search
Back to results

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease, Brain Stimulation, Cerebellum

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcranial direct current stimulation at 2 mA
Transcranial direct current stimulation at 4 mA
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation
Sponsored by
Thorsten Rudroff
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring transcranial direct current stimulation, walking, balance

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Adult (50-90 yrs) with a positive diagnosis of Parkinson's disease from a movement disorder specialist
  • 2) an unchanged regimen of dopaminergic medication for at least the last 3 months
  • 3) able to independently walk for 6 min
  • 4) without other chronic psychiatric or medical conditions
  • 5) not taking any psychoactive medications

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1) pregnant
  • 2) known holes or fissures in the skull
  • 3) metallic objects or implanted devices in the skull (e.g., metal plate, deep brain stimulator)
  • 4) current or previous injuries or surgeries that cause unusual gait
  • 5) score less than 24 or 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment or telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment, respectively
  • 6) experience freezing of gait
  • 7) a diagnosis of dementia or other neurodegenerative diseases

Sites / Locations

  • University of Iowa

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Sham and Experimental Sessions

Arm Description

50% of participants will have a unilateral cerebellar montage with the anode (active electrode) three cm lateral to the inion on the side ipsilateral to the more PD-affected side and the cathode (return electrode) on the ipsilateral cheek. 50% of participants will have a bilateral cerebellar tDCS will have both electrodes placed 3 cm to either side of the inion, with the anode assigned to the most PD-affected side and the cathode assigned to the less PD-affected side. Stimulation is turned (2 mA) on for the 30 seconds at the beginning and the end of the trial, but it turned to 0 mA in the intervening time. A unilateral cerebellar montage will be applied. tDCS intensity will be 2 mA. Bilateral cerebellar tDCS will be applied. tDCS intensity will be 2 mA. A unilateral cerebellar montage will be applied. tDCS intensity will be 4 mA. Bilateral cerebellar tDCS will be applied. tDCS intensity will be 4 mA.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Speed Walked During 30 Meter Walk Test
Walk as fast and as safe as possible over 30 meter
Time to Complete the Timed Up and Go Test
From a seated position, stand up, walk 5 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit back down in the chair.
Movement of the Center of Pressure (2D; Forward-backward, Left-right) While Standing on a Firm Surface (Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Stand as still as possible on a firm surface for 1 minute with the eyes open. Calculate the area of an ellipse that contains 95% of the 2D trace of the center of pressure movement.
Movement of the Center of Pressure (2D; Forward-backward, Left-right) While Standing on a Foam Surface (6 cm Foam Pad Placed on Top of Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Stand as still as possible on a foam surface for 1 minute with the eyes open. Calculate the area of an ellipse that contains 95% of the 2D trace of the center of pressure movement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Movement of the Center of Pressure (1D; Forward-backward) While Standing on a Firm Surface (Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Stand as still as possible on a firm surface for 1 minute with the eyes open.
Movement of the Center of Pressure (1D; Left-Right) While Standing on a Firm Surface (Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Stand as still as possible on a firm surface for 1 minute with the eyes open.
Movement of the Center of Pressure (1D; Forward-backward) While Standing on a Foam Surface (6 cm Foam Pad Placed on Top of Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Stand as still as possible on a foam surface for 1 minute with the eyes open.
Movement of the Center of Pressure (1D; Left-Right) While Standing on a Foam Surface (6 cm Foam Pad Placed on Top of Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Stand as still as possible on a foam surface for 1 minute with the eyes open.

Full Information

First Posted
August 2, 2019
Last Updated
October 16, 2022
Sponsor
Thorsten Rudroff
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04046055
Brief Title
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease
Official Title
Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 1, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Thorsten Rudroff

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and affects approximately 1 million people in the United States with total annual costs approaching 11 billion dollars. The most common symptoms of PD are tremor, stiffness, slowness, and trouble with balance/walking, which lead to severe impairments in performing activities of daily living. Current medical and surgical treatments for PD are either only mildly effective, expensive, or associated with a variety of side-effects. Therefore, the development of practical and effective add-ons to current therapeutic treatment approaches would have many benefits. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can affect brain activity and can help make long-term brain changes to improve functions like walking and balance. While a few initial research studies and review articles involving tDCS have concluded that tDCS may improve PD walking and balance, many results are not meaningful in real life and several crucial issues still prevent tDCS from being a useful add-on intervention in PD. These include the selection of stimulation sites (brain regions stimulated) and tDCS electrode placement. Most studies have targeted the motor cortex (brain region that controls intentional movement), but there is evidence that the cerebellum - which helps control gait and balance, is connected to several other brain areas, and is easily stimulated with tDCS - may be a likely location to further optimize walking and balance in PD. There is also evidence that certain electrodes placements may be better than others. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the effects of cerebellar tDCS stimulation using two different placement strategies on walking and balance in PD. Additionally, although many tDCS devices are capable of a range of stimulation intensities (for example, 0 mA - 5 mA), the intensities currently used in most tDCS research are less than 2 mA, which is sufficient to produce measurable improvements; but, these improvements may be expanded at higher intensities. In the beginning, when the safety of tDCS was still being established for human subjects, careful and moderate stimulation approaches were warranted. However, recent work using stimulation at higher intensities (for example, up to 4 mA) have been performed in different people and were found to have no additional negative side-effects. Now that the safety of tDCS at higher intensities is better established, studies exploring the differences in performance between moderate (i.e., 2 mA) and higher (i.e., 4 mA) intensities are necessary to determine if increasing the intensity increases the effectiveness of the desired outcome. Prospective participants will include 10 people with mild-moderate PD that will be recruited to complete five randomly-ordered stimulation sessions, separated by at least 5 days each. Each session will involve one visit to the Integrative Neurophysiology Laboratory (INPL) and will last for approximately one hour. Data collection is expected to take 4-6 months. Each session will include walking and balance testing performed while wearing the tDCS device. Total tDCS stimulation time for each session will be 25 minutes.
Detailed Description
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder and affects approximately 1 million people in the United States with total annual costs approaching 11 billion dollars. The most common symptoms of PD are tremor, stiffness, slowness, and trouble with balance/walking, which lead to severe impairments in performing activities of daily living. Current medical and surgical treatments for PD are either only mildly effective, expensive, or associated with a variety of side-effects. Therefore, the development of practical and effective add-ons to current therapeutic treatment approaches would have many benefits. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can affect brain activity and can help make long-term brain changes to improve functions like walking and balance. While a few initial research studies and review articles involving tDCS have concluded that tDCS may improve PD walking and balance, many results are not meaningful in real life and several crucial issues still prevent tDCS from being a useful add-on intervention in PD. These include the selection of stimulation sites (brain regions stimulated) and tDCS electrode placement. Most studies have targeted the motor cortex (brain region that controls intentional movement), but there is evidence that the cerebellum - which helps control gait and balance, is connected to several other brain areas, and is easily stimulated with tDCS - may be a likely location to further optimize walking and balance in PD. There is also evidence that certain electrodes placements may be better than others. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine the effects of cerebellar tDCS stimulation using two different placement strategies on walking and balance in PD. Additionally, although many tDCS devices are capable of a range of stimulation intensities (for example, 0 mA - 5 mA), the intensities currently used in most tDCS research are less than 2 mA, which is sufficient to produce measurable improvements; but, these improvements may be expanded at higher intensities. In the beginning, when the safety of tDCS was still being established for human subjects, careful and moderate stimulation approaches were warranted. However, recent work using stimulation at higher intensities (for example, up to 4 mA) have been performed in different people and were found to have no additional negative side-effects. Now that the safety of tDCS at higher intensities is better established, studies exploring the differences in performance between moderate (i.e., 2 mA) and higher (i.e., 4 mA) intensities are necessary to determine if increasing the intensity increases the effectiveness of the desired outcome. Prospective participants will include 10 people with mild-moderate PD that will be recruited to complete five randomly-ordered stimulation sessions (baseline/SHAM, unilateral tDCS montage at 2 mA, unilateral tDCS montage at 4 mA, bilateral tDCS montage at 2 mA, and bilateral montage at 4 mA), separated by at least 5 days. Each session will involve one visit to the Integrative Neurophysiology Laboratory (INPL) and will last for approximately one hour. Data collection is expected to take 4-6 months. Each session will include gait (30-meter walk test [30mWT], 6-minute walk test [6MWT], Timed Up and Go [TUG]) and balance testing (standing on a force platform with either a firm surface or a foam surface) performed in conjunction with one of the five randomly-ordered stimulation conditions (SHAM, unilateral 2 mA, unilateral 4 mA, bilateral 2 mA, and bilateral 4 mA). Total tDCS stimulation time for each session will be 25 minutes. Gait characteristics (i.e., gait speed, stride length, step length, toe-off angle, etc.) and distance walked during the 30mWT and 6MWT will also be determined with inertial sensors (OPAL motion sensors).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease, Brain Stimulation, Cerebellum
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, walking, balance

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Model Description
All participants completed all 5 randomly ordered tDCS sessions (sham, unilateral 2 mA, unilateral4 mA, bilateral 2 mA, and bilateral 4 mA.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Participants will be blind to the different stimulation intensities (sham, 2 mA, 4 mA)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
7 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sham and Experimental Sessions
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
50% of participants will have a unilateral cerebellar montage with the anode (active electrode) three cm lateral to the inion on the side ipsilateral to the more PD-affected side and the cathode (return electrode) on the ipsilateral cheek. 50% of participants will have a bilateral cerebellar tDCS will have both electrodes placed 3 cm to either side of the inion, with the anode assigned to the most PD-affected side and the cathode assigned to the less PD-affected side. Stimulation is turned (2 mA) on for the 30 seconds at the beginning and the end of the trial, but it turned to 0 mA in the intervening time. A unilateral cerebellar montage will be applied. tDCS intensity will be 2 mA. Bilateral cerebellar tDCS will be applied. tDCS intensity will be 2 mA. A unilateral cerebellar montage will be applied. tDCS intensity will be 4 mA. Bilateral cerebellar tDCS will be applied. tDCS intensity will be 4 mA.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial direct current stimulation at 2 mA
Other Intervention Name(s)
tDCS
Intervention Description
Uses weak electrical current (2 mA intensity) to either increase or decrease brain excitability and improve functional or cognitive outcomes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial direct current stimulation at 4 mA
Other Intervention Name(s)
tDCS
Intervention Description
Uses weak electrical current (4 mA intensity) to either increase or decrease brain excitability and improve functional or cognitive outcomes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham transcranial direct current stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sham tDCS
Intervention Description
Uses weak electrical current (2 mA intensity) at the beginning and the end of a given stimulation period to control for potential placebo-like effects or participant expectation bias.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Speed Walked During 30 Meter Walk Test
Description
Walk as fast and as safe as possible over 30 meter
Time Frame
10 minutes
Title
Time to Complete the Timed Up and Go Test
Description
From a seated position, stand up, walk 5 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit back down in the chair.
Time Frame
10 minutes
Title
Movement of the Center of Pressure (2D; Forward-backward, Left-right) While Standing on a Firm Surface (Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Description
Stand as still as possible on a firm surface for 1 minute with the eyes open. Calculate the area of an ellipse that contains 95% of the 2D trace of the center of pressure movement.
Time Frame
1 minute
Title
Movement of the Center of Pressure (2D; Forward-backward, Left-right) While Standing on a Foam Surface (6 cm Foam Pad Placed on Top of Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Description
Stand as still as possible on a foam surface for 1 minute with the eyes open. Calculate the area of an ellipse that contains 95% of the 2D trace of the center of pressure movement.
Time Frame
1 minute
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Movement of the Center of Pressure (1D; Forward-backward) While Standing on a Firm Surface (Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Description
Stand as still as possible on a firm surface for 1 minute with the eyes open.
Time Frame
1 minute
Title
Movement of the Center of Pressure (1D; Left-Right) While Standing on a Firm Surface (Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Description
Stand as still as possible on a firm surface for 1 minute with the eyes open.
Time Frame
1 minute
Title
Movement of the Center of Pressure (1D; Forward-backward) While Standing on a Foam Surface (6 cm Foam Pad Placed on Top of Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Description
Stand as still as possible on a foam surface for 1 minute with the eyes open.
Time Frame
1 minute
Title
Movement of the Center of Pressure (1D; Left-Right) While Standing on a Foam Surface (6 cm Foam Pad Placed on Top of Force Platform) for 1 Minute
Description
Stand as still as possible on a foam surface for 1 minute with the eyes open.
Time Frame
1 minute

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1) Adult (50-90 yrs) with a positive diagnosis of Parkinson's disease from a movement disorder specialist 2) an unchanged regimen of dopaminergic medication for at least the last 3 months 3) able to independently walk for 6 min 4) without other chronic psychiatric or medical conditions 5) not taking any psychoactive medications Exclusion Criteria: 1) pregnant 2) known holes or fissures in the skull 3) metallic objects or implanted devices in the skull (e.g., metal plate, deep brain stimulator) 4) current or previous injuries or surgeries that cause unusual gait 5) score less than 24 or 17 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment or telephone-Montreal Cognitive Assessment, respectively 6) experience freezing of gait 7) a diagnosis of dementia or other neurodegenerative diseases
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thorsten Rudroff, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Iowa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs