search
Back to results

Impact of Steerable Delivery Sheaths on Successful Closure of LA A With AMULET

Primary Purpose

Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.
Sponsored by
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Atrial Fibrillation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with atrial fibrillation who meets the indication/criteria for left atrial appendage occlusion and undergoing implantation of Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Left Atrial Appendage Occluder device

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient been/being implanted with device other than Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Prisoners
  • Patients not willing to participate in the study

Sites / Locations

  • Menorah Medical Center
  • Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
  • Overland Park Regional Medical Center
  • Centerpoint Medical Center Clinic
  • Centerpoint Medical Center
  • Research Medical Center Clinic
  • Research Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Patients with Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath

Patients with Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath

Arm Description

Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath.

Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants with Acute Closure of Left Atrial Appendage
Acute closure ( less than or equal to 3mm) of the left atrial appendage after Left Atrial Appedage Occlusion(LAAO) procedure
Number of patients with Cardiac Perforation
Number of patients with cardiac perforation
Need for Pericardiocentesis
Need for pericardiocentesis within 7 days of implantation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of devices
Number of devices changed prior to final implant during the procedure
Number of device repositions
Number of device repositions performed during the procedure
Closure Rates
45 day closure rates of left atrial appendage ( less than or equal to 3mm)
Number of participants with Device related thrombus (DRT)
Number of participants with Device related thrombus (DRT)
Number of participants with Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
Number of participants with Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months of the procedure

Full Information

First Posted
July 12, 2022
Last Updated
March 8, 2023
Sponsor
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
Collaborators
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05464511
Brief Title
Impact of Steerable Delivery Sheaths on Successful Closure of LA A With AMULET
Official Title
Impact of Steerable Delivery Sheaths on Successful Closure of Left Atrial Appendage With AMULET Dual Mechanism Closure Device (STEER-CLOSE Study)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
April 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
October 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
Collaborators
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The novel Amplatzer steerable delivery sheath (Abbott Vascular) is found to be safe and effective in performing LAAO procedure. However, the procedural outcomes have not been compared with the traditional non-steerable fixed curve sheath. In this study investigators aim to compare the outcome of patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath versus a novel steerable sheath.
Detailed Description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormal heart rhythm associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. It is one of the strongest risk factors of systemic thromboembolism (TE), with stroke being the most serious outcome. Prevention of stroke is the cornerstone of managing AF, which can be achieved either by oral anticoagulation (OAC) or Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients who have a contraindication to OAC. Heterogeneity in cardiac chamber size, interatrial septum, LAA anatomy and orientation, operator experience and currently available fixed curve sheaths add to the complexity of the procedure. Alignment of LAAO device along the access of the left atrial appendage body is an important factor in improving closure rates. The devices which are currently approved by FDA for LAA closure in the U.S. are Amplatzer Amulet device (Abbott Medical) and Watchman and Watchman FLX devices (Boston Scientific). In a recent study, Amplatzer Amulet device was found to be noninferior in terms of safety and effectiveness, with superior LAA occlusion rates but higher device-related complications as compared to first generation watchman device. The LAAO device sheaths that are used currently have fixed shapes and angles that may not be optimal for some LAA anatomy, which can lead to excessive device manipulation, prolonged procedure time, and potentially suboptimal co-axiality during the process. This may lead to increase device related complications. The new Amplatzer steerable delivery sheath (Abbott Vascular) is designed to provide distal bidirectional steerability of the sheath for Amulet implantation. Such steerability may enable successful endovascular closure of greater proportion of LAA, allow precise position of the transseptal puncture, and potentially reduce procedural times and complications with complex cases. Investigators hypothesize that the use of novel steerable sheath for LAAO closure is safer and more effective as compared to non-steerable fixed curve sheath

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This will be a multi-centered, retrospective as well as prospective observational registry with patients undergoing LAAO with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device. This study will proceed with a target of 300 patients who have undergone or are planned to undergo LAAO with dual mechanism closure Amulet device. Patient level data of participating centers will be obtained from National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) of patients who have already had the procedure. Prospective data will be collected for all patients willing to participate in the study.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Patients with Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath.
Arm Title
Patients with Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.
Intervention Description
Left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with Acute Closure of Left Atrial Appendage
Description
Acute closure ( less than or equal to 3mm) of the left atrial appendage after Left Atrial Appedage Occlusion(LAAO) procedure
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Number of patients with Cardiac Perforation
Description
Number of patients with cardiac perforation
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Need for Pericardiocentesis
Description
Need for pericardiocentesis within 7 days of implantation
Time Frame
7 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of devices
Description
Number of devices changed prior to final implant during the procedure
Time Frame
1 day (procedure day)
Title
Number of device repositions
Description
Number of device repositions performed during the procedure
Time Frame
1 day (procedure day)
Title
Closure Rates
Description
45 day closure rates of left atrial appendage ( less than or equal to 3mm)
Time Frame
45 days
Title
Number of participants with Device related thrombus (DRT)
Description
Number of participants with Device related thrombus (DRT)
Time Frame
45 days
Title
Number of participants with Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA)
Description
Number of participants with Transient ischemic attack (TIA) or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months of the procedure
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with atrial fibrillation who meets the indication/criteria for left atrial appendage occlusion and undergoing implantation of Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Left Atrial Appendage Occluder device Exclusion Criteria: Patient been/being implanted with device other than Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Pregnant or breastfeeding patients Prisoners Patients not willing to participate in the study
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Donita Atkins
Phone
816-651-1969
Email
datkins@kchrf.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Organizational Affiliation
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Menorah Medical Center
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Overland Park Regional Medical Center
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centerpoint Medical Center Clinic
City
Independence
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64057
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centerpoint Medical Center
City
Independence
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64057
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Medical Center Clinic
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64032
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23008509
Citation
Gangireddy SR, Halperin JL, Fuster V, Reddy VY. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: an assessment of net clinical benefit. Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov;33(21):2700-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs292. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25399274
Citation
Reddy VY, Sievert H, Halperin J, Doshi SK, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Whisenant B, Kar S, Swarup V, Gordon N, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1988-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15192. Erratum In: JAMA. 2015 Mar 10;313(10):1061.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27898435
Citation
Jazayeri MA, Vuddanda V, Parikh V, Lakkireddy DR. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: current state of the art. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):27-38. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000367.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34459659
Citation
Lakkireddy D, Thaler D, Ellis CR, Swarup V, Sondergaard L, Carroll J, Gold MR, Hermiller J, Diener HC, Schmidt B, MacDonald L, Mansour M, Maini B, O'Brien L, Windecker S. Amplatzer Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Versus Watchman Device for Stroke Prophylaxis (Amulet IDE): A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2021 Nov 9;144(19):1543-1552. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057063. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34620400
Citation
Saw J, Perrin N, Nestelberger T, Mondesert B, Tsang M, Ibrahim R. First-in-Human Experience With the Amplatzer Steerable Delivery Sheath for Left Atrial Appendage Closure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct 11;14(19):2191-2193. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.022. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Impact of Steerable Delivery Sheaths on Successful Closure of LA A With AMULET

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs