Clinical Evaluation on Using Personal Face Masks With Spectacles Versus Contact Lenses
Primary Purpose
Myopia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
somofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lens
Single Vision Spectacle for Vision Correction
Personal Facemask
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Myopia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- They are aged between 18 and 40 years.
- They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
- They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
- They are a 'neophyte' (i.e. someone who has not worn contact lenses previously, with the exception for the purposes of a trial fitting).
- They have a contact lens spherical prescription between +8.00D and -10.00D (inclusive) based on the ocular refraction.
- They have a cylindrical correction of -0.75DC or less in each eye based on the ocular refraction.
- They own and habitually wear single vision spectacles.
- They are willing to be fitted with contact lenses and understand they may be randomised to either group.
- They are willing to wear the contact lenses (if relevant) or spectacles for at least 8 hours per day, 5 days per week.
- They are able to wear the supplied surgical masks for the majority of time that they need to wear PFM and will wear the PFM for at least one hour a day for at least four days per week.
- They can attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses (if relevant) or spectacles.
- They agree to not participate in other clinical research while enrolled on this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens
- wear.
- They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
- They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
- They have had cataract surgery.
- They have had corneal refractive surgery.
- They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
- They are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
- They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
- They require significant ocular/face personal protective equipment beyond a personal face mask.
- They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
- They have spectacles which are not within ±0.50D of their refractive error.
Sites / Locations
- Eurolens Research
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Single Vision Spectacle for Vision correction
somofilcon A Daily disposable contact lenses
Arm Description
Single Vision Spectacle
Daily disposable contact lenses
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Visual Acuity - High Contrast
Visual Acuity under high contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart
Visual Acuity - Low Contrast
Visual Acuity under low contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart
Visual Acuity - High Contrast
Visual Acuity under high contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Breathability
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Breathability assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Breathability
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Breathability assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Heat
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Heat assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Heat
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Heat assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Tightness
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Tightness assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Tightness
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Tightness assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Ease in Talking
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Ease in Talking assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Ease in Talking
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Ease in Talking assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Comfort on Ear Lobes
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Comfort on ear lobes assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Comfort on Ear Lobes
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Comfort on ear lobes assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Overall Comfort
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Overall Comfort assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Overall Comfort
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Overall Comfort assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Difficulty in Walking When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in walking when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy).
Difficulty in Walking When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in walking when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Driving When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in driving when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Driving When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in driving when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Reading When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in reading when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Reading When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in reading when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Working With a Computer When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in working with a computer when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Working With a Computer When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in working with a computer when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Exercising (Physical Activities) When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in exercising (physical activities)when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Exercising (Physical Activities) When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in exercising (physical activities)when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Socializing When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in socializing when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Difficulty in Socializing When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Difficulty in socializing when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Physical Safety Concerns When Wearing Your Vision Correction and Facemask
Physical safety concerns when wearing your vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Extremely concerned, 2 - Moderately concerned, 3- Somewhat concerned, 4 -Slightly concerned, 5- Not at all concerned)
Physical Safety Concerns When Wearing Your Vision Correction and Facemask
Physical safety concerns when wearing your vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Extremely concerned, 2 - Moderately concerned, 3- Somewhat concerned, 4 -Slightly concerned, 5- Not at all concerned)
Emotional Impact of Using the Facemask When Wearing Your Vision Correction
Emotional impact of using the facemask when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)
Emotional Impact of Using the Facemask When Wearing Your Vision Correction
Emotional impact of using the facemask when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)
Impact of Using the Facemask on Your Personal Appearance When Wearing Your Vision Correction
Impact of using the facemask on your personal appearance when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)
Impact of Using the Facemask on Your Personal Appearance When Wearing Your Vision Correction
Impact of using the facemask on your personal appearance when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04658797
First Posted
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 22, 2021
Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04658797
Brief Title
Clinical Evaluation on Using Personal Face Masks With Spectacles Versus Contact Lenses
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation on Using Personal Face Masks With Spectacles Versus Contact Lenses
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 1, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 15, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 30, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to explore satisfaction with vision correction and ease of use of PFM (Personal Face Masks) in a group of spectacle wearers who were randomised to continue wearing spectacles or be fitted with daily disposable contact lenses.
Detailed Description
This was a two arm parallel-group, randomised study. Subjects wearing single vision spectacles were recruited to participate in the study. Subjects were randomised to either continue to use their spectacles or to be fitted with the study daily disposable (DD) contact lens.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myopia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Single Vision Spectacle for Vision correction
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Single Vision Spectacle
Arm Title
somofilcon A Daily disposable contact lenses
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Daily disposable contact lenses
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
somofilcon A Daily Disposable Contact Lens
Intervention Description
Daily Disposable Contact Lens
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Single Vision Spectacle for Vision Correction
Intervention Description
Single Vision Spectacle
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Personal Facemask
Intervention Description
Personal Facemask
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Acuity - High Contrast
Description
Visual Acuity under high contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Visual Acuity - Low Contrast
Description
Visual Acuity under low contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Visual Acuity - High Contrast
Description
Visual Acuity under high contrast was measured using logMAR Visual Acuity Chart
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Breathability
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Breathability assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Breathability
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Breathability assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Heat
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Heat assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Heat
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Heat assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Tightness
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Tightness assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Tightness
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Tightness assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Ease in Talking
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Ease in Talking assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire -Ease in Talking
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Ease in Talking assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Comfort on Ear Lobes
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Comfort on ear lobes assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Comfort on Ear Lobes
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Comfort on ear lobes assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
2 Weeks
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Overall Comfort
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Overall Comfort assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Subjective Response on Facemask Usability Questionnaire - Overall Comfort
Description
Subjective response on facemask usability questionnaire - Overall Comfort assessed on a 5 point scale (1- very unsatisfactory, 2- Unsatisfactory, 3- Average, 4- Satisfactory, 5- Very Satisfactory)
Time Frame
2 Weeks
Title
Difficulty in Walking When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in walking when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Difficulty in Walking When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in walking when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
2 Weeks
Title
Difficulty in Driving When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in driving when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Difficulty in Driving When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in driving when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Difficulty in Reading When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in reading when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Difficulty in Reading When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in reading when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Difficulty in Working With a Computer When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in working with a computer when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Difficulty in Working With a Computer When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in working with a computer when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Difficulty in Exercising (Physical Activities) When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in exercising (physical activities)when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Difficulty in Exercising (Physical Activities) When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in exercising (physical activities)when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Difficulty in Socializing When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in socializing when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Difficulty in Socializing When Using Wearing Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Difficulty in socializing when using wearing vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- very difficult, 2- difficult, 3- Neutral, 4, Easy, 5- Very Easy)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Physical Safety Concerns When Wearing Your Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Physical safety concerns when wearing your vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Extremely concerned, 2 - Moderately concerned, 3- Somewhat concerned, 4 -Slightly concerned, 5- Not at all concerned)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Physical Safety Concerns When Wearing Your Vision Correction and Facemask
Description
Physical safety concerns when wearing your vision correction and facemask assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Extremely concerned, 2 - Moderately concerned, 3- Somewhat concerned, 4 -Slightly concerned, 5- Not at all concerned)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Emotional Impact of Using the Facemask When Wearing Your Vision Correction
Description
Emotional impact of using the facemask when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Emotional Impact of Using the Facemask When Wearing Your Vision Correction
Description
Emotional impact of using the facemask when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Impact of Using the Facemask on Your Personal Appearance When Wearing Your Vision Correction
Description
Impact of using the facemask on your personal appearance when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Impact of Using the Facemask on Your Personal Appearance When Wearing Your Vision Correction
Description
Impact of using the facemask on your personal appearance when wearing your vision correction assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1- Severe, 2- Major, 3- Moderate, 4- Minor, 5- Insignificant)
Time Frame
2 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
They are aged between 18 and 40 years.
They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
They are a 'neophyte' (i.e. someone who has not worn contact lenses previously, with the exception for the purposes of a trial fitting).
They have a contact lens spherical prescription between +8.00D and -10.00D (inclusive) based on the ocular refraction.
They have a cylindrical correction of -0.75DC or less in each eye based on the ocular refraction.
They own and habitually wear single vision spectacles.
They are willing to be fitted with contact lenses and understand they may be randomised to either group.
They are willing to wear the contact lenses (if relevant) or spectacles for at least 8 hours per day, 5 days per week.
They are able to wear the supplied surgical masks for the majority of time that they need to wear PFM and will wear the PFM for at least one hour a day for at least four days per week.
They can attain at least 0.20 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in each eye with the study lenses (if relevant) or spectacles.
They agree to not participate in other clinical research while enrolled on this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens
wear.
They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
They have had cataract surgery.
They have had corneal refractive surgery.
They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
They are pregnant or breastfeeding.
They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
They have any infectious disease which would, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicate contact lens wear or pose a risk to study personnel; or they have any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV), or a history of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction.
They require significant ocular/face personal protective equipment beyond a personal face mask.
They have taken part in any other contact lens or care solution clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.
They have spectacles which are not within ±0.50D of their refractive error.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carole Maldonado-Codina
Organizational Affiliation
Eurolens Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Eurolens Research
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M13 9PL
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Evaluation on Using Personal Face Masks With Spectacles Versus Contact Lenses
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs