search
Back to results

Can the Lambre Device Occlude IRRegular And Large Appendages in Patients With Non-Valvular AF (CORRAL-AF)

Primary Purpose

Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Appendage Thrombosis, CVA

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LAmbre PlusTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure System
Market approved oral anticoagulation (OAC), such as warfarin (Coumadin), dabigatran (Pradaxa), rivaroxaban (Xarelto), apixiban (Eliquis), edoxaban (Savaysa), or betrixaban (Bevyxxa)
Sponsored by
Brian O'Neill MD
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Atrial Fibrillation focused on measuring LAMBRE device, Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion device, CVA prevention, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiovascular angiography, Anti-coagulation management, Thromboembolism, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, non-pharmacological alternative, Thrombosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Potential subjects must meet ALL of the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study:

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient is a male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age
  2. The patient has documented paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation or flutter
  3. The patient has a CHADS2 score ≥ 2 or a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 3, and is recommended for oral anticoagulation therapy
  4. The patient is deemed by their physician to be suitable for short-term OAC, but there is an appropriate rationale for seeking a non-pharmacologic alternative to oral anticoagulation
  5. The patient is deemed suitable for LAA closure in a shared decision model with a non-implanting physician
  6. The patient is willing and able to comply with protocol-specified treatment and follow-up evaluations
  7. The patient (or his or her legally authorized representative) has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, and has been provided written informed consent approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee (EC)

Potential subjects will be excluded if ANY of the following conditions apply:

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to index procedure per site standard test
  2. Patients with atrial fibrillation that is defined by a single occurrence, or that is transient or reversible (e.g., secondary to CABG, an interventional procedure, pneumonia, or hyperthyroidism)
  3. Patients who require long-term anticoagulation/DAPT for a condition other than atrial fibrillation
  4. Patients not suitable for short term oral anti-coagulation (including due to bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or absolute contraindication to OAC or DAPT ) or who will refuse transfusion
  5. Patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease, known severe aortic stenosis requiring surgical or percutaneous valve replacement, or existing mechanical valve prosthesis
  6. Active infection with bacteremia
  7. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin/bivalirudin, any device material or component (nitinol, nickel, titanium, PET), and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated
  8. Anatomic conditions that would prevent performance of the LAA occlusion procedure (e.g., prior atrial septal defect [ASD] or patient foramen ovale [PFO] surgical repair or implanted closure device, or obliterated left atrial appendage)
  9. Recent (within 30 days pre-procedure) or planned (within 60 days post procedure) cardiac or non-cardiac interventional or surgical procedure (e.g., cardioversion, ablation, percutaneous coronary intervention, cataract surgery, etc.)
  10. Recent (within 90 days pre-procedure) stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction
  11. Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class IV)
  12. Known asymptomatic carotid artery disease with>70% diameter stenosis OR symptomatic carotid disease (>50% diameter stenosis with ipsilateral stroke or TIA). Subjects with prior carotid endarterectomy or carotid stent placement may be enrolled, provided that known diameter stenosis is <50%.
  13. Past or pending heart or any other organ transplant, or on the waiting list for any organ transplant
  14. Current participation in another investigational drug or device study
  15. Size of the left atrial appendage at the LAmbre Plus defined landing zone within outside the manufactures recommendations (Table 2.)
  16. Patients with an indication for chronic P2Y12 platelet inhibition therapy
  17. Patients who are unable to undergo CT scan

Echocardiographic Exclusion Criteria

  1. Left atrial appendage anatomy may accommodate implantation of the WATCHMAN device, according to IFU.
  2. LVEF <25%
  3. Intracardiac thrombus or dense spontaneous echo contrast, as visualized by TEE within 2 days prior to implant
  4. Presence of a high-risk patent foramen ovale (PFO), defined as an atrial septal aneurysm (excursion >15 mm or length >15 mm) or large shunt (early, within 3 beats and/or substantial passage of bubbles)
  5. Moderate or severe mitral valve stenosis (mitral valve area <1.5 cm2)
  6. Complex atheroma with mobile plaque of the descending aorta and/or aortic arch (Grade 4 or higher)
  7. Presence of an intracardiac tumor

Sites / Locations

  • Henry Ford Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Other

Arm Label

Device Arm

Control Arm

Roll-in Arm

Arm Description

The LAmbre PlusTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure System (LAmbre device)

Market approved oral anticoagulation (OAC)

225 roll-in subjects

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Composite of time to first occurrence of stroke, cardiovascular death, or clinically relevant major or non-major bleeding events
Defined as composite of: First occurrence of stroke defined by NeuroARC; Cardiovascular death defined as any death due to proximate cause (e.g., MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, and all procedure related deaths, including those related to concomitant treatment; Clinically relevant major or non-major bleeding events defined by hemoglobin of ≥2.0 g/dl during a 24-h period, transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red cells, bleeding at a critical site (intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, or retroperitoneal), or fatal bleeding
Composite of time to first occurrence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism
Defined as composite of: First occurrence of ischemic stroke defined by NeuroARC; Systemic embolization defined as acute vascular insufficiency or occlusion of the extremities or any non-CNS organ associated with clinical, imaging, surgical/autopsy evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanism (e.g. trauma, atherosclerosis, or instrumentation). When there is presence of prior peripheral artery disease, angiographic or surgical or autopsy evidence is required to show abrupt arterial occlusion.
Overall safety
Overall safety is defined as the composite of: Major procedure-related complications, defined as the composite of cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion with tamponade, device embolization, and major vascular complications (adjudicated by the independent Clinical Events Committee as related to the study device or procedure); AND Major adverse events, defined as all death, all stroke and major bleeding as compared to OAC

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mortality
Death classified as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular and reported cumulatively and individually
Myocardial Infarction
Occurrence of MI defined by modified Third Universal Definition, which will be adjudicated and classified by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)
Peri-Procedural Stroke
Occurrence of peri-procedural stroke defined as Overt CNS Injury (NeuroARC defined)
Bleeding Complications
Occurrence of bleeding complications evaluated as major bleeding (BARC Type ≥3); major and minor bleeding (BARC ≥2) and its components by BARC Type
Major Procedure-Related Complications
Occurrence of major procedure-related complications, defined as the composite of cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion with tamponade, ischemic stroke (NeuroARC defined), device embolization, major vascular complications (VARC 3 defined), and major bleeding
Vascular Complications
Occurrence of Vascular complications (VARC 3 defined)
Embolic events
Occurrence of embolic events, defined as the composite of ischemic stroke (NeuroARC defined) and systemic embolization
Ischemic Stroke
Occurrence of ischemic stroke (NeuroARC defined)
Systemic embolization
Occurrence of systemic embolization defined by acute vascular insufficiency or occlusion of the extremities or any non-CNS organ associated with clinical, imaging, surgical/autopsy evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanism (e.g. trauma, atherosclerosis, or instrumentation). When there is presence of prior peripheral artery disease, angiographic or surgical or autopsy evidence is required to show abrupt arterial occlusion.
All CNS injury and dysfunction
Occurrence of all CNS injury and dysfunction (NeuroARC defined)
Technical success
Technical success is defined as successful implantation (acceptable device position, stability, and LAA seal) with the assigned device
Closure success
Closure success is defined as technical success followed by successful LAA closure (complete LAA closure or peri-device residual jet <5 mm in width by TEE/Imaging or CT)
Procedural Success
Procedural success is defined as technical success without major procedure-related complications
Total Procedural Time
Total procedural time is defined as time elapsed between first venous access and removal of the last catheter from the venous access sheath
Device Thrombosis
Occurrence of device thrombosis

Full Information

First Posted
December 17, 2020
Last Updated
July 17, 2023
Sponsor
Brian O'Neill MD
Collaborators
Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04684212
Brief Title
Can the Lambre Device Occlude IRRegular And Large Appendages in Patients With Non-Valvular AF
Acronym
CORRAL-AF
Official Title
Can the Lambre Device Occlude IRRegular And Large Appendages in Patients With Non-Valvular AF: The CORRAL-AF Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
August 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
August 1, 2028 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2033 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Brian O'Neill MD
Collaborators
Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the implantation of the LAmbre PlusTM device in patients with large or irregularly shaped appendages with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are at increased risk for stroke and systemic embolism compared to oral anticoagulation (OAC).
Detailed Description
This prospective, randomized, multicenter study will enroll 2,931 subjects (2706 randomized subjects, 225 roll-in subjects) at up to 75 investigational sites in the United States. Patients presenting with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are at increased risk for stroke and systemic embolism based on CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and who are recommended for oral anticoagulation therapy but have an appropriate rationale to seek a non-pharmacologic alternative to oral anticoagulation, and who meet all eligibility criteria will be enrolled in the study. Subjects will have clinical follow-up in-hospital and at 45 days, 6 months, 12 months, and annually up to 5-years. CT/Imaging or Transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) follow-up will occur at 45 days and TEE at 1-year. The LAmbre PlusTM Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure System is intended to reduce the risk of thromboembolism from the left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who: Are at increased risk for stroke and systemic embolism based on CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores and are recommended for oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy; AND Are deemed by their physician to be suitable for OAC; AND Have an appropriate rationale to seek a non-pharmacological alternative to OAC, taking into account the safety and effectiveness of the device compared to OAC

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Appendage Thrombosis, CVA
Keywords
LAMBRE device, Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion device, CVA prevention, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiovascular angiography, Anti-coagulation management, Thromboembolism, nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, non-pharmacological alternative, Thrombosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This prospective, randomized, multicenter study will enroll 2,931 subjects (2706 randomized subjects, 225 roll-in subjects) at up to 75 investigational sites in the United States.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2931 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Device Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The LAmbre PlusTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure System (LAmbre device)
Arm Title
Control Arm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Market approved oral anticoagulation (OAC)
Arm Title
Roll-in Arm
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
225 roll-in subjects
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LAmbre PlusTM Left Atrial Appendage Closure System
Other Intervention Name(s)
LAmbre device
Intervention Description
The LAmbre Plus device is a self-expanding occluder, composed of a distal Umbrella and a proximal Cover laser welded together, delivered percutaneously via femoral venous access and trans-septal puncture. The distal Umbrella consists of an elastic nitinol frame and outer PET membrane, and has circumferential anchors to secure the occluder to the left atrial appendage (LAA) wall. The proximal Cover is a disc of elastic nitinol mesh, which seals the orifice of the LAA and minimizes thrombus formation, and includes a PET membrane to prevent the passage of blood into the LAA after implantation.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Market approved oral anticoagulation (OAC), such as warfarin (Coumadin), dabigatran (Pradaxa), rivaroxaban (Xarelto), apixiban (Eliquis), edoxaban (Savaysa), or betrixaban (Bevyxxa)
Other Intervention Name(s)
OAC
Intervention Description
Continuation of market approved OAC drug.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Composite of time to first occurrence of stroke, cardiovascular death, or clinically relevant major or non-major bleeding events
Description
Defined as composite of: First occurrence of stroke defined by NeuroARC; Cardiovascular death defined as any death due to proximate cause (e.g., MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, and all procedure related deaths, including those related to concomitant treatment; Clinically relevant major or non-major bleeding events defined by hemoglobin of ≥2.0 g/dl during a 24-h period, transfusion of ≥2 units of packed red cells, bleeding at a critical site (intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, pericardial, intramuscular with compartment syndrome, or retroperitoneal), or fatal bleeding
Time Frame
through study completion, up to 5 years
Title
Composite of time to first occurrence of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism
Description
Defined as composite of: First occurrence of ischemic stroke defined by NeuroARC; Systemic embolization defined as acute vascular insufficiency or occlusion of the extremities or any non-CNS organ associated with clinical, imaging, surgical/autopsy evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanism (e.g. trauma, atherosclerosis, or instrumentation). When there is presence of prior peripheral artery disease, angiographic or surgical or autopsy evidence is required to show abrupt arterial occlusion.
Time Frame
through study completion, up to of 5 years
Title
Overall safety
Description
Overall safety is defined as the composite of: Major procedure-related complications, defined as the composite of cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion with tamponade, device embolization, and major vascular complications (adjudicated by the independent Clinical Events Committee as related to the study device or procedure); AND Major adverse events, defined as all death, all stroke and major bleeding as compared to OAC
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mortality
Description
Death classified as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular and reported cumulatively and individually
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Title
Myocardial Infarction
Description
Occurrence of MI defined by modified Third Universal Definition, which will be adjudicated and classified by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC)
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Title
Peri-Procedural Stroke
Description
Occurrence of peri-procedural stroke defined as Overt CNS Injury (NeuroARC defined)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Bleeding Complications
Description
Occurrence of bleeding complications evaluated as major bleeding (BARC Type ≥3); major and minor bleeding (BARC ≥2) and its components by BARC Type
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Title
Major Procedure-Related Complications
Description
Occurrence of major procedure-related complications, defined as the composite of cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion with tamponade, ischemic stroke (NeuroARC defined), device embolization, major vascular complications (VARC 3 defined), and major bleeding
Time Frame
45 days
Title
Vascular Complications
Description
Occurrence of Vascular complications (VARC 3 defined)
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Title
Embolic events
Description
Occurrence of embolic events, defined as the composite of ischemic stroke (NeuroARC defined) and systemic embolization
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Title
Ischemic Stroke
Description
Occurrence of ischemic stroke (NeuroARC defined)
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Title
Systemic embolization
Description
Occurrence of systemic embolization defined by acute vascular insufficiency or occlusion of the extremities or any non-CNS organ associated with clinical, imaging, surgical/autopsy evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanism (e.g. trauma, atherosclerosis, or instrumentation). When there is presence of prior peripheral artery disease, angiographic or surgical or autopsy evidence is required to show abrupt arterial occlusion.
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Title
All CNS injury and dysfunction
Description
Occurrence of all CNS injury and dysfunction (NeuroARC defined)
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years
Title
Technical success
Description
Technical success is defined as successful implantation (acceptable device position, stability, and LAA seal) with the assigned device
Time Frame
within 24 hours Post-procedure
Title
Closure success
Description
Closure success is defined as technical success followed by successful LAA closure (complete LAA closure or peri-device residual jet <5 mm in width by TEE/Imaging or CT)
Time Frame
45 days
Title
Procedural Success
Description
Procedural success is defined as technical success without major procedure-related complications
Time Frame
7 days Post-procedure
Title
Total Procedural Time
Description
Total procedural time is defined as time elapsed between first venous access and removal of the last catheter from the venous access sheath
Time Frame
within 24 hours Post-procedure
Title
Device Thrombosis
Description
Occurrence of device thrombosis
Time Frame
45 days, 6 months, 12 months, 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Potential subjects must meet ALL of the following criteria to be eligible for inclusion in the study: Inclusion Criteria: The patient is a male or non-pregnant female ≥18 years of age The patient has documented paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation or flutter The patient has a CHADS2 score ≥ 2 or a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥ 3, and is recommended for oral anticoagulation therapy The patient is deemed by their physician to be suitable for short-term OAC, but there is an appropriate rationale for seeking a non-pharmacologic alternative to oral anticoagulation The patient is deemed suitable for LAA closure in a shared decision model with a non-implanting physician The patient is willing and able to comply with protocol-specified treatment and follow-up evaluations The patient (or his or her legally authorized representative) has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, and has been provided written informed consent approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee (EC) Potential subjects will be excluded if ANY of the following conditions apply: Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or nursing patients and those who plan pregnancy in the period up to 1 year following index procedure. Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test done within 7 days prior to index procedure per site standard test Patients with atrial fibrillation that is defined by a single occurrence, or that is transient or reversible (e.g., secondary to CABG, an interventional procedure, pneumonia, or hyperthyroidism) Patients who require long-term anticoagulation/DAPT for a condition other than atrial fibrillation Patients not suitable for short term oral anti-coagulation (including due to bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or absolute contraindication to OAC or DAPT ) or who will refuse transfusion Patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease, known severe aortic stenosis requiring surgical or percutaneous valve replacement, or existing mechanical valve prosthesis Active infection with bacteremia Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin/bivalirudin, any device material or component (nitinol, nickel, titanium, PET), and/or contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated Anatomic conditions that would prevent performance of the LAA occlusion procedure (e.g., prior atrial septal defect [ASD] or patient foramen ovale [PFO] surgical repair or implanted closure device, or obliterated left atrial appendage) Recent (within 30 days pre-procedure) or planned (within 60 days post procedure) cardiac or non-cardiac interventional or surgical procedure (e.g., cardioversion, ablation, percutaneous coronary intervention, cataract surgery, etc.) Recent (within 90 days pre-procedure) stroke, transient ischemic attack, or myocardial infarction Severe heart failure (New York Heart Association Class IV) Known asymptomatic carotid artery disease with>70% diameter stenosis OR symptomatic carotid disease (>50% diameter stenosis with ipsilateral stroke or TIA). Subjects with prior carotid endarterectomy or carotid stent placement may be enrolled, provided that known diameter stenosis is <50%. Past or pending heart or any other organ transplant, or on the waiting list for any organ transplant Current participation in another investigational drug or device study Size of the left atrial appendage at the LAmbre Plus defined landing zone within outside the manufactures recommendations (Table 2.) Patients with an indication for chronic P2Y12 platelet inhibition therapy Patients who are unable to undergo CT scan Echocardiographic Exclusion Criteria Left atrial appendage anatomy may accommodate implantation of the WATCHMAN device, according to IFU by size. LVEF <25% Intracardiac thrombus or dense spontaneous echo contrast, as visualized by TEE within 2 days prior to implant Presence of a high-risk patent foramen ovale (PFO), defined as an atrial septal aneurysm (excursion >15 mm or length >15 mm) or large shunt (early, within 3 beats and/or substantial passage of bubbles) Moderate or severe mitral valve stenosis (mitral valve area <1.5 cm2) Complex atheroma with mobile plaque of the descending aorta and/or aortic arch (Grade 4 or higher) Presence of an intracardiac tumor
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Brian O'Neill, MD
Phone
313-916-8708
Email
boneil3@hfhs.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Stephen Krafchak, MS
Phone
313-916-3571
Email
skrafch1@hfhs.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian O'Neill, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Henry Ford Health System
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Henry Ford Hospital
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen Krafchak, MS
Phone
313-916-3571
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian O'Neill, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25842274
Citation
Mandalenakis Z, Von Koch L, Eriksson H, Dellborg M, Caidahl K, Welin L, Rosengren A, Hansson PO. The risk of atrial fibrillation in the general male population: a lifetime follow-up of 50-year-old men. Europace. 2015 Jul;17(7):1018-22. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv036. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16527828
Citation
Heeringa J, van der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Kors JA, van Herpen G, Stricker BH, Stijnen T, Lip GY, Witteman JC. Prevalence, incidence and lifetime risk of atrial fibrillation: the Rotterdam study. Eur Heart J. 2006 Apr;27(8):949-53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi825. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11343485
Citation
Go AS, Hylek EM, Phillips KA, Chang Y, Henault LE, Selby JV, Singer DE. Prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults: national implications for rhythm management and stroke prevention: the AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) Study. JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2370-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2370.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24103419
Citation
Dewland TA, Olgin JE, Vittinghoff E, Marcus GM. Incident atrial fibrillation among Asians, Hispanics, blacks, and whites. Circulation. 2013 Dec 3;128(23):2470-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002449. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28784826
Citation
Lau DH, Nattel S, Kalman JM, Sanders P. Modifiable Risk Factors and Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2017 Aug 8;136(6):583-596. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023163.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1866765
Citation
Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991 Aug;22(8):983-8. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.8.983.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12401529
Citation
Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002 Oct 1;113(5):359-64. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01236-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25713737
Citation
Kong B, Liu Y, Huang H, Jiang H, Huang C. Left atrial appendage closure for thromboembolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: advances and perspectives. J Thorac Dis. 2015 Feb;7(2):199-203. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17577005
Citation
Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 19;146(12):857-67. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24685669
Citation
January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):e1-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.022. Epub 2014 Mar 28. No abstract available. Erratum In: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 2;64(21):2305-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15477396
Citation
Gage BF, van Walraven C, Pearce L, Hart RG, Koudstaal PJ, Boode BS, Petersen P. Selecting patients with atrial fibrillation for anticoagulation: stroke risk stratification in patients taking aspirin. Circulation. 2004 Oct 19;110(16):2287-92. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145172.55640.93. Epub 2004 Oct 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19762550
Citation
Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010 Feb;137(2):263-72. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1584. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20299623
Citation
Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, de Vos CB, Crijns HJ, Lip GY. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010 Nov;138(5):1093-100. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0134. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9412618
Citation
Brass LM, Krumholz HM, Scinto JM, Radford M. Warfarin use among patients with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 1997 Dec;28(12):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2382.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21798501
Citation
Chan PS, Maddox TM, Tang F, Spinler S, Spertus JA. Practice-level variation in warfarin use among outpatients with atrial fibrillation (from the NCDR PINNACLE program). Am J Cardiol. 2011 Oct 15;108(8):1136-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.017. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10610643
Citation
Go AS, Hylek EM, Borowsky LH, Phillips KA, Selby JV, Singer DE. Warfarin use among ambulatory patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: the anticoagulation and risk factors in atrial fibrillation (ATRIA) study. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Dec 21;131(12):927-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-12-199912210-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16528001
Citation
Birman-Deych E, Radford MJ, Nilasena DS, Gage BF. Use and effectiveness of warfarin in Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2006 Apr;37(4):1070-4. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000208294.46968.a4. Epub 2006 Mar 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17693178
Citation
Mant J, Hobbs FD, Fletcher K, Roalfe A, Fitzmaurice D, Lip GY, Murray E; BAFTA investigators; Midland Research Practices Network (MidReC). Warfarin versus aspirin for stroke prevention in an elderly community population with atrial fibrillation (the Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Treatment of the Aged Study, BAFTA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Aug 11;370(9586):493-503. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61233-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21719769
Citation
Broderick JP, Bonomo JB, Kissela BM, Khoury JC, Moomaw CJ, Alwell K, Woo D, Flaherty ML, Khatri P, Adeoye O, Ferioli S, Kleindorfer DO. Withdrawal of antithrombotic agents and its impact on ischemic stroke occurrence. Stroke. 2011 Sep;42(9):2509-14. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.611905. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21830957
Citation
Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, Breithardt G, Halperin JL, Hankey GJ, Piccini JP, Becker RC, Nessel CC, Paolini JF, Berkowitz SD, Fox KA, Califf RM; ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):883-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19717844
Citation
Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, Pogue J, Reilly PA, Themeles E, Varrone J, Wang S, Alings M, Xavier D, Zhu J, Diaz R, Lewis BS, Darius H, Diener HC, Joyner CD, Wallentin L; RE-LY Steering Committee and Investigators. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561. Epub 2009 Aug 30. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 4;363(19):1877.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21870978
Citation
Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, Al-Khalidi HR, Ansell J, Atar D, Avezum A, Bahit MC, Diaz R, Easton JD, Ezekowitz JA, Flaker G, Garcia D, Geraldes M, Gersh BJ, Golitsyn S, Goto S, Hermosillo AG, Hohnloser SH, Horowitz J, Mohan P, Jansky P, Lewis BS, Lopez-Sendon JL, Pais P, Parkhomenko A, Verheugt FW, Zhu J, Wallentin L; ARISTOTLE Committees and Investigators. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):981-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107039. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10797031
Citation
Kalra L, Yu G, Perez I, Lakhani A, Donaldson N. Prospective cohort study to determine if trial efficacy of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation translates into clinical effectiveness. BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1236-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1236.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16271478
Citation
Ono A, Fujita T. Low-intensity anticoagulation for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: efficacy and safety in actual clinical practice. J Clin Neurosci. 2005 Nov;12(8):891-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.10.011. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16103572
Citation
Ruiz Ortiz M, Romo Penas E, Franco Zapata MF, Mesa Rubio D, Anguita Sanchez M, Lopez Granados A, Arizon del Prado JM, Valles Belsue F. Oral anticoagulation in patients aged 75 years or older with chronic non-valvar atrial fibrillation: effectiveness and safety in daily clinical practice. Heart. 2005 Sep;91(9):1225-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2004.050831. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10933359
Citation
Katz ES, Tsiamtsiouris T, Applebaum RM, Schwartzbard A, Tunick PA, Kronzon I. Surgical left atrial appendage ligation is frequently incomplete: a transesophageal echocardiograhic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Aug;36(2):468-71. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00765-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19683639
Citation
Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Mullin CM, Sick P; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009 Aug 15;374(9689):534-42. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61343-X. Erratum In: Lancet. 2009 Nov 7;374(9701):1596.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23325525
Citation
Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Halperin JL, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation: 2.3-Year Follow-up of the PROTECT AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation) Trial. Circulation. 2013 Feb 12;127(6):720-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.114389. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29582475
Citation
Kleinecke C, Gomez Monterrosas O, Scalone G, Lam YY, Shin ES, Bellmann B, Brachmann J, Park JW. First-in-human experience of left atrial appendage occlusion with the steerable FuStar sheath. J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):532-537. doi: 10.1111/joic.12509. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29122133
Citation
Huang H, Liu Y, Xu Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Cao K, Zhang S, Yang Y, Yang X, Huang D, Yu B, Su X, Wu L, Huang C. Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the LAmbre Device for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 13;10(21):2188-2194. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.072.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29885707
Citation
Park JW, Sievert H, Kleinecke C, Vaskelyte L, Schnupp S, Sievert K, Lam YY, Stahli BE, Zhang D, Li A, Brachmann J. Left atrial appendage occlusion with lambre in atrial fibrillation: Initial European experience. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;265:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.120.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28183511
Citation
Lansky AJ, Messe SR, Brickman AM, Dwyer M, van der Worp HB, Lazar RM, Pietras CG, Abrams KJ, McFadden E, Petersen NH, Browndyke J, Prendergast B, Ng VG, Cutlip DE, Kapadia S, Krucoff MW, Linke A, Moy CS, Schofer J, van Es GA, Virmani R, Popma J, Parides MK, Kodali S, Bilello M, Zivadinov R, Akar J, Furie KL, Gress D, Voros S, Moses J, Greer D, Forrest JK, Holmes D, Kappetein AP, Mack M, Baumbach A. Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: An Academic Research Consortium Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Feb 14;69(6):679-691. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.045.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21670242
Citation
Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011 Jun 14;123(23):2736-47. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33871579
Citation
VARC-3 WRITING COMMITTEE; Genereux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Bax JJ, Leipsic JA, Blanke P, Blackstone EH, Finn MT, Kapadia S, Linke A, Mack MJ, Makkar R, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Reardon M, Rodes-Cabau J, Van Mieghem NM, Webb JG, Cohen DJ, Leon MB. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10985216
Citation
Robins JM, Finkelstein DM. Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests. Biometrics. 2000 Sep;56(3):779-88. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00779.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32586585
Citation
Osmancik P, Herman D, Neuzil P, Hala P, Taborsky M, Kala P, Poloczek M, Stasek J, Haman L, Branny M, Chovancik J, Cervinka P, Holy J, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, Havranek S, Vancura V, Opatrny J, Peichl P, Tousek P, Lekesova V, Jarkovsky J, Novackova M, Benesova K, Widimsky P, Reddy VY; PRAGUE-17 Trial Investigators. Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants in High-Risk Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jun 30;75(25):3122-3135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.067.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34537184
Citation
Korsholm K, Damgaard D, Valentin JB, Packer EJS, Odenstedt J, Sinisalo J, Putaala J, Naess H, Al-Jazi MA, Karlsson JE, Pontoppidan J, Modrau B, Hjort J, Matzen KL, Johnsen SP, Nielsen-Kudsk JE. Left atrial appendage occlusion vs novel oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: rationale and design of the multicenter randomized occlusion-AF trial. Am Heart J. 2022 Jan;243:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.020. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27587437
Citation
Sahay S, Nombela-Franco L, Rodes-Cabau J, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Salinas P, Biagioni C, Nunez-Gil I, Gonzalo N, de Agustin JA, Del Trigo M, Perez de Isla L, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Escaned J, Macaya C. Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure versus medical treatment in atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis from randomised trials. Heart. 2017 Jan 15;103(2):139-147. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309782. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17470709
Citation
Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, Boam A, Cohen DJ, van Es GA, Steg PG, Morel MA, Mauri L, Vranckx P, McFadden E, Lansky A, Hamon M, Krucoff MW, Serruys PW; Academic Research Consortium. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: a case for standardized definitions. Circulation. 2007 May 1;115(17):2344-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22922414
Citation
Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Chaitman BA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2551-67. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31678086
Citation
Korsholm K, Berti S, Iriart X, Saw J, Wang DD, Cochet H, Chow D, Clemente A, De Backer O, Moller Jensen J, Nielsen-Kudsk JE. Expert Recommendations on Cardiac Computed Tomography for Planning Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 10;13(3):277-292. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.054. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Can the Lambre Device Occlude IRRegular And Large Appendages in Patients With Non-Valvular AF

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs