Us vs Fluoroscopic Guided Renal Access (Puncture)
Primary Purpose
Hydronephrosis
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Renal puncture
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hydronephrosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- infected hydronephrotic kidney onen's grade 2-3
- obstructed good cortex with backpressure changes onen's grade 2-3 .
- Evaluation of function of asymptomatic hydronephrotic kidney thin cortex onen's grade 4
Exclusion Criteria:
- congenital anomalies of kidney
- patient underwent transplant or urinary diversion
- solitary kidney
Sites / Locations
- Mostafs Kamel Abdel RahmanRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Ultrasonographic guided renal access
Fluoroscopic guided renal access
Arm Description
The use of ultrasound to make a puncture in kidney for pcn for drainage or evaluation of function or for shunt of urine
The use of fluoroscopy to make a puncture in kidney for pcn for drainage or evaluation of function or for shunt of urine
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Duration of puncture
The time taken for make a puncture
duration of operation
time taken from patient putted on table until end of operation
Rate of success
the rate success of intervention by u/s or by fluoroscopy
Secondary Outcome Measures
rate of Perioperative complication
numbers of patients with Adverse effects occures intra operative ,bleeding ,extravasation
Haemoglobin concentration change
Compare preoperative and post operative Hg concentration
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04090255
Brief Title
Us vs Fluoroscopic Guided Renal Access
Acronym
Puncture
Official Title
Ultrasonography Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Renal Access
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 10, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Assiut University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
this present study is to compare the result of fluoroscopy, ultrasonography (US) in the guidance of percutaneous nephrostomy pcn .
Detailed Description
investigators will enroll 100 patients who are candidates for PCN in the study. By simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to two patient groups (group 1, US-guided approach , group 2, fluoroscopy-guided approach.The end point of the study is the comparison of outcome of procedure including stone free rate, transfusion rate, operation time, access time, length of stay and complications.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hydronephrosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Ultrasonographic guided renal access
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The use of ultrasound to make a puncture in kidney for pcn for drainage or evaluation of function or for shunt of urine
Arm Title
Fluoroscopic guided renal access
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The use of fluoroscopy to make a puncture in kidney for pcn for drainage or evaluation of function or for shunt of urine
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Renal puncture
Intervention Description
The use of a needle for entering pelvicalyceal system of the kidney and put a guide wire for further pcn
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of puncture
Description
The time taken for make a puncture
Time Frame
Within the operation
Title
duration of operation
Description
time taken from patient putted on table until end of operation
Time Frame
withen the operation
Title
Rate of success
Description
the rate success of intervention by u/s or by fluoroscopy
Time Frame
withen the operation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
rate of Perioperative complication
Description
numbers of patients with Adverse effects occures intra operative ,bleeding ,extravasation
Time Frame
withen the operation
Title
Haemoglobin concentration change
Description
Compare preoperative and post operative Hg concentration
Time Frame
24 hours post procedure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
infected hydronephrotic kidney onen's grade 2-3
obstructed good cortex with backpressure changes onen's grade 2-3 .
Evaluation of function of asymptomatic hydronephrotic kidney thin cortex onen's grade 4
Exclusion Criteria:
congenital anomalies of kidney
patient underwent transplant or urinary diversion
solitary kidney
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mostafa K Abdel rahman, A lecturer
Phone
+201061133200
Email
Mostafa075@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fathy G Elanany, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Assiut
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohamed A Sayed, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Assiut
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hosney M Bahnasawy, Ass Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Assiut
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mostafs Kamel Abdel Rahman
City
Assiut
State/Province
Sedfa
ZIP/Postal Code
11775
Country
Egypt
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
mostafa k abdel rahman, resident
Phone
+201061133200
Email
mostafa075@gmail.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31484611
Citation
Chen X, Peng PX, He YH, Ding ZS, Wang JF, Tan YW, Zhou XF. [Evaluation and Comparison of SHA.LIN,S.T.O.N.E.Nephrolithometry Scoring System,and Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Nephrolithometry Nomogram for Predicting Stone Free Rate and Postoperative Outcomes after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy]. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2019 Aug 30;41(4):492-500. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.10767. Chinese.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28221157
Citation
Zanetti SP, Boeri L, Gallioli A, Talso M, Montanari E. Minimally invasive PCNL-MIP. Arch Esp Urol. 2017 Jan;70(1):226-234.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29477809
Citation
Gulati M, Cheng J, Loo JT, Skalski M, Malhi H, Duddalwar V. Pictorial review: Renal ultrasound. Clin Imaging. 2018 Sep-Oct;51:133-154. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21740734
Citation
Qiu Z, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Sun YC. Modified biological training model for percutaneous renal surgery with ultrasound and fluroscopy guidance. Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 May;124(9):1286-9.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Us vs Fluoroscopic Guided Renal Access
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs