search
Back to results

Integration of Auditory, and Deep Brain Stimulation to Enhance Deep Sleep in Parkinson's Disease

Primary Purpose

Parkinson Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Acoustic stimulation
Sponsored by
Christian Baumann
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Parkinson Disease focused on measuring sleep, neurodegeneration, slow-wave sleep, deep brain stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent
  • Diagnosis of PD along with international criteria with mild to moderate disease severity (Hoehn-Yahr (HY) stages ll-lll), selected for receiving STN-DBS therapy with the neurostimulator PERCEPT™
  • Sufficient German language comprehension to follow the study procedures and answer all questions related to the study outcomes
  • Age above 18 years
  • Negative pregnancy test during screening in female patients of childbearing potential (except in women who are surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or post-menopausal for longer than 1 year)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to give informed consent
  • Known presence of neurologic (other than PD), psychiatric, or systemic diseases (others than associated with PD)
  • Clinical moderate to severe sleep-wake disorders (e.g. RLS-Index≥20, sleep apnea index ≥ 15 or, PLM-Index ≥ 15 if associated with arousals assessed during clinical PSG (in the framework of the pre-DBS work-up) and the clinical presentation of a RLS)
  • Atypical or secondary Parkinsonism
  • Severe medical conditions as renal insufficiency, liver failure, or congestive heart failure
  • Skin disorders/problems/allergies in face/ear area that could worsen with electrode application
  • Regular use of benzodiazepines other long-acting central nervous system (CNS)-depressant substances or long-acting antidepressants
  • Use of melatonin less than 1 day prior to recording session
  • Substance or alcohol abuse (i.e. > 0.5 l wine or 1 l beer per day)
  • High caffeine consumption (> 5 servings/day; including coffee, energy drink)
  • Known or suspected drug- or medication abuse
  • Hearing deficiency resulting in inability to hear the auditory stimuli during sleep (based on results of standard pure-tone threshold audiometry)
  • Not tolerating AS during screening night
  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems or cognitive deficits
  • Participation in another study with the intervention within the 30 days preceding, and during the present study
  • Previous enrolment in the current study
  • Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees, and other dependent persons
  • Shift work (work during the night)
  • Travelling more than 2 time zones in the last month before the intervention starts or during the intervention (start of intervention will be adapted to fit with this criteria)
  • Lack of safe contraception, defined as: Female patients of childbearing potential, not using and not willing to continue using a medically reliable method of contraception for the entire study duration, such as oral, injectable, or implantable contraceptives, or intrauterine contraceptive devices, or who are not using any other method considered sufficiently reliable by the investigator in individual cases. Please note that female patients who are surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or post-menopausal for longer than 1 year are not considered as being of child bearing potential.
  • During DBS implantation/ICU:

    • Use of long-acting substances (i.e. long-lasting benzodiazepines, anti-depressants)
    • Use of full anesthesia
    • Atypical STN electrophysiology
    • Miss-location of the DBS leads (location will be checked after surgery using SureTune™ Medtronic software based on CT and MRI)

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Sleep Measurements

Arm Description

LFP recording from STN using externalized wires or implanted neurostimulator, while simultaneously recording clinical surface EEG and applying AS during deep sleep.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Identification of STN LFP correlates of cortical slow waves (i.e. 1-4 Hz, in the surface EEG)
The temporal relationships of the surface EEG and the LFP will be investigated using the event-related potentials (ERP) and cross-correlation analysis.
Comparing the slope of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The slope of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the slope of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
Comparing the amplitude of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The amplitude of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the slope of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
Comparing the incidence of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The number of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the number of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
AS effect on SWA in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Comparing SWA (EEG power between 0.5-4.5Hz) during ON and OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
AS effect on the slope of slow waves in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Comparing the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during ON compared to the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
AS effect on the amplitude of slow waves in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Comparing the amplitude of slow waves of all detected slow waves during ON compared to the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Comparing event-related potentials (ERP) between surface EEG and STN-LFP
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Comparing time-frequency analysis of event-related spectral power (ERSP) between surface EEG and STN-LFP
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Comparing inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) between surface EEG and STN-LFP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., total number of stimuli presented
Number of presented tones will be compared between Recording Session 1, 2 and 3
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., phase targeting of AS
Accuracy of slow-wave phase targeting during AS will be compared between Recording Session 1, 2 and 3
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., characterization of detected slow-waves
The slope of detected slow-waves will be compared between Recording Session 1,2 and 3
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., characterization of detected slow-waves
the amplitude of detected slow-waves will be compared between Recording Session 1,2 and 3
Investigation of relationships between behavioral performance changes and the AS effects (slow-wave characteristics in surface EEG and STN LFP) under DBS ON and OFF conditions
Comparing reaction time and response inhibition in the Go-NoGo Task between conditions and the evening and morning

Full Information

First Posted
October 15, 2021
Last Updated
September 19, 2023
Sponsor
Christian Baumann
Collaborators
Klinik Lengg AG, University Children's Hospital, University of Zurich
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05184270
Brief Title
Integration of Auditory, and Deep Brain Stimulation to Enhance Deep Sleep in Parkinson's Disease
Official Title
Integration of Auditory Slow-Wave Stimulation Into Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation to Enhance Deep Sleep in Parkinson's Disease: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 10, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 7, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 7, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Christian Baumann
Collaborators
Klinik Lengg AG, University Children's Hospital, University of Zurich

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study is an open-label trial to validate the local field potential (LFP) activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for slow-wave detection during acoustic stimulation during nighttime sleep in Parkinson's disease patients that receive deep-brain-stimulation (DBS) therapy with the novel PERCEPT™ DBS system.
Detailed Description
The objective of this study is to validate the STN signal for slow-wave detection during auditory stimulation. To test this, the electrophysiological activity within the STN will be measured as local field potentials (LFP) using standard STN-DBS electrodes. To assess whether the recorded STN activity can be used for AS, the coherence analysis of cortical and STN slow waves will be performed. At the screening consultation, the study physician will obtain written informed consent, confirm inclusion and exclusion criteria, and obtain entry questionnaires including demographics, medical history, and concomitant therapy. Following a successful screening consultation, the study physician will schedule a screening night at the sleep laboratory in the department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich (USZ), during which clinical surface EEG (12-channel system, including EMG, ECG, and EOG) will be recorded and AS will be applied. To test the individual susceptibility to AS, ERPs to auditory stimuli and SWA change will be assessed. If the screening night was successful, each patient will undergo a baseline consultation and 3 recording sessions. During all 3 recording sessions, the patients will be asked about their subjective sleep quality and current mood, concomitant therapy (including LED), and MDS-UPDRS III will be performed by the study physician. The surgical implantation (which is not part of the current proposal) follows standardized clinical protocol and is applied in 2 steps. Sleep will be recorded simultaneously with clinical surface EEG and STN LFP in all 3 recording sessions (combined LFP-EEG recording) and AS will be performed based on slow-wave detected in the surface EEG. In detail: In the first step, DBS leads are implanted in the STN, keeping the wires externalized. Following one night in the intensive or intermediate care unit for monitoring, patients will undergo a full-night combined LFP-EEG recording and AS (Recording Session 1), with LFP data collected from the externalized wires (DBS off). Next, the surgery will be completed by implantation of the neuromodulator and its connection to the DBS leads. Following the completion of the surgery, rehabilitation will start. The rehabilitation period will last for 2-5 weeks. At the end of the rehabilitation Recording Session 2 and 3 will take place. These recording session will be separated by 2-3 days and their order will be randomized and counterbalanced across participants. During Recording Session 2, combined LFP-EEG recording and AS will be performed during first 4 hours of the night sleep; STN LFP will be recorded with the implanted neurostimulator (DBS off). Recording Session 3 will be similar to Recording Session 2, but with DBS on (i.e. using DBS settings that were adjusted during rehabilitation). Because stable LFP recordings by PERCEPT™ PC neurostimulator is only possible for 4 hours, LFP sleep recordings during Recording Session 2 and 3 are limited to the first 4h of sleep. Surface EEG and AS, however, will be performed for the whole night after the LFP recoding end. Recording Sessions 2 and 3 will take place either at Clinic Lengg or in the USZ sleep laboratory (if the patient will be at a different rehabilitation center than Clinic Lengg). Additionally, circadian rhythm will be assessed continuously throughout the interventions using actigraphy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Parkinson Disease
Keywords
sleep, neurodegeneration, slow-wave sleep, deep brain stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
15 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sleep Measurements
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
LFP recording from STN using externalized wires or implanted neurostimulator, while simultaneously recording clinical surface EEG and applying AS during deep sleep.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Acoustic stimulation
Intervention Description
In this project, the intervention is a presentation of low-volume non-arousing auditory stimuli during deep NREM sleep via attached headphones. Stimuli will be applied targeting the up-phase of slow waves to enhance sleep slow-wave activity. Previous studies showed that this procedure does not lead to reduced sleep quality nor result in changed sleep architecture. Therefore, no negative consequences as a result of our intervention are to be expected. In fact, it is currently applied in several other studies including children, adults, and the elderly. Importantly, stimulation is not arousing, as the sounds presented during deep sleep are brief (50 ms) and at low volume (around 50 dB). In case of arousal during sleep (detected using the surface EEG signal), the volume will be adjusted.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Identification of STN LFP correlates of cortical slow waves (i.e. 1-4 Hz, in the surface EEG)
Description
The temporal relationships of the surface EEG and the LFP will be investigated using the event-related potentials (ERP) and cross-correlation analysis.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
Comparing the slope of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Description
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The slope of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the slope of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
Comparing the amplitude of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Description
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The amplitude of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the slope of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
Comparing the incidence of slow wave across the night between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Description
In the EEG and the LFP recordings slow waves (0.5-4.5Hz) will be detected during all night NREM sleep. The number of all detected slow-waves at the beginning of the night (i.e., first hour of sleep) will be compared to the number of all detected slow waves at the end of the night (i.e., last hour of sleep) for the EEG and the LFP recordings separately. The overnight difference will be compared between the EEG and the LFP recordings.
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
AS effect on SWA in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Description
Comparing SWA (EEG power between 0.5-4.5Hz) during ON and OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
AS effect on the slope of slow waves in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Description
Comparing the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during ON compared to the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
AS effect on the amplitude of slow waves in the surface EEG and STN-LFP
Description
Comparing the amplitude of slow waves of all detected slow waves during ON compared to the slope of slow waves of all detected slow waves during OFF windows between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Description
Comparing event-related potentials (ERP) between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Description
Comparing time-frequency analysis of event-related spectral power (ERSP) between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
AS effect on frequencies over >4Hz
Description
Comparing inter-trial phase coherence (ITPC) between surface EEG and STN-LFP
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., total number of stimuli presented
Description
Number of presented tones will be compared between Recording Session 1, 2 and 3
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., phase targeting of AS
Description
Accuracy of slow-wave phase targeting during AS will be compared between Recording Session 1, 2 and 3
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., characterization of detected slow-waves
Description
The slope of detected slow-waves will be compared between Recording Session 1,2 and 3
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
Quantitative comparison of presented stimuli between recording sessions (i.e. DBS ON vs DBS OFF), i.e., characterization of detected slow-waves
Description
the amplitude of detected slow-waves will be compared between Recording Session 1,2 and 3
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years
Title
Investigation of relationships between behavioral performance changes and the AS effects (slow-wave characteristics in surface EEG and STN LFP) under DBS ON and OFF conditions
Description
Comparing reaction time and response inhibition in the Go-NoGo Task between conditions and the evening and morning
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Signed informed consent Diagnosis of PD along with international criteria with mild to moderate disease severity (Hoehn-Yahr (HY) stages ll-lll), selected for receiving STN-DBS therapy with the neurostimulator PERCEPT™ Sufficient German language comprehension to follow the study procedures and answer all questions related to the study outcomes Age above 18 years Negative pregnancy test during screening in female patients of childbearing potential (except in women who are surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or post-menopausal for longer than 1 year) Exclusion Criteria: Failure to give informed consent Known presence of neurologic (other than PD), psychiatric, or systemic diseases (others than associated with PD) Clinical moderate to severe sleep-wake disorders (e.g. RLS-Index≥20, sleep apnea index ≥ 15 or, PLM-Index ≥ 15 if associated with arousals assessed during clinical PSG (in the framework of the pre-DBS work-up) and the clinical presentation of a RLS) Atypical or secondary Parkinsonism Severe medical conditions as renal insufficiency, liver failure, or congestive heart failure Skin disorders/problems/allergies in face/ear area that could worsen with electrode application Regular use of benzodiazepines other long-acting central nervous system (CNS)-depressant substances or long-acting antidepressants Use of melatonin less than 1 day prior to recording session Substance or alcohol abuse (i.e. > 0.5 l wine or 1 l beer per day) High caffeine consumption (> 5 servings/day; including coffee, energy drink) Known or suspected drug- or medication abuse Hearing deficiency resulting in inability to hear the auditory stimuli during sleep (based on results of standard pure-tone threshold audiometry) Not tolerating AS during screening night Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems or cognitive deficits Participation in another study with the intervention within the 30 days preceding, and during the present study Previous enrolment in the current study Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees, and other dependent persons Shift work (work during the night) Travelling more than 2 time zones in the last month before the intervention starts or during the intervention (start of intervention will be adapted to fit with this criteria) Lack of safe contraception, defined as: Female patients of childbearing potential, not using and not willing to continue using a medically reliable method of contraception for the entire study duration, such as oral, injectable, or implantable contraceptives, or intrauterine contraceptive devices, or who are not using any other method considered sufficiently reliable by the investigator in individual cases. Please note that female patients who are surgically sterilized/hysterectomized or post-menopausal for longer than 1 year are not considered as being of child bearing potential. During DBS implantation/ICU: Use of long-acting substances (i.e. long-lasting benzodiazepines, anti-depressants) Use of full anesthesia Atypical STN electrophysiology Miss-location of the DBS leads (location will be checked after surgery using SureTune™ Medtronic software based on CT and MRI)
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich
City
Zurich
ZIP/Postal Code
8091
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Integration of Auditory, and Deep Brain Stimulation to Enhance Deep Sleep in Parkinson's Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs