search
Back to results

PD-Ballet: Effectiveness and Implementation in Parkinson's Disease

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dance with ballet elements
Sponsored by
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring dance, ballet, complementary therapy, exercise, multimodal

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Effectiveness investigation eligibility criteria (PwPs only)

  1. Inclusion:

    • Age of 18 and upwards
    • diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to the UK PD Brain Bank criteria
    • Hoehn Yarhr stages I-V
  2. Exclusion:

    • diagnosis or suspicion of other causes for parkinsonism
    • advanced-stage therapy consideration (deep brain stimulation, continuous levodopa duodenal infusion, and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion)
    • any condition interfering with the ability to give the informed consent
    • Indication of dementia through a score of ≤21 on MoCA
    • enrolment in a simultaneous investigational trial
    • inability to travel to the weekly sessions

Implementation science investigation eligibility criteria f) Inclusion:

  • People with Parkinson's - patients with a formal diagnosis of PD who have participated in the PD-Ballet intervention.
  • Family members of PwP - relatives/carers/nominated person of the patients with a formal diagnosis of PD who have participated in the PD-Ballet intervention
  • Clinicians (Referrers) - neurologists/geriatricians/neuropsychiatrists/SALT/OT, as well as PD specialist nurses, physicians and research staff experienced in PD
  • Dance leaders (Deliverers) - English National Ballet dancers involved in the PD-Ballet project
  • Support staff (Supporters)- other parties involved with the PD-Ballet project

    g) Exclusion:

  • People with Parkinson's - parkinsonism other than PD, lack of involvement in the PD-Ballet project
  • Clinicians - Neurologists/geriatricians/neuropsychiatrists/SALT/OT, as well as PD specialist nurses, physicians and research staff experienced in PD
  • Dance leaders - English National Ballet dancers not involved in the PD-Ballet project
  • Support staff - other parties not involved with the PD-Ballet project

Sites / Locations

  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention

Usual Treatment

Arm Description

usual treatment with the addition of joining 'Tea and Biscuit' sessions remotely

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in total score of the Movement Disorders Society Sponsored Non-Motor Rating Scale
Clinical Effectiveness Primary Outcome Measure, higher score indicate worse non-motor symptomatology, the maximum score is 1008.
Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Implementation Effectiveness Primary Outcome Measure - a 4 item, 5-point likert scale

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in total score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse motor condition
Change in total score of 10-meter walk test
Clinical Effectiveness. Time taken to walk 10 meters is calculated and compared at specific timepoints.
Change in total score of King's Parkinson's Pain Scale
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse levels of pain
Change in total score of Timed Up and Go test
Clinical Effectiveness. Time taken to carry out the test measured. A change between timepoints will be measured.
Change in total score of Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Clinical Effectiveness. Maximum score 30. Lower scores indicate cognitive impairment.
Clinical Impression of Severity Index for Parkinson's disease
provides a clinical judgment on Parkinson's disease (PD) severity based on motor symptoms and complications, cognitive status, and disability
Change in total score of Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale 2
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse sleep quality
Change in total score of Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse quality of life.
Change in total score and sub-scores of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse anxiety and depression.
Change in total score of Schwab and England Scale
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates higher level of independence in performing activities of daily living.
Change in total score of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Clinical Effectiveness. A lower score indicates better quality of life
Change in total score of Parkinson's Fatigue Scale-16
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more fatigue.
Change in total score of Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more activity
Change in total score of Starkstein Apathy Scale
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates more apathy.
Change in total score of Wearing Off Questionnaire-9
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse wearing-off.
Change in total score of Zaritt Burden Interview
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more carer burden.
Electrodiagnostic Measures - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation paired with Electroencephalography and electromyography.
Clinical Effectiveness - exploratory measure. EMG data are analysed via Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design). Peak-to-peak MEP amplitudes are measured for each trial and averaged per condition. SICI is calculated as the ratio of mean conditioned MEP to mean unconditioned MEP. TMS-evoked EEG potentials will be calculated by averaging artifact-free EEG trials for each experimental condition (i.e., before and after intervention). To smooth the signal a low-pass filter of 45 Hz will be applied to TEPs. The aim is to evaluate drug-induced changes for the 5 typical TEPs components (P = Positive, N = Negative) in accordance with the literature: N15-P25, N45, P70, N100, and P180.
Change in the scores of Parkinson's KinetiGraph parameters (bradykinesia, dyskinesia, tremor, immobility)
Clinical Effectiveness, objective artigraphy based wearable sensor worn at home for 6 days at each time point.
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Implementation Effectiveness - a 4-item, 5-point likert scale
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Implementation Effectiveness - a 4-item, 5-point likert scale
Sustainability scale (NOMAD)
Implementation Effectiveness - a 19 item implementation science survey (Finch et al., 2015)
Implementation costs
Health Economics - questionnaire regarding the potentially incurred costs related to clinical care for a person with Parkinson. The investigators will measure the potential change in direct and indirect costs incurred from clinical care.

Full Information

First Posted
July 23, 2020
Last Updated
April 19, 2021
Sponsor
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Collaborators
King's College London
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04719468
Brief Title
PD-Ballet: Effectiveness and Implementation in Parkinson's Disease
Official Title
Efficacy of Ballet Dancing on Motor and Non-motor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease: a Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-implementation Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
February 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Collaborators
King's College London

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Current literature consistently demonstrates beneficial motor effects of dance-based therapies in Parkinson's disease, along with improved quality of life. Little is known about the non-motor gains following such therapy. To date, no RTC has been conducted to investigate the benefits of ballet dancing in Parkinson's disease. The investigators aim to recruit 160 people with Parkinson's to either: participate in a 12-week ballet-based dancing intervention followed by a 'social Tea and Biscuit' session, or 12-week usual treatment monitoring and 'social Tea and Biscuit' sessions taking place after each intervention session. This study employs a randomised, controlled, single-blind, hybrid type 2 design with a hybrid implementation protocol to investigate both clinical efficacy of the programme and implementation aspects. The project's primary outcome measure is centered around non-motor symptoms of PD. Other measures include motor assessments, wearable sensors and quality of life assessments. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the delivery of the sessions will be a hybrid model - virtual sessions will be the primary method, with some capacity for in-person delivery when possible and deemed safe.
Detailed Description
Parkinson's Disease is a neurodegenerative condition currently affecting over 120,000 people in the UK and this number is set to double by 2065. The current treatment is based around symptomatic pharmacotherapy with levodopa being the gold standard. Currently there is some evidence for non-pharmacological treatments outlined by NICE guidelines, with no recommendations to specific adjuvant non-pharmacotherapies to aid PD symptoms, other than referral for physiotherapy. However, physical exercise has been shown to improve balance, strength, coordination and gait, leading to a significant improvement in quality of life. While a clear benefit of physical exercise on the motor symptoms is evident, few studies to date focused on the effects of group classes and on non-motor effects. Dance is emerging as a therapeutic option with cognitive, functional and psychosocial benefits, due to it being a multi-dimensional activity offering auditory, visual and sensory stimulation, musical experience, social interaction, memory, motor learning and emotional perception, expression and interaction and as such stimulating multiple pathways. To date, no research has explored acute and chronic effects of exercise based interventions (such as dance therapy with ballet) in comparison to the conventional therapy-based management of Parkinson's. This is a randomised, controlled, single-blind study involving 160 PwP across all stages of the disease. Participants will be allocated to either standard therapy plus 12 weekly sessions of ballet-based dancing followed by 'Tea and Biscuit' session or standard therapy with 'Tea and Biscuit' session on a 2:1 ratio. Non-motor symptoms, motor symptoms and quality of life will be measured using validated scales, questionnaires and wearable sensor recordings (Parkinson's KinetiGraph, GaitSmart). Furthermore, electrophysiological measures will be performed to determine the effects on cortical activity in a subgroup of participants. Assessments will be performed by a blinded rater at baseline and at the end of the intervention. The project will also explore the possibility of implementation of such therapy into the current pathways. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the delivery of the sessions will be a hybrid model - virtual sessions will be the primary method, with some capacity for in-person delivery when possible and deemed safe.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease
Keywords
dance, ballet, complementary therapy, exercise, multimodal

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Blinded rater
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
160 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Usual Treatment
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
usual treatment with the addition of joining 'Tea and Biscuit' sessions remotely
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Dance with ballet elements
Intervention Description
Ballet-based dance sessions will be delivered by trained artists within the English National Ballet group in a professional dance space/ delivered remotely, COVID-19 permitting.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in total score of the Movement Disorders Society Sponsored Non-Motor Rating Scale
Description
Clinical Effectiveness Primary Outcome Measure, higher score indicate worse non-motor symptomatology, the maximum score is 1008.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Description
Implementation Effectiveness Primary Outcome Measure - a 4 item, 5-point likert scale
Time Frame
post intervention (week 12)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in total score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse motor condition
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of 10-meter walk test
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. Time taken to walk 10 meters is calculated and compared at specific timepoints.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of King's Parkinson's Pain Scale
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse levels of pain
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Timed Up and Go test
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. Time taken to carry out the test measured. A change between timepoints will be measured.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. Maximum score 30. Lower scores indicate cognitive impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Clinical Impression of Severity Index for Parkinson's disease
Description
provides a clinical judgment on Parkinson's disease (PD) severity based on motor symptoms and complications, cognitive status, and disability
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale 2
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse sleep quality
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score and sub-scores of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse anxiety and depression.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Schwab and England Scale
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates higher level of independence in performing activities of daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. A lower score indicates better quality of life
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Parkinson's Fatigue Scale-16
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more fatigue.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more activity
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Starkstein Apathy Scale
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates more apathy.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Wearing Off Questionnaire-9
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse wearing-off.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in total score of Zaritt Burden Interview
Description
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more carer burden.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Electrodiagnostic Measures - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation paired with Electroencephalography and electromyography.
Description
Clinical Effectiveness - exploratory measure. EMG data are analysed via Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design). Peak-to-peak MEP amplitudes are measured for each trial and averaged per condition. SICI is calculated as the ratio of mean conditioned MEP to mean unconditioned MEP. TMS-evoked EEG potentials will be calculated by averaging artifact-free EEG trials for each experimental condition (i.e., before and after intervention). To smooth the signal a low-pass filter of 45 Hz will be applied to TEPs. The aim is to evaluate drug-induced changes for the 5 typical TEPs components (P = Positive, N = Negative) in accordance with the literature: N15-P25, N45, P70, N100, and P180.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Change in the scores of Parkinson's KinetiGraph parameters (bradykinesia, dyskinesia, tremor, immobility)
Description
Clinical Effectiveness, objective artigraphy based wearable sensor worn at home for 6 days at each time point.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Description
Implementation Effectiveness - a 4-item, 5-point likert scale
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Description
Implementation Effectiveness - a 4-item, 5-point likert scale
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Sustainability scale (NOMAD)
Description
Implementation Effectiveness - a 19 item implementation science survey (Finch et al., 2015)
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Title
Implementation costs
Description
Health Economics - questionnaire regarding the potentially incurred costs related to clinical care for a person with Parkinson. The investigators will measure the potential change in direct and indirect costs incurred from clinical care.
Time Frame
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Effectiveness investigation eligibility criteria (PwPs only) Inclusion: Age of 18 and upwards diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to the UK PD Brain Bank criteria Hoehn Yarhr stages I-V Exclusion: diagnosis or suspicion of other causes for parkinsonism advanced-stage therapy consideration (deep brain stimulation, continuous levodopa duodenal infusion, and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion) any condition interfering with the ability to give the informed consent Indication of dementia through a score of ≤21 on MoCA enrolment in a simultaneous investigational trial inability to travel to the weekly sessions Implementation science investigation eligibility criteria f) Inclusion: People with Parkinson's - patients with a formal diagnosis of PD who have participated in the PD-Ballet intervention. Family members of PwP - relatives/carers/nominated person of the patients with a formal diagnosis of PD who have participated in the PD-Ballet intervention Clinicians (Referrers) - neurologists/geriatricians/neuropsychiatrists/SALT/OT, as well as PD specialist nurses, physicians and research staff experienced in PD Dance leaders (Deliverers) - English National Ballet dancers involved in the PD-Ballet project Support staff (Supporters)- other parties involved with the PD-Ballet project g) Exclusion: People with Parkinson's - parkinsonism other than PD, lack of involvement in the PD-Ballet project Clinicians - Neurologists/geriatricians/neuropsychiatrists/SALT/OT, as well as PD specialist nurses, physicians and research staff experienced in PD Dance leaders - English National Ballet dancers not involved in the PD-Ballet project Support staff - other parties not involved with the PD-Ballet project
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Aleksandra Podlewska, MSc
Phone
02032997189
Email
aleksandra.podlewska@nhs.net
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
K Ray Chaudhuri, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
King's College London
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE5 9RS
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aleksandra Podlewska, MSc
Phone
02032997189
Email
aleksandra.podlewska@nhs.net
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lucia Batzu, MD
Phone
02032997189
Email
l.batzu@nhs.net

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35105591
Citation
Soukup T, Davis RE, Baldellou Lopez M, Healey A, Estevao C, Fancourt D, Dazzan P, Pariante C, Dye H, Osborn T, Bind R, Sawyer K, Rebecchini L, Hazelgrove K, Burton A, Manoharan M, Perkins R, Podlewska A, Chaudhuri R, Derbyshire-Fox F, Hartley A, Woods A, Crane N, Bakolis I, Sevdalis N. Study protocol: randomised controlled hybrid type 2 trial evaluating the scale-up of two arts interventions for postnatal depression and Parkinson's disease. BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):e055691. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055691.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

PD-Ballet: Effectiveness and Implementation in Parkinson's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs