Changes in dopamine
To determine if the device has an impact on dopamine levels
Changes in epinephrine
To determine if the device has an impact on epinephrine levels
Changes in norepinephrine
To determine if the device has an impact on norepinephrine levels
Changes in cortisol
To determine if the device has an impact on cortisol levels
Changes in arousal
To determine if the device has an impact on arousal levels measured by the "Felt Arousal Scale". The minimum score is 1 and maximum score is 6. These measures are not indicative of better or worse outcomes.
Sleep Quality
Index of sleep quality using the Neurology Quality of Life (Neuro-QOL) sleep subscale.
Changes in fatigue
To determine if the device has an impact on fatigue levels measured by the "Fatigue Scale". The minimum score is 1 and maximum score is 5. These measures are not indicative of better or worse outcomes.
Changes in Marksmanship Accuracy
Simulated marksmanship using optical targetry
Changes in Marksmanship Reaction Time
Simulated marksmanship using optical targetry
Changes in cognitive flexibility by local switch cost RT (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on cognitive flexibility by measuring local switch cost RT within the heterogenous condition when switching rule sets represented as the additional time to respond to switch relative to repeat trials.
Changes in cognitive flexibility by local switch cost ACC (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on cognitive flexibility by measuring local switch cost ACC within the heterogenous condition when switching rule sets represented as the difference between error rates for switch relative to repeat trials.
Changes in cognitive flexibility by local switch cost IES (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on cognitive flexibility by measuring local switch cost inverse efficiency scores (IES) represented as dividing RTs by 1 minus the percentage of errors (i.e., percentage of correct responses).
Changes in global executive function by global cost RT (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on global executive function by measuring global cost RT represented as the difference between the time required to respond between the heterogeneous and homogeneous conditions.
Changes in global executive function by global cost ACC (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on global executive function by measuring global cost ACC represented as the difference between error rates between homogeneous and heterogeneous conditions.
Changes in global executive function by global cost IES (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on global executive function by measuring global cost IES.
Changes in working memory by mixing cost RT (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on working memory by measuring mixing cost RT represented as the additional time required to respond between the repeat trials in the heterogenous condition relative to the trials in the homogeneous condition.
Changes in working memory by mixing cost ACC (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on working memory by measuring mixing cost ACC represented as the difference in error rates on repeat trials in the heterogenous condition relative to the trials in the homogeneous condition.
Changes in working memory by mixing cost IES (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on working memory by measuring mixing cost IES.
Changes in attention (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention measured by the omission errors when an individual fails to respond to a color-switch task trial, and omission error runs when an individual fails to respond to multiple successive trials.
Changes in Inhibitory Control (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on inhibitory control measured by the commission errors when an individual fails to respond correctly to a color-switch task trial, and commission error runs when an individual fails to respond correctly to multiple successive trials.
Changes in attention and cognitive control by ACC (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention and cognitive control by measuring heterogeneous condition ACC.
Changes in attention and cognitive control by RT (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention and cognitive control by measuring heterogeneous condition RT.
Changes in attention and cognitive control by IES (Switch Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention and cognitive control by measuring heterogeneous condition IES.
Changes in Inhibitory Control (Go/No go)
To determine if the device has an impact on inhibitory control by measuring reaction time to Go targets (hits).
To determine if the device has an impact on inhibitory control by measuring errors of commission representing incorrect responses to the target NoGo (false alarm).
Changes in Attention (Go/No go)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention by measuring errors of omission to the target Go (misses).
Changes in Autonomic Nervous System Function (ANS) by linear metrics
To determine if the device has an impact on ANS function by measuring heart rate variability represented by linear (RMSSD, SDNN, CVNN) time domain metrics.
Changes in Autonomic Nervous System Function (ANS) by nonlinear metrics
To determine if the device has an impact on ANS function by measuring heart rate variability represented by nonlinear (ApSaEn) time domain metric.
Changes in Autonomic Nervous System Function (ANS) by frequency domain metrics
To determine if the device has an impact on ANS function by measuring heart rate variability represented by frequency domain (HF, LF, Coherence Ratio) metrics.
Changes in Inhibitory Control by accuracy scores (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on inhibitory control measured by the accuracy scores (% of correct answers) for compatible-congruent, incompatible-congruent, compatible-incongruent, and incompatible-incongruent Flanker Task trials.
Changes in Inhibitory Control by average response time (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on inhibitory control measured by the average response time to incongruent flanker task trials irrespective of compatible or incompatible rule sets.
Changes in Inhibitory Control by commission errors (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on inhibitory control measured by the commission errors when an individual fails to respond correctly to a flanker task trial, and commission error runs when an individual fails to respond correctly to multiple successive trials.
Changes in Attention by accuracy (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention measured by the accuracy scores for congruent-compatible Flanker task trials.
Changes in Attention by average response time (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention measured by the overall average response time (milliseconds) to compatible and incompatible Flanker task trails irrespective of trial congruency.
Changes in Attention by omission errors (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on attention measured by the omission errors when an individual fails to respond to a flanker task trial, and omission error runs when an individual fails to respond to multiple successive trials.
Changes in Cognitive flexibility by accuracy (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on cognitive flexibility by the accuracy scores for incongruent-incompatible Flanker task trials.
Changes in Cognitive flexibility by average response time (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on cognitive flexibility measured by the average response time to incongruent-incompatible flanker task trials.
Changes in Cognitive control by post-error accuracy (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on cognitive control measured by post-error accuracy on Flanker task trials following an error.
Changes in Cognitive control by sequential congruency effect (Flanker Task)
To determine changes in cognitive control measured by sequential congruency effect when lower interference occurs following an incongruent relative to a congruent flanker task trial reflecting a consciously controlled narrowing of attention to the central target.
Changes in Cognitive control by inverse efficiency (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on cognitive control measured by inverse efficiency a metric of a speed-accuracy trade-off for Flanker task trials.
Changes in Attentional Inhibition (Flanker Task)
To determine if the device has an impact on attentional inhibition measured by congruency interference representing the costs associated with the interference demands associated with incongruent vs congruent flanker task trials.
Changes in verbal learning (HVLT)
To determine if the device has an impact on verbal learning by measuring total recall score via combining the word recall score from the three trials.
Changes in memory recall (HVLT)
To determine if the device has an impact on memory by measuring delayed recall via the delayed recall score.
Changes in retention (HVLT)
To determine if the device has an impact on memory by measuring retention via dividing the delayed recall trial by the score obtained on the trial prior exercise.
Changes in memory retention (HVLT)
To determine if the device has an impact on memory by measuring retention via calculating a retention discrimination index by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives.