Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair. (QoL-TAPP)
Primary Purpose
Hernia, Inguinal
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hernia, Inguinal focused on measuring Hernia, Inguinal, Pain, Chronic Pain, Quality of Life, Laparoscopic Surgery, Cyanoacrylates, Mesh, Surgical
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- primary inguinal hernia
- unilateral hernia
Exclusion Criteria:
- bilateral hernia
- recurrent hernia
- incarcerated hernia
- large scrotal hernia
- known femoral hernia
- need for associated procedures
- not able to understand the questionaire
- immunosuppression (including corticosteroids, radiotherapy, chemotherapy)
- chronic renal failure (hemodialysis)
- active infection
- pregnancy
- allergy to polypropylene or cyanoacrylate
- patient's refusal and/or absence of informed consent
Sites / Locations
- Hospital ClínicRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Laparoscopic repair
Open repair
Arm Description
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Chronic pain
Pain scores (0-10) using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument (EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire). Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Restrictions of activities
Restrictions of activities because of pain or discomfort at the site of the hernia. Scores (0-10) using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Cosmetic discomfort
Cosmetic discomfort with abdomen shape o site of the hernia . Scores (0-10) using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Duration of surgery
Time from start of incision to skin closure
Rate of postoperative complications
Rate of postoperative complications (i.e., re-admission, urinary retention, symptomatic seroma, surgical-site infection). The severity of complications will be reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
Early recurrences
Clinical recurrence or those confirmed by ultrasound examination
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04211142
First Posted
December 22, 2019
Last Updated
September 27, 2023
Sponsor
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04211142
Brief Title
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair.
Acronym
QoL-TAPP
Official Title
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair. Randomized Study Comparing Laparoscopic TAPP Repair With Open Lichtenstein Repair (QoL-TAPP Study)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 20, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Chronic pain, restriction of activities and esthetical outcome will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, at 1, 4 and 12 months, using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS-QoL score).
Detailed Description
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical operations. Since the introduction of mesh repair, recurrence rates have fallen dramatically and chronic pain, as a side-effect of surgery, is becoming increasingly important.
Chronic pain is defined as pain or discomfort that lasts for more than 3 months after surgery. The reported incidence of chronic pain varies between 0 and 75 per cent after open mesh repair, and between 0 and 29 per cent after laparoscopic repair. Prospective trials suggest that there is less chronic pain after laparoscopic than open repair.
Although pain is an important parameter determining the Quality of Life (QoL) after a hernia operation, other aspects, like restriction of activities and esthetical outcome, are also of importance.
This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia.
Chronic pain, restriction of activities and esthetical outcome will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, at 1, 4 and 12 months, using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS-QoL score). The EuraHS-QoL score is a validated hernia specific questionnaire with 9 questions that can be scored by the patient in an 11-point scale from 0-10. The EuraHS-QoL questions are divided in 3 domains: "Pain" (range 0-30), "Restriction of activities" (range 0-40), and "Esthetical discomfort" (range 0-20). The total score ranges from 0-90, with the lower scores being the most favourable outcome.
The EuraHS-QoL score can be downloaded in several languages from EuraHS web pages ( http://www.eurahs.eu/EuraHS-QoL-download.php). EuraHS QoL score was previously validated and the results have been already reported in Surgery (Muysoms FE., Surgery. 2016 ;160:1344-1357)
Up to 216 patients will need to be enrolled for this study (n=108/group) and each subject will be followed for up to 12 months after the surgical intervention. The sample size was calculated to explore differences in chronic postoperative pain between the groups, accepting an α risk of 0.05 and a statistical power defined as 90 per cent (β risk = 0.1) in a two-sided test.
The study will be carried out at the Hospital Plató in Barcelona (Spain). Hospital Plató is a district general hospital serving an aggregate population of over 150.000. Hospital surgery department undertakes conventional open and laparoscopic treatment for inguinal hernia on a regular basis.
The hernia repair will be performed in all patients of both arms using the same lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene® 60 g/m2 ; B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany): A tailored 7.5 × 15 cm mesh for repairs in the open Lichtenstein arm, and a tailored 15 x 15 cm mesh for all patients in the laparoscopic TAPP arm. To avoid biases, meshes will be fixed in all patients (both groups) by applying liquid drops of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®; B. Braun Surgical, Rubí, Barcelona, Spain).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hernia, Inguinal
Keywords
Hernia, Inguinal, Pain, Chronic Pain, Quality of Life, Laparoscopic Surgery, Cyanoacrylates, Mesh, Surgical
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
216 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Laparoscopic repair
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)
Arm Title
Open repair
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)
Intervention Description
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
Intervention Description
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Chronic pain
Description
Pain scores (0-10) using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument (EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire). Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Restrictions of activities
Description
Restrictions of activities because of pain or discomfort at the site of the hernia. Scores (0-10) using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Cosmetic discomfort
Description
Cosmetic discomfort with abdomen shape o site of the hernia . Scores (0-10) using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Duration of surgery
Description
Time from start of incision to skin closure
Time Frame
Surgery
Title
Rate of postoperative complications
Description
Rate of postoperative complications (i.e., re-admission, urinary retention, symptomatic seroma, surgical-site infection). The severity of complications will be reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Early recurrences
Description
Clinical recurrence or those confirmed by ultrasound examination
Time Frame
1-year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
primary inguinal hernia
unilateral hernia
Exclusion Criteria:
bilateral hernia
recurrent hernia
incarcerated hernia
large scrotal hernia
known femoral hernia
need for associated procedures
not able to understand the questionaire
immunosuppression (including corticosteroids, radiotherapy, chemotherapy)
chronic renal failure (hemodialysis)
active infection
pregnancy
allergy to polypropylene or cyanoacrylate
patient's refusal and/or absence of informed consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Salvador Guillaumes, MD, PhD
Phone
+ 34 687 79 54 58
Email
guillaumes@clinic.cat
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Irene Bachero, MD
Phone
+34 627 31 59 56
Email
ibachero@clinic.cat
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Salvador Guillaumes, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nils Jimmy Hidalgo, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Irene Bachero, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Clínic
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08006
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Irene Bachero, MD
Email
ibachero@clinic.cat
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28218406
Citation
Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Carvajal F, Veres A, Troyano D, Trias M, Martrat A, Ardid J, Obiols J, Lopez-Cano M. Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with glue or sutures for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):688-694. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10488. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27316825
Citation
Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F. A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument. Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1344-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs