search
Back to results

Motivational Wellness Coaching to Reduce Childhood Obesity in Families and Kids (WC4K)

Primary Purpose

Obesity

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Wellness Coaching for Families and Kids
Sponsored by
Kaiser Permanente
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Obesity focused on measuring Motivational Interviewing, Wellness, Coaching

Eligibility Criteria

2 Years - 8 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

25 Eligible Intervention Clinics will provide motivational interview counseling and referrals to Wellness Coaching Eligible Children age 2-8 have a body mass index in the 85 percentile or higher.

Exclusion criteria are families that don't speak English or Spanish as a primary language.

Sites / Locations

  • Kaiser Permanente PasadenaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Wellness Coaching for Families and Kids

Arm Description

For clinics assigned to mBMI2Kids intervention, Pediatricians will be trained in Motivational Interviewing (MI) and behavioral intervention. Pediatricians will conduct up to 3 sessions with each parent (3 x 10 min) and refer patients electronically to experienced MI-trained lifestyle coaches. With full access to the electronic medical record coaches will call referred families (child's BMI-for-age ≥85th percentile) and deliver a telephonic MI counseling over two years (6 x 45 min) simultaneous with pediatricians. 50 clinics will be selected with 25 participating in the intervention and 25 providing patients with usual care.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Determine the effectiveness and dose-response relationship of a pragmatic, system-integrated child-hood obesity intervention using mBMI2Kids (a modified BMI2 approach) at follow-up.
Hypothesis 1-1: At 2-yr follow-up, patients ages 2-8 yrs with baseline BMI ≥85th percentile who were reached in intervention clinics will show a net mean BMI decrease between 0.8 and 1.0 kg/m2 (adjusted for sex, age) compared to usual care (population effect). Hypothesis 1-2: At 2-yr follow-up, patients who received the full planned MI-dose (defined as 8 of 12 sessions) will show a net mean BMI decrease between 1.0 and 1.2 kg/m2 (adjusted for sex, age) compared to usual care (individual effect).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Investigate how patient characteristics such as minority or low-income background and parental obesity modify the effect of the mBMI2Kids intervention (Heterogeneity of effects).
Minority or low-income background patients need a higher MI dose than other patient groups in achieving a targeted mean BMI decrease of 1.0 kg/m2 (adjusted for sex, age). Guided by the RE-AIM framework 25, we will examine reach (based on participation), effectiveness (BMI) com-pared to usual care, MI dose-response), adoption (based on clinics and PCPs participating actively), implementation (fidelity to intervention, delayed intervention), and address maintenance and potential sustainability.

Full Information

First Posted
August 5, 2021
Last Updated
December 21, 2022
Sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05143697
Brief Title
Motivational Wellness Coaching to Reduce Childhood Obesity in Families and Kids
Acronym
WC4K
Official Title
Integrated Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Childhood Obesity in a Large Health Maintenance Organization
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 16, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Kaiser Permanente
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Primary care settings lack interventions to address the childhood obesity epidemic that are feasible and sustainable without requiring significant resources. The investigators propose to modify and test an intervention shown to lower children's body mass index(BMI) so that it is feasible, sustainable, and easily disseminated in a real-world clinical setting. If successful, the investigators will be able to provide recommendations to providers and health care systems that help prioritize future intervention strategies and research investments to reduce obesity in children that can be quickly translated into other settings and widely adopted after the study period, with the goal of halting and reversing the childhood obesity epidemic.
Detailed Description
Rates of childhood obesity in the United States (US) remain at historic highs. Before the age of 11 years, 18% of all children in the US are already obese; 26% of Hispanic and 24% of Black children are obese. Pediatric primary care settings are underutilized in preventing and treating childhood obesity. An evidence-based method for treatment of childhood obesity to help engage and motivate patients is Motivational Interviewing (MI). One recent successful study, BMI2 (for Brief Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Child Body Mass Index) directed at the parents of children in pediatric care practices lowered body mass index (BMI) significantly. MI-based approaches have been particularly successful for racial/ethnic minorities and low-income populations. However, the targeted MI dose of BMI2 requires significant resources, with MI sessions administered by the PCP and a registered dietician. It is unclear whether the impressive results of BMI2 can be replicated in a health care system with real-world conditions. It is challenging to find an effective intervention that is feasible and sustainable without requiring significant resources. Our overall goal is to reduce excess body weight in children in primary care. The investigators will conduct a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial in 50 pediatric clinics in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) to test the effectiveness of a modified version of BMI2 intervention in pediatric clinics (25 intervention, 25 usual care with attention control, = 10,800 children). The clinics serve over 45,000 children aged 2-8 yrs who are overweight or obese with high racial/ethnic and socioeconomic diversity (53% Hispanic; 23% state-subsidized insurance). Using MI techniques, primary care providers (PCPs) will initiate and maintain discussion about weight management with parent (6 x 20 min) and refer patients electronically to experienced and MI-trained lifestyle coaches. With full access to the electronic medical record (EMR), coaches will call referred families (child's BMI-for-age ≥85th percentile) and deliver intervention via telephonic MI counseling over two years (6 x 45 min). Usual care clinics with attention control will include regular encounters and educational videos as attention control. Primary Aim: Determine the effectiveness and dose-response relationship of a pragmatic, system-integrated childhood obesity intervention using mBMI2Kids (a modified BMI2 approach) on BMI at 2-yr follow-up. Secondary Aim: Investigate how patient characteristics such as minority or low-income background and parental obesity modify the effect of the mBMI2Kids intervention (Heterogeneity of effects). IMPACT: This study has the potential for a highly significant shift in pediatric primary care practices. Our results will provide valuable guidance to providers and health care systems to help them effectively halt and reverse the childhood obesity epidemic. Our results can be quickly translated into other clinical care settings and endorse the meaningful use of EMR systems to support providers using tools and centralized approaches that make interventions scalable.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Obesity
Keywords
Motivational Interviewing, Wellness, Coaching

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
The proposed study is a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial to test the impact of a modified version of the BMI2 intervention, which we have named mBMI2Kids. Target population are children aged 2-8 years with a BMI-for-age ≥85 percentile from 50 Kaiser Permanente pediatric clinics in Southern California. All children and their parent/guardian reached will be included according to the clinic in which they receive care (Intervention-to-treat approach).
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
11880 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Wellness Coaching for Families and Kids
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
For clinics assigned to mBMI2Kids intervention, Pediatricians will be trained in Motivational Interviewing (MI) and behavioral intervention. Pediatricians will conduct up to 3 sessions with each parent (3 x 10 min) and refer patients electronically to experienced MI-trained lifestyle coaches. With full access to the electronic medical record coaches will call referred families (child's BMI-for-age ≥85th percentile) and deliver a telephonic MI counseling over two years (6 x 45 min) simultaneous with pediatricians. 50 clinics will be selected with 25 participating in the intervention and 25 providing patients with usual care.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Wellness Coaching for Families and Kids
Other Intervention Name(s)
WC4K
Intervention Description
The investigators propose to conduct a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial in 50 pediatric clinics in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC), to test the effectiveness of mBMI2Kids (a modified version of the BMI2 interven-tion) in pediatric clinics (randomization unit). Clinics serve over 45,000 children aged 2-8 yrs who are obese and have high racial/ethnic and socioeconomic diversity (53% Hispanic; 23% state-subsidized insurance). Clinics will be randomized into either 25 intervention or 25 usual care + attention control (enrolling 10,800 children). KP's long-standing electronic medical record (EMR) and stable membership, a research team embedded in care, existing team of lifestyle coaches, and ability to rapidly disseminate findings makes us uniquely positioned to conduct this study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Determine the effectiveness and dose-response relationship of a pragmatic, system-integrated child-hood obesity intervention using mBMI2Kids (a modified BMI2 approach) at follow-up.
Description
Hypothesis 1-1: At 2-yr follow-up, patients ages 2-8 yrs with baseline BMI ≥85th percentile who were reached in intervention clinics will show a net mean BMI decrease between 0.8 and 1.0 kg/m2 (adjusted for sex, age) compared to usual care (population effect). Hypothesis 1-2: At 2-yr follow-up, patients who received the full planned MI-dose (defined as 8 of 12 sessions) will show a net mean BMI decrease between 1.0 and 1.2 kg/m2 (adjusted for sex, age) compared to usual care (individual effect).
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Investigate how patient characteristics such as minority or low-income background and parental obesity modify the effect of the mBMI2Kids intervention (Heterogeneity of effects).
Description
Minority or low-income background patients need a higher MI dose than other patient groups in achieving a targeted mean BMI decrease of 1.0 kg/m2 (adjusted for sex, age). Guided by the RE-AIM framework 25, we will examine reach (based on participation), effectiveness (BMI) com-pared to usual care, MI dose-response), adoption (based on clinics and PCPs participating actively), implementation (fidelity to intervention, delayed intervention), and address maintenance and potential sustainability.
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
2 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
25 Eligible Intervention Clinics will provide motivational interview counseling and referrals to Wellness Coaching Eligible Children age 2-8 have a body mass index in the 85 percentile or higher. Exclusion criteria are families that don't speak English or Spanish as a primary language.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kimberly J Holmquist, MPHc
Phone
626-243-8604
Email
Kimberly.J.Holmquist@kp.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jessica D Vallejo, MS
Phone
626-564-3035
Email
Jessica.D.Vallejo@kp.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Corinna Koebnick, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Kaiser Permanente
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente Pasadena
City
Pasadena
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91101
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Poornima S Kunani, MD
Phone
424-264-9537
Email
Poornima.S.Kunani@kp.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jessica D Vallejo, MS
Phone
626-564-3035
Email
Jessica.D.Vallejo@kp.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Corinna M Koebnick, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No IPD will be shared
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24710576
Citation
Skinner AC, Skelton JA. Prevalence and trends in obesity and severe obesity among children in the United States, 1999-2012. JAMA Pediatr. 2014 Jun;168(6):561-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24570244
Citation
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27261549
Citation
Resnicow K, Harris D, Wasserman R, Schwartz RP, Perez-Rosas V, Mihalcea R, Snetselaar L. Advances in Motivational Interviewing for Pediatric Obesity: Results of the Brief Motivational Interviewing to Reduce Body Mass Index Trial and Future Directions. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016 Jun;63(3):539-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.02.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29922826
Citation
Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Hales CM, Carroll MD, Aoki Y, Freedman DS. Differences in Obesity Prevalence by Demographics and Urbanization in US Children and Adolescents, 2013-2016. JAMA. 2018 Jun 19;319(23):2410-2418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5158.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20083515
Citation
US Preventive Services Task Force; Barton M. Screening for obesity in children and adolescents: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):361-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2037. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18055653
Citation
Davis MM, Gance-Cleveland B, Hassink S, Johnson R, Paradis G, Resnicow K. Recommendations for prevention of childhood obesity. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120 Suppl 4:S229-53. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329E.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18055654
Citation
Spear BA, Barlow SE, Ervin C, Ludwig DS, Saelens BE, Schetzina KE, Taveras EM. Recommendations for treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120 Suppl 4:S254-88. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329F.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26617555
Citation
Borrello M, Pietrabissa G, Ceccarini M, Manzoni GM, Castelnuovo G. Motivational Interviewing in Childhood Obesity Treatment. Front Psychol. 2015 Nov 12;6:1732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01732. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25825539
Citation
Resnicow K, McMaster F, Bocian A, Harris D, Zhou Y, Snetselaar L, Schwartz R, Myers E, Gotlieb J, Foster J, Hollinger D, Smith K, Woolford S, Mueller D, Wasserman RC. Motivational interviewing and dietary counseling for obesity in primary care: an RCT. Pediatrics. 2015 Apr;135(4):649-57. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1880.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19966092
Citation
Ford AL, Hunt LP, Cooper A, Shield JP. What reduction in BMI SDS is required in obese adolescents to improve body composition and cardiometabolic health? Arch Dis Child. 2010 Apr;95(4):256-61. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.165340. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21911346
Citation
Frohlich G, Pott W, Albayrak O, Hebebrand J, Pauli-Pott U. Conditions of long-term success in a lifestyle intervention for overweight and obese youths. Pediatrics. 2011 Oct;128(4):e779-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3395. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15919841
Citation
Kirk S, Zeller M, Claytor R, Santangelo M, Khoury PR, Daniels SR. The relationship of health outcomes to improvement in BMI in children and adolescents. Obes Res. 2005 May;13(5):876-82. doi: 10.1038/oby.2005.101.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15574616
Citation
Reinehr T, Kiess W, Kapellen T, Andler W. Insulin sensitivity among obese children and adolescents, according to degree of weight loss. Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):1569-73. doi: 10.1542/peds.2003-0649-F.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25664425
Citation
Apter AJ. Understanding adherence requires pragmatic trials: lessons from pediatric asthma. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Apr;169(4):310-1. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3661. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27914904
Citation
Asarnow J, Ougrin D. From efficacy to pragmatic trials: does the dodo bird verdict apply? Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;4(2):84-85. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30404-7. Epub 2016 Dec 1. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27518663
Citation
Ford I, Norrie J. Pragmatic Trials. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):454-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510059. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32723736
Citation
Wright ME, Delacroix E, Sonneville KR, Considine S, Proctor T, Steffes J, Harris D, Shone LP, Woo H, Vaughan R, Grundmeier RW, Fiks AG, Stockwell MS, Resnicow K. Reducing paediatric overweight and obesity through motivational interviewing: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in the AAP PROS research network. BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 28;10(7):e035720. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035720.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11479052
Citation
Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Aug;44(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00186-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27272581
Citation
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, Fryar CD, Kruszon-Moran D, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Trends in Obesity Prevalence Among Children and Adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 Through 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2292-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6361.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15837955
Citation
Daniels SR, Arnett DK, Eckel RH, Gidding SS, Hayman LL, Kumanyika S, Robinson TN, Scott BJ, St Jeor S, Williams CL. Overweight in children and adolescents: pathophysiology, consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation. 2005 Apr 19;111(15):1999-2012. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000161369.71722.10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17188605
Citation
Freedman DS, Mei Z, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS, Dietz WH. Cardiovascular risk factors and excess adiposity among overweight children and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. J Pediatr. 2007 Jan;150(1):12-17.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.08.042.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Motivational Wellness Coaching to Reduce Childhood Obesity in Families and Kids

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs