search
Back to results

HIS-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (HOT-CRT)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure,Congestive, Cardiomyopathies, Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HOT-CRT
Biventricular Pacing
Sponsored by
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure,Congestive focused on measuring Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients at least 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis is NYHA Class II, III, and ambulatory Class IV heart failure with either ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy and patients with NYHA Class I symptoms and ischemic cardiomyopathy, with at least one of the following:

    • LV systolic dysfunction with LVEF ≤ 35% and Evidence of bundle branch block with QRS duration > 120 msec
    • LV systolic dysfunction with LVEF ≤ 50% and with need for >40% Right Ventricular (RV) pacing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Existing CRT device
  • Inability of patient capacity to provide consent for themselves either due to medical or psychiatric comorbidity
  • Pregnancy
  • Participation in other device trials
  • Inability to complete study requirements

Sites / Locations

  • Geisinger Health

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

HOT-CRT

Biventricular Pacing

Arm Description

Subjects randomized to HOT-CRT will undergo CRT as described below. His bundle pacing lead will be placed initially to achieve CRT. If complete resynchronization is achieved (BBB normalization) but capture thresholds are high (1.5-2V), the lead may be placed in the distal conduction system (left bundle branch area). If only partial QRS narrowing is achieved, a coronary sinus lead may be placed and LV timing may be optimized to achieve maximal resynchronization. This will be at the discretion of the implanting physician. Only FDA approved leads and devices will be used.

Subjects randomized to biventricular pacing will undergo left ventricular lead placement in the coronary sinus venous branches.Only FDA approved leads and devices will be used.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction
change in LVEF measured by 2D echo at 6 months compared to baseline
Freedom from major complications or need for CRT lead revision
complication such as lead dislodgment, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, systemic embolism, phrenic nerve stimulation not correctable by programming

Secondary Outcome Measures

Heart failure hospitalization (HFH)
Heart failure hospitalization is defined as an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required intravenous therapy.
Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation requiring ICD therapy
ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation that required ICD therapy such as anti-tachycardia pacing or shock
Crossover of treatment from HOT-CRT to BVP or BVP to HOT-CRT
Failure to implant His bundle or left bundle pacing lead requiring cross over to coronary sinus lead; failure to implant coronary sinus lead necessitating cross-over to His bundle or left bundle pacing lead
Change in NYHA functional class
Functional class change at 6 months compared to baseline.
Change in QRS duration
QRS duration at final programmed configuration between the 2 groups will be compared at implant and at 6 month follow-up
Change in LV end-systolic volume index
15% or more increase in LV end-systolic volume index at 6 months compared to baseline.
Composite endpoint of death, HFH, ventricular arrhythmias or crossover
Time to combined endpoint of death, HFH, VA or crossover.
Change in quality of life (QOL)scores
Change in QOL measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at 6 months compared to baseline. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Change in quality of life (QOL)scores
Change in QOL measured by EuroQol-5D at 6 months compared to baseline. Scores on each of 5 patient reported dimensions are converted to a single utility index using country specific value sets. Additionally, a visual analog scale from 0-100, in which higher score reflects better health status.

Full Information

First Posted
September 16, 2020
Last Updated
July 18, 2023
Sponsor
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04561778
Brief Title
HIS-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Acronym
HOT-CRT
Official Title
HIS-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
April 15, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 10, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a randomized, prospective, single-blinded trial to determine the overall rate of successful His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (HOT-CRT) versus biventricular pacing using coronary sinus lead (BVP) to compare acute and mid-term outcomes. Acute outcomes include change in QRS duration pre-and post-pacing (degree of QRS narrowing) and incidence of major periprocedural complications (pericardial tamponade, need for lead revision, etc.). Mid-term outcomes include echocardiographic response at 6 months along with a composite clinical outcome of heart failure hospitalization, ventricular arrhythmias, crossover, and all-cause mortality.
Detailed Description
This is a single-blinded study of 100 patients randomized to a strategy of His-Purkinje conduction system pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (HOT-CRT) versus biventricular pacing using coronary sinus (CS) lead (BVP). Both treatment options use standard-of-care, FDA-approved devices. The distinction is only in the allocation toward HOT-CRT and BVP. Treating physicians will be aware of assignment in order to facilitate routine device follow-up. Echocardiographic and electrocardiographic evaluation will also be performed in a blinded manner. Cross-over is permitted between treatment group allocation if: CS lead cannot be placed due to difficult cannulation of the CS, limited branches at the posterolateral or lateral wall, or phrenic nerve capture. These subjects may then cross-over to HOT-CRT. HOT-CRT subjects may cross-over if His or left bundle pacing lead cannot be positioned with adequate stability and reasonable pacing output, or if optimal QRS narrowing cannot be achieved. Implant procedure will be per routine percutaneous access, as is standard for pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICDs). . All subjects will receive an FDA-approved cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker or defibrillator device, as per standard of care outlined for the subject. Follow-up will be performed at 2 weeks post-implant for incision check and device interrogation as is standard of care. In addition, routine device and clinical follow-up will be scheduled at 3 and 6 months. Electrocardiography (ECG) will be performed pre-implant, prior to hospital discharge, at 3 months, and 6 months. Echocardiography will be performed pre-implant and 6 months to evaluate for change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF), chamber dimensions, volumes, and change in Left Ventricular (LV) end systolic volume index as is standard of care in the treatment of patients with advanced heart failure. New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and quality of life (utilizing the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EQ 5D) will be assessed pre-implant and at 6 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure,Congestive, Cardiomyopathies, Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Keywords
Heart Failure, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Subjects will be blinded to treatment arm. Echocardiographic evaluation will be performed by study physician blinded to lead placement
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
HOT-CRT
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to HOT-CRT will undergo CRT as described below. His bundle pacing lead will be placed initially to achieve CRT. If complete resynchronization is achieved (BBB normalization) but capture thresholds are high (1.5-2V), the lead may be placed in the distal conduction system (left bundle branch area). If only partial QRS narrowing is achieved, a coronary sinus lead may be placed and LV timing may be optimized to achieve maximal resynchronization. This will be at the discretion of the implanting physician. Only FDA approved leads and devices will be used.
Arm Title
Biventricular Pacing
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to biventricular pacing will undergo left ventricular lead placement in the coronary sinus venous branches.Only FDA approved leads and devices will be used.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
HOT-CRT
Intervention Description
Subjects enrolled in the study will receive a permanent cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator) as clinically indicated. Subjects randomized to HOT-CRT will have His bundle pacing lead placed initially to achieve CRT. If complete resynchronization is achieved (BBB normalization) but capture thresholds are high (1.5-2V), the lead may be placed in the distal conduction system (left bundle branch area). If only partial QRS narrowing is achieved, a coronary sinus lead may be placed and left ventricular timing may be optimized to achieve maximal resynchronization.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Biventricular Pacing
Intervention Description
Subjects enrolled in the study will receive a permanent CIED (CRT-pacemaker or CRT-defibrillator) as clinically indicated. Subjects randomized to Biventricular pacing will undergo left ventricular lead placement in the coronary sinus venous branches.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction
Description
change in LVEF measured by 2D echo at 6 months compared to baseline
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Freedom from major complications or need for CRT lead revision
Description
complication such as lead dislodgment, pericardial tamponade, pneumothorax, systemic embolism, phrenic nerve stimulation not correctable by programming
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Heart failure hospitalization (HFH)
Description
Heart failure hospitalization is defined as an unplanned outpatient or emergency department visit or inpatient hospitalization in which the patient presented with signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and required intravenous therapy.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation requiring ICD therapy
Description
ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation that required ICD therapy such as anti-tachycardia pacing or shock
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Crossover of treatment from HOT-CRT to BVP or BVP to HOT-CRT
Description
Failure to implant His bundle or left bundle pacing lead requiring cross over to coronary sinus lead; failure to implant coronary sinus lead necessitating cross-over to His bundle or left bundle pacing lead
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in NYHA functional class
Description
Functional class change at 6 months compared to baseline.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in QRS duration
Description
QRS duration at final programmed configuration between the 2 groups will be compared at implant and at 6 month follow-up
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in LV end-systolic volume index
Description
15% or more increase in LV end-systolic volume index at 6 months compared to baseline.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Composite endpoint of death, HFH, ventricular arrhythmias or crossover
Description
Time to combined endpoint of death, HFH, VA or crossover.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in quality of life (QOL)scores
Description
Change in QOL measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire at 6 months compared to baseline. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in quality of life (QOL)scores
Description
Change in QOL measured by EuroQol-5D at 6 months compared to baseline. Scores on each of 5 patient reported dimensions are converted to a single utility index using country specific value sets. Additionally, a visual analog scale from 0-100, in which higher score reflects better health status.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients at least 18 years of age Diagnosis is NYHA Class II, III, and ambulatory Class IV heart failure with either ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy and patients with NYHA Class I symptoms and ischemic cardiomyopathy, with at least one of the following: LV systolic dysfunction with LVEF ≤ 35% and Evidence of bundle branch block with QRS duration > 120 msec LV systolic dysfunction with LVEF ≤ 50% and with need for >40% Right Ventricular (RV) pacing Exclusion Criteria: Existing CRT device Inability of patient capacity to provide consent for themselves either due to medical or psychiatric comorbidity Pregnancy Participation in other device trials Inability to complete study requirements
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Geisinger Clinic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Geisinger Health
City
Danville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17822
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

HIS-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing Optimized Trial of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs