (1992). Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can. J. Pub. Health July/August supplement 2:S7-11 Norms: Lusardi, M.M. (2004). Functional Performance in Community Living Older Adults. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 26(3), 14-22.
    Time Frame
    24 months
    Title
    Number of Participants with improved mobility using the HAW assessed by Lower Extremity Functional Scale
    Description
    The Lower Extremity Functional scale (LFES) is a self-administered set of 20 questions with answers ranging from 0-4 to assess the function of one or both lower extremities. The rating scale is as follows: 0. Extreme difficulty, including inability to perform an activity Quite a bit of difficulty Moderate difficulty A little bit of difficulty No difficulty The totals are summed at the bottom of the table. The minimum important change on the scale is 9 points, which means that a clinical change exists with a change of 9 points on the scale. The LEFS has a margin of error of +/- 5 points, which means that a patient's tabulated score is within 5 points of his "true" score.
    Time Frame
    24 months
    Title
    Number of participants with accelerated recovery
    Description
    Using data that is collected by the study coordinator from patients involved in the study, and their scores on the functional outcome measures in the tables below, the study aim is to show an accelerated recovery and return to a prior level of function among use of the HAW faster than the control group using a conventional walker. This data, along with patient testimonials, will hopefully show that the HAW can be used for a wide variety of patients to improve their level of mobility and safety during ambulation on stairs and uneven ground.
    Time Frame
    24 Months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of participants with reduced costs associated with the HAW
    Description
    The HAW will reduce the need for costly home repairs, while improving a patient's fear of falling on stairs, improve their community ambulation, decrease medical bills, and lower the need for assistance from outside people within the home.
    Time Frame
    24 Months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    90 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: 1. 40 consecutive mentally competent patients (as determined by a score of 22 or higher on the mini mental state exam.) 2. Patients age 65-90 who suffer an acute hip fracture from a fall and will be assigned to the use of a walker. The patient will be given and instructed on the use of the Waldo County General Hospital standard walker or the HAW. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patients who are deemed cognitively impaired (scores less than 22 on mini mental state exam). 2. Patients who are unable to lift a walker up onto steps. 3. Patients who have upper extremity weakness or injury due to fall and unsafe to use a standard walker as intended. 4. Patient who are shorter than five foot two inches tall or patients six foot three inches or taller as height limitations are based on prototypes available at this time. Early withdrawal can be done at any time by a patient for any reason especially if the patient feels unsafe with the assigned walker or if surgery is indicated for a non-union of the fracture or failure of the implanted TFN.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Peter Klausmeyer, PT, DPT
    Organizational Affiliation
    Waldo County General Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    Citation
    University of California - Disability Statistics Center. (2018, September 28). Mobility Device Statistics: United States. Retrieved October 3, 2018, from https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/statistics/mobility-stats.php
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    1202204
    Citation
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10201543
    Citation
    Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;79(4):371-83.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    1468055
    Citation
    Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992 Jul-Aug;83 Suppl 2:S7-11.
    Results Reference
    background
    Links:
    URL
    https://3willswalkers.wixsite.com/walker
    Description
    Official Website for the "HAW" -- invited and built by one of the investigators of 3 Wills, LLC.

    Learn more about this trial

    Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of Utilizing a Hydraulically Adjustable Walker in the Treatment of Hip Fracture

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs