Heart Watch Study: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Primary Purpose
Cardioversion, Atrial Fibrillation
Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Apple Watch
Withings Move
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Cardioversion
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >22
- English-speaking
- Planned for direct current cardioversion or catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, as noted by referring clinical staff or on chart review
- Participant is willing and able to read and sign consent and participate in study
- Participant lives independently and does not require continuous care
- Participant has an email account (or is willing to create one)
- Participant has a compatible smartphone (iPhone 6s or later)
- Participant is willing to wear only the device they are randomized to receive for the study period for as many hours during the day as they are able, except for time spent charging the device or in environments that may be suboptimal for the device
- Participant is willing to use the Hugo mobile health platform and Apple Watch Series 6 or Withings Move
- Participant has cardiology care at YNHH, Duke Health, or Mayo Clinic
Exclusion Criteria:
- No exclusion criteria
Sites / Locations
- Yale-New Haven Hospital
- Mayo Clinic
- Duke University Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Apple Watch
Withings Move
Arm Description
Patients will be provided with the Apple Watch Series 6 with Irregular Rhythm Detection and ECG capabilities.
Patients will be provided with the Withings Move with activity tracking.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Quality-of-life (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life)
Difference in the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire global score at 6 months compared to baseline between the Apple Watch and patients randomized to the Withings Move arm at 6 months compared to baseline. Reported on a scale from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome
Secondary Outcome Measures
Proportion of participants with acute care use at 6 months
Acute care use will be compared between the two groups at 6 months. Acute care is defined as an emergency department visits, observation stays, and all hospitalizations over the 6 month period.
Proportion of participants with acute care use at 12 months
Acute care use will be compared between the two groups at 12 months. Acute care is defined as an emergency department visits, observation stays, and all hospitalizations over the 12 month period.
Proportion of participants with outpatient care use at 6 months
Outpatient care use will be compared between the two groups at 6 months. Outpatient care is defined as outpatient primary care visits, outpatient cardiology or cardiac electrophysiology visits, and scheduled telephone encounters.
Proportion of participants with outpatient care use at 12 months
Outpatient care use will be compared between the two groups at 12 months. Outpatient care is defined as outpatient primary care visits, outpatient cardiology or cardiac electrophysiology visits, and scheduled telephone encounters.
Proportion of participants with rhythm-related diagnostic testing at 6 months
Rhythm-related diagnostic testing will be assessed at 6 month including total ECGs and total outpatient heart rhythm monitors
Proportion of participants with rhythm-related diagnostic testing at 12 months
Rhythm-related diagnostic testing will be assessed at 12 month including total ECGs and total outpatient heart rhythm monitors
Proportion of patients taking anticoagulants
Anticoagulation use will be assessed at 6 months using the Brief Medication Questionnaire to trend patients' monthly responses about anticoagulation use
Proportion of patients taking anticoagulants
Anticoagulation use will be assessed at 12 months using the Brief Medication Questionnaire to trend patients' monthly responses about anticoagulation use
Quality-of-life (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life) Domains
Difference within individual domains of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life questionnaire between patients randomized to the Apple Watch and patients randomized to the Withings Move arm over the 6 month period. Reported on a scale from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome
Quality-of-life (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life) Domains
Difference within individual domains of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life questionnaire between patients randomized to the Apple Watch and patients randomized to the Withings Move arm over the 12 month period. Reported on a scale from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome
Proportion of participants with clinical treatment for atrial fibrillation or flutter
A composite outcome of rhythm control intervention, which is defined as at least one additional cardioversion, initiation of antiarrhythmic medical therapy, dose escalation of antiarrhythmic medication, change to another antiarrhythmic medication, or ablation for atrial fibrillation over the 6 month period. The medication data will be obtained primarily from electronic health record data.
Proportion of participants with clinical treatment for atrial fibrillation or flutter
A composite outcome of rhythm control intervention, which is defined as at least one additional cardioversion, initiation of antiarrhythmic medical therapy, dose escalation of antiarrhythmic medication, change to another antiarrhythmic medication, or ablation for atrial fibrillation over the 12 month period. The medication data will be obtained primarily from electronic health record data.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04468321
First Posted
July 7, 2020
Last Updated
June 2, 2023
Sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
Mayo Clinic, Duke University, National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04468321
Brief Title
Heart Watch Study: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Official Title
Heart Watch Study: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 18, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
Mayo Clinic, Duke University, National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center (NESTcc)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This will be a prospective multi-center, randomized, controlled trial of 150 patients conducted to assess the impact of individual use of the Apple Watch compared to the Withings Move on patient-reported and clinical outcomes at 6 months and up to 1 year.
Detailed Description
This is a a randomized, controlled trial to determine the impact of the Apple Watch Series 6 compared to the Withings Move on both patient-reported outcomes and clinical utilization over 6 months and up to 1 year. Our research method will employ a patient-centered health data sharing platform (called Hugo) for real-world surveillance of outcomes in 150 total patients after they receive elective direct current cardioversion (DCCV) or catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Patients will be enrolled at each of 3 clinical sites: Yale-New Haven Hospital, the Mayo Clinic, and Duke Health. Half of the patients will be randomized to receive the Apple Watch Series 6, while half will receive a control device (Withings Move). Patients will then be queried about specific symptoms related to atrial fibrillation and medication adherence monthly. This project will provide novel and needed post-market data about the Apple Watch Series 6 ECG and irregular rhythm detection notification features and, on a larger scale, help delineate the impact of an innovative digital health technology on real-world patient outcomes.
Specific Aim 1: To assess the impact of using the Apple Watch ECG and irregular rhythm notification features on patient-reported outcomes and clinical utilization after patients receive cardioversion or catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
Specific Aim 2: To determine the accuracy of the Apple Watch ECG compared to physician interpretation of 12-lead ECGs obtained in routine clinical care.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cardioversion, Atrial Fibrillation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
105 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Apple Watch
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will be provided with the Apple Watch Series 6 with Irregular Rhythm Detection and ECG capabilities.
Arm Title
Withings Move
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will be provided with the Withings Move with activity tracking.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Apple Watch
Intervention Description
Participants will be assigned to the Apple Watch arm to assess the impact of individual use of the Apple Watch on patient-reported and clinical utilization outcomes using Hugo.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Withings Move
Intervention Description
Participants will be assigned to the Withings Move arm to assess the impact of individual use of the Withings Move on patient-reported and clinical utilization outcomes using Hugo.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality-of-life (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life)
Description
Difference in the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT) questionnaire global score at 6 months compared to baseline between the Apple Watch and patients randomized to the Withings Move arm at 6 months compared to baseline. Reported on a scale from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of participants with acute care use at 6 months
Description
Acute care use will be compared between the two groups at 6 months. Acute care is defined as an emergency department visits, observation stays, and all hospitalizations over the 6 month period.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Proportion of participants with acute care use at 12 months
Description
Acute care use will be compared between the two groups at 12 months. Acute care is defined as an emergency department visits, observation stays, and all hospitalizations over the 12 month period.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Proportion of participants with outpatient care use at 6 months
Description
Outpatient care use will be compared between the two groups at 6 months. Outpatient care is defined as outpatient primary care visits, outpatient cardiology or cardiac electrophysiology visits, and scheduled telephone encounters.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Proportion of participants with outpatient care use at 12 months
Description
Outpatient care use will be compared between the two groups at 12 months. Outpatient care is defined as outpatient primary care visits, outpatient cardiology or cardiac electrophysiology visits, and scheduled telephone encounters.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Proportion of participants with rhythm-related diagnostic testing at 6 months
Description
Rhythm-related diagnostic testing will be assessed at 6 month including total ECGs and total outpatient heart rhythm monitors
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Proportion of participants with rhythm-related diagnostic testing at 12 months
Description
Rhythm-related diagnostic testing will be assessed at 12 month including total ECGs and total outpatient heart rhythm monitors
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Proportion of patients taking anticoagulants
Description
Anticoagulation use will be assessed at 6 months using the Brief Medication Questionnaire to trend patients' monthly responses about anticoagulation use
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Proportion of patients taking anticoagulants
Description
Anticoagulation use will be assessed at 12 months using the Brief Medication Questionnaire to trend patients' monthly responses about anticoagulation use
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Quality-of-life (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life) Domains
Description
Difference within individual domains of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life questionnaire between patients randomized to the Apple Watch and patients randomized to the Withings Move arm over the 6 month period. Reported on a scale from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Quality-of-life (Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life) Domains
Description
Difference within individual domains of the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life questionnaire between patients randomized to the Apple Watch and patients randomized to the Withings Move arm over the 12 month period. Reported on a scale from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Proportion of participants with clinical treatment for atrial fibrillation or flutter
Description
A composite outcome of rhythm control intervention, which is defined as at least one additional cardioversion, initiation of antiarrhythmic medical therapy, dose escalation of antiarrhythmic medication, change to another antiarrhythmic medication, or ablation for atrial fibrillation over the 6 month period. The medication data will be obtained primarily from electronic health record data.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Proportion of participants with clinical treatment for atrial fibrillation or flutter
Description
A composite outcome of rhythm control intervention, which is defined as at least one additional cardioversion, initiation of antiarrhythmic medical therapy, dose escalation of antiarrhythmic medication, change to another antiarrhythmic medication, or ablation for atrial fibrillation over the 12 month period. The medication data will be obtained primarily from electronic health record data.
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
22 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age >22
English-speaking
Planned for direct current cardioversion or catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, as noted by referring clinical staff or on chart review
Participant is willing and able to read and sign consent and participate in study
Participant lives independently and does not require continuous care
Participant has an email account (or is willing to create one)
Participant has a compatible smartphone (iPhone 6s or later)
Participant is willing to wear only the device they are randomized to receive for the study period for as many hours during the day as they are able, except for time spent charging the device or in environments that may be suboptimal for the device
Participant is willing to use the Hugo mobile health platform and Apple Watch Series 6 or Withings Move
Participant has cardiology care at YNHH, Duke Health, or Mayo Clinic
Exclusion Criteria:
No exclusion criteria
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph Ross, MD, MHS
Organizational Affiliation
Yale University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Noseworthy, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Mayo Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sreekanth Vemulapalli, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sanket Dhruva, MD, MHS
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Yale-New Haven Hospital
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06510
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Once the study has been completed, IPD will be shared in a way which will protect patient confidentiality using a data sharing platform for research purposes
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become available once the study has been completed.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35234659
Citation
Dhruva SS, Shah ND, Vemulapalli S, Deshmukh A, Beatty AL, Gamble GM, Freeman JV, Hummel JP, Piccini JP, Akar JG, Ervin K, Arges KL, Emanuel L, Noseworthy PA, Hu T, Bartlett V, Ross JS. Heart Watch Study: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 30;11(12):e054550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054550.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2021.07.10.21260230v1
Description
Preprint of protocol manuscript
Learn more about this trial
Heart Watch Study: a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs