search
Back to results

Evaluating the Performance of Precision1 Daily Disposable Contact Lens in a Group of Heavy Digital Device Users (PUG)

Primary Purpose

Myopia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Verofilcon A contact lenses
Sponsored by
University of Waterloo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myopia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 40 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive) and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
  2. Has read and signed an information consent letter;
  3. Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
  4. Is a heavy digital device user (at least 6 hours on a typical day using any combination of digital devices such as PC, laptop, smartphone, or tablet);
  5. Is a habitual wearer of daily, spherical, soft contact lenses (no bifocal or multifocal contact lenses, no extended wear or monovision, not a current wearer of Precision1 lenses) for at least 5 days/week and at least 10 hours/day during the month prior to enrollment;
  6. Has a vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction that ranges between -0.50D to -6.00D in each eye;
  7. Has a vertex corrected refractive cylinder of no more than -1.00D cylindrical correction in each eye after vertexing to the corneal plane;
  8. Demonstrates an acceptable fit and achieves best corrected visual acuity of at least 0.20 log MAR in each eye with Precision1 contact lenses;
  9. Is willing to wear Precision1 CLs at least 5 days per week and 10 hours per day throughout the study;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
  2. Has any known active* ocular disease and/or infection;
  3. Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
  4. Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable;
  5. Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study;
  6. Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment;
  7. Is aphakic;
  8. Has undergone refractive error surgery;

    • For the purposes of this study, active ocular disease is defined as infection or inflammation which requires therapeutic treatment. Mild (i.e. not considered clinically relevant) lid abnormalities (blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, papillae), corneal and conjunctival staining and dry eye are not considered active ocular disease. Neovascularization and corneal scars are the result of previous hypoxia, infection or inflammation and are therefore not active.

Sites / Locations

  • Centre for Ocular Research & Education

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Refit

Arm Description

Refit and dispense patient with Verofilcon A contact lenses and evaluate lens performance.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their dryness after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their clarity of vision after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their dryness after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their clarity of vision after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their dryness after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their clarity of vision after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their dryness after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their clarity of vision after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their comfort after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their dryness after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their vision clarity after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their comfort after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their dryness after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their vision clarity after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their comfort after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their dryness after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their vision clarity after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their comfort after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their dryness after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Participants rate their vision clarity after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day comfort on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day dryness on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day vision clarity on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day comfort on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day dryness on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day rating of vision clarity on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day comfort on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day dryness on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day vision clarity on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Comfort at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day comfort on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Dryness at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day dryness on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Participants rate their end of day rating of vision clarity on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
December 13, 2019
Last Updated
January 9, 2023
Sponsor
University of Waterloo
Collaborators
Alcon Research
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04201639
Brief Title
Evaluating the Performance of Precision1 Daily Disposable Contact Lens in a Group of Heavy Digital Device Users
Acronym
PUG
Official Title
Evaluating the Performance of Precision1 Daily Disposable Contact Lens in a Group of Heavy Digital Device Users
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 13, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 27, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 27, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Waterloo
Collaborators
Alcon Research

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of Precision1 DD CLs with regard to subjective symptoms (dryness, comfort, vision), lens fit and time to haze in CL wearers who identify themselves as heavy digital devices users (at least 6 hours of digital device use per day).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myopia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
32 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Refit
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Refit and dispense patient with Verofilcon A contact lenses and evaluate lens performance.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Verofilcon A contact lenses
Other Intervention Name(s)
Precision1™
Intervention Description
Daily disposable silicone hydrogel contact lenses indicated for the optical correction of refractive ametropia (myopia and hyperopia)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Dispense Visit (Day 0)
Title
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their dryness after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Dispense Visit (Day 0)
Title
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their clarity of vision after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Dispense Visit (Day 0)
Title
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their dryness after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their clarity of vision after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their dryness after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their clarity of vision after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their dryness after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their clarity of vision after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Comfort After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)
Title
Subjective Dryness After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)
Title
Subjective Rating of Clarity of Vision After Contact Lens Insertion
Description
Participants rate their comfort after insertion on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)
Title
Subjective Comfort With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their comfort after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Dryness With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their dryness after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their vision clarity after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Comfort With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their comfort after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Dryness With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their dryness after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their vision clarity after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Comfort With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their comfort after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Dryness With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their dryness after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their vision clarity after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Comfort With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their comfort after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)
Title
Subjective Dryness With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their dryness after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)
Title
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity With Contact Lens Wear After 6 Hours of Digital Device Use
Description
Participants rate their vision clarity after 6 hours of digital device use on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)
Title
Subjective Comfort at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day comfort on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Dryness at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day dryness on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day vision clarity on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 1
Title
Subjective Comfort at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day comfort on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Dryness at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day dryness on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day rating of vision clarity on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 7
Title
Subjective Comfort at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day comfort on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Dryness at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day dryness on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day vision clarity on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Day 10
Title
Subjective Comfort at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day comfort on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)
Title
Subjective Dryness at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day dryness on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)
Title
Subjective Rating of Vision Clarity at End of Day With Contact Lens Wear
Description
Participants rate their end of day rating of vision clarity on a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
Followup visit (occurring at a single visit any day from Day 12-16)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive) and has full legal capacity to volunteer; Has read and signed an information consent letter; Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; Is a heavy digital device user (at least 6 hours on a typical day using any combination of digital devices such as PC, laptop, smartphone, or tablet); Is a habitual wearer of daily, spherical, soft contact lenses (no bifocal or multifocal contact lenses, no extended wear or monovision, not a current wearer of Precision1 lenses) for at least 5 days/week and at least 10 hours/day during the month prior to enrollment; Has a vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction that ranges between -0.50D to -6.00D in each eye; Has a vertex corrected refractive cylinder of no more than -1.00D cylindrical correction in each eye after vertexing to the corneal plane; Demonstrates an acceptable fit and achieves best corrected visual acuity of at least 0.20 log MAR in each eye with Precision1 contact lenses; Is willing to wear Precision1 CLs at least 5 days per week and 10 hours per day throughout the study; Exclusion Criteria: Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study; Has any known active* ocular disease and/or infection; Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study; Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment; Is aphakic; Has undergone refractive error surgery; For the purposes of this study, active ocular disease is defined as infection or inflammation which requires therapeutic treatment. Mild (i.e. not considered clinically relevant) lid abnormalities (blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, papillae), corneal and conjunctival staining and dry eye are not considered active ocular disease. Neovascularization and corneal scars are the result of previous hypoxia, infection or inflammation and are therefore not active.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lyndon Jones, PhD, FCOptom
Organizational Affiliation
Centre for Ocular Research & Education
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre for Ocular Research & Education
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2L 3G1
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Evaluating the Performance of Precision1 Daily Disposable Contact Lens in a Group of Heavy Digital Device Users

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs