Auditory Training With Speech Related Acoustic Cues Using Psychophysical Testing
Primary Purpose
Deafness
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Auditory training
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional basic science trial for Deafness
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Native speakers of English
- Cochlear Nucleus cochlear implant users or Advanced Bionics users
- Postlingually deafened
- Has had device experience for at least one year
- Can be child or adult at the time of enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Cochlear implant users
Arm Description
The group will receive auditory training (psychophysical), and will be evaluated for speech recognition to determine the effect of training.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
speech recognition after training
Subjects will be measured for their baseline speech recognition performance (A) and then measured again for speech recognition after receiving auditory training using the psychophysical methods (B). Finally, the subjects will be measured for speech recognition the third time after the training is withdrawn following a ABA longitudinal design.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03867032
Brief Title
Auditory Training With Speech Related Acoustic Cues Using Psychophysical Testing
Official Title
Auditory Training With Speech Related Acoustic Cues Using Psychophysical Testing
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
PI passed away. Ending grant and closing down lab
Study Start Date
December 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 26, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
East Carolina University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators will evaluate whether auditory training with speech-related acoustic features in psychophysical testing will help CI subjects improve speech recognition. The primary endpoint is the speech recognition measures.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Deafness
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cochlear implant users
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The group will receive auditory training (psychophysical), and will be evaluated for speech recognition to determine the effect of training.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Auditory training
Intervention Description
Training with psychophysical tests (amplitude modulation detection on single electrodes) for improving speech recognition
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
speech recognition after training
Description
Subjects will be measured for their baseline speech recognition performance (A) and then measured again for speech recognition after receiving auditory training using the psychophysical methods (B). Finally, the subjects will be measured for speech recognition the third time after the training is withdrawn following a ABA longitudinal design.
Time Frame
starting 12 months after the award and will take up to 3.5 years to complete
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Native speakers of English
Cochlear Nucleus cochlear implant users or Advanced Bionics users
Postlingually deafened
Has had device experience for at least one year
Can be child or adult at the time of enrollment
Exclusion Criteria:
None
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19293398
Citation
Banai K, Hornickel J, Skoe E, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N. Reading and subcortical auditory function. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Nov;19(11):2699-707. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp024. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25590651
Citation
Baumann S, Joly O, Rees A, Petkov CI, Sun L, Thiele A, Griffiths TD. The topography of frequency and time representation in primate auditory cortices. Elife. 2015 Jan 15;4:e03256. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03256.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25618067
Citation
Boebinger D, Evans S, Rosen S, Lima CF, Manly T, Scott SK. Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jan;137(1):378-87. doi: 10.1121/1.4904537.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20211951
Citation
Chen JK, Chuang AY, McMahon C, Hsieh JC, Tung TH, Li LP. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e793-800. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3620. Epub 2010 Mar 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28213134
Citation
Coffey EBJ, Mogilever NB, Zatorre RJ. Speech-in-noise perception in musicians: A review. Hear Res. 2017 Sep;352:49-69. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16081006
Citation
Fritz J, Elhilali M, Shamma S. Active listening: task-dependent plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex. Hear Res. 2005 Aug;206(1-2):159-76. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.01.015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21361447
Citation
Fitzgerald MB, Wright BA. Perceptual learning and generalization resulting from training on an auditory amplitude-modulation detection task. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Feb;129(2):898-906. doi: 10.1121/1.3531841.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25321148
Citation
Fu QJ, Galvin JJ 3rd, Wang X, Wu JL. Benefits of music training in mandarin-speaking pediatric cochlear implant users. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Feb;58(1):163-9. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-14-0127.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23927116
Citation
Huyck JJ, Wright BA. Learning, worsening, and generalization in response to auditory perceptual training during adolescence. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1172-82. doi: 10.1121/1.4812258.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23459244
Citation
Looi V, Gfeller K, Driscoll V. MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW. Semin Hear. 2012 Nov 1;33(4):307-334. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329222. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19906958
Citation
Parbery-Clark A, Skoe E, Kraus N. Musical experience limits the degradative effects of background noise on the neural processing of sound. J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 11;29(45):14100-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3256-09.2009.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21747773
Citation
Patel AD. Why would Musical Training Benefit the Neural Encoding of Speech? The OPERA Hypothesis. Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 29;2:142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00142. eCollection 2011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16672673
Citation
Polley DB, Steinberg EE, Merzenich MM. Perceptual learning directs auditory cortical map reorganization through top-down influences. J Neurosci. 2006 May 3;26(18):4970-82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3771-05.2006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24489819
Citation
Ruggles DR, Freyman RL, Oxenham AJ. Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 28;9(1):e86980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086980. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22573676
Citation
Sabin AT, Eddins DA, Wright BA. Perceptual learning evidence for tuning to spectrotemporal modulation in the human auditory system. J Neurosci. 2012 May 9;32(19):6542-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5732-11.2012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24959653
Citation
Szpiro SF, Wright BA, Carrasco M. Learning one task by interleaving practice with another task. Vision Res. 2014 Aug;101:118-24. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20861390
Citation
Wright BA, Sabin AT, Zhang Y, Marrone N, Fitzgerald MB. Enhancing perceptual learning by combining practice with periods of additional sensory stimulation. J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 22;30(38):12868-77. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0487-10.2010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19411117
Citation
Yucel E, Sennaroglu G, Belgin E. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Jul;73(7):1043-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 May 2.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Auditory Training With Speech Related Acoustic Cues Using Psychophysical Testing
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs