search
Back to results

Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia

Primary Purpose

Advanced Care Planning, Dementia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
telehealth advance care planning
Sponsored by
Oregon Health and Science University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Advanced Care Planning

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Family member of a person with a diagnosis of dementia (any type)
  • English-speaking family member
  • Family member of a person with dementia admitted to a nursing home

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand/read English
  • Advance directive already in patient chart

Sites / Locations

  • University of Pennsylvania

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention

Non-Intervention

Arm Description

One time receipt and review of an information sheet

Usual care will be delivered per standards of care.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility of Information Sheet among Study Population
Feasibility of the information sheet is defined as the consent rate of family members who are offered enrollment. This will be calculatd as a percent of family members (number of enrolled participants/number of eligible participants offered enrollment)
Acceptibility of Decision Aid Tool
Acceptability using an adapted tool (https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval_accept.html) which measures the ratings of comprehensibility of the information sheet among participants in the intervention group. Responses are reported descriptively in terms of proportions responding positively or negatively on each criteria.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Decision Self-efficacy Scale
Measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making, including shared decision making. Eleven responses are measured on a 0-4 likert scale and a final summed scale is converted to a 0-100 range (scores are summed, divided by 11, then multiplied by 25). A score of zero means low self efficacy and score of 100 means extremely high self efficacy.
Family Member Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Measures family member self-efficacy in medical decision-making on behalf of a loved one. This scale has two versions, one for conscious and one for unconscious loved ones, which we will use accordingly. Thirteen items are measured on a 0-5 Likert scale with 1 being "cannot do at all" and 5 being "certain I can do." Higher scores indicate higher decision making self-efficacy.
Adaptation of Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey
Questions adapted from an 82-item questionnaire that measures advance care planning engagement in terms of knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness. We include 10 questions from the measure. We used a mean imputation approach. All available data were included to create an average 5-point Likert score.
Preparation for Decision-Making Scale
Measures perception of the usefulness of a decision support tool in preparing respondent for decision-making. Responses are on a Likert scale of 1-5 with one being "not at all" and five being " a great deal." Items are summed for scoring. A higher score indicates a higher level of perceived helpfulness in preparing for decision-making.
Adaptation of Advance Care Planning Engagement for Surrogates Survey
We adapted 9 items from the 17-item Advance Care Planning for Surrogates survey. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale. We will calculate a summary score, with higher scores indicates a higher level of engagement.
Knowledge about Dementia
Six questions to assess family members' knowledge about dementia were developed for this pilot study. All questions are true/false. Each correct answer will be coded as 1, each incorrect answer will be scored as 0. Higher scores indicate more knowledge.

Full Information

First Posted
August 25, 2021
Last Updated
August 17, 2023
Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05049291
Brief Title
Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia
Official Title
Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia in Long-term Services and Support Facilities
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 10, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 18, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 18, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
Collaborators
University of Pennsylvania

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Advance care planning allows people to have their wishes taken into account even in the advanced stages of the persons' condition and at the end of life when the person may be unable to communicate. However, a recent review found an absence of high-quality guidelines for advanced care planning in dementia care. Since few evidence-based resources exist, the investigators propose a study to generate, refine, and pilot test an education information sheet designed to promote advanced care planning among families of persons with dementia.
Detailed Description
To determine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of an education information sheet to promote advance care planning among family members of persons with advanced dementia in long-term services and support facilities. Introducing an education information sheet containing prognosis and outcomes will be feasible, acceptable, and increase self-efficacy and do-not-hospitalize decision preferences among family members of persons with advanced dementia.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Advanced Care Planning, Dementia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
13 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
One time receipt and review of an information sheet
Arm Title
Non-Intervention
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Usual care will be delivered per standards of care.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
telehealth advance care planning
Intervention Description
An education information sheet containing prognosis and outcomes of acute care and intensive treatments
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of Information Sheet among Study Population
Description
Feasibility of the information sheet is defined as the consent rate of family members who are offered enrollment. This will be calculatd as a percent of family members (number of enrolled participants/number of eligible participants offered enrollment)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Acceptibility of Decision Aid Tool
Description
Acceptability using an adapted tool (https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/eval_accept.html) which measures the ratings of comprehensibility of the information sheet among participants in the intervention group. Responses are reported descriptively in terms of proportions responding positively or negatively on each criteria.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decision Self-efficacy Scale
Description
Measures self-confidence or belief in one's abilities in decision making, including shared decision making. Eleven responses are measured on a 0-4 likert scale and a final summed scale is converted to a 0-100 range (scores are summed, divided by 11, then multiplied by 25). A score of zero means low self efficacy and score of 100 means extremely high self efficacy.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Family Member Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale
Description
Measures family member self-efficacy in medical decision-making on behalf of a loved one. This scale has two versions, one for conscious and one for unconscious loved ones, which we will use accordingly. Thirteen items are measured on a 0-5 Likert scale with 1 being "cannot do at all" and 5 being "certain I can do." Higher scores indicate higher decision making self-efficacy.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Adaptation of Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey
Description
Questions adapted from an 82-item questionnaire that measures advance care planning engagement in terms of knowledge, contemplation, self-efficacy and readiness. We include 10 questions from the measure. We used a mean imputation approach. All available data were included to create an average 5-point Likert score.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Preparation for Decision-Making Scale
Description
Measures perception of the usefulness of a decision support tool in preparing respondent for decision-making. Responses are on a Likert scale of 1-5 with one being "not at all" and five being " a great deal." Items are summed for scoring. A higher score indicates a higher level of perceived helpfulness in preparing for decision-making.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Adaptation of Advance Care Planning Engagement for Surrogates Survey
Description
We adapted 9 items from the 17-item Advance Care Planning for Surrogates survey. Response options are on a 5-point Likert scale. We will calculate a summary score, with higher scores indicates a higher level of engagement.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Knowledge about Dementia
Description
Six questions to assess family members' knowledge about dementia were developed for this pilot study. All questions are true/false. Each correct answer will be coded as 1, each incorrect answer will be scored as 0. Higher scores indicate more knowledge.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Family member of a person with a diagnosis of dementia (any type) English-speaking family member Family member of a person with dementia admitted to a nursing home Exclusion Criteria: Inability to understand/read English Advance directive already in patient chart
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Pilot Study of an Advance Care Planning Intervention Among Persons With Dementia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs