search
Back to results

Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Rib Fractures

Primary Purpose

Rib Fractures, Trauma, Anesthesia

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active ropivacaine 0.3% erector spinae plane perineural administration
Placebo erector spinae plane perineural administration
Sponsored by
University of California, San Diego
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rib Fractures

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having a total of 1-6 rib fractures at least 3 cm distal to the costo-transverse joint (bilateral fractures are acceptable, but the total of the two sides combined must not exceed 6 fractures)
  • regional anesthetic requested by the admitting service
  • patient accepting of a perineural catheter insertion and subsequent study fluid treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chronic opioid use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to presentation and duration of use > 4 weeks; of note, any testing for opioid use will not occur as part of the study, but may as standard of care)
  • pregnancy
  • incarceration
  • inability to communicate with the investigators
  • weight < 45 kg or morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m2)
  • comorbidity precluding either perineural catheter insertion or subsequent ambulatory perineural local anesthetic administration (e.g., current infection at the catheter insertion site, known hepatic or renal insufficiency, immune-compromised status of any etiology)
  • any patient unable to correctly perform incentive spirometry as this is the primary outcome measure
  • any patient with any degree of decreased mental capacity as determined by the surgical service
  • any reason an investigator believes study participation would not be in the best interest of the potential subject
  • flail chest
  • chest tube
  • fracture of the 1st rib on either side
  • any injury other than the rib fracture(s) that potentially effects inspiratory effort or volume (e.g., clavicle fracture)
  • inability to contact the investigators during the perineural administration, and vice versa (e.g., lack of telephone access).

Sites / Locations

  • University California San Diego

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Active Treatment

Placebo

Arm Description

This group will receive a single injection nerve block of ropivacaine 0.5% (20 mL) followed by an infusion/boluses of ropivacaine 0.3% (continuous block)

This group will receive a single injection nerve block of ropivacaine 0.5% (20 mL) followed by an infusion/boluses of normal saline

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Maximal Inspired Volume - Absolute
Measured via a handheld incentive spirometer. The best of three measurements will be recorded as the maximum inspired volume.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Maximal Inspired Volume - Absolute
Measured via a handheld incentive spirometer. The best of three measurements will be recorded as the maximum inspired volume.
Maximal Inspired Volume - Percentage Change From Baseline Prior to Intervention
Measured via a handheld incentive spirometer. The best of three measurements will be recorded as the maximum inspired volume.
Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form, Interference Subscale)
The Brief Pain Inventory (short form, Interference scale) is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain and its impact on physical and emotional functioning [7 questions related specifically to rib fracture pain and not other injuries]. We calculated the total score of the 7 questions combined. The minimum is zero (no interference, better outcome) and the maximum is 70 (maximum interference, worse outcome).
Rib Fracture Pain When Using an Incentive Spirometer
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
WORST Rib Fracture Pain in Previous 24 Hours
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
AVERAGE Rib Fracture Pain in Previous 24 Hours
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
LEAST Rib Fracture Pain in Previous 24 Hours
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
CURRENT Rib Fracture Pain in Previous 24 Hours
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Opioid Consumption
Amount of opioid used in last 24 hours (ultimately measured in morphine equivalents)
Sleep Disturbances Due to Rib Fracture Pain
Number of awakenings due to rib fracture pain the previous night

Full Information

First Posted
September 13, 2020
Last Updated
May 17, 2023
Sponsor
University of California, San Diego
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04558281
Brief Title
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Rib Fractures
Official Title
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Analgesia and Improving Incentive Spirometry Following Traumatic Rib Fractures
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Could only enroll 4 subjects in nearly 2 years
Study Start Date
May 23, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 26, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 24, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Diego

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Rib fractures are one of the most common injuries in trauma patients. These fractures are associated with significant pain as well as decreased ability to inspire deeply or cough to clear secretions, which together lead to complications of the lungs and breathing which leads to risks of further injury and even death. One recent study found that the ability to move air into and out of the lungs practically doubled with the administration of a single-injection Erector Spainae Plane Block (ESPB) while pain levels nearly halved. However, a single-injection nerve block lasts less than 24 hours while a perineural local anesthetic infusion (also termed a "continuous peripheral nerve block") may be administered for multiple days. This entails inserting a tiny tube through the skin and into the area around the nerves, after which more local anesthetic may be administered prolonging the numbing effects. The possibility of extending the duration of a ESPB with local anesthetic administration via a perineural catheter has not be investigated. We therefore are conducting a randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm study to investigate the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB following traumatic rib fractures. The primary outcome of this study will be the maximum inspired volume measured by incentive spirometry on the afternoon following the nerve block procedure. We hypothesize that the maximum inspired volume will be significantly increased in the afternoon following the procedure with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB.
Detailed Description
Rib fractures are one of the most common injuries in trauma patients. These fractures are associated with significant pain as well as decreased ability to inspire deeply or cough to clear secretions, which together lead to complications of the lungs and breathing which leads to risks of further injury and even death. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a nerve block that covers multiple rib fractures with a single injection. This block entails injecting local anesthetic in the back superficial to the vertebral bodies. One study found that the ability to move air into and out of the lungs practically doubled with the administration of a single-injection ESPB while pain levels nearly halved. A single-injection nerve block lasts less than 24 hours while a perineural local anesthetic infusion (also termed a "continuous peripheral nerve block") may be administered for multiple days. This entails inserting a tiny tube through the skin and into the area around the nerves, after which more local anesthetic may be administered prolonging the numbing effects. The possibility of extending the duration of a ESPB with local anesthetic administration via a perineural catheter has not be investigated. We therefore are conducting a randomized, tripe-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm study to investigate the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB following traumatic rib fracture. Subjects will be individuals who present with rib fracture(s) and significant pain. Those who consent to participate in this study will have an ESP catheter inserted using ultrasound-guidance on the ipsilateral side at the level of the inferior-most fracture. For bilateral fractures, a second catheter will also be inserted on the remaining side. The single-injection ESPB will be administered to each catheter with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% (with epinephrine). Subjects with an accurately-inserted catheter based on visualization of local anesthetic spread will be allocated to one of two possible perineural treatments stratified by unilateral vs. bilateral fractures (1:1 ratio in blocks of 2): active (ropivacaine 0.3%) placebo (normal saline) Computer-generated randomization lists will be created by the UCSD Investigational Drug Service which will keep the randomization lists and not release them to the investigators until the study is completed, at which time they will provide lists of subjects who received "Treatment A" and "Treatment B" so that the statistician can analyze the data. Only after the analysis is complete will "Treatment A" and "Treatment B" be defined for the investigators for manuscript preparation [producing a triple-masked study]. Of note, for bilateral catheters the treatments on both sides will always be identical: each subject will be randomized to a single treatment and not each side of bilateral cases. Subjects will receive a basal infusion of study fluid (ropivacaine vs. placebo) 1 mL/h to keep the catheter lumen patent as soon as the infusion pump is initiated with a 500 mL reservoir. In addition, intermittent boluses (13 mL programmed automatic bolus every 2 hours) will begin 5 hours after pump initiation. For bilateral catheters, a 6-hour delay for one of the pumps will ensure that the pair of pumps alternate sides for the bolus doses each hour. This protocol will provide nearly 71-72 hours of study fluid administration. Following local anesthetic reservoir exhaustion, subjects or their caretakers will remove the catheters with instructions provided by phone. This is standard at UC San Diego for all ambulatory continuous peripheral nerve blocks and will not be unique to study participation. The catheter is disposable in the trash and the infusion pump will be returned using a pre-addressed and postage-paid envelope provided to subjects prior to leaving the hospital. Subjects will be contacted by telephone to collect study data on post procedure days 1, 2, 7, and at months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, and 12. The ultimate objective of the proposed line of research is to determine if the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB prolongs analgesia following traumatic rib fractures; and, if this analgesic intervention improves pulmonary mechanics measured with incentive spirometry. Specific Aim 1: To determine if the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB improves maximum inspiratory volume following traumatic rib fracture(s). Hypothesis 1a: The maximum inspired volume will be significantly increased in the afternoon following the procedure [primary endpoint] as well as at other time points following the procedure [secondary end points] with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB [measured with an incentive spirometer]. Hypothesis 1b: The maximum inspired volume as a percentage of the baseline will be significantly increased in the afternoon following the procedure [secondary endpoint of greatest interest], as well as at other time points following the procedure [secondary end points] with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB [measured with an incentive spirometer]. Specific Aim 2: To determine if the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB decreases the pain associated with rib fracture(s). Hypothesis 2a: The severity of rib fracture pain at rest will be significantly decreased within the 12 months following the procedure with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB [measured using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain]. Hypothesis 2b: The severity of rib fracture pain when using the spirometer or coughing will be significantly decreased within the 12 months following the procedure with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB [measured using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain]. Hypothesis 2c: The incidence of chronic rib fracture pain will be significantly decreased 6 and 12 months following a rib fracture with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB [measured using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain]. Hypothesis 2d: The severity of chronic rib fracture pain will be significantly decreased 6 and 12 months following a rib fracture with the addition of a continuous ESPB to a single-injection ESPB [measured using the Numeric Rating Scale for pain].

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rib Fractures, Trauma, Anesthesia, Anesthesia, Local

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel group clinical study
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Study solution containing either local anesthetic (ropivacaine) or saline will be prepared by the UCSD Investigational Drug Study Service. Both ropivacaine and normal saline are clear and indistinguishable visually.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
4 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Active Treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group will receive a single injection nerve block of ropivacaine 0.5% (20 mL) followed by an infusion/boluses of ropivacaine 0.3% (continuous block)
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
This group will receive a single injection nerve block of ropivacaine 0.5% (20 mL) followed by an infusion/boluses of normal saline
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Active ropivacaine 0.3% erector spinae plane perineural administration
Intervention Description
Ropivacaine 0.3% administration via an erector spinae plane perineural catheter
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo erector spinae plane perineural administration
Intervention Description
Normal saline administration via an erector spinae plane perineural catheter
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Maximal Inspired Volume - Absolute
Description
Measured via a handheld incentive spirometer. The best of three measurements will be recorded as the maximum inspired volume.
Time Frame
Between 1200 and 1700 on the day following the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Maximal Inspired Volume - Absolute
Description
Measured via a handheld incentive spirometer. The best of three measurements will be recorded as the maximum inspired volume.
Time Frame
Afternoons on postoperative days 2 and 7, postoperative months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, and 12
Title
Maximal Inspired Volume - Percentage Change From Baseline Prior to Intervention
Description
Measured via a handheld incentive spirometer. The best of three measurements will be recorded as the maximum inspired volume.
Time Frame
Afternoons on postoperative days 1, 2 and 7, postoperative months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, and 12
Title
Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form, Interference Subscale)
Description
The Brief Pain Inventory (short form, Interference scale) is an instrument specifically designed to assess pain and its impact on physical and emotional functioning [7 questions related specifically to rib fracture pain and not other injuries]. We calculated the total score of the 7 questions combined. The minimum is zero (no interference, better outcome) and the maximum is 70 (maximum interference, worse outcome).
Time Frame
Months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 12 following procedure
Title
Rib Fracture Pain When Using an Incentive Spirometer
Description
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Time Frame
Days 1, 2, and 7, and months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 12 following procedure
Title
WORST Rib Fracture Pain in Previous 24 Hours
Description
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Time Frame
Days 1, 2, and 7, and months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 12 following procedure
Title
AVERAGE Rib Fracture Pain in Previous 24 Hours
Description
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Time Frame
Days 1, 2, and 7, and months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 12 following procedure
Title
LEAST Rib Fracture Pain in Previous 24 Hours
Description
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Time Frame
Days 1, 2, and 7, and months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 12 following procedure
Title
CURRENT Rib Fracture Pain in Previous 24 Hours
Description
Pain rated from 0-10 using a Numeric Rating Scale with 0 equivalent to no pain and 10 equivalent to the worst imaginable pain
Time Frame
Days 1, 2, and 7, and months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 12 following procedure
Title
Opioid Consumption
Description
Amount of opioid used in last 24 hours (ultimately measured in morphine equivalents)
Time Frame
Days 1, 2, and 7, and months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 12 following procedure
Title
Sleep Disturbances Due to Rib Fracture Pain
Description
Number of awakenings due to rib fracture pain the previous night
Time Frame
Days 1, 2, and 7, and months 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 6, 12 following procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: having a total of 1-6 rib fractures at least 3 cm distal to the costo-transverse joint (bilateral fractures are acceptable, but the total of the two sides combined must not exceed 6 fractures) regional anesthetic requested by the admitting service patient accepting of a perineural catheter insertion and subsequent study fluid treatment. Exclusion Criteria: chronic opioid use (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to presentation and duration of use > 4 weeks; of note, any testing for opioid use will not occur as part of the study, but may as standard of care) pregnancy incarceration inability to communicate with the investigators weight < 45 kg or morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m2) comorbidity precluding either perineural catheter insertion or subsequent ambulatory perineural local anesthetic administration (e.g., current infection at the catheter insertion site, known hepatic or renal insufficiency, immune-compromised status of any etiology) any patient unable to correctly perform incentive spirometry as this is the primary outcome measure any patient with any degree of decreased mental capacity as determined by the surgical service any reason an investigator believes study participation would not be in the best interest of the potential subject flail chest chest tube fracture of the 1st rib on either side any injury other than the rib fracture(s) that potentially effects inspiratory effort or volume (e.g., clavicle fracture) inability to contact the investigators during the perineural administration, and vice versa (e.g., lack of telephone access).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John J Finneran IV, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Diego
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Diego
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University California San Diego
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Blocks for Rib Fractures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs