Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation Training on Pain Perception in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
Primary Purpose
Pain, Chronic
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Action Observation
Motor imagery
Placebo Action observation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain, Chronic focused on measuring Motor Imagery, Action observation, Pain perception
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and women aged between 18 and 65 years
- Medical diagnosis of non specific chronic neck pain with more than 6 months of evolution of neck pain
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with rheumatic diseases, cervical hernia, cervical whiplash syndrome, neck surgeries o a history of arthrodesis
- Systemic diseases
- Vision, hearing or vestibular problems
- Severe trauma or a traffic accident that had an impact on the cervical area.
Sites / Locations
- CSEU La Salle
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Action Observation
Motor Imagery
Placebo Group
Arm Description
This group receives an action observation training through the visualization of a video of cervical movements.
This group receives an motor imagery through the imagery process of cervical movements.
This group receives a placebo action observation training through the visualization of a video of a documentary video
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain pressure threshold
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) is one of these tests and it is defined as the minimum force applied which induces pain. The measurement shall be carried out by using an algometer (pressure device that induces mechanical stimuli) is to standardize the amount of pressure applied in the neck region. The reliability of pressure pain thresholds according to raters or measurement frequencies is relatively high
Secondary Outcome Measures
Visual and Kinesthetic Motor Imagery Ability
Visual and Kinesthetic Motor Imagery Ability will be measured with Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R). MIQ-R has four movements repeated in two subscales, a visual and a kinesthetic one. Additionally, a score between 1 and 7 is assigned, with 1 representing difficulty in picturing the motor image or difficulty in feeling the movement previously made, and 7 representing the maximum ease. The internal consistencies of the MIQ-R have been consistently adequate with Cronbach's α coefficients ranging above 0.84 for the total scale, 0.80 for de visual subscale and 0.84 for the kinesthetic subscale (Campos & González, 2010).
Mental Chronometry
Mental chronometry evaluation was also used to measure the subject's motor imagery
The degree of physical activity
The degree of physical activity was objectified through the The International Physical Activity Questionnaire questionnaire, which allows the subjects to be divided into three groups according to their level of activity, which can be high, moderate, and low or inactive
Laterality task
With the task of recognition of the neck's laterality, two aspects will be evaluated: first, the precision (percentage of correct answers) of the discrimination of the laterality which is the capacity to recognize if a part of the body belongs to the right or left and second, the response time that the participants use in the task of discrimination or cognitive judgment. The app designed and developed by the NOI group will be used.
Pain catastrophizing
The Spanish version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) assesses the degree of pain catastrophizing. The PCS has 13 items and a 3-factor structure of rumination, magnification, and helplessness.
Kinesiophobia
Fear of movement or kinesiophobia will be quantified with the Spanish version of the Kinesiophobia Tampa Scale (TSK-11). This instrument demonstrates reliability and validity in patients with chronic pain, being shorter than the original scale. The total score ranges from 11 to 44 points, with the highest scores indicating greater fear of a new injury due to movement
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03905577
First Posted
April 2, 2019
Last Updated
July 7, 2019
Sponsor
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03905577
Brief Title
Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation Training on Pain Perception in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
Official Title
Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation Training on Pain Perception in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidad Autonoma de Madrid
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the influence of motor imagery or action observation training on pain perception in patients with chronic neck pain. Perception of pain will be measured by the pain pressure threshold.
A group of patients will receive an action observation training of neck movements, another will receive a protocol of motor imagery of the same movements and the last group will be a placebo group, through the viewing of a documentary video.
Detailed Description
Motor imagery is defined as a dynamic mental process of an action, without its real motor execution. Action observation training consists of watching an action performed by someone else. Both motor imagery and action observation have been shown to produce a neurophysiological activation of the brain areas related to the planning and execution of voluntary movement in a manner that resembles how the action is performed in reality.
Both motor imagery and action observation are interventions that can generate adaptive neuroplastic changes on a cortical level, leading to a decrease in chronic pain. These rehabilitation techniques are used in pain treatment and impaired movement injuries that could be due to a nervous system alteration.
The effectiveness of motor imagery is controversial; several studies have presented unfavorable outcomes from this technique. Some variables, such as the duration of the sessions, the time employed the type of motor task or the number of sessions can influence the outcomes of these studies. Thus, it is necessary to clarify the controversial aspects of motor imagery, which lead us to perform this study.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Chronic
Keywords
Motor Imagery, Action observation, Pain perception
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Action Observation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group receives an action observation training through the visualization of a video of cervical movements.
Arm Title
Motor Imagery
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group receives an motor imagery through the imagery process of cervical movements.
Arm Title
Placebo Group
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
This group receives a placebo action observation training through the visualization of a video of a documentary video
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Action Observation
Intervention Description
Action Observation training
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Motor imagery
Intervention Description
Motor imagery protocol
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo Action observation
Intervention Description
Placebo Action Observation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain pressure threshold
Description
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT) is one of these tests and it is defined as the minimum force applied which induces pain. The measurement shall be carried out by using an algometer (pressure device that induces mechanical stimuli) is to standardize the amount of pressure applied in the neck region. The reliability of pressure pain thresholds according to raters or measurement frequencies is relatively high
Time Frame
Change from baseline and immediately post-intervention.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual and Kinesthetic Motor Imagery Ability
Description
Visual and Kinesthetic Motor Imagery Ability will be measured with Movement Imagery Questionnaire-Revised (MIQ-R). MIQ-R has four movements repeated in two subscales, a visual and a kinesthetic one. Additionally, a score between 1 and 7 is assigned, with 1 representing difficulty in picturing the motor image or difficulty in feeling the movement previously made, and 7 representing the maximum ease. The internal consistencies of the MIQ-R have been consistently adequate with Cronbach's α coefficients ranging above 0.84 for the total scale, 0.80 for de visual subscale and 0.84 for the kinesthetic subscale (Campos & González, 2010).
Time Frame
Immediately before the intervention
Title
Mental Chronometry
Description
Mental chronometry evaluation was also used to measure the subject's motor imagery
Time Frame
Immediately before the intervention
Title
The degree of physical activity
Description
The degree of physical activity was objectified through the The International Physical Activity Questionnaire questionnaire, which allows the subjects to be divided into three groups according to their level of activity, which can be high, moderate, and low or inactive
Time Frame
Immediately before the intervention
Title
Laterality task
Description
With the task of recognition of the neck's laterality, two aspects will be evaluated: first, the precision (percentage of correct answers) of the discrimination of the laterality which is the capacity to recognize if a part of the body belongs to the right or left and second, the response time that the participants use in the task of discrimination or cognitive judgment. The app designed and developed by the NOI group will be used.
Time Frame
Immediately before the intervention
Title
Pain catastrophizing
Description
The Spanish version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) assesses the degree of pain catastrophizing. The PCS has 13 items and a 3-factor structure of rumination, magnification, and helplessness.
Time Frame
Immediately before the intervention
Title
Kinesiophobia
Description
Fear of movement or kinesiophobia will be quantified with the Spanish version of the Kinesiophobia Tampa Scale (TSK-11). This instrument demonstrates reliability and validity in patients with chronic pain, being shorter than the original scale. The total score ranges from 11 to 44 points, with the highest scores indicating greater fear of a new injury due to movement
Time Frame
Immediately before the intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Men and women aged between 18 and 65 years
Medical diagnosis of non specific chronic neck pain with more than 6 months of evolution of neck pain
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with rheumatic diseases, cervical hernia, cervical whiplash syndrome, neck surgeries o a history of arthrodesis
Systemic diseases
Vision, hearing or vestibular problems
Severe trauma or a traffic accident that had an impact on the cervical area.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
CSEU La Salle
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28023
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation Training on Pain Perception in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs