search
Back to results

Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin for Vascular Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis

Primary Purpose

Vascular Diseases, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Surgical Site Infection

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound)
Sponsored by
Lawson Health Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Vascular Diseases

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients identified as requiring lower extremity bypass for peripheral arterial disease by their consultant surgeon with high-risk features for vascular surgical site infection including,

  • BMI >30
  • Dialysis dependence
  • Redo surgery
  • Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2)
  • Tissue loss (ischemic ulceration or gangrene of the feet)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient does not provide informed consent for surgery or study
  • Patient received antibiotics for an active infection within 7 days prior to surgery
  • Patient has an allergy to gentamicin or vancomycin
  • Patient has a pre-existing infection of the surgical site

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin

    Control

    Arm Description

    Immediately prior to closure of the incision, 1g of vancomycin will be mixed in 4mL of normal saline and applied as a paste directly to the muscle, fascia and subcutaneous tissue. Gentamicin-eluting collagen sponges will be cut to the appropriate size to cover the defect and applied after application of vancomycin. Following closure, the surgical site will be covered with a sterile dressing and left in place for 48hrs.

    The surgical wound is closed in the standard fashion with 3 layer closure with staples for skin. Following closure, the surgical site will be covered with a sterile dressing and left in place for 48hrs.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of participants with surgical site infection (%)
    Per CDC definition and according to Szilagyi classification

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Length of stay
    In-hospital following initial surgery
    Number of Emergency Department Visits
    Between discharge and first post-operative follow-up appointment
    Number of participants dying of any cause
    Any cause
    Number of participants requiring re-operation
    For graft failure
    Number of participants requiring major lower limb amputation
    Above ankle

    Full Information

    First Posted
    January 22, 2020
    Last Updated
    January 28, 2020
    Sponsor
    Lawson Health Research Institute
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04238923
    Brief Title
    Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin for Vascular Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis
    Official Title
    Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Vascular Surgery
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    May 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    July 1, 2021 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Lawson Health Research Institute

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    Yes
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    Yes
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Many patients who undergo vascular surgery to improve the blood flow to their legs are at risk of developing an infection in the surgical site and are then at risk of serious complications such as hospital readmission, failure of the surgical procedure and lower limb amputation. Surgical site infections may be reduced in high-risk patients by applying two commonly used antibiotics (gentamicin and vancomycin) into the surgical incision at the end of the surgical procedure. This will be compared to the standard of care treatment at London Health Sciences Center.
    Detailed Description
    Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most common complications to develop following peripheral vascular surgery and increase the patient's risk for major amputation, graft failure and increase healthcare resource utilization. SSI are defined by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) as infections occurring within 30-90 days of a surgical procedure, or 1 year if a prosthetic implant was placed, and are divided into superficial, deep and organ space based on depth of microbial invasion. The incidence of SSI in patients undergoing limb saving vascular surgery has consistently been found to exceed the CDC average of 2.1% for other clean surgical procedures, despite the routine use of perioperative antibiotics and aggressive wound care. A recent review of SSI in vascular surgery showed rates as high as 30%, and the investigators' institution has reported a SSI rate of 20%. Coagulase-negative staphylococcus species are the most frequent isolates from SSI following peripheral vascular surgery, with the highly virulent organism, MRSA becoming increasingly prevalent. Gram-negative organisms account for another 20-30% of SSI, with Pseudomonas isolates commonly identified, particularly in the groin. Several procedure- and patient-related factors have emerged as important predictors of SSI following peripheral vascular surgery, among the most important of which are obesity, tissue loss, redo surgery, dialysis dependence and diabetes mellitus. Obesity has been found to double the risk of SSI. Obese patients are shown to have lower tissue concentrations of antibiotics, which would place them at higher risk of developing SSI. Patients with tissue loss secondary to critical limb ischemia also are at increased risk of SSI resulting from bacterial spread from contaminated ulcers and poor vascular supply to the wound. As well, patients undergoing redo surgery face an increased risk of wound and graft infection secondary to the impaired vascular supply and healing potential of scar tissue. Diabetes mellitus and dialysis dependence are also independent risk factors for SSI following infrainguinal bypass due to a multitude of disease factors, especially immunologic dysfunction and impaired blood supply to the healing tissue. Prophylactic intravenous antibiotics are the only intervention thus far consistently found to effectively prevent SSI in patients undergoing vascular surgery, however because of the aforementioned factors such measures are less effective in high-risk patients. Data to support other perioperative practices to prevent wound infections in vascular surgery are sparse. Among other surgical disciplines, topical antibiotics are re-emerging as a valid strategy to prevent SSI based on improved understanding of the mechanisms of drug delivery and identification of high-risk patients. In particular, vancomycin applied directly to surgical wounds has shown promise in preventing SSI. Topical vancomycin is believed to prevent gram-positive SSI, particularly those caused by MRSA, while minimizing adverse events related to systemic exposure to vancomycin such as nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity by virtue of limited absorption from the tissue bed. There is one retrospective study in the vascular surgery literature of 454 patients undergoing aortofemoral or infrainguinal procedures that showed reduction of 30-day SSI rates with use of topical vancomycin compared to controls (25.1 vs. 17.2%, p=0.049). More extensive data regarding the use of topical vancomycin prophylaxis comes from the orthopaedic literature. A recent review of orthopaedic studies, although mostly retrospective, highlighted benefits in spine surgery, total joint arthroplasty, foot and ankle surgery and elbow surgery. Further, 8 spine meta-analyses since 2014 have shown reduction in SSI rates with topical vancomycin administration. Local gentamicin applied to surgical wounds has also been found effective, particularly in the prevention of gram-negative SSI, providing broad gram-negative coverage including Pseudomonas species. One randomized controlled trial assessing the prophylactic use of collagen gentamicin sponge in 40 patients undergoing prosthetic femoropopliteal bypass found significant reduction in groin SSI with use of a collagen gentamicin sponge (Collatamp G). An additional prospective cohort study and case series data also show favorable results in small patient samples of patients An additional prospective cohort study and case series data also show favorable results in small patient samples of patients undergoing various vascular operations. Cardiac surgeons have reported effective use of this antibiotic locally in prevention of sternal wound infections. Notably, a large randomized, double blinded-controlled trial of 1950 patients undergoing cardiac surgery through median sternotomy demonstrated decreased SSI rates at 60 days with the use of gentamicin containing collagen implants compared to controls (4.3 vs. 9.0%, p<0.001). The ability of gentamicin eluting sponges to prevent SSI in sternal wounds was confirmed in a recent meta-analysis. These sponges achieve high local levels of gentamicin for 36 hours with minimal systemic absorption in addition to accelerating hemostasis. Recently, wound closure using topical vancomycin paste and gentamicin irrigation has been shown in a retrospective study to reduce SSI in cardiac surgery sternotomy wounds by almost two thirds. In this trial, an aggressive prophylactic approach using selective administration of topical vancomycin and gentamicin to the surgical wounds of patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization at high-risk for SSI based on an elevated body mass index (BMI) >30, tissue loss, redo surgery, diabetes mellitus or renal failure will be compared to similar patients receiving standard perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and wound care to evaluate the impact on 90-day SSI rates.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Vascular Diseases, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Surgical Site Infection, Bypass Complication

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Phase 2, Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    356 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Immediately prior to closure of the incision, 1g of vancomycin will be mixed in 4mL of normal saline and applied as a paste directly to the muscle, fascia and subcutaneous tissue. Gentamicin-eluting collagen sponges will be cut to the appropriate size to cover the defect and applied after application of vancomycin. Following closure, the surgical site will be covered with a sterile dressing and left in place for 48hrs.
    Arm Title
    Control
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    The surgical wound is closed in the standard fashion with 3 layer closure with staples for skin. Following closure, the surgical site will be covered with a sterile dressing and left in place for 48hrs.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Topical vancomycin paste (1g vancomycin powder + 4mL sterile saline) and Collatamp G gentamicin-eluting sponge (Azralez Pharmaceuticals; 2.0mg gentamicin sulphate/cm2 to cover wound)
    Intervention Description
    Topical vancomycin paste and gentamicin-eluting collagen sponge will be applied directly to the deep layers of the wound following reconstruction, prior to closure.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of participants with surgical site infection (%)
    Description
    Per CDC definition and according to Szilagyi classification
    Time Frame
    90 days
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Length of stay
    Description
    In-hospital following initial surgery
    Time Frame
    Perioperative period
    Title
    Number of Emergency Department Visits
    Description
    Between discharge and first post-operative follow-up appointment
    Time Frame
    90 days
    Title
    Number of participants dying of any cause
    Description
    Any cause
    Time Frame
    90 days
    Title
    Number of participants requiring re-operation
    Description
    For graft failure
    Time Frame
    90 days
    Title
    Number of participants requiring major lower limb amputation
    Description
    Above ankle
    Time Frame
    90 days

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients identified as requiring lower extremity bypass for peripheral arterial disease by their consultant surgeon with high-risk features for vascular surgical site infection including, BMI >30 Dialysis dependence Redo surgery Diabetes mellitus (type 1 or 2) Tissue loss (ischemic ulceration or gangrene of the feet) Exclusion Criteria: Patient does not provide informed consent for surgery or study Patient received antibiotics for an active infection within 7 days prior to surgery Patient has an allergy to gentamicin or vancomycin Patient has a pre-existing infection of the surgical site
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Dominic S LeBlanc, MD
    Phone
    5196858500
    Ext
    13846
    Email
    dominic.leblanc@lhsc.on.ca
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Luc Dubois, MD, MSc
    Organizational Affiliation
    London Health Sciences Centre
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    18154995
    Citation
    Nguyen LL, Brahmanandam S, Bandyk DF, Belkin M, Clowes AW, Moneta GL, Conte MS. Female gender and oral anticoagulants are associated with wound complications in lower extremity vein bypass: an analysis of 1404 operations for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Dec;46(6):1191-1197. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.053.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19619975
    Citation
    Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Pomposelli FB, Wyers MC, Siracuse JJ, Schermerhorn ML. Body mass index: surgical site infections and mortality after lower extremity bypass from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005-2007. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;24(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 19.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21458203
    Citation
    Greenblatt DY, Rajamanickam V, Mell MW. Predictors of surgical site infection after open lower extremity revascularization. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Aug;54(2):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.034. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19954920
    Citation
    Vogel TR, Dombrovskiy VY, Carson JL, Haser PB, Lowry SF, Graham AM. Infectious complications after elective vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jan;51(1):122-9; discussion 129-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    1656747
    Citation
    Culver DH, Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Banerjee SN, Edwards JR, Tolson JS, Henderson TS, et al. Surgical wound infection rates by wound class, operative procedure, and patient risk index. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. Am J Med. 1991 Sep 16;91(3B):152S-157S. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(91)90361-z.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24737857
    Citation
    Turtiainen J, Hakala T. Surgical wound infections after peripheral vascular surgery. Scand J Surg. 2014 Dec;103(4):226-31. doi: 10.1177/1457496913514384. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18774446
    Citation
    Bandyk DF. Vascular surgical site infection: risk factors and preventive measures. Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;21(3):119-23. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2008.05.008.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21422859
    Citation
    Pevzner L, Swank M, Krepel C, Wing DA, Chan K, Edmiston CE Jr. Effects of maternal obesity on tissue concentrations of prophylactic cefazolin during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;117(4):877-882. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820b95e4.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22906362
    Citation
    Ott E, Bange FC, Sohr D, Teebken O, Mattner F. Risk factors associated with surgical site infections following vascular surgery at a German university hospital. Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Jun;141(6):1207-13. doi: 10.1017/S095026881200180X. Epub 2012 Aug 21.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23312940
    Citation
    Siracuse JJ, Nandivada P, Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, Chaikof EL, Pomposelli FB, Schermerhorn ML. Prosthetic graft infections involving the femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.049. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15472606
    Citation
    Virkkunen J, Heikkinen M, Lepantalo M, Metsanoja R, Salenius JP; Finnvasc Study Group. Diabetes as an independent risk factor for early postoperative complications in critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Oct;40(4):761-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.040.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12422107
    Citation
    Ramdev P, Rayan SS, Sheahan M, Hamdan AD, Logerfo FW, Akbari CM, Campbell DR, Pomposelli FB Jr. A decade experience with infrainguinal revascularization in a dialysis-dependent patient population. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Nov;36(5):969-74. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.128297.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25259555
    Citation
    Khan NR, Thompson CJ, DeCuypere M, Angotti JM, Kalobwe E, Muhlbauer MS, Camillo FX, Klimo P Jr. A meta-analysis of spinal surgical site infection and vancomycin powder. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):974-83. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE1445. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23313181
    Citation
    Mohammed S, Pisimisis GT, Daram SP, Bechara CF, Barshes NR, Lin PH, Kougias P. Impact of intraoperative administration of local vancomycin on inguinal wound complications. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):1079-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.073. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28529861
    Citation
    Fleischman AN, Austin MS. Local Intra-wound Administration of Powdered Antibiotics in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Bone Jt Infect. 2017 Jan 1;2(1):23-28. doi: 10.7150/jbji.16649. eCollection 2017.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26424335
    Citation
    Ghobrial GM, Cadotte DW, Williams K Jr, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS. Complications from the use of intrawound vancomycin in lumbar spinal surgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E11. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15258.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24703108
    Citation
    Alcala-Cerra G, Paternina-Caicedo AJ, Moscote-Salazar LR, Gutierrez-Paternina JJ, Nino-Hernandez LM. [Application of vancomycin powder into the wound during spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis]. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2014 May-Jun;58(3):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2013.10.004. Epub 2014 Apr 2. Spanish.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25281550
    Citation
    Xiong L, Pan Q, Jin G, Xu Y, Hirche C. Topical intrawound application of vancomycin powder in addition to intravenous administration of antibiotics: A meta-analysis on the deep infection after spinal surgeries. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014 Nov;100(7):785-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25637469
    Citation
    Kang DG, Holekamp TF, Wagner SC, Lehman RA Jr. Intrasite vancomycin powder for the prevention of surgical site infection in spine surgery: a systematic literature review. Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):762-70. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.01.030. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24373682
    Citation
    Chiang HY, Herwaldt LA, Blevins AE, Cho E, Schweizer ML. Effectiveness of local vancomycin powder to decrease surgical site infections: a meta-analysis. Spine J. 2014 Mar 1;14(3):397-407. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25535069
    Citation
    Bakhsheshian J, Dahdaleh NS, Lam SK, Savage JW, Smith ZA. The use of vancomycin powder in modern spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):816-23. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.033. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24838506
    Citation
    Evaniew N, Khan M, Drew B, Peterson D, Bhandari M, Ghert M. Intrawound vancomycin to prevent infections after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015 Mar;24(3):533-42. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3357-0. Epub 2014 May 18.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22659222
    Citation
    Hussain ST. Local application of gentamicin-containing collagen implant in the prophylaxis and treatment of surgical site infection following vascular surgery. Int J Surg. 2012;10 Suppl 1:S5-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 May 29.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    2929171
    Citation
    Horch R, Kronung G. [Prevention of infection in teflon prostheses for dialysis access. Experiences with a resorbable combined collagen-antibiotic system]. Vasa. 1989;18(1):30-4. German.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    10364947
    Citation
    Holdsworth J. Treatment of infective and potentially infective complications of vascular bypass grafting using gentamicin with collagen sponge. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 May;81(3):166-70.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15620935
    Citation
    Friberg O, Svedjeholm R, Soderquist B, Granfeldt H, Vikerfors T, Kallman J. Local gentamicin reduces sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jan;79(1):153-61; discussion 161-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.043.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25703409
    Citation
    Kowalewski M, Pawliszak W, Zaborowska K, Navarese EP, Szwed KA, Kowalkowska ME, Kowalewski J, Borkowska A, Anisimowicz L. Gentamicin-collagen sponge reduces the risk of sternal wound infections after heart surgery: Meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;149(6):1631-40.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.034. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    14623407
    Citation
    Ruszczak Z, Friess W. Collagen as a carrier for on-site delivery of antibacterial drugs. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2003 Nov 28;55(12):1679-98. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2003.08.007.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28402472
    Citation
    Andreas M, Muckenhuber M, Hutschala D, Kocher A, Thalhammer F, Vogt P, Fleck T, Laufer G. Direct sternal administration of Vancomycin and Gentamicin during closure prevents wound infection. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jul 1;25(1):6-11. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx032.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Topical Gentamicin and Vancomycin for Vascular Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs