search
Back to results

How to Develop a Training Program for Nurses in Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block

Primary Purpose

Hip Fractures, Ultrasound Therapy; Complications, Pain, Acute

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Norway
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Emergency nurses
Sponsored by
Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Hip Fractures focused on measuring Task shifting, Ultrasound guided, Training, Education, Emergency department, Registered nurse, Nerve block, Hip fracture

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Registered nurses or registered nurses with continuing education in acute nursing or geriatrics
  • The nurses need to be aware that it will increase the workload in beginning of the project.
  • Registered nurse has to be senior staff experienced i.e. worked in the ED
  • Motivated to take on a new task in the ED
  • Certificated in advanced CPR
  • Familiar with routines in the ED and the relevant patient group
  • They must be willing to be a part of this project for approximately 12 months.
  • Working at least 75%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refuse to participate

Sites / Locations

  • Vestfold Hospital Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Emergency nurses

Arm Description

Emergency nurses who are trained in an one-day course

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cumulative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement at 120 minutes after start of procedure, measured by 5 timepoints
Cumulative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED at 120 minutes after admission, measured by five time Points; At the end of procedure, 30 min.-, 60 min.-, 90 min.- and 120 min after start of procedure. NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement at baseline
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED at baseline (inclution of patient) NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 30 minutes
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 30 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 60 minutes
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 60 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 90 minutes
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 90 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 120 minutes
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 120 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Hematoma
Hematoma - defined as a new tumor > 2 centimeter in the groin / injection site measured by ultrasound, Yes or no
Intravasal injection
Intravasal injection - visually + circulatory and neurological symptoms, yes or no
Patient experience- description of pain
Patient experience of pain- During rest and motion measured by a 1-5 scale
Patient satisfaction- waiting time to pain relief
Patiens experiences on waiting time to pain relief measured in a scale form 1-5
Patient satisfaction- information
Patient experiences on information measured in a scale form 1-5
Patient satisfaction- description of pain before the procedure
Patient experience on pre-procedure pain measured by 1-5 scale
Patient satisfaction- description of pain after the procedure
Patient satisfaction- description of pain after the procedure measured by 1-5 scale
Patient satisfaction- safety
Patient satisfaction- description of patient reported feeling of safety during nurse led procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Patient satisfaction-effect of procedure
Patient satisfaction regarding reduction of pain after the procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Patient satisfaction-hearing status
Patient satisfaction hearing status measured by a 1-4 scale
Self reported-registered nurse- complexity
Complexity of procedure measured by scale 1-5
Self reported-registered nurse-success
Success of procedure measured by 1-5 scale
Self reported-registered nurse-Recognition of anatomic structures
Recognition of anatomic structures at ultrasound, measured by a 1-4
Self reported-registred nurse-spread of anesthesia
Spread of anesthesia, measured by a 1-4 scale
Self reported-registered nurse- patient benefit from procedure
Patient benefit of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-complexity
Complexity of procedure measured by scale 1-5
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-success
Success of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-Recognition of anatomic structures
Recognition of anatomic structures at ultrasound measured by a 1-4 scale
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-spread of anesthesia
Spread of anesthesia, measured by a 1-4 scale
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-Patient benefit of procedure
Patient benefit of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale

Full Information

First Posted
November 12, 2020
Last Updated
December 2, 2020
Sponsor
Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
Collaborators
University of South-Eastern Norway
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04659395
Brief Title
How to Develop a Training Program for Nurses in Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block
Official Title
How to Develop a Training Program for Nurses in Ultrasound Guided Femoral - a Methodology Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 19, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 11, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sykehuset i Vestfold HF
Collaborators
University of South-Eastern Norway

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In this study the intervention consists of a one-day-training program for nurses and three supervised ultrasound guided femoral nerve block (UGFNB) per registered nurse. The training consists of an instruction movie, one-day on-site-simulation and practical examination. The nurses are watching an instruction video and review current local guidelines for UGFNB in advance. The one-day training is situated in a simulation center and consists of theoretical and practical training divided into; infection prevention, anatomy, use of ultrasound and prevention and treatment of complications. A ultrasound model (Gen II Femoral Vascular Access and Regional Anesthesia Ultrasound Training Model) and a living human model is used to examine the femoral nerve and the neighboring structures using ultrasound. At the end of the one-day course, the nurses attends a practical examination with the researchers and anesthesiologists observing, to assure that they could perform the UGFNB procedure correctly. To pass the exam and be able to move on to the supervised blocks in real patients, there has to be a consensus between the researchers and anesthesiologist that they had sufficient knowledge and practical skills. 1) Sterile procedure 2) Management of the ultrasound machine and oral description of the anatomic surroundings in the groin area 3) Preparation of the local anesthetics and performance of an UGFNB. They also have to do an oral presentation in how they would perform a cardiopulmonary resuscitation procedure and how to manage complications / toxic reactions. Approved exam required at least seven points. This study will explore if a one-day course as described above is adequate, sufficient and maintains the safety framework of performing UGFNB in nurses
Detailed Description
Acute pain is a common reason for patients admitted to Emergency Departments (ED) . Globally over 1 million hip fractures occur yearly , a trauma that is close related with acute distinct pain in the proximal part of the affected extremity. Experiencing severe pain is associated with increased length of stay, higher risk of delirium, movement restriction, difficulties with mobilization and reduced health related quality of life. There is considerable research regarding patients' satisfaction with their ED experiences. These studies indicate that patient dissatisfaction with the stay at ED has been an international challenge over several years . Disapproval such as; pain management , but also limited information on potential latency before further treatment and poor explanation about the causes and treatment of the condition is prominent. Pain control can be difficult , and often requires advanced nursing and physician care due to co-morbidity . Inadequate analgesia appear to be risk factors for delirium in frail older adults, and research indicates that total avoiding opioids or using very low or high doses of opioids may increase the risk of delirium. Therefore, optimizing acute pain management is important. Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve block (UGFNB) performed in hip fracture patients is a valuable alternative to systemic analgesic, as it provides analgesia to the fractured area, thereby facilitating reduction in opioid administration. Traditionally, an UGFNB is performed by an anesthesiologist. Recently, several examples of task shifting from physicians to nurses are described with no significant difference in successful treatment results with equal patients satisfaction and safety as physician performed procedures. Task shifting approach is endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in order to make more efficient use of the available human resource of health. A recent report from the European Union (EU) states that implementation of task shifting has been rarely evaluated and limited documented. Therefore, we need studies to examine the methodology in how we can train nurses in the ED to take more responsibility for assessing and treating patients. In the study we aime to; describe a methodology for a training course for nurse led UGFNB. evaluate if the training process resulted in a safe and successful UGFNB. Data which will be collected are ASA classification (ASA Physical Status Classification System ) Length of stay Morbidity Hospital acquired pneumonia Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) Acute renal failure Respiratory failure Complication rate, number of; intravasal injection - visually + circulatory and neurological symptoms hematoma - defined as a new tumor > 2 cm in the groin / injection site measured by ultrasound Neurologic systemic outcomes / symptoms / paresthesia that have occurred after admission and which persist until discharge. Allergic reaction Number of total morphine equivalents, mg (iv/po) administered prehospital and during Emergency Department stay Patients physical characteristic (physical examination; gender, age, height, weight, , blood pressure, heart rate, SpO2 (oxygen saturation) and use of oxygen will be noted together with current disease A short, but personal interview with the patients having received an UGFNB by a study nurse can describe both the service received and the patient's experience with it. The interviews will be performed after the patient has been relieved of pain. The PhD (Philosophiae Doctor)-candidate, not the study nurse having performed the nerve block, will conduct the interviews. The patients will be asked whether the nerve block relieved them of pain, how they experienced the procedure and the fact that it was performed by a nurse had any relevance. Also, the PhD-candidate will interview the patient at a later point during the hospital stay for a second time to compare the answers The study nurses and the anesthesiologists that has supervised the nurses will be presented with a questionnaire after each UGFNB conducted. The PhD-candidate will hand out the questionnaire immediately after the FNB is conducted by a study nurse. The items in the questionnaire include feasibility and success of the procedure and are identical for nurses and anesthesiologists. Finally, each study nurse will do three UGFNB with supervision by an anesthesiologist before we start inclusion in a later randomized controlled trial. Five study nurses will be included and fifteen patients. The inclusion criteria for patients will be: Patients arriving at the ED diagnosed with a hip fracture (radiological confirmed) ASA- classification 1-4 Written and verbal informed consent by patient Exclusion criteria for patients will be: Patients with; dementia, without ability to give informed consent and other cognitively challenges needed to participate in this study (at the discretion of the study nurse) Known allergies to local anesthetic (Ropivacaine) used in UGFNB Use of anticoagulants or platelet inhibitors. Acetylsalicylic acid and dipyridamole is allowed. If a recent (last 2 hours) INR( international normalized ratio) is below <1.5 the patient can be included. Pregnant Age <18 years Severe head injury which leads to significant loss of consciousness (GCS <12) >10 mg or more morphine administrated pre-hospital Skin lesions/infection at presumed block site Patients admitted with other suspected or verified fractures, except small fractures in hands and foots. Verbal and written informed consent The study nurses will inform the patients by oral and written information and inclusion and intervention of the patient will start after written consent.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hip Fractures, Ultrasound Therapy; Complications, Pain, Acute
Keywords
Task shifting, Ultrasound guided, Training, Education, Emergency department, Registered nurse, Nerve block, Hip fracture

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
A methodology study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
5 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Emergency nurses
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Emergency nurses who are trained in an one-day course
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Emergency nurses
Intervention Description
Emergency nurses who are trained for one-day in ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cumulative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement at 120 minutes after start of procedure, measured by 5 timepoints
Description
Cumulative Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED at 120 minutes after admission, measured by five time Points; At the end of procedure, 30 min.-, 60 min.-, 90 min.- and 120 min after start of procedure. NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Time Frame
120 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement at baseline
Description
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED at baseline (inclution of patient) NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Time Frame
At baseline (timepoint 0)
Title
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 30 minutes
Description
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 30 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Time Frame
After 30 minutes from baseline
Title
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 60 minutes
Description
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 60 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Time Frame
After 60 minutes from baseline
Title
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 90 minutes
Description
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 90 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Time Frame
After 90 minutes from baseline
Title
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement after 120 minutes
Description
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) - during passive movement (30 degree flexion in the fractured hip) in patients with hip fracture during stay in the ED after 120 minutes from baseline NRS score: 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain.
Time Frame
After 120 minutes from baseline
Title
Hematoma
Description
Hematoma - defined as a new tumor > 2 centimeter in the groin / injection site measured by ultrasound, Yes or no
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Intravasal injection
Description
Intravasal injection - visually + circulatory and neurological symptoms, yes or no
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient experience- description of pain
Description
Patient experience of pain- During rest and motion measured by a 1-5 scale
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient satisfaction- waiting time to pain relief
Description
Patiens experiences on waiting time to pain relief measured in a scale form 1-5
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient satisfaction- information
Description
Patient experiences on information measured in a scale form 1-5
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient satisfaction- description of pain before the procedure
Description
Patient experience on pre-procedure pain measured by 1-5 scale
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient satisfaction- description of pain after the procedure
Description
Patient satisfaction- description of pain after the procedure measured by 1-5 scale
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient satisfaction- safety
Description
Patient satisfaction- description of patient reported feeling of safety during nurse led procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient satisfaction-effect of procedure
Description
Patient satisfaction regarding reduction of pain after the procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient satisfaction-hearing status
Description
Patient satisfaction hearing status measured by a 1-4 scale
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Self reported-registered nurse- complexity
Description
Complexity of procedure measured by scale 1-5
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-registered nurse-success
Description
Success of procedure measured by 1-5 scale
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-registered nurse-Recognition of anatomic structures
Description
Recognition of anatomic structures at ultrasound, measured by a 1-4
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-registred nurse-spread of anesthesia
Description
Spread of anesthesia, measured by a 1-4 scale
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-registered nurse- patient benefit from procedure
Description
Patient benefit of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-complexity
Description
Complexity of procedure measured by scale 1-5
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-success
Description
Success of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-Recognition of anatomic structures
Description
Recognition of anatomic structures at ultrasound measured by a 1-4 scale
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-spread of anesthesia
Description
Spread of anesthesia, measured by a 1-4 scale
Time Frame
approximately 2 hours
Title
Self reported-Anesthesiologist-Patient benefit of procedure
Description
Patient benefit of procedure measured by a 1-5 scale
Time Frame
approxemitely 2 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Registered nurses or registered nurses with continuing education in acute nursing or geriatrics The nurses need to be aware that it will increase the workload in beginning of the project. Registered nurse has to be senior staff experienced i.e. worked in the ED Motivated to take on a new task in the ED Certificated in advanced CPR Familiar with routines in the ED and the relevant patient group They must be willing to be a part of this project for approximately 12 months. Working at least 75%. Exclusion Criteria: Refuse to participate
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elin saga, Nurse
Organizational Affiliation
The Hospital of Vestfold
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Vestfold Hospital Trust
City
Tønsberg
ZIP/Postal Code
3103
Country
Norway

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No plan for sharing IPD
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24957807
Citation
Dochez E, van Geffen GJ, Bruhn J, Hoogerwerf N, van de Pas H, Scheffer G. Prehospital administered fascia iliaca compartment block by emergency medical service nurses, a feasibility study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2014 Jun 23;22:38. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-22-38.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Mandy, L. . Nurse-led femoral nerve service for patients with fractured neck of femur. Advanced Nursing Practice in Pain Management. C. E. e. al., John wiley and sons: (2009)16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29500558
Citation
Ketelaars R, Stollman JT, van Eeten E, Eikendal T, Bruhn J, van Geffen GJ. Emergency physician-performed ultrasound-guided nerve blocks in proximal femoral fractures provide safe and effective pain relief: a prospective observational study in The Netherlands. Int J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar 2;11(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0173-z.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Layzell M. Nurse-led femoral nerve block service for patients with fractured neck of femur. 2010 05.02.18. In: Advancing nursing practice in pain management [Internet]. Chichester, West Sussex; Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Pub.; [16]
Results Reference
background
Citation
WHO (2008). Task Shifting - Global Recommendations and Guidelines. WHO. Geneva, Switzerland., WHO Document Production Services: 96.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

How to Develop a Training Program for Nurses in Ultrasound Guided Femoral Nerve Block

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs