search
Back to results

A Targeted and Tailored Pharmacist Intervention to Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Drugs Among Diabetes Patients

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension, Medication Nonadherence

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Indonesia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Reminders, habit-based strategies and/or involvement of family member
Counselling to increase knowledge
Counselling to increase motivation
Explore/address other drug related problems
Usual care based on the Indonesian guideline
Sponsored by
University of Groningen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 focused on measuring Medication non-adherence, Type 2 diabetes, Antihypertensive agents

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years old.
  • Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least one year based on patient's medical record.
  • Using at least one antihypertensive drug in the last three months.
  • Provision of signed informed consent.
  • Have sub-optimal medication adherence to antihypertensive drugs according to the MARS (<20).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe mental or physical constraints.
  • Pregnancy or in the lactation period.
  • Illiterate in Indonesian language.
  • Enrollment in another intervention study.
  • Those not responsible for taking their own medication

Sites / Locations

  • Community Health Centers

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Intervention

Control group

Arm Description

A targeted and tailored pharmacist intervention at baseline and at 1-month follow-up.

Usual care based on the Indonesian guideline at baseline and 1-month follow-up.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Medication adherence
The differences in change in total score of medication adherence using Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS). The Indonesian version of the MARS showed to be valid (correlation value of each question to the total score > 0.396) and reliable (Cronbach α coefficient of 0.803). Patients will indicate how often each statement applied to them on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from always (score 1) to never (score 5). Items are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 5 to 25.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Blood pressure level
Within and between patient changes in blood pressure (BP) level (systolic blood pressure [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up. BP measurements will be performed by a nurse who is blinded to the group assignment.
Medication beliefs
Within patient changes on beliefs about medication will be assessed using the BMQ-specific at baseline and 3-month follow-up. The BMQ-specific contains 5 items about necessity beliefs (e.g. "My health at present depends on my blood pressure-lowering medicines"), and 5 items about concern beliefs (e.g. "I sometimes worry about becoming too dependent on my blood pressure-lowering medicines"). All items have a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree with an overall range from 5 (low necessity, low concern) to 25 (high necessity, high concern). A necessity-concern differential score will be calculated by subtracting the scores of the concerns scale from the necessity scale (range -20 to 20). A positive differential score indicates stronger beliefs in the necessity, while a negative score indicates stronger concerns.
Reach
Reach will be assessed by measuring the participation rates and representativeness of patients who participate in this study. In case a patient refuses or discontinues to participate in this study, patient's age, gender, and BP lowering drugs the patient uses will be recorded by research assistants. This information is used to calculate the participation rate and assess differences between responders and non-responders. To determine representativeness, patient's demographics will be compared to census demographics in Bandung City, Indonesia.
Pharmacists' adoption of the intervention
Pharmacists' adoption with various parts of the intervention will be assessed by focus group discussion (FGD). Example of questions: What do you think of the program in general?(Regarding number of sessions, time between sessions, duration of sessions) Tell me about positive experiences you have had with the program. Do others agree? Do others have different experiences? Tell me about negative experiences you have had with the program. Do others agree? Do others have different experiences?
Patients' adoption of the intervention
Patients' adoption with various parts of the intervention will be assessed by a questionnaire (e.g How satisfied are you with the information provided by the pharmacist regarding your antihypertensive drugs during the past three months?)
Pharmacists' suggestions for future implementation
Pharmacists' suggestions for future implementation of the intervention will be assessed by FGD with following questions: Suppose that you were in charge, do you think this program could be implemented in your CHC? Please explain why or why not. What do others think? What do you see as barriers? What would help to support the implementation?
Patients' suggestions for future implementation
Patients' suggestions for future implementation of the intervention will be assessed by a questionnaire (e.g How could we improve the program?)
Pharmacists' willingness to maintain the intervention
Pharmacists' willingness to continue the intervention as part of routine clinical practice over the long term will be assessed by FGD with the following questions: Suppose that this program is implemented, do you think this program will sustain in your CHC? - Please explain why or why not. What do others think? What do you see as barriers? What would help to sustain this program?
Patients' willingness to maintain the intervention
Patients' willingness to continue the intervention as part of routine clinical practice over the long term will be assessed by a questionnaire (e.g Suppose that this program will be implemented in the future, how often would you like to receive it?)

Full Information

First Posted
June 26, 2019
Last Updated
March 23, 2020
Sponsor
University of Groningen
Collaborators
Universitas Padjadjaran
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04023734
Brief Title
A Targeted and Tailored Pharmacist Intervention to Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Drugs Among Diabetes Patients
Official Title
A Targeted and Tailored Pharmacist Intervention to Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Drugs Among Patients With Diabetes in Indonesia: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 16, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Groningen
Collaborators
Universitas Padjadjaran

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to assess the effect of a targeted and tailored pharmacist intervention on medication adherence among diabetes patients non-adherent to antihypertensive drugs. The secondary objectives are to assess the effect of the intervention on blood pressure level and medication beliefs, and to evaluate the implementation and adoption of the intervention for pharmacists and patients.
Detailed Description
Adherence to chronic medication is often suboptimal. However, existing interventions to improve adherence are either too complex or expensive for implementation and scale-up in low-middle income countries and/or not particularly effective. A cluster randomized controlled trial with 3-months follow-up will be conducted in 10 Community Health Centers (CHCs) in Indonesia. Patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and reported non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs according to the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) are eligible to participate. Patients in the five CHCs randomized to the intervention group will receive a targeted and tailored pharmacist intervention at baseline (first session) and at 1-month follow-up (second session). The intervention will be low-cost, align with the current CHC workflow and will not require a substantial change to the current system. Before dispensing antihypertensive drugs during the first session, the pharmacist will discuss patient-specific barrier(s) for medication adherence based on their responses on MARS and three additional questions, which are derived from the Brief Medication Questionnaires. The intervention strategies will then be tailored to their identified adherence problems. Based on current literature, the investigators defined four non-adherence problems that can be addressed by the community pharmacist, i.e. (1) forgetfulness, (2) lack of knowledge, (3) lack of motivation or (4) other drug-related problems. Of note, patients might need a combined intervention strategy to address all experienced problems. The four non-adherence problems and recommended intervention strategies are specified below: Strategies to cope with forgetfulness include reminders, habit-based strategies and/or involvement of family members. The content of the counselling to cope with lack of knowledge will focus on educating patients about about the purpose of the medication, when and how to take the medication, the need for long-term use, the importance of medication adherence, and how to deal with possible side effects. To explore which education is needed, the patient will be asked whether they know why and how to take their medication. The teach-back method will be used, where the patient is asked to explain the pharmacist what he/she has understood after receiving the education. The content of the counselling to cope with lack of motivation will focus on exploring and discussing the patients' concerns and necessity beliefs (motivational interviewing). The content of the counselling to address other drug related problems will focus on exploring other problems underlying the non-adherence, for example experiencing side effects, costs, polypharmacy, difficulty to refill antihypertensive drugs in time, or medication intake problems, and offering solutions/alternatives when possible. The follow-up session will be conducted in one month after the baseline session, when patients refill their medication at the next regular outpatient visit. The purpose of the follow-up session is (1) to evaluate the short-term effect of the intervention and discuss the patients' implementation of and experiences with the offered information and recommendations, and (2) to address non-adherence problems that were not yet addressed during the first session. Where needed, the pharmacist, together with patient, can make changes to the coping plan and discuss additional interventions. As the quality of the intervention will depend on the competences and skills of the pharmacist, treatment integrity will be enhanced by an obligatory communication training focusing on motivational interviewing and the teach-back method, and by providing supportive material as part of the intervention. Patients in five CHCs randomized to the control group will receive pharmacist counselling based on the Indonesian guideline of pharmacy practice. At each visit, they can receive information about the quantity and dose of the dispensed drugs, when and how to use and store the drugs, side effects and how to deal with them, the importance of medication adherence, and confirming if the patient understands how to take medications correctly. Patients in the control group will complete all assessments at the same time points as those in the intervention group The primary study outcome is the difference between intervention and control group in change in total adherence scores using the MARS between baseline and 3 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes are blood pressure (BP), medication beliefs using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ)-specific, and evaluate the intervention using the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Hypertension, Medication Nonadherence
Keywords
Medication non-adherence, Type 2 diabetes, Antihypertensive agents

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
113 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A targeted and tailored pharmacist intervention at baseline and at 1-month follow-up.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Usual care based on the Indonesian guideline at baseline and 1-month follow-up.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Reminders, habit-based strategies and/or involvement of family member
Intervention Description
Strategies to cope with forgetfulness include reminders, habit-based strategies and/or involvement of family members. The use of a reminder tool and pill boxes will be encouraged and a reminder app can be implemented if patients own a mobile phone. The habit-based strategy will be delivered through a printed worksheet which is tailored to patient's daily routine. Patients will be asked to identify the appropriate place and time to take their medication, and an action they conduct every day that could serve as a prompt or cue to take their medication. Patients will be asked to write coping plans to formulate their own "if-then" plans for all daily doses of their antihypertensive drug(s). Moreover, patients will be asked to choose a family member to become their treatment supporter. This individual will be asked to support patients to take the antihypertensive drugs. Pharmacists will remind patients to take his/her completed worksheet to the next visit.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Counselling to increase knowledge
Intervention Description
The content of the counselling to cope with lack of knowledge will focus on educating patients about the purpose of the medication, when and how to take the medication, the need for long-term use, the importance of medication adherence, and how to deal with possible side effects. To explore which education is needed, the patient will be asked whether they know why and how to take their medication. The teach-back method will be used, where the patient is asked to explain the pharmacist what he/she has understood after receiving the education.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Counselling to increase motivation
Intervention Description
The content of the counselling to cope with lack of motivation will focus on exploring and discussing their concerns and necessity beliefs. This method is called motivational interviewing. This is done by asking a first question about whether the medication bothers the patient. Follow-up on this question can focus on any concerns or low necessity beliefs (e.g., when patients are bothered by the medication because they think the medication is not needed or are afraid of side-effects).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Explore/address other drug related problems
Intervention Description
The content of the counselling to address other drug related problems will focus on exploring these other problems underlying the non-adherence, for example experiencing side effects, costs, polypharmacy, difficulty to refill antihypertensive drugs in time, or medication intake problems, and offering solutions/alternatives when possible.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Usual care based on the Indonesian guideline
Intervention Description
Patients in five CHCs randomized to the control group will receive pharmacist counselling based on the Indonesian guideline of pharmacy practice. At each visit, they will receive information about the quantity and dose of the dispensed drugs, when and how to use and store the drugs, side effects and how to deal with them, the importance of medication adherence, and confirming if the patient understands how to take medications correctly.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Medication adherence
Description
The differences in change in total score of medication adherence using Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS). The Indonesian version of the MARS showed to be valid (correlation value of each question to the total score > 0.396) and reliable (Cronbach α coefficient of 0.803). Patients will indicate how often each statement applied to them on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from always (score 1) to never (score 5). Items are summed to obtain a total score ranging from 5 to 25.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Blood pressure level
Description
Within and between patient changes in blood pressure (BP) level (systolic blood pressure [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]) at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up. BP measurements will be performed by a nurse who is blinded to the group assignment.
Time Frame
Baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up
Title
Medication beliefs
Description
Within patient changes on beliefs about medication will be assessed using the BMQ-specific at baseline and 3-month follow-up. The BMQ-specific contains 5 items about necessity beliefs (e.g. "My health at present depends on my blood pressure-lowering medicines"), and 5 items about concern beliefs (e.g. "I sometimes worry about becoming too dependent on my blood pressure-lowering medicines"). All items have a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly disagree to strongly agree with an overall range from 5 (low necessity, low concern) to 25 (high necessity, high concern). A necessity-concern differential score will be calculated by subtracting the scores of the concerns scale from the necessity scale (range -20 to 20). A positive differential score indicates stronger beliefs in the necessity, while a negative score indicates stronger concerns.
Time Frame
Baseline and 3-month follow-up
Title
Reach
Description
Reach will be assessed by measuring the participation rates and representativeness of patients who participate in this study. In case a patient refuses or discontinues to participate in this study, patient's age, gender, and BP lowering drugs the patient uses will be recorded by research assistants. This information is used to calculate the participation rate and assess differences between responders and non-responders. To determine representativeness, patient's demographics will be compared to census demographics in Bandung City, Indonesia.
Time Frame
On completion of the final assessments at 3-month follow-up.
Title
Pharmacists' adoption of the intervention
Description
Pharmacists' adoption with various parts of the intervention will be assessed by focus group discussion (FGD). Example of questions: What do you think of the program in general?(Regarding number of sessions, time between sessions, duration of sessions) Tell me about positive experiences you have had with the program. Do others agree? Do others have different experiences? Tell me about negative experiences you have had with the program. Do others agree? Do others have different experiences?
Time Frame
On completion of the final assessments at 1-month follow-up.
Title
Patients' adoption of the intervention
Description
Patients' adoption with various parts of the intervention will be assessed by a questionnaire (e.g How satisfied are you with the information provided by the pharmacist regarding your antihypertensive drugs during the past three months?)
Time Frame
On completion of the final assessments at 3-month follow-up.
Title
Pharmacists' suggestions for future implementation
Description
Pharmacists' suggestions for future implementation of the intervention will be assessed by FGD with following questions: Suppose that you were in charge, do you think this program could be implemented in your CHC? Please explain why or why not. What do others think? What do you see as barriers? What would help to support the implementation?
Time Frame
On completion of the final assessments at 1-month follow-up.
Title
Patients' suggestions for future implementation
Description
Patients' suggestions for future implementation of the intervention will be assessed by a questionnaire (e.g How could we improve the program?)
Time Frame
On completion of the final assessments at 3-month follow-up.
Title
Pharmacists' willingness to maintain the intervention
Description
Pharmacists' willingness to continue the intervention as part of routine clinical practice over the long term will be assessed by FGD with the following questions: Suppose that this program is implemented, do you think this program will sustain in your CHC? - Please explain why or why not. What do others think? What do you see as barriers? What would help to sustain this program?
Time Frame
On completion of the final assessments at 1-month follow-up.
Title
Patients' willingness to maintain the intervention
Description
Patients' willingness to continue the intervention as part of routine clinical practice over the long term will be assessed by a questionnaire (e.g Suppose that this program will be implemented in the future, how often would you like to receive it?)
Time Frame
On completion of the final assessments at 3-month follow-up.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: At least 18 years old. Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least one year based on patient's medical record. Using at least one antihypertensive drug in the last three months. Provision of signed informed consent. Have sub-optimal medication adherence to antihypertensive drugs according to the MARS (<20). Exclusion Criteria: Patients with severe mental or physical constraints. Pregnancy or in the lactation period. Illiterate in Indonesian language. Enrollment in another intervention study. Those not responsible for taking their own medication
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sofa D Alfian
Organizational Affiliation
University of Groningen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Community Health Centers
City
Bandung
State/Province
West Java
Country
Indonesia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Other researchers may contact the principal investigator (s.d.alfian@rug.nl)
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25412402
Citation
Nieuwlaat R, Wilczynski N, Navarro T, Hobson N, Jeffery R, Keepanasseril A, Agoritsas T, Mistry N, Iorio A, Jack S, Sivaramalingam B, Iserman E, Mustafa RA, Jedraszewski D, Cotoi C, Haynes RB. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;2014(11):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30561486
Citation
Kini V, Ho PM. Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence: A Review. JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2461-2473. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19271.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22618980
Citation
Cutrona SL, Choudhry NK, Fischer MA, Servi AD, Stedman M, Liberman JN, Brennan TA, Shrank WH. Targeting cardiovascular medication adherence interventions. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2012 May-Jun;52(3):381-97. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2012.10211.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25062071
Citation
van Boven JF, Stuurman-Bieze AG, Hiddink EG, Postma MJ, Vegter S. Medication monitoring and optimization: a targeted pharmacist program for effective and cost-effective improvement of chronic therapy adherence. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2014 Aug;20(8):786-92. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2014.20.8.786.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12136497
Citation
Wroe AL. Intentional and unintentional nonadherence: a study of decision making. J Behav Med. 2002 Aug;25(4):355-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1015866415552.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18157998
Citation
Clifford S, Barber N, Horne R. Understanding different beliefs held by adherers, unintentional nonadherers, and intentional nonadherers: application of the Necessity-Concerns Framework. J Psychosom Res. 2008 Jan;64(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.05.004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31911526
Citation
Alfian SD, Abdulah R, Denig P, van Boven JFM, Hak E. Targeted and tailored pharmacist-led intervention to improve adherence to antihypertensive drugs among patients with type 2 diabetes in Indonesia: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 6;10(1):e034507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034507.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Targeted and Tailored Pharmacist Intervention to Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Drugs Among Diabetes Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs