search
Back to results

The Effect of Traction Forces in People With Obesity Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain, Obesity

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Poland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
lumbar traction therapy
Sponsored by
Poznan University of Physical Education
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Low Back Pain focused on measuring biomarkers of low back pain, inflammation, disk degeneration, traction therapy, lumbar traction

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Written consent to participate in the study,
  2. Age: 35 - 60 years,
  3. Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) or normal weight (BMI 18,5-29,9 kg/m2),
  4. Stable body weight in the last month ± 2 kg,
  5. Chronic low back pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Secondary form of obesity;
  2. Serious neurological defects (including large muscle losses, sensory disturbances in a large area of the lower limb, occurrence of cauda equina syndrome);
  3. Surgery, post-accident mechanical injuries, history of spine fractures;
  4. History of rheumatic disease (RA, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus);
  5. Osteoporosis;
  6. Pain located in a location other than the spine which is more severe than the low back pain;
  7. Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes;
  8. Poorly controlled hypertension (mean systolic blood pressure> 140mmHg and / or average diastolic blood pressure> 90mmHg) during the last month and / or the necessity of modification of pharmacological treatment;
  9. Lipid disorders requiring the introduction of pharmacological treatment in the last 3 months before observation or during observation;
  10. Acute coronary event, unstable angina, stroke or transient cerebral ischemia in the last 6 months;
  11. Features of heart failure in physical examination and / or additional tests (chest X-ray, echocardiography);
  12. Clinically significant arrhythmias, conduction disorders, pacemaker implantation;
  13. Fainting in an interview,
  14. Chronic kidney disease with creatinine clearance <60mL / min / 1.73m2;
  15. Clinically significant liver dysfunction (transaminases exceeding 3 times the normal range);
  16. Acute or chronic, clinically apparent inflammatory process of the respiratory tract, inflammatory processes of the genitourinary system, inflammatory process in the head and neck;
  17. Acute infection in the last month;
  18. Cancer;
  19. Alcohol abuse, drug addiction;
  20. Pregnancy;
  21. Uncontrolled mental illness that may falsify test results;
  22. Other conditions which may pose any risk to the patient during the observation.

Sites / Locations

  • Poznan University of Physical Education

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Patients With Obesity

Normal-Weight Patients

Arm Description

40 subjects aged 35-60 with simple obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) and chronic low back pain.

20 subjects aged 35-60 with normal body weight (BMI ≤ 24.9 and ≥ 18.5 kg/m2) suffering from chronic low back pain.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Interleukin-2, interleukin-4, interleukin-10, interleukin-17, RANTES, differentiating growth factor 15 (GDF-15) [pg/ml]
ELISA
Interleukin-2, interleukin-4, interleukin-10, interleukin-17, RANTES, differentiating growth factor 15 (GDF-15) [pg/ml]
ELISA
Stem cell growth factor β [ng/ml]
ELISA
Stem cell growth factor β [ng/ml]
ELISA
Leptin [ng/ml]
ELISA
Leptin [ng/ml]
ELISA
Adipsin [pg/ml]
ELISA
Adipsin [pg/ml]
ELISA
Neuropeptide Y [pg/ml]
ELISA
Neuropeptide Y [pg/ml]
ELISA
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor [pg/ml]
ELISA
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor [pg/ml]
ELISA
Chondroitin sulfate CS846 [ng/mL]
ELISA
Chondroitin sulfate CS846 [ng/mL]
ELISA

Secondary Outcome Measures

Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine
MRI 1.5T
Total body fat content [%]
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Total body fat content [%]
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Lean body mass [kg]
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Lean body mass [kg]
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Mobility of the spine
electrogoniometer
Mobility of the spine
electrogoniometer
Muscle bioelectric signal amplitude
electromyograph
Muscle bioelectric signal amplitude
electromyograph
State of tension of erector spinae muscles [Hz]
Natural oscillation frequency [Hz], characterizing Tone or Tension will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Dynamic stiffness of erector spinae muscles [N/m]
Biomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Logarithmic decrement of natural oscillation, characterizing elasticity of erector spinae muscles
Biomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
State of tension of erector spinae muscles [Hz]
Natural oscillation frequency [Hz], characterizing Tone or Tension will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Dynamic stiffness of erector spinae muscles [N/m]
Biomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Logarithmic decrement of natural oscillation, characterizing elasticity of erector spinae muscles
Biomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Pain threshold
algometer
Pain threshold
algometer
Pain intensity: questionnaire
visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity questionare (reporting a score on a 10-point scale, the minimum (0) means no pain and the maximum (10) means a worst pain imaginable
Pain intensity: questionnaire
visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity questionare (reporting a score on a 10-point scale, the minimum (0) means no pain and the maximum (10) means a worst pain imaginable
Disability caused by pain in the spine
Oswestry questionnaire. When completing the questionnaire, the subject answers questions concerning: pain intensity, independence, lifting objects, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, sexual activity and traveling. The answers to the questions help to classify how limited the functioning of the patient is while performing certain activities. Responses are graded from 0 to 5. The overall score is given on a 0-50 point scale, where the higher the score, the greater the disability.
Disability caused by pain in the spine
Oswestry questionnaire. When completing the questionnaire, the subject answers questions concerning: pain intensity, independence, lifting objects, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, sexual activity and traveling. The answers to the questions help to classify how limited the functioning of the patient is while performing certain activities. Responses are graded from 0 to 5. The overall score is given on a 0-50 point scale, where the higher the score, the greater the disability.

Full Information

First Posted
July 6, 2020
Last Updated
October 10, 2023
Sponsor
Poznan University of Physical Education
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04507074
Brief Title
The Effect of Traction Forces in People With Obesity Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain
Official Title
The Effect of Traction Forces on Changes in Biochemical Markers of Degeneration and Functional Parameters of the Spine in People With Obesity Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
January 1, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Poznan University of Physical Education

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the research study is to assess the impact of traction forces on changes in systemic markers concentrations of spinal structure damage in people with obesity. The research group will include 40 subjects aged 35-60 with simple obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) and chronic lumbar spine pain syndrome. The control group will consist of 20 subjects with normal body weight suffering from the same pain, at a similar age to the patients in the study group. Persons will be qualified for examination by a specialist in internal medicine and a physiotherapist. To assess the degree of structural damage within the intervertebral disc and adjacent anatomical structures, patients will undergo magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine (MRI 1.5T, standard in 3 projections). Patients will undergo traction therapy under the supervision of a physiotherapist. The application of traction forces on the traction table (ST6567P-SEERSMEDICAL) will last 30 minutes a day for 4 weeks (continuous traction mode with a maximum strength of 30% of the patient's body weight). Twice, before and after therapy, the following will be assessed: (1) body composition (by DXA method), (2) other anthropometric indicators, (3) functional parameters of the spine: mobility (electrogoniometer), muscle bioelectric signal amplitude (electromyograph), soft tissue biophysical parameters (myotonometer), (4) pain threshold and intensity in the lumbar region (using an algometer and validated questionnaires), (5) disability caused by pain in the spine (Oswestry questionnaire), (6) blood biochemical indicators selected on the basis of the latest research on biomarkers of spinal damage (for this purpose, 25ml venous blood will be taken from the subjects). Blood levels of interleukin-17, interleukin-4, interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-10 (IL-10), differentiating growth factor 15 (GDF-15), leptin, adipsin, chemokine CCL5 (RANTES), stem cell growth factor β (SCGF-β), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), neuropeptide Y, and chondroitin sulfate CS846 will be determined in the blood of the subjects. It is planned to assess the relationship of the studied biomarkers with the degree of disk degeneration, obesity, lean and fat body mass, pain intensity, and functional indicators of the spine. Patients will be asked to stop taking anti-inflammatory drugs during therapy and at least 24 hours prior to blood sampling.
Detailed Description
People suffering from obesity are particularly vulnerable to mechanical compression of the intervertebral discs, and as a result their degeneration, hernia and pressure on the nerve roots, which together cause inflammation and pain in the damaged area. This is a significant public health problem due to the 100% incidence of pain syndrome among people with obesity. The use of traction forces has beneficial effects on degenerated intervertebral discs, but there are no studies assessing the effectiveness of the traction method in relation to a group of obese people with back pain syndrome. Beneficial biochemical changes in the blood, alleviation of pain, improvement of functional parameters of the spine are expected after application of traction forces to the patients in the mechanism of decompression of the destroyed and being in chronic inflammation intervertebral discs. Identification of biomarkers enabling to monitor the effects of therapies in patients with chronic back pain can become a contribution to change standards in the diagnosis of back pain and reorientation in its treatment to real causes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain, Obesity
Keywords
biomarkers of low back pain, inflammation, disk degeneration, traction therapy, lumbar traction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
49 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Patients With Obesity
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
40 subjects aged 35-60 with simple obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) and chronic low back pain.
Arm Title
Normal-Weight Patients
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
20 subjects aged 35-60 with normal body weight (BMI ≤ 24.9 and ≥ 18.5 kg/m2) suffering from chronic low back pain.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
lumbar traction therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
lumbar traction
Intervention Description
The application of traction forces on the traction table (ST6567P-SEERSMEDICAL) will last 30 minutes a day for 4 weeks (continuous traction mode with a maximum strength of 30% of the patient's body weight).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Interleukin-2, interleukin-4, interleukin-10, interleukin-17, RANTES, differentiating growth factor 15 (GDF-15) [pg/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Interleukin-2, interleukin-4, interleukin-10, interleukin-17, RANTES, differentiating growth factor 15 (GDF-15) [pg/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Stem cell growth factor β [ng/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Stem cell growth factor β [ng/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Leptin [ng/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Leptin [ng/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Adipsin [pg/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Adipsin [pg/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Neuropeptide Y [pg/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Neuropeptide Y [pg/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor [pg/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor [pg/ml]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Chondroitin sulfate CS846 [ng/mL]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Chondroitin sulfate CS846 [ng/mL]
Description
ELISA
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine
Description
MRI 1.5T
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Total body fat content [%]
Description
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Total body fat content [%]
Description
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Lean body mass [kg]
Description
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Lean body mass [kg]
Description
dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Mobility of the spine
Description
electrogoniometer
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Mobility of the spine
Description
electrogoniometer
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Muscle bioelectric signal amplitude
Description
electromyograph
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Muscle bioelectric signal amplitude
Description
electromyograph
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
State of tension of erector spinae muscles [Hz]
Description
Natural oscillation frequency [Hz], characterizing Tone or Tension will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Dynamic stiffness of erector spinae muscles [N/m]
Description
Biomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Logarithmic decrement of natural oscillation, characterizing elasticity of erector spinae muscles
Description
Biomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
State of tension of erector spinae muscles [Hz]
Description
Natural oscillation frequency [Hz], characterizing Tone or Tension will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Dynamic stiffness of erector spinae muscles [N/m]
Description
Biomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Logarithmic decrement of natural oscillation, characterizing elasticity of erector spinae muscles
Description
Biomechanical properties will be assessed with myotonometer device.
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Pain threshold
Description
algometer
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Pain threshold
Description
algometer
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Pain intensity: questionnaire
Description
visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity questionare (reporting a score on a 10-point scale, the minimum (0) means no pain and the maximum (10) means a worst pain imaginable
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Pain intensity: questionnaire
Description
visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity questionare (reporting a score on a 10-point scale, the minimum (0) means no pain and the maximum (10) means a worst pain imaginable
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention
Title
Disability caused by pain in the spine
Description
Oswestry questionnaire. When completing the questionnaire, the subject answers questions concerning: pain intensity, independence, lifting objects, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, sexual activity and traveling. The answers to the questions help to classify how limited the functioning of the patient is while performing certain activities. Responses are graded from 0 to 5. The overall score is given on a 0-50 point scale, where the higher the score, the greater the disability.
Time Frame
pre-intervention
Title
Disability caused by pain in the spine
Description
Oswestry questionnaire. When completing the questionnaire, the subject answers questions concerning: pain intensity, independence, lifting objects, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, sexual activity and traveling. The answers to the questions help to classify how limited the functioning of the patient is while performing certain activities. Responses are graded from 0 to 5. The overall score is given on a 0-50 point scale, where the higher the score, the greater the disability.
Time Frame
48 hours after the intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Written consent to participate in the study, Age: 35 - 60 years, Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg / m2) or normal weight (BMI 18,5-29,9 kg/m2), Stable body weight in the last month ± 2 kg, Chronic low back pain. Exclusion Criteria: Secondary form of obesity; Serious neurological defects (including large muscle losses, sensory disturbances in a large area of the lower limb, occurrence of cauda equina syndrome); Surgery, post-accident mechanical injuries, history of spine fractures; History of rheumatic disease (RA, ankylosing spondylitis, systemic lupus); Osteoporosis; Pain located in a location other than the spine which is more severe than the low back pain; Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes; Poorly controlled hypertension (mean systolic blood pressure> 140mmHg and / or average diastolic blood pressure> 90mmHg) during the last month and / or the necessity of modification of pharmacological treatment; Lipid disorders requiring the introduction of pharmacological treatment in the last 3 months before observation or during observation; Acute coronary event, unstable angina, stroke or transient cerebral ischemia in the last 6 months; Features of heart failure in physical examination and / or additional tests (chest X-ray, echocardiography); Clinically significant arrhythmias, conduction disorders, pacemaker implantation; Fainting in an interview, Chronic kidney disease with creatinine clearance <60mL / min / 1.73m2; Clinically significant liver dysfunction (transaminases exceeding 3 times the normal range); Acute or chronic, clinically apparent inflammatory process of the respiratory tract, inflammatory processes of the genitourinary system, inflammatory process in the head and neck; Acute infection in the last month; Cancer; Alcohol abuse, drug addiction; Pregnancy; Uncontrolled mental illness that may falsify test results; Other conditions which may pose any risk to the patient during the observation.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marzena Ratajczak, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Poznan University of Physical Education
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Małgorzata Waszak, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Poznan University of Physical Education
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Poznan University of Physical Education
City
Poznań
ZIP/Postal Code
61-871
Country
Poland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28347933
Citation
Chow DHK, Yuen EMK, Xiao L, Leung MCP. Mechanical effects of traction on lumbar intervertebral discs: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Jun;29:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.03.007. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9839819
Citation
Omarker K, Myers RR. Pathogenesis of sciatic pain: role of herniated nucleus pulposus and deformation of spinal nerve root and dorsal root ganglion. Pain. 1998 Nov;78(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00119-5.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Maciaszek J, Skrypnik D, Ratajczak M, Stemplewski R, Osiński W, Bogdański P, Mądry E, Walkowiak J, Karolkiewicz J. Two aerobic exercise programs in management of back pain among middle-aged obese women: A randomized controlled study. Human Movement. 2016; 17(2): 72-79.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26440592
Citation
Weber KT, Satoh S, Alipui DO, Virojanapa J, Levine M, Sison C, Quraishi S, Bloom O, Chahine NO. Exploratory study for identifying systemic biomarkers that correlate with pain response in patients with intervertebral disc disorders. Immunol Res. 2015 Dec;63(1-3):170-80. doi: 10.1007/s12026-015-8709-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30776685
Citation
Tarabeih N, Shalata A, Trofimov S, Kalinkovich A, Livshits G. Growth and differentiation factor 15 is a biomarker for low back pain-associated disability. Cytokine. 2019 May;117:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25367206
Citation
Sowa GA, Perera S, Bechara B, Agarwal V, Boardman J, Huang W, Camacho-Soto A, Vo N, Kang J, Weiner D. Associations between serum biomarkers and pain and pain-related function in older adults with low back pain: a pilot study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Nov;62(11):2047-55. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13102. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Effect of Traction Forces in People With Obesity Suffering From Chronic Low Back Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs