search
Back to results

LAAO Versus NOAC in Patients With AF and PCI

Primary Purpose

Atrial Fibrillation, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
The WATCHMAN/WATCHMAN FLX device
Rivaroxaban + Clopidogre
Aspirin + Clopidogrel
Sponsored by
Xijing Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Atrial Fibrillation focused on measuring Left atrial appendage occlusion, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Novel oral anti-coagulation, Atrial Fibrillation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Successful PCI for unstable angina or CCS
  2. Non-valvular atrial fibrillation
  3. Concomitant at least one of the following conditions: congestive heart failure, hypertension, ≥65yrs, diabetes, previous stroke, TIA or thromboembolism
  4. Eligible for long-term novel oral anti-coagulation (NOAC) therapy
  5. Able to understand and provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures/medications

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be disqualified from participation in the study:

Clinical exclusion criteria:

  1. Under the age of 18
  2. Unable to give informed consent or currently participating in another trial and not yet at its primary endpoint
  3. Patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing (a pregnancy test must be performed within 7 days prior to the index procedure in women of child-bearing potential according to local practice)
  4. Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 3 years
  5. Haemodynamical unstable
  6. Known contraindication to medications such as heparin, antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs, or contrast
  7. PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or experienced a peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) caused by PCI
  8. Known contraindication to LAAO or LAAO is not required
  9. Comorbidities other than atrial fibrillation that required long term use of anticoagulation (such as implanted a mechanical valve)
  10. The patient had or is planning to have any cardiac (excluding the current PCI procedure) or non-cardiac interventional or surgical procedure within 30 days prior to or 60 days after the WATCHMAN device implant (e.g., cardioversion, ablation, cataract surgery)
  11. Ongoing overt bleeding
  12. Previous stroke/TIA within 30 days of enrolment
  13. Symptomatic carotid artery disease
  14. Severe renal insufficiency (CrCl≤30ml/min)

Imaging Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus
  2. High risk patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect requiring invasive treatment
  3. Anatomical unsuitable for LAAO
  4. Rheumatic heart valve disease, mitral valve stenosis (valve area <1.5cm2)

Sites / Locations

  • Ling TaoRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO)

Novel oral anti-coagulation (NOAC)-based anti-thrombotic therapy

Arm Description

Device: The WATCHMAN/WATCHMAN FLX device Drug: Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD + Clopidogrel 75mg QD for 45 days, followed by Aspirin 100mg QD + Clopidogrel 75mg QD for 10.5 months after LAAO

Drug: Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD + Clopidogrel 75mg QD for 12 months

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
MACCE define as a composite endpoint of any death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction (MI), and systemic embolism (SE).

Secondary Outcome Measures

BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding events
Powered Key secondary endpoint, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined type 2, 3, 5 bleeding events

Full Information

First Posted
April 22, 2022
Last Updated
June 28, 2023
Sponsor
Xijing Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05353140
Brief Title
LAAO Versus NOAC in Patients With AF and PCI
Official Title
Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Novel Oral Anti-coagulation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Randomized, Multicentre, Open-label, Non-inferiority Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 20, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 20, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Xijing Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) coincides with coronary artery disease (CAD) shared common risk factors and pathophysiologic pathways. CAD affects approximately 25% of AF patient according to the trial Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM), while in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) atrial fibrillation affected about 9% of patients with CAD. It is reported that approximately 5-8% of the patients who underwent PCI had concomitated atrial fibrillation. For AF patients who underwent PCI, both antiplatelet and antithrombotic medications are required for preventing stent thrombosis and ischemic stroke, leading to an increased risk of bleeding. Finding a safe and effective balance between the risk of ischaemic events and bleeding complications is challenged by the shared risk factors for either event such as advanced age, congestive heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, previous stroke, etc.. Previous pivotal trials have shown that in patients with atrial fibrillation and requiring antiplatelet treatment, a NOAC plus clopidogrel regimen was associated with a lower incidence of bleeding events as compared with a warfarin-based triple antithrombotic strategy. Therefore, the current expert opinions and consensus of North American Societies recommend a NOAC plus a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients with AF and PCI. However, the NOAC plus clopidogrel strategy still led to 16.8% of clinically significant bleeding (PIONEER AF-PCI). Consequently, the compliance of OAC/NOAC is commonly suboptimal among PCI patients who require an antithrombotic strategy for AF. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a non-pharmacological strategy for stroke prevention in patients with AF. Both randomized data and registries have confirmed it can be an alternative to oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular AF. Current guidelines recommend LAAO for patients with NVAF who have contraindications or are unsuitable for long-term OAC. Considering the unique high risk of AF patients with PCI, LAAO may be an attractive treatment option by obviating the need for combined oral anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. However, so far there is no data from neither randomized cohorts nor real-world registries showing if LAAO can be a safe and effective alternative strategy compared to VKA/NOAC for stroke prevention in AF patients who underwent PCI. The PROTECT AF and PREVAIL studies showed that the percutaneous LAAO was non-inferior to warfarin therapy, and the PRAGUE-17 trial showed non-inferior to direct oral anticoagulants, however, the small sample size of these trials limited further subgroup analyses of the PCI sub-population. In the NCDR registry, which is the largest cohort of LAAO up to now, 20.3% of the LAAO patients had a prior myocardial infarction. However, the proportion of stent implantation was not reported. Among previous trials, the proportion of patients with coronary artery disease ranged from 28.5% to 47.5%. The large number of AF patients with CAD warrant the optimal stroke prevention strategy to be assessed in this population. The primary goal of the proposed study is to investigate if the non-inferiority would be met for the LAAO when compared to NOACs in NVAF patients with PCI in terms of a composite endpoint of any death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction, systemic embolism at 12 months. In addition, the powered key secondary will also have 80% of power to show superiority for the LAAO when compared to NOACs in terms of BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding events at 36 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Fibrillation, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Keywords
Left atrial appendage occlusion, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Novel oral anti-coagulation, Atrial Fibrillation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1386 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Device: The WATCHMAN/WATCHMAN FLX device Drug: Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD + Clopidogrel 75mg QD for 45 days, followed by Aspirin 100mg QD + Clopidogrel 75mg QD for 10.5 months after LAAO
Arm Title
Novel oral anti-coagulation (NOAC)-based anti-thrombotic therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Drug: Rivaroxaban 15 mg QD + Clopidogrel 75mg QD for 12 months
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
The WATCHMAN/WATCHMAN FLX device
Intervention Description
Watchman device was an umbrella-shaped, self-expanding, nitinol structure with a porous partial polyethylene terephthalate membrane (160 um mesh) and 10 struts. The membrane portion of the structure faces into the body of the left atrial to block embolization of thrombus and provide scaffolding on which endothelialization can occur. The On July 21st, 2020, the FDA approved the next generation LAAO device, named Watchman FLX. This newiteration of the Watchman LAAO platform offers full capability of recapture and redeployment of the device, decreasedmetallic exposure, an increased number of contact points for sealing, a fully rounded delivery shape, and precision anchors designed to provide optimal device engagement with the LAA.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rivaroxaban + Clopidogre
Intervention Description
Previous pivotal trials have shown that in patients with atrial fibrillation and requiring antiplatelet treatment, a NOAC plus clopidogrel regimen was associated with a lower incidence of bleeding events as compared with a warfarin-based triple antithrombotic strategy. Therefore, the current expert opinions and consensus of North American Societies recommend a NOAC plus a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients with AF and PCI. In the present study, Rivaroxaban + Clopidogre are required for 45 days in LAAO group after LAAO.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Aspirin + Clopidogrel
Intervention Description
Aspirin + Clopidogrel are required from 46 days to 12 months after LAAO.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
Description
MACCE define as a composite endpoint of any death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction (MI), and systemic embolism (SE).
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding events
Description
Powered Key secondary endpoint, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined type 2, 3, 5 bleeding events
Time Frame
36 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
BARC type 2, 3 or 5 bleeding events
Description
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined type 2, 3, 5 bleeding events
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 60months
Title
BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding events
Description
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined type 3, 5 bleeding events
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
BARC type 2 bleeding events
Description
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined type 2 bleeding events
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
A composite endpoint of any death, any stroke, and systemic embolism
Description
A composite endpoint of any death, any stroke, and systemic embolism
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Any death
Description
Any death
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Any stroke
Description
Any stroke
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Any myocardial infarction (MI)
Description
Any myocardial infarction (MI)
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Systemic embolism (SE)
Description
Systemic embolism (SE)
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Target lesion failure (TLF)
Description
Target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (TLR), and its individual components
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Patient oriented Composite Endpoint (PoCE)
Description
Patient oriented Composite Endpoint (PoCE), defined as the composite of any death, any myocardial infarction, any stroke, any revascularization, and systemic embolism, and its individual components
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Net adverse clinical events (NACE)
Description
Net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as the composite of any death, any myocardial infarction, any stroke, any revascularization, systemic embolism, and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding events and its individual components
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Acute/subacute/early thrombosis
Description
Acute, subacute, or early thrombosis
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
TIMI major bleeding and/or minor bleeding
Description
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) defined major bleeding and/or minor bleeding
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
ISTH major bleeding and/or clinically relevant minor bleeding
Description
International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) defined major bleeding and/or clinically relevant minor bleeding
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Device/Technical/Procedural successful rate
Description
Device success was defined as the device deployed and implanted in the correct position. Technical success was defined as the exclusion of the left atrial appendage, with no device-related complications and no leak >5 mm. Procedural success was defined as technical success and no procedure-related complications
Time Frame
30 days post LAAO
Title
Procedure related major complications
Description
Defined according to the the Munich consensus document on definitions, endpoints, and data collection requirements for LAAO clinical studies
Time Frame
30 days post LAAO
Title
Patient adherence to allocated medication
Description
Patient adherence to allocated medication, defined as the use of medication strategies of this trial on 80% of the time in therapeutic range
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Neurological assessment
Description
Neurological assess by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score: The mRS is used to assess long-term function following a stroke event. Complete a mRS Stroke Assessment Worksheet at approximately 90 days following the stroke for a long-term functional assessment. Scores: 0, No symptoms; 1, No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms; 2, Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities; 3, Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted; 4, Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted; 5, Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent; 6, Dead.
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Neurological assessment
Description
Neurological assess by NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score: The NIHSS is an acute stroke assessment tool used to assess stroke severity, with a score of 0-42. The higher the score, the more severe the neurological deficit. NIHSS score ≤ 4 should be considered mild strokes, and ≥ 21 should be considered severe strokes. An NIHSS should be completed at baseline and within 24-48 hours of the stroke event during follow-up for urgent assessment of stroke severity. If there is a change or abnormality of NIHSS, a neurologist consultation is required to determine whether the increase in the corresponding score compared to the previous visit is due to neurological reasons.
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months
Title
Quality of life assessments
Description
Quality of life assess by Five-level EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L): EQ-5D-5L is a simple and general health measurement method. In the description part, the health status will be described in 5 dimensions. The questionnaire require subjects to choose the most suitable option for themselves from each dimension according to their health status. The visual analog scale section is on a vertical scale, recording subjects' self-assessed health status.
Time Frame
45days, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 60months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Successful PCI for unstable angina or CCS Non-valvular atrial fibrillation Concomitant at least one of the following conditions: congestive heart failure, hypertension, ≥65yrs, diabetes, previous stroke, TIA or thromboembolism Eligible for long-term novel oral anti-coagulation (NOAC) therapy Able to understand and provide informed consent and comply with all study procedures/medications Exclusion Criteria: Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be disqualified from participation in the study: Clinical exclusion criteria: Under the age of 18 Unable to give informed consent or currently participating in another trial and not yet at its primary endpoint Patient is a woman who is pregnant or nursing (a pregnancy test must be performed within 7 days prior to the index procedure in women of child-bearing potential according to local practice) Concurrent medical condition with a life expectancy of less than 3 years Haemodynamical unstable Known contraindication to medications such as heparin, antiplatelet or anticoagulation drugs, or contrast PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), or experienced a peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) caused by PCI Known contraindication to LAAO or LAAO is not required Comorbidities other than atrial fibrillation that required long term use of anticoagulation (such as implanted a mechanical valve) The patient had or is planning to have any cardiac (excluding the current PCI procedure) or non-cardiac interventional or surgical procedure within 30 days prior to or 60 days after the WATCHMAN device implant (e.g., cardioversion, ablation, cataract surgery) Ongoing overt bleeding Previous stroke/TIA within 30 days of enrolment Symptomatic carotid artery disease Severe renal insufficiency (CrCl≤30ml/min) Imaging Exclusion Criteria: Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus High risk patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect requiring invasive treatment Anatomical unsuitable for LAAO Rheumatic heart valve disease, mitral valve stenosis (valve area <1.5cm2)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Chao Gao, M.D., Ph.D.
Phone
+86-18629551066
Email
woshigaochao@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ruining Zhang, BSc
Phone
+86-15802990370
Email
ruining-zhang@qq.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ling Tao, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Xijing Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ling Tao
City
Xi'an
State/Province
Shannxi
ZIP/Postal Code
710032
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chao Gao
Email
woshigaochao@gmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

LAAO Versus NOAC in Patients With AF and PCI

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs