search
Back to results

iMedA: Improving MEDication Adherence Through Person-Centered Care and Adaptive Interventions (iMedA)

Primary Purpose

Hypertension

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Reminder
Educational message
Motivational messages
showing trends
Sponsored by
Halmstad University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Hypertension focused on measuring hypertension, digital intervention, adaptive intervention

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 40-70 years old
  • have hypertension diagnosis (i.e. ICD 10 codes from I10 to I16 in the person's medical history) for 1 year or more and have prescribed medications;
  • not receiving medication with unit-dose packaged (Apodos);
  • no previous stroke or myocardial infarction;
  • no psychological disorder or cognitive impairment;
  • no pregnancy-induced hypertension;
  • no insulin treatment;
  • no kidney disease defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have no own smartphone
  • not understanding the Swedish language both spoken and written

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    adaptive intervention

    Arm Description

    The patients will receive various adaptive digital interventions through mobile app.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    change from baseline medication adherence score at 6 months
    medication adherence score (MA) measured through the Maastricht Utrecht Adherence in Hypertension (MUAH-16) questionnaire. The higher score is correlated to better medication adherence. MUAH-16 has 4 subscales: 2 of them measures positive and the other 2 measures negative aspects of medication adherence. Therefore, we consider a positive score for the 2 positive subscales and negative scores to the negative ones. The result will be the final score showing the medication adherence score of the participant. The answers are supposed to be on a 7-point Likert scale (1: completely disagree and 7:completely agree). Therefore, the max score will be 48 and the min score will be -48. Based on the previous study, there has been shown a correlation between having a higher score and higher medication adherence.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    change from baseline Blood pressure at 6 months
    Systolic and diastolic Blood Pressure (BP). The lower BP the better outcome.
    change from baseline health literacy score at 6 months
    health literacy (HL) measured through the Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Scale. We expect to see an increase in HL through time, therefore the higher HL the better outcome. Considering the 5-point Likert scale , the max score will be 25 and the min score will be 5.
    change from baseline Quality of Life at 6 months
    quality of life measured through the EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ5D) instrument. The higher score the better outcome. The answers to each of the five dimensions is between 1-3 scale. The EQ-VAS scale is between 0-100.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 22, 2020
    Last Updated
    June 8, 2020
    Sponsor
    Halmstad University
    Collaborators
    Region Halland
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04413500
    Brief Title
    iMedA: Improving MEDication Adherence Through Person-Centered Care and Adaptive Interventions
    Acronym
    iMedA
    Official Title
    iMedA: Improving MEDication Adherence Through Person Centered Care and Adaptive Interventions
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    September 2020 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    February 2021 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    February 2021 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Halmstad University
    Collaborators
    Region Halland

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The aim of this study is to design, implement, and evaluate an adaptive personalized digital intervention, to be delivered through a mobile application, to increase medication adherence and self-care management for persons with hypertension. This is a collaborative project between Halmstad University and Region Halland in Halland county, Sweden. The project is divided into three steps: 1)Focus groups 2)pilot study 3)Longitudinal study. The design of the study is influenced by the Intervention Mapping technique, which is used for the design and development of health promotion programs. The investigators first conducted a systematic review in order to detect the determinants, behaviors to change, and implemented digital strategies in the previous studies. The result was drawn in the Matrix of Change Objectives to facilitate the mapping. Then through focus groups, the investigators are going to ascertain the needs of the Swedish context. Through what has been learned with these findings, digital interventions will be designed and developed to be delivered via mobile application. A pilot study is considered then to evaluate the feasibility and usability testing of digital intervention. Finally, a longitudinal study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the digital intervention in the longer term. The design is proposed to be an interrupted time series (ITS) approach which is considered to be the strongest quasi-experimental design that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention.
    Detailed Description
    The design of the digital intervention module is considered to follow the just-in-time adaptive intervention framework (JITAI). JITAI is an intervention design aiming to provide the right type/amount of support, at the right time, by adapting to an individual's circumstances. It has enormous potential for promoting health behavior change, which in this study is supposed to be medication compliance. Based on the JITAI's conceptual model, there are the following components: Decision points (DP) DP is a time when an intervention decision is made. Considering the nature of JITAIs which are delivered through mobiles, DPs are much more rapidly than is standard interventions. In iMedA, DP is considered to be daily and accompanied by the time of medication intake question, i.e. "Did the participant take the anti-hypertensive medication today?". Intervention options (IO) IOs are a set of possible interventions that are going to be delivered at DPs. In JITAI, IOs can be various types of support (information, advice, feedback, etc), source of support (mobile, nurse, physician, etc), amounts of support (intensity, dose, etc), type of media/channel (phone call, SMS, etc). From the conducted literature review, the investigators summarised all types of digital interventions to hypertensive patients as: Reminders for medication intake (daily), BP measurement (monthly), PA (biweekly) Informational contents regarding hypertension and all its facts, consequences, treatments, risks, medications and side-effects, lifestyle, and so on (text, videos, etc) Trends on medication intake/PA/BP/etc Motivational messages Distal outcomes (DO) DO is the ultimate goal that the intervention is trying to achieve. In iMedA, the investigators considered primary and secondary DOs. Primarily the investigators aim at improving medication adherence. Then in the long term, blood pressure control is considered as secondary DOs besides the increased quality of life, assessment of the lifestyle behavior (smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, and food intake), and communicative and critical health literacy. In order to measure MA, the investigators consider (1) self-reported medication intake through a mobile app; (2) MUAH-16 which is a medication adherence questionnaire for hypertension; and (3) pickups from pharmacies. The self-reported values are supposed to be collected every day. MUAH-16 is measured pre- and post- intervention. BP is considered to be measured every month. There are automatic devices in every primary care center that people can go and measure their BP free of charge. QoL and HL are measured through EQ5D and HL respectively and pre- and post- intervention. Lifestyle assessments are measured (bi)weekly through self-report values. Proximal outcomes (PO) POs are the short-term goals of the interventions. They can be mediators and/or intermediate measures of the DOs. Medication intake rate is considered to be the main PO, which is measured daily. Physical activity rate which is measured (bi)weekly is another PO. Since most of the contents are educational and they try to increase the hypertension knowledge of the participants, the investigators will add a PO to measure how much their knowledge has increased. The investigators consider two methods to measure it. First, after showing the content, the investigators will ask "Did the participant know …?". Second, a simple gamification test will be designed to be delivered biweekly. To prevent poor adherence to the interventions, it is recommended to define a few POs related to intervention engagement and fatigue. Therefore, the investigators consider the number of clicked interventions, number of watched videos, like/dislike feedbacks per each intervention as POs related to intervention adherence and retention. Tailoring variables (TV) TVs are information about the participant that are used to decide when to provide which intervention. In other words, they are used to personalise the interventions and make them adaptive to the individual's circumstances. They can be measured actively or passively or both. Active assessments require an individual's engagement in measuring, for example through self-reports, while passive assessments require minimal/no individual engagement, for example through mobile phone's sensors. POs are often used as TVs. From baseline information, a few TVs can be selected including alcohol consumption, smoking, specific diet (vegetarian, vegan, etc), age, and gender, in order to personalise the interventions. All of the POs are also considered as TVs. From the MUAH-16 questionnaire, the investigators start to know more about individual's beliefs, barriers and behaviour about medication adherence. It has four subscales regarding (1)positive attitude towards healthcare and medication; (2) lack of discipline; (3) aversion towards medication; and (4) active coping with health problems. Each subscale contains four questions. At the beginning of the intervention, MUAH-16 questions are used as TVs. Then during the intervention period, and based on the previously delivered informational contents to the individual, the answers to "Did the participant know …?" questions will be used as TVs. Decision rules (DR) DRs are the adaptation engine of JITAIs. They are used to determine which IO to deliver to whom and when. They are the links between IOs and TVs. DRs in iMedA will be probabilistic rules from experts modified by "suggestions" from reinforcement learning.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Hypertension
    Keywords
    hypertension, digital intervention, adaptive intervention

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Supportive Care
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    32 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    adaptive intervention
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    The patients will receive various adaptive digital interventions through mobile app.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Reminder
    Intervention Description
    A reminder to take the anti-hypertension medication with adjustable frequency.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Educational message
    Intervention Description
    An educational message to increase the knowledge about various facts around hypertension. The short messages are supposed to be sent based on the patient's needs.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Motivational messages
    Intervention Description
    The motivational short messages to increase the motivational levels.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    showing trends
    Intervention Description
    Short messages contain different trends of medication intake rate, BP, physical activity rate, and so on.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    change from baseline medication adherence score at 6 months
    Description
    medication adherence score (MA) measured through the Maastricht Utrecht Adherence in Hypertension (MUAH-16) questionnaire. The higher score is correlated to better medication adherence. MUAH-16 has 4 subscales: 2 of them measures positive and the other 2 measures negative aspects of medication adherence. Therefore, we consider a positive score for the 2 positive subscales and negative scores to the negative ones. The result will be the final score showing the medication adherence score of the participant. The answers are supposed to be on a 7-point Likert scale (1: completely disagree and 7:completely agree). Therefore, the max score will be 48 and the min score will be -48. Based on the previous study, there has been shown a correlation between having a higher score and higher medication adherence.
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    change from baseline Blood pressure at 6 months
    Description
    Systolic and diastolic Blood Pressure (BP). The lower BP the better outcome.
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    change from baseline health literacy score at 6 months
    Description
    health literacy (HL) measured through the Communicative and Critical Health Literacy Scale. We expect to see an increase in HL through time, therefore the higher HL the better outcome. Considering the 5-point Likert scale , the max score will be 25 and the min score will be 5.
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    change from baseline Quality of Life at 6 months
    Description
    quality of life measured through the EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ5D) instrument. The higher score the better outcome. The answers to each of the five dimensions is between 1-3 scale. The EQ-VAS scale is between 0-100.
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    medication intake rate
    Description
    self-reported medication intake. We expect to see an increase in the medication intake rate.
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 6 months
    Title
    physical activity
    Description
    physical activity rate. We expect to observe a higher physical activity rate.
    Time Frame
    through study completion, an average of 6 months
    Title
    change from baseline medication pickups from pharmacies at 6 months
    Description
    check the anti-hypertensive medication pickups from pharmacies. We expect that the pickups from pharmacies will increase.
    Time Frame
    6 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    40 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    70 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: aged 40-70 years old have hypertension diagnosis (i.e. ICD 10 codes from I10 to I16 in the person's medical history) for 1 year or more and have prescribed medications; not receiving medication with unit-dose packaged (Apodos); no previous stroke or myocardial infarction; no psychological disorder or cognitive impairment; no pregnancy-induced hypertension; no insulin treatment; no kidney disease defined as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min Exclusion Criteria: have no own smartphone not understanding the Swedish language both spoken and written
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Kobra Etminani
    Phone
    +46729773851
    Email
    kobra.etminani@hh.se
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Slawomir Nowaczyk
    Email
    slawomir.nowaczyk@hh.se
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Kobra Etminani
    Organizational Affiliation
    Halmstad University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    27663578
    Citation
    Nahum-Shani I, Smith SN, Spring BJ, Collins LM, Witkiewitz K, Tewari A, Murphy SA. Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs) in Mobile Health: Key Components and Design Principles for Ongoing Health Behavior Support. Ann Behav Med. 2018 May 18;52(6):446-462. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9830-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29171719
    Citation
    Cabral AC, Castel-Branco M, Caramona M, Fernandez-Llimos F, Figueiredo IV. Developing an adherence in hypertension questionnaire short version: MUAH-16. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jan;20(1):118-124. doi: 10.1111/jch.13137. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12174032
    Citation
    Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Zhang F, Ross-Degnan D. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2002 Aug;27(4):299-309. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2002.00430.x.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32271148
    Citation
    Etminani K, Tao Engstrom A, Goransson C, Sant'Anna A, Nowaczyk S. How Behavior Change Strategies are Used to Design Digital Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Among Patients With Hypertension: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 9;22(4):e17201. doi: 10.2196/17201.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    33978593
    Citation
    Etminani K, Goransson C, Galozy A, Norell Pejner M, Nowaczyk S. Improving Medication Adherence Through Adaptive Digital Interventions (iMedA) in Patients With Hypertension: Protocol for an Interrupted Time Series Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 May 12;10(5):e24494. doi: 10.2196/24494.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    iMedA: Improving MEDication Adherence Through Person-Centered Care and Adaptive Interventions

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs