Feasibility of a Systems Approach for Alzheimer's Services Among Latinos Attending Primary Care Practices
Primary Purpose
Dementia
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Alianza Latina
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Dementia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Identify as Latino
- Community dwelling
- Diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia
- Have a caregiver 18 years old or older
- Have co-participant with access to a privately-owned cell phone with a flat fee for text messages
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not identify as Latino
- Not Community dwelling
- Not diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia
- Not having a caregiver 18 years old or older
- Not having a co-participant with access to a privately-owned cell phone with a flat fee for text messages
Sites / Locations
- University of Kansas Medical CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Alianza Latina
Arm Description
The main components of Alianza Latina are 1) providing primary care providers with education, training and tools for timely dementia diagnosis and optimal treatment and 2) providing Latino dementia patients with enhanced chronic care through bilingual Health Navigators.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Provider recruitment feasibility
Metrics of the number of providers who agree to be trained per month
Provider retention feasibility
Metrics of the percentage of providers who continue to partner with the study team by the end of the provider intervention period
Provider fidelity feasibility 1
Percentage of providers able to implement screenings in regular workflow, measured via survey with the question "To what extent were you able to implement screenings in regular workflow" with three response options: "not at all", "to some degree", "usually", "almost always" and "always"
Provider assessment feasibility 1
Metrics of the percentage of providers who complete baseline and follow-up surveys about dementia knowledge, attitudes and skills
Provider fidelity feasibility 2
Metrics of the Number of referrals to Health Navigator per month
Overall provider satisfaction with training
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with training (not at all to very much)
Importance of Navigators to providers
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on the perceived importance of Navigators to providers (not at all to very much)
Participant recruitment fidelity
Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who enroll in Health Navigator services
Participant Retention fidelity
Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads followed up at six months
Participant assessment fidelity
Metrics of the percentage of planned baseline and follow-up survey ratings completed
Participant treatment adherence
Metrics of the percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who attends at least 50% of Health Navigator visits
Overall participant satisfaction with the clinic side of the intervention
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with clinic services (not at all to very much)
Overall participant satisfaction with the Navigator side of the intervention
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with Navigator services (not at all to very much)
Participant suggestions of improvement
Survey question including an open-ended question about which aspects of the intervention they would change
Practitioner adherence to guideline recommendations
10-item checklist administered to the dyads asking about the implementations of different aspects of dementia service guidelines
Secondary Outcome Measures
Patients' behavioral symptoms
Brief version of the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire: This is a validated clinical instrument for evaluating psychopathology in dementia. If any of the 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms is present, caregivers rate their own distress on a six-point scale (not distressing at all-extreme or very severe distress). For example, if the caregiver responds yes to "is the patient resistive to help from others at times, or hard to handle?", the following question would follow: "rate the severity of the symptom". An overall severity summary score is calculated by adding the severity scores of all items and higher scores mean higher severity.
Patients' depression
Short Geriatric Depression Scale: This scale consists of 15 yes vs no questions. Questions from the Long Form GDS which had the highest correlation with depressive symptoms in validation studies were selected for the short version. Of the 15 items, 10 indicated the presence of depression when answered positively, while the rest (question numbers 1, 5, 7, 11, 13) indicated depression when answered negatively. Scores of 0-4 are considered normal, depending on age, education, and complaints; 5-8 indicate mild depression; 9-11 indicate moderate depression; and 12-15 indicate severe depression.
Patients' quality of life
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: The QoL-AD is comprised of 13 items (physical health, energy, mood, living situation, memory, family, marriage, friends, self as a whole, ability to do chores, ability to do things for fun, money and life as a whole). Response options include 1(poor), 2(fair), 3(good) and 4 (excellent), for a total score of 13-52, with higher scores indicating better QoL.
Caregivers' quality of life
In general, how satisfied are you with your life?" with a 4-point scale from 1 (Very Satisfied) to 4 (Very Dissatisfied)
Caregivers' depression
10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D-10): This is a 10-item, self-report rating scale that measures characteristic symptoms of depression in the past week (e.g. depression, loneliness, restless sleep). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time) with positively worded items (items 5 and 8) reverse scored. Items yield summary scores that range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher severity. An example of an item is: "I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me"
Caregivers' burden
Short Zarit Burden Interview: This scale has 6 items and address the perceived impact of the act of providing care on the physical health, emotional health, social activities and financial situation of the caregiver. Each item has five response options ranging from "never" to "nearly always". Higher scores mean higher burden.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04418232
First Posted
June 2, 2020
Last Updated
December 21, 2022
Sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
Collaborators
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04418232
Brief Title
Feasibility of a Systems Approach for Alzheimer's Services Among Latinos Attending Primary Care Practices
Official Title
Feasibility of a Novel Systems Approach for Improving Utilization of Alzheimer's Disease Services Among Latinos Attending Primary Care Practices
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
Collaborators
National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The research team will train primary care practitioners from Kansas City clinics to enhance skills in cultural competence, dementia detection, treatment and referral to a Health Navigator among Latinos 65 and older with dementia. The Health Navigator will provide patient/caregiver dyads referred by Alianza Latina providers with care management, psychosocial support and links to relevant community resources. Outcomes include feasibility and acceptability of 1) PCP training and 2) patient and caregiver dementia care.
Detailed Description
Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are a major cause of mortality and disability in later life and cost the US healthcare system more than cancer or heart disease. The National Alzheimer's Plan Act and the National Institutes of Health have identified ADRD disparities among ethnic minorities as a public health priority. Latinos with ADRD experience substantial disparities with reduced rates of early diagnosis and lower quality care compared to their non-Latino white peers, which put them at an increased risk for steeper cognitive decline, morbidity, mortality and higher caregiver burden. A number of barriers conspire to create these disparities including a lack of an evidence-based strategy to address ADRD in clinics, patient and primary care provider (PCP) reduced ADRD knowledge, negative attitudes regarding ADRD, PCP's lack of time, cultural and language barriers and health insurance status. To improve healthcare delivery to Latinos with ADRD, researchers need to redesign current ADRD detection and care systems to follow evidence-based recommendations for early detection and culturally appropriate chronic care.
The overall aim of this proposal is to enhance the delivery of ADRD services to Latinos in primary care through a scalable systems approach that includes evidence-based recommendations. Primary care clinics are the ideal setting to provide ADRD services, as 93% of older Latinos have a usual source of healthcare. The novel systems approach (Alianza Latina/Latino Alliance) will enhance timely ADRD diagnosis and optimal care to minimize behavioral symptoms and cognitive decline among Latinos in a linguistically and culturally-appropriate way. Alianza Latina will use the Collaborative Care Framework that capitalizes on PCPs and Health Navigators. 1) PCPs will undergo evidence-based training to enhance timely and culturally appropriate diagnosis and implement it in their work routine. 2) PCPs will detect, treat and refer Latino ADRD patients to a bilingual Health Navigator to provide chronic care management, which will reduce PCP time burden.
Aim 2: Test the feasibility and acceptability of Alianza Latina. Aim 2.a: The research team will train PCPs from Kansas City clinics to enhance skills in cultural competence, ADRD detection, treatment and referral to a Health Navigator among Latinos 65 and older with ADRD. Aim 2.b. The Health Navigator will provide patients/caregiver dyads referred by Alianza Latina PCPs with care management, psychosocial support and links to relevant community resources. The research team will assess the feasibility and acceptability of 1) PCP training and 2) patient and caregiver ADRD care. Caregivers will be enrolled in a text messaging program, called CuidaTEXT, that will educate about memory and thinking problems, solve problems that are common among families with memory and thinking problems, send reminders for appointments and medications, and improve communication with the PCP, family, friends, and other resources.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dementia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Alianza Latina
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The main components of Alianza Latina are 1) providing primary care providers with education, training and tools for timely dementia diagnosis and optimal treatment and 2) providing Latino dementia patients with enhanced chronic care through bilingual Health Navigators.
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
Alianza Latina
Intervention Description
The main components of Alianza Latina are 1) providing primary care providers with education, training and tools for timely dementia diagnosis and optimal treatment and 2) providing Latino dementia patients with enhanced chronic care through bilingual Health Navigators.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Provider recruitment feasibility
Description
Metrics of the number of providers who agree to be trained per month
Time Frame
During the 9 months of the provider intervention period
Title
Provider retention feasibility
Description
Metrics of the percentage of providers who continue to partner with the study team by the end of the provider intervention period
Time Frame
During the 9 months of the provider intervention period
Title
Provider fidelity feasibility 1
Description
Percentage of providers able to implement screenings in regular workflow, measured via survey with the question "To what extent were you able to implement screenings in regular workflow" with three response options: "not at all", "to some degree", "usually", "almost always" and "always"
Time Frame
9 months (end of the provider intervention period)
Title
Provider assessment feasibility 1
Description
Metrics of the percentage of providers who complete baseline and follow-up surveys about dementia knowledge, attitudes and skills
Time Frame
During the 9 months of the provider intervention period
Title
Provider fidelity feasibility 2
Description
Metrics of the Number of referrals to Health Navigator per month
Time Frame
During the 9 months of the provider intervention period
Title
Overall provider satisfaction with training
Description
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with training (not at all to very much)
Time Frame
9 months (end of the provider intervention period)
Title
Importance of Navigators to providers
Description
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on the perceived importance of Navigators to providers (not at all to very much)
Time Frame
9 months (end of the provider intervention period)
Title
Participant recruitment fidelity
Description
Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who enroll in Health Navigator services
Time Frame
During the 15 months of the whole intervention period
Title
Participant Retention fidelity
Description
Metrics of percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads followed up at six months
Time Frame
During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period
Title
Participant assessment fidelity
Description
Metrics of the percentage of planned baseline and follow-up survey ratings completed
Time Frame
During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period
Title
Participant treatment adherence
Description
Metrics of the percentage of referred Latino dementia dyads who attends at least 50% of Health Navigator visits
Time Frame
During the 6 months of the Navigator intervention period
Title
Overall participant satisfaction with the clinic side of the intervention
Description
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with clinic services (not at all to very much)
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Title
Overall participant satisfaction with the Navigator side of the intervention
Description
Survey question including a 5-item Likert scale on satisfaction with Navigator services (not at all to very much)
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Title
Participant suggestions of improvement
Description
Survey question including an open-ended question about which aspects of the intervention they would change
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Title
Practitioner adherence to guideline recommendations
Description
10-item checklist administered to the dyads asking about the implementations of different aspects of dementia service guidelines
Time Frame
6 months after baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patients' behavioral symptoms
Description
Brief version of the Neuropsychiatry Inventory Questionnaire: This is a validated clinical instrument for evaluating psychopathology in dementia. If any of the 12 neuropsychiatric symptoms is present, caregivers rate their own distress on a six-point scale (not distressing at all-extreme or very severe distress). For example, if the caregiver responds yes to "is the patient resistive to help from others at times, or hard to handle?", the following question would follow: "rate the severity of the symptom". An overall severity summary score is calculated by adding the severity scores of all items and higher scores mean higher severity.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Title
Patients' depression
Description
Short Geriatric Depression Scale: This scale consists of 15 yes vs no questions. Questions from the Long Form GDS which had the highest correlation with depressive symptoms in validation studies were selected for the short version. Of the 15 items, 10 indicated the presence of depression when answered positively, while the rest (question numbers 1, 5, 7, 11, 13) indicated depression when answered negatively. Scores of 0-4 are considered normal, depending on age, education, and complaints; 5-8 indicate mild depression; 9-11 indicate moderate depression; and 12-15 indicate severe depression.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Title
Patients' quality of life
Description
Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease: The QoL-AD is comprised of 13 items (physical health, energy, mood, living situation, memory, family, marriage, friends, self as a whole, ability to do chores, ability to do things for fun, money and life as a whole). Response options include 1(poor), 2(fair), 3(good) and 4 (excellent), for a total score of 13-52, with higher scores indicating better QoL.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Title
Caregivers' quality of life
Description
In general, how satisfied are you with your life?" with a 4-point scale from 1 (Very Satisfied) to 4 (Very Dissatisfied)
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Title
Caregivers' depression
Description
10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D-10): This is a 10-item, self-report rating scale that measures characteristic symptoms of depression in the past week (e.g. depression, loneliness, restless sleep). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale, from 0 (rarely or none of the time) to 3 (most or all of the time) with positively worded items (items 5 and 8) reverse scored. Items yield summary scores that range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating higher severity. An example of an item is: "I was bothered by things that usually don't bother me"
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months from baseline
Title
Caregivers' burden
Description
Short Zarit Burden Interview: This scale has 6 items and address the perceived impact of the act of providing care on the physical health, emotional health, social activities and financial situation of the caregiver. Each item has five response options ranging from "never" to "nearly always". Higher scores mean higher burden.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months from baseline
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Identify as Latino
Community dwelling
Diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia
Have a caregiver 18 years old or older
Have co-participant with access to a privately-owned cell phone with a flat fee for text messages
Exclusion Criteria:
Not identify as Latino
Not Community dwelling
Not diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment or dementia
Not having a caregiver 18 years old or older
Not having a co-participant with access to a privately-owned cell phone with a flat fee for text messages
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jaime Perales Puchalt, PhD, MPH
Phone
913-588-3716
Email
jperales@kumc.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaime Perales Puchalt, PhD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
KUMC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66103
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elisabeth Pauley
Phone
913-588-0980
Email
epauley2@kumc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaime Perales Puchalt, PhD, MPH
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey Burns, MD, MS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Williams, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Allen Greiner, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The final dataset will include patients' and caregivers' demographic and behavioral data from interviews as well as metrics and feasibility information provided by the primary care providers. Along with the dataset, we will create a code book documenting all variables. Study participants may find their diagnosis information potentially stigmatizing, and may prefer that these diagnoses remain entirely confidential. Although the data analytic files will not have direct identifiers (only study identification numbers), the possibility of deductive disclosure of subjects with certain clinical characteristics may remain. To safeguard against the unlikely event of deductive disclosure, we will only make the data files and codebook available to other researchers on a case-by-case basis.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
February 1, 2025
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers requesting data will need to complete a request form outlining intended use of the data, and agree to use the data solely for this intended purpose. Prior to data release, researchers requesting data will be required to sign a confidentiality agreement specifying that they will not identify any individual participant, that they will use secure technology to safeguard the data, and that they will destroy or return the data after their analyses are completed.
Learn more about this trial
Feasibility of a Systems Approach for Alzheimer's Services Among Latinos Attending Primary Care Practices
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs