search
Back to results

Telemedicine Optimized Burn Intervention (TOBI)

Primary Purpose

Burns, Pediatric ALL

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Face-to-face burn care
Telemedicine enhanced burn care
Sponsored by
Medical University of South Carolina
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Burns focused on measuring Pediatrics, Telemedicine, Mobile health, Burns

Eligibility Criteria

0 Years - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

Participants will be eligible for enrollment if:

  1. the patient (child) is < 18 years of age;
  2. the patient is diagnosed with a partial thickness burn between <1% TBSA - 20% TBSA by a pediatric burn surgeon;
  3. the burn is being treated with advanced burn dressing therapy (e.g., Silvadene™, Polysporin™, Acticoat™, Mepilex™, or Mepitel™);
  4. the burn is evaluated by the MUSC burn team within 48 hours of injury;
  5. the patient's caregiver (parent or legal guardian) is able to speak, hear, and understand English, as determined during study recruitment procedures;
  6. the patient/caregiver owns and is capable of using a smart device (an Android or iOS smartphone) with permission to download TOBI app from the Google Store or AppStore;
  7. able to comply with outpatient clinic visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no exclusion criteria. All participants who meet inclusion criteria would be eligible to participate in the study.

Sites / Locations

  • Medical University of South CarolinaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Face-to-face arm

TOBI arm

Arm Description

Standard face-to-face burn care.

A novel smartphone application for burn wound care, called the Telemedicine Optimized Burn Intervention (TOBI), was recently developed to enable burn experts to direct burn wound care while the patient and caregiver are home through text messaging and video-conferencing. The app was designed to bring expert wound care directly to the patient's home to address barriers to healthcare, including high cost burden and time commitment (e.g., geographic limitations, transportation to burn centers, parking, lodging, meals, time away from school and work), particularly for patients/families in rural and medically underserved communities. TOBI is synced with a portal used by providers, as an adjunct to standard therapy. This burn app provides education through frequently asked questions, instructional burn dressing change videos in addition to direct communication between patient and burn expert through store-and-forward pictures and videoconferencing.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants who agree to participate in the study
Looking at the number of participants who agree to enroll in the study versus the total number of participants who are approached to participate in the study
Percentage of participants retained in the study over time
Looking at the percentage or ratio of participants retained in the study versus those lost to attrition
TOBI treatment fidelity
Looking at the percentage of TOBI providers' adherence to the treatment protocol. Will use a fidelity checklist at each visit.
Number of participants that experienced adverse events, serious adverse events, and unexpected problems
Looking at the number of participants in each condition that experienced AE, SEA, and UPs.
Number of times problems with technology happened in the TOBI condition
Looking at the number of times providers or participants experienced technological problems with TOBI

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of days until wound is healed
Looking at the number of days it takes for wound to heal following burn injury in both conditions
Treatment adherence
Looking at the number of deviations from the prescribed treatment
Number of unscheduled ED/clinic and video visits
Looking at the number of days participants had unscheduled visits
Time to treatment of wound complication
Looking at the amount of time between a wound complication (e.g., infection, conversion to deeper burn requiring surgery, conversion to deeper burn requiring a change in therapy) until treatment is sought
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep (PROMIS-Sleep) (4-item form) scores
Looking at average scores on the PROMIS-Sleep (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported) between the two conditions. Scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores = greater sleep problems.
Patient-reported pain scores
Looking at average pain scores between the two conditions using the Wong-Baker Scale (0-10, with higher scores = more pain)
Caregiver's perception of child's pain scores
Looking at average pain scores between the two conditions using the caregivers' report (0-10 scale, with higher scores = more pain)
Attitudes Towards Technology and Telemedicine Questionnaire
Looking at the change in group average scores on the Attitudes Towards Technology and Telemedicine Questionnaire (caregiver-reported) from baseline to 1 month follow-up. Scores may range between 26-130, with higher scores = more positive attitudes towards technology and telemedicine.
Perception of Healthcare Access
Looking at the change in group average scores on the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), Pragmatics Subscale (caregiver-reported). Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores = fewer barriers and problems with access.
Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scores
Looking at the change in group average scores on the PANAS questionnaire measuring positive and negative affect (caregiver-reported). PANAS has two subscales - positive and negative affect. The scores on each subscale range between 10-50, with higher scores = higher levels of affect.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-Depression) (4-item form) scores
Looking at the change in group average scores on the PROMIS-Depression (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 4-20, with higher scores = more depression symptoms.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Anxiety (PROMIS-Anxiety) (4-item form) scores
Looking at the change in group average scores on the PROMIS-Anxiety (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 4-20, with higher scores = more anxiety symptoms.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - General Self-Efficacy (PROMIS-General-Self-Efficacy) (4-item form) scores
Looking at average scores on the PROMIS-General-Self-Efficacy (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 4-20, with higher scores = greater general self-efficacy.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Self-Efficacy to Manage Emotions (PROMIS-Self-Efficacy-Manage-Emotions) (4-item form) scores
Looking at average scores on the PROMIS-Self-Efficacy-Manage-Emotions (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 4-20, with higher scores = greater self-efficacy to manage emotions.
Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) sores
Looking at average scores on the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 0-52, with higher scores = greater peritraumatic distress. An optimal cutoff score of 23 (sensitivity = 71%; specificity = 73%) is good for predicting clinically elevated PTSD 30-days post-injury.
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) scores
Looking at average scores on the Perceived Stress Scale (caregiver-reported) between two conditions. Scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores = higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress.
Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) scores
Average scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (caregiver-reported). Scores range from 0-105, with higher scores = greater posttraumatic growth.
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8) scores
Looking at average scores on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 scores (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 8-32, with higher scores = greater satisfaction.
mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) Scores
Looking at average scores on the MAUQ questionnaire measuring app usability (caregiver-reported in TOBI condition only). Raw scores range between 21-147 and average scores range between 1-7, with higher overall average = higher usability of the app.
Total number of face-to-face visits
Looking at the total number of face-to-face visits
Total number of TOBI visits
Looking at the total number of TOBI visits
Total travel time
Looking at the total travel time in each condition
Direct cost to patient/caregiver
Looking at the direct cost to patient/caregiver
Time to return to work/school
Looking at the average time it took patient/caregiver to return to school/work
App metrics (TOBI condition only)
Looking at the TOBI app metrics (# of video-conferences, messages, & photos)

Full Information

First Posted
August 18, 2021
Last Updated
January 13, 2023
Sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05019144
Brief Title
Telemedicine Optimized Burn Intervention
Acronym
TOBI
Official Title
A Novel Telemedicine Optimized Burn Intervention (TOBI) for Pediatric Burn-injured Patients and Their Caregivers
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Medical University of South Carolina
Collaborators
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Because burn patients and their caregivers often live long distances from regional burn centers, access to expert burn care is limited, resulting in a negative effect on adherence to treatment and a higher risk of wound complication. A novel smartphone application synchronized with a web portal for providers, called the Telemedicine Optimized Burn Intervention (TOBI), was recently developed to enable burn experts to direct burn wound care while the patient and caregiver are home through text messaging, image transfer, and video-conferencing. The goal of the present study is evaluate TOBI compared to face-to-face care as usual for pediatric patients/caregivers visiting a burn center. This study will also assess the feasibility of conducting a larger-scale clinical trial in several burn centers. The app will allow the physician and patient to make instant decisions regarding treatment, allowing for "turn on a dime" treatment decisions, rather than having the patients and families wait for scheduled clinic appointments, often hours away from home. This "on demand" medical care takes an innovative approach to increasing access to burn experts through smartphone technology and addressing adherence to prescribed treatment by increasing communication between provider and patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Burns, Pediatric ALL
Keywords
Pediatrics, Telemedicine, Mobile health, Burns

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
64 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Face-to-face arm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard face-to-face burn care.
Arm Title
TOBI arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A novel smartphone application for burn wound care, called the Telemedicine Optimized Burn Intervention (TOBI), was recently developed to enable burn experts to direct burn wound care while the patient and caregiver are home through text messaging and video-conferencing. The app was designed to bring expert wound care directly to the patient's home to address barriers to healthcare, including high cost burden and time commitment (e.g., geographic limitations, transportation to burn centers, parking, lodging, meals, time away from school and work), particularly for patients/families in rural and medically underserved communities. TOBI is synced with a portal used by providers, as an adjunct to standard therapy. This burn app provides education through frequently asked questions, instructional burn dressing change videos in addition to direct communication between patient and burn expert through store-and-forward pictures and videoconferencing.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Face-to-face burn care
Intervention Description
If the participants are assigned to FTF care, they will receive standard burn care including a return follow-up in the burn clinic on a routine basis as prescribed by the clinical burn team (at least once per week) until the burn has healed.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Telemedicine enhanced burn care
Intervention Description
Participants assigned to TOBI will be given instructions how to download and use TOBI on a smartphone, including how to interface with burn clinicians using text-messaging, videoconferencing, and sending photos of the child's burn(s). The participants will have scheduled video visits with the care provider at least weekly until the burn has healed. The participants will be able to use other features of the app, such as text-messaging and sending photos of the burn(s), as needed. The participants will be able to use standard FTF burn care as well. They will be given instructions how to contact the burn team through the hospital paging operator if TOBI is unavailable or there is an emergency.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants who agree to participate in the study
Description
Looking at the number of participants who agree to enroll in the study versus the total number of participants who are approached to participate in the study
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
Percentage of participants retained in the study over time
Description
Looking at the percentage or ratio of participants retained in the study versus those lost to attrition
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
TOBI treatment fidelity
Description
Looking at the percentage of TOBI providers' adherence to the treatment protocol. Will use a fidelity checklist at each visit.
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
Number of participants that experienced adverse events, serious adverse events, and unexpected problems
Description
Looking at the number of participants in each condition that experienced AE, SEA, and UPs.
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
Number of times problems with technology happened in the TOBI condition
Description
Looking at the number of times providers or participants experienced technological problems with TOBI
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of days until wound is healed
Description
Looking at the number of days it takes for wound to heal following burn injury in both conditions
Time Frame
Measured during the treatment phase (2-4 weeks)
Title
Treatment adherence
Description
Looking at the number of deviations from the prescribed treatment
Time Frame
Measured during the treatment phase (2-4 weeks)
Title
Number of unscheduled ED/clinic and video visits
Description
Looking at the number of days participants had unscheduled visits
Time Frame
Measured during the treatment phase (2-4 weeks)
Title
Time to treatment of wound complication
Description
Looking at the amount of time between a wound complication (e.g., infection, conversion to deeper burn requiring surgery, conversion to deeper burn requiring a change in therapy) until treatment is sought
Time Frame
Measured during the treatment phase (2-4 weeks)
Title
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Sleep (PROMIS-Sleep) (4-item form) scores
Description
Looking at average scores on the PROMIS-Sleep (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported) between the two conditions. Scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores = greater sleep problems.
Time Frame
Measured during the treatment phase (2-4 weeks)
Title
Patient-reported pain scores
Description
Looking at average pain scores between the two conditions using the Wong-Baker Scale (0-10, with higher scores = more pain)
Time Frame
Measured during the treatment phase (2-4 weeks)
Title
Caregiver's perception of child's pain scores
Description
Looking at average pain scores between the two conditions using the caregivers' report (0-10 scale, with higher scores = more pain)
Time Frame
Measured during the treatment phase (2-4 weeks)
Title
Attitudes Towards Technology and Telemedicine Questionnaire
Description
Looking at the change in group average scores on the Attitudes Towards Technology and Telemedicine Questionnaire (caregiver-reported) from baseline to 1 month follow-up. Scores may range between 26-130, with higher scores = more positive attitudes towards technology and telemedicine.
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and 1-month follow-up
Title
Perception of Healthcare Access
Description
Looking at the change in group average scores on the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), Pragmatics Subscale (caregiver-reported). Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores = fewer barriers and problems with access.
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and 1-month follow-up
Title
Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scores
Description
Looking at the change in group average scores on the PANAS questionnaire measuring positive and negative affect (caregiver-reported). PANAS has two subscales - positive and negative affect. The scores on each subscale range between 10-50, with higher scores = higher levels of affect.
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and 1-month follow-up
Title
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Depression (PROMIS-Depression) (4-item form) scores
Description
Looking at the change in group average scores on the PROMIS-Depression (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 4-20, with higher scores = more depression symptoms.
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and 1-month follow-up
Title
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Anxiety (PROMIS-Anxiety) (4-item form) scores
Description
Looking at the change in group average scores on the PROMIS-Anxiety (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 4-20, with higher scores = more anxiety symptoms.
Time Frame
Measured at baseline and 1-month follow-up
Title
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - General Self-Efficacy (PROMIS-General-Self-Efficacy) (4-item form) scores
Description
Looking at average scores on the PROMIS-General-Self-Efficacy (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 4-20, with higher scores = greater general self-efficacy.
Time Frame
Measured at baseline only
Title
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System - Self-Efficacy to Manage Emotions (PROMIS-Self-Efficacy-Manage-Emotions) (4-item form) scores
Description
Looking at average scores on the PROMIS-Self-Efficacy-Manage-Emotions (4-item form) questionnaire (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 4-20, with higher scores = greater self-efficacy to manage emotions.
Time Frame
Measured at baseline only
Title
Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) sores
Description
Looking at average scores on the Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 0-52, with higher scores = greater peritraumatic distress. An optimal cutoff score of 23 (sensitivity = 71%; specificity = 73%) is good for predicting clinically elevated PTSD 30-days post-injury.
Time Frame
Measured at baseline only
Title
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) scores
Description
Looking at average scores on the Perceived Stress Scale (caregiver-reported) between two conditions. Scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores = higher perceived stress. Scores ranging from 0-13 would be considered low stress. Scores ranging from 14-26 would be considered moderate stress. Scores ranging from 27-40 would be considered high perceived stress.
Time Frame
Measured at 1-month follow-up only
Title
Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) scores
Description
Average scores on the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (caregiver-reported). Scores range from 0-105, with higher scores = greater posttraumatic growth.
Time Frame
Measured at 1-month follow-up only
Title
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8) scores
Description
Looking at average scores on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 scores (caregiver-reported). Scores range between 8-32, with higher scores = greater satisfaction.
Time Frame
Measured at 1-month follow-up only
Title
mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ) Scores
Description
Looking at average scores on the MAUQ questionnaire measuring app usability (caregiver-reported in TOBI condition only). Raw scores range between 21-147 and average scores range between 1-7, with higher overall average = higher usability of the app.
Time Frame
Measured at 1-month follow-up only
Title
Total number of face-to-face visits
Description
Looking at the total number of face-to-face visits
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
Total number of TOBI visits
Description
Looking at the total number of TOBI visits
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
Total travel time
Description
Looking at the total travel time in each condition
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
Direct cost to patient/caregiver
Description
Looking at the direct cost to patient/caregiver
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
Time to return to work/school
Description
Looking at the average time it took patient/caregiver to return to school/work
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached
Title
App metrics (TOBI condition only)
Description
Looking at the TOBI app metrics (# of video-conferences, messages, & photos)
Time Frame
24 months from the enrollment of the first participant or until the study number is reached

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
0 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Participants will be eligible for enrollment if: the patient (child) is < 18 years of age; the patient is diagnosed with a partial thickness burn between <1% TBSA - 20% TBSA by a pediatric burn surgeon; the burn is being treated with advanced burn dressing therapy (e.g., Silvadene™, Polysporin™, Acticoat™, Mepilex™, or Mepitel™); the burn is evaluated by the MUSC burn team within 48 hours of injury; the patient's caregiver (parent or legal guardian) is able to speak, hear, and understand English, as determined during study recruitment procedures; the patient/caregiver owns and is capable of using a smart device (an Android or iOS smartphone) with permission to download TOBI app from the Google Store or AppStore; able to comply with outpatient clinic visits. Exclusion Criteria: There are no exclusion criteria. All participants who meet inclusion criteria would be eligible to participate in the study.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aaron P Lesher, MD
Phone
843-792-3851
Email
leshera@musc.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aaron Lesher, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Telemedicine Optimized Burn Intervention

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs