search
Back to results

Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Surgical Techniques

Primary Purpose

Gingival Recession, Root Planing

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
xenogeneic collagen matrix
Sponsored by
Assiut University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Gingival Recession focused on measuring root coverage, mucoderm, connective tissue, grafts

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • -The selected patients for this study are non-smokers, aged 18-60 years with multiple gingival recession (Miller class 1, or 2.) for more than two adjacent affected teeth with plaque score less than 25%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • -Patients with systemic complications, psychological problems, parafunctional habits, or patients presented with Mal-posed teeth, hypermobile teeth, teeth with Miller class 3 gingival recession were excluded from this study.

Sites / Locations

  • Assiut University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

root coverage surgeries using autologous connective tissue for treatment of gingival recession

root coverage surgeries using xenogenic collagen matrix for treatment of gingival recession

Arm Description

root coverage surgeries using tunneling technique of autologous connective tissue as a treatment of Miller class two gingival recession

root coverage surgeries using tunneling technique of mucodrm membrane ; xenogeneic collagen matrix as a treatment of Miller class two gingival recession

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The zone of keratinized gingiva
The distance from the tip of the papilla to the mucogingival junction minus the probing depth measured in mm using graduated periodontal probe.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Periodontal probing depth
measured from the gingival margin to the depth of the gingival sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.
Clinical attachment loss
measured from the cementoenamel junction to the depth of the sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.
Gingival recession
The depth measured from the gingival margin to the cementoenamel junction in mm.
Patient satisfaction of the esthetics
measured using the visual analog scale.

Full Information

First Posted
June 21, 2021
Last Updated
July 7, 2021
Sponsor
Assiut University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04966208
Brief Title
Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Surgical Techniques
Official Title
Root Coverage Using Tunneling Technique of Xenogenic Collagen Matrix vs. Autologous Connective Tissue as a Treatment of Miller Class Two Gingival Recession (RCT Study)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 1, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 15, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Assiut University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Coronally the advanced flap is considered a predictable treatment of gingival recession but in certain situations, it needs a filler like subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG) which is considered as the gold standard treatment approach. This randomized controlled trial compares the clinical benefits and effectiveness of a xenogenic collagen matrix (mucoderm, botiss, dental, Berlin, Germany) as a filler to the subperiosteal connective tissue graft (CTG).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gingival Recession, Root Planing
Keywords
root coverage, mucoderm, connective tissue, grafts

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
root coverage surgeries using autologous connective tissue for treatment of gingival recession
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
root coverage surgeries using tunneling technique of autologous connective tissue as a treatment of Miller class two gingival recession
Arm Title
root coverage surgeries using xenogenic collagen matrix for treatment of gingival recession
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
root coverage surgeries using tunneling technique of mucodrm membrane ; xenogeneic collagen matrix as a treatment of Miller class two gingival recession
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
xenogeneic collagen matrix
Intervention Description
xenogeneic collagen matrix called mucoderm used for root coverage for treatment of gingival recession instead of harvesting from the patients connective tissue
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The zone of keratinized gingiva
Description
The distance from the tip of the papilla to the mucogingival junction minus the probing depth measured in mm using graduated periodontal probe.
Time Frame
6 months after the surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Periodontal probing depth
Description
measured from the gingival margin to the depth of the gingival sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.
Time Frame
6 months after the surgery
Title
Clinical attachment loss
Description
measured from the cementoenamel junction to the depth of the sulcus in six sites per tooth and measured in mm.
Time Frame
6 months after the surgery
Title
Gingival recession
Description
The depth measured from the gingival margin to the cementoenamel junction in mm.
Time Frame
6 months after the surgery
Title
Patient satisfaction of the esthetics
Description
measured using the visual analog scale.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: -The selected patients for this study are non-smokers, aged 18-60 years with multiple gingival recession (Miller class 1, or 2.) for more than two adjacent affected teeth with plaque score less than 25% Exclusion Criteria: -Patients with systemic complications, psychological problems, parafunctional habits, or patients presented with Mal-posed teeth, hypermobile teeth, teeth with Miller class 3 gingival recession were excluded from this study.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Assiut University
City
Assuit
ZIP/Postal Code
71111111
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Gingival Recession Treatment Using Two Different Surgical Techniques

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs