search
Back to results

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Study (IMMI)

Primary Purpose

Sarcopenia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation , no high protein ice cream supplementation
Sponsored by
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Sarcopenia focused on measuring Frailty,, Immobility, Electrical Stimulation, High protein

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >/=65 years
  • Hospitalised due to incident fragility fracture (hip, spine, pelvis, rib, upper limb, lower limb)
  • Immobile 72 hours after admission or completion of surgery whichever is the later.
  • Predicted date of discharge >/= 7 days after recruitment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give valid informed consent

    • Residence outside catchment area of hospital (likely to be moved during the study period)
    • Unable to communicate in English sufficiently to participate in neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
    • Implanted medical device (e.g. pacemaker)
    • Any other contraindications to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (e.g. injury to the stimulation sites)
    • Leg amputation or any pre-injury conditions affecting a leg unilaterally such as hemiparesis
    • Dysphagia for liquids
    • Protein supplementation clinically indicated and prescribed
    • End stage renal failure
    • Obesity (BMI>30)
    • End of life, for any reason
    • Any other clinical reason why rehabilitation is not clinically indicated
    • Within 10 days of being symptom free having been COVID-19 positive (PCR testing or clinical criteria), or other barrier nursed patients
    • Lactose intolerance

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Other

    Other

    Arm Label

    Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to one leg

    High protein ice cream supplementation

    Arm Description

    NMES left leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation NMES right leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation

    NMES left leg, high protein ice cream supplementation NMES right leg, high protein ice cream supplementation

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Lower limb muscle strength
    using A hand-held dynamometer for both vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles
    Hand grip strength
    using a standard device
    Ultrasound
    Ultrasound parameters of vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles (thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity).
    iEMG derived motor unit structure and function
    intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) measures of muscle control
    Elderly Mobility Scale
    measuring 9 domains from very fit 1 to terminally ill 9
    Nottingham Extended ADL
    The Answers to the questions should be given whenever possible by the person who is the subject of the questionnaire Answers should be recorded by ticking one box for each question
    Disability and functional independence using Barthel ADL score.
    an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL). variables describing ADL and mobility are scored, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Tolerability measurement
    high number yes, low number no
    Pain/Visual analogue scores
    1 less pain, 10 severe pain
    Mortality Rate
    the number of participants who died within 6 months period after recruitment.
    Number of protein supplementation doses consumed
    How many cups participants consumed 1 cup lowest and 18 cups highest
    Acceptability verbal questionnaire of Neuromuscular stimulation
    yes / no answers, number of sessions participants say yes they accept or no not accept
    Number of treatment sessions of Neuromuscular stimulation
    number of treatment sessions 1 lowest and 18 highest
    Duration of treatment sessions of Neuromuscular stimulation
    number of weeks participants received Neuromuscular stimulation 1 week lowest, 6 weeks highest

    Full Information

    First Posted
    February 9, 2021
    Last Updated
    March 9, 2021
    Sponsor
    Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04792307
    Brief Title
    Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Study
    Acronym
    IMMI
    Official Title
    Feasibility RCT of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation; an Intervention to Maintain and Improve neuroMuscular Function During Periods of Immobility
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    April 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    June 30, 2022 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    In this study, the investigators will use feasibility RCT design to determine whether it is justifiable to conduct a large-scale clinical trial of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with or without additional protein supplementation in hospitalised patients who are temporarily immobilised following a fragility fracture. Muscle thickness, muscle strength, patients' mobility and self-care will be assessed at baseline and after 6-wk trial duration or until patients discharged from hospital. Outcomes will include participants' recruitment rate, tolerability and accessibility and their characteristics.
    Detailed Description
    In frail elderly people with existing sarcopenia, muscle mass, muscle strength and muscle function during immobility after lower limb fractures are impaired and affect their functional abilities to achieve activities of daily living. To reverse these consequences, limited intervention studies show that resistance exercise training and protein supplement at least partly reverses sarcopenia. However, guidelines do not currently advise specific protein supplementation as a treatment to prevent or reverse sarcopenia. Additionally, these exercises are difficult to perform in adequate intensity when patients are ill, tired, or in pain and these same factors may reduce appetite. In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with and without a high protein oral nutritional supplement. Methods: In this study, the investigators will use feasibility RCT design to determine whether it is justifiable to conduct a large-scale clinical trial of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with or without additional protein supplementation in hospitalised patients who are temporarily immobilised following a fragility fracture. Muscle thickness, muscle strength, patients' mobility and self-care will be assessed at baseline and after 6-wk trial duration or until patients discharged from hospital. Outcomes will include participants' recruitment rate, tolerability and accessibility and their characteristics. Discussion This study addresses the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with or without high protein supplements on mobility, self-care, muscle mass and strength in immobile older people with frailty after lower limb fracture. The information from this study may justify a large-scale clinical trial of using electrical stimulation with or without high protein supplement.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Sarcopenia
    Keywords
    Frailty,, Immobility, Electrical Stimulation, High protein

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Other
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    will randomly allocate participants offering half of them additional protein supplementation over and above their ordinary diet
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    66 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to one leg
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    NMES left leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation NMES right leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation
    Arm Title
    High protein ice cream supplementation
    Arm Type
    Other
    Arm Description
    NMES left leg, high protein ice cream supplementation NMES right leg, high protein ice cream supplementation
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Neuromuscular electrical stimulation , no high protein ice cream supplementation
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Neuromuscular electrical stimulation with high protein ice cream supplementation
    Intervention Description
    A trained operator applies Neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment to one leg, for approximately 30 minutes per session, three sessions per week with or without high protein ice cream. Treatment can stimulate the nerve controlling the vastus lateralis muscle in the thigh or the nerve controlling the tibialis anterior muscle in the lower leg, or both. In our study, we will aim to stimulate both nerves and muscle groups, on the basis that the maximal effect with result from the maximal amount of muscle stimulated.Treatment is adjusted to generate a specific force and maintained for up to 5 minutes, followed by a rest period and then repeated three times over the typical 30-minute session. The stimulation can vary according to the frequency (pulses per second, typically 10-50Hz). Additional protein supplementation: high protein ice cream :a single doses of a high protein supplement after each bout of neuromuscular electrical stimulation,
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Lower limb muscle strength
    Description
    using A hand-held dynamometer for both vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles
    Time Frame
    "Change from Baseline lower limb muscle strength at 6 weeks"
    Title
    Hand grip strength
    Description
    using a standard device
    Time Frame
    "Change from Baseline Hand grip strength at 6 weeks"
    Title
    Ultrasound
    Description
    Ultrasound parameters of vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles (thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity).
    Time Frame
    "Change from Baseline lower limb muscle thickness at 6 weeks"
    Title
    iEMG derived motor unit structure and function
    Description
    intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) measures of muscle control
    Time Frame
    "Change from Baseline lower limb muscle control at 6 weeks"
    Title
    Elderly Mobility Scale
    Description
    measuring 9 domains from very fit 1 to terminally ill 9
    Time Frame
    "Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks"and " 6 months"
    Title
    Nottingham Extended ADL
    Description
    The Answers to the questions should be given whenever possible by the person who is the subject of the questionnaire Answers should be recorded by ticking one box for each question
    Time Frame
    "Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks"and " 6 months"
    Title
    Disability and functional independence using Barthel ADL score.
    Description
    an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL). variables describing ADL and mobility are scored, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge.
    Time Frame
    Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks "and " 6 months"]
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Tolerability measurement
    Description
    high number yes, low number no
    Time Frame
    "up to 6 weeks"
    Title
    Pain/Visual analogue scores
    Description
    1 less pain, 10 severe pain
    Time Frame
    "Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks "
    Title
    Mortality Rate
    Description
    the number of participants who died within 6 months period after recruitment.
    Time Frame
    At 6 months after recruitment
    Title
    Number of protein supplementation doses consumed
    Description
    How many cups participants consumed 1 cup lowest and 18 cups highest
    Time Frame
    "up to 6 weeks"
    Title
    Acceptability verbal questionnaire of Neuromuscular stimulation
    Description
    yes / no answers, number of sessions participants say yes they accept or no not accept
    Time Frame
    "up to 6 weeks"
    Title
    Number of treatment sessions of Neuromuscular stimulation
    Description
    number of treatment sessions 1 lowest and 18 highest
    Time Frame
    "up to 6 weeks"
    Title
    Duration of treatment sessions of Neuromuscular stimulation
    Description
    number of weeks participants received Neuromuscular stimulation 1 week lowest, 6 weeks highest
    Time Frame
    "up to 6 weeks"

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: >/=65 years Hospitalised due to incident fragility fracture (hip, spine, pelvis, rib, upper limb, lower limb) Immobile 72 hours after admission or completion of surgery whichever is the later. Predicted date of discharge >/= 7 days after recruitment Exclusion Criteria: Unable to give valid informed consent Residence outside catchment area of hospital (likely to be moved during the study period) Unable to communicate in English sufficiently to participate in neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Implanted medical device (e.g. pacemaker) Any other contraindications to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (e.g. injury to the stimulation sites) Leg amputation or any pre-injury conditions affecting a leg unilaterally such as hemiparesis Dysphagia for liquids Protein supplementation clinically indicated and prescribed End stage renal failure Obesity (BMI>30) End of life, for any reason Any other clinical reason why rehabilitation is not clinically indicated Within 10 days of being symptom free having been COVID-19 positive (PCR testing or clinical criteria), or other barrier nursed patients Lactose intolerance
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    John Gladman, Prof.
    Phone
    0441158230242
    Email
    John.Gladman@nottingham.ac.uk
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    saleh aloraibi, PhD
    Phone
    00447459274400
    Email
    Saleh.Aloraibi@nottingham.ac.uk
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Maria Kofali
    Organizational Affiliation
    Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    Official's Role
    Study Chair

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    individual participant data (IPD) available only to those involved in the research project
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    30312372
    Citation
    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. Erratum In: Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):601.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30048806
    Citation
    Wilkinson DJ, Piasecki M, Atherton PJ. The age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function: Measurement and physiology of muscle fibre atrophy and muscle fibre loss in humans. Ageing Res Rev. 2018 Nov;47:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27610086
    Citation
    Rudrappa SS, Wilkinson DJ, Greenhaff PL, Smith K, Idris I, Atherton PJ. Human Skeletal Muscle Disuse Atrophy: Effects on Muscle Protein Synthesis, Breakdown, and Insulin Resistance-A Qualitative Review. Front Physiol. 2016 Aug 25;7:361. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00361. eCollection 2016.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24089670
    Citation
    Anthony K, Robinson K, Logan P, Gordon AL, Harwood RH, Masud T. Chair-based exercises for frail older people: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:309506. doi: 10.1155/2013/309506. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    33098419
    Citation
    Welch C, Majid Z, Greig C, Gladman J, Masud T, Jackson T. Interventions to ameliorate reductions in muscle quantity and function in hospitalised older adults: a systematic review towards acute sarcopenia treatment. Age Ageing. 2021 Feb 26;50(2):394-404. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa209.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Dacombe PJ, Clement RGE, Woodard J, Sahota O. Poor nutritional intake in acute fractured neck of femur admission - is this well described clinical problem still under-managed? International Journal of Surgery (Abtracts) 2010 : 8 ; 501-578
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27748503
    Citation
    Jones S, Man WD, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Wilcock A, Maddocks M. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD009419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19699838
    Citation
    Symons TB, Sheffield-Moore M, Wolfe RR, Paddon-Jones D. A moderate serving of high-quality protein maximally stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in young and elderly subjects. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Sep;109(9):1582-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.06.369.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16645295
    Citation
    Martin HJ, Yule V, Syddall HE, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A. Is hand-held dynamometry useful for the measurement of quadriceps strength in older people? A comparison with the gold standard Bodex dynamometry. Gerontology. 2006;52(3):154-9. doi: 10.1159/000091824.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32706848
    Citation
    Lunt E, Ong T, Gordon AL, Greenhaff PL, Gladman JRF. The clinical usefulness of muscle mass and strength measures in older people: a systematic review. Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):88-95. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa123.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25140439
    Citation
    Tarquinio C, Kivits J, Minary L, Coste J, Alla F. Evaluating complex interventions: perspectives and issues for health behaviour change interventions. Psychol Health. 2015 Jan;30(1):35-51. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.953530. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    3403500
    Citation
    Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3. doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    8310887
    Citation
    Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Adams SA. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1993 Nov;22(6):419-24. doi: 10.1093/ageing/22.6.419.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    16129869
    Citation
    Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    15817019
    Citation
    Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. Erratum In: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1991.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Elia M RC, Stratton R, Todorovic V, Evans L, Farrer K. Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) for adults www.bapen.org.uk 2004
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25083133
    Citation
    Laufer Y, Shtraker H, Elboim Gabyzon M. The effects of exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: a 3-month follow-up study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Jul 17;9:1153-61. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S64104. eCollection 2014.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Asakawa Y, Jung JH, Koh SE. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves strength, pain and weight distribution on patients with knee instability post surgery. Physical therapy rehabilitation science. 2014;3(2):112-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27932876
    Citation
    Chen RC, Li XY, Guan LL, Guo BP, Wu WL, Zhou ZQ, Huo YT, Chen X, Zhou LQ. Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the rehabilitation of moderate-to-severe COPD: a meta-analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 28;11:2965-2975. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S120555. eCollection 2016.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Study

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs