search
Back to results

Evaluation of Different Methods of Ultrasound Image Analysis for Real-time Monitoring of HIFU Prostate Cancer Treatment (ELASTO-US)

Primary Purpose

Prostatic Neoplasms

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HIFU treatment of prostate cancer
Sponsored by
Hospices Civils de Lyon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostatic Neoplasms focused on measuring Prostatic Neoplasms, HIFU, Focal One, Prostate cancer, focal treatment, total ablation, hemi ablation

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patient who has been clearly informed of the study and has agreed, with sufficient time for reflection, to participate by signing the study informed consent form. Male aged ≥ 50 years, PSA ≤ 15 ng/mL diagnosis of localized prostate cancer (stage T1 or T2) with a Gleason score of ≤ 7 Focal, hemiablation or ablation HIFU treatment validated in Multidisciplinary Concerted Meeting Patient enrolled in Medicare or equivalent plan. Interpretable preoperative multiparametric MRI performed within 180 days prior to surgery Exclusion Criteria: an ASA score >3 brachytherapy for prostate cancer Person of full age protected by law (person under guardianship or curatorship). Contraindication to HIFU treatment as defined in the Focal One instructions for use : - Multiple intraprostatic calcifications inducing, on ultrasound, a shadow cone in the prostate preventing the penetration of ultrasound and therefore the realization of the treatment. Presence of permanent radioactive implants in the rectal wall. Presence of an implant (stent, catheter) located less than 1 cm from the treatment area. Fistula of the urinary tract or rectum. Anal or rectal fibrosis, anal or rectal stenosis or other abnormalities making insertion of the Focal One® catheter difficult. Anatomical abnormality of the rectum or rectal mucosa. Patient with an artificial sphincter, penile prosthesis or intraprostatic implant, such as a stent. History of inflammatory bowel disease. Current urogenital infection (infection should be treated prior to HIFU treatment). Patient allergic to latex with known severe reactionsCounter-indications to anesthesia

Sites / Locations

  • Service d'Urologie et Chirurgie de la Transplantation - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices Civils de LyonRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Patients with localized prostate cancer

Arm Description

Patients with localized prostate cancer for which focal treatment, hemi-ablation or total ablation of the prostate is indicated will be treated by HIFU applied by FocalOne device.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The percentage of analyses that could be completed for each of the three HIFU necrosis detection techniques
To determine the feasibility of implementing the Gray Level Histogram, The Nakagami imaging and proposed in this study, different factors will take into account : the quality of the acquired ultrasound images, the quality of the ultrasound image registration and the quality of the MRI image registration. The implementation of passive elastography, one of the three new methods proposed in this study, requires the presence of a sufficient wavefield in the tissue under study. An ultrasound expert will evaluate this aspect and determine whether or not the mechanical properties of the tissue can be assessed by passive elastography.

Secondary Outcome Measures

To determinate the threshold to differenciate the necrotic area from the non necrotic area
The threshold of the necrotic area will be determined by optimizing the sensitivity/specificity between voxels (necrotic, partially necrotic or non-necrotic). On post-op MRI, the prostate volume will be cut into voxels where each voxel will be classified according to its level of necrosis (total, partial or non-necrotic) by an expert radiologist.
To determinate the threshold to differenciate the partially necrotic area from the non necrotic area
The threshold of the necrotic area will be determined by optimizing the sensitivity/specificity between voxels (necrotic, partially necrotic or non-necrotic). On post-op MRI, the prostate volume will be cut into voxels where each voxel will be classified according to its level of necrosis (total, partial or non-necrotic) by an expert radiologist.
To compare the segmentation of the necrotic zone obtained with the studied parameter to the segmentation obtained with the post treatment MRI
The Hausdorff distance, which evaluates the similarity with necrotic areas on post-op MRI, will be calculated for each parameter, for each patient and for each of the two segmentation modalities. A total of 12 Hausdorff distances per patient.
To compare the segmentation of the partially necrotic zone obtained with the studied parameter to the segmentation obtained with the post treatment MRI.
The Hausdorff distance, which evaluates the similarity with necrotic areas on post-op MRI, will be calculated for each parameter, for each patient and for each of the two segmentation modalities. A total of 12 Hausdorff distances per patient.
To assess of the impact of patient characteristics and treatment history for prostate cancer.
The segmentations obtained with the studied parameter will be analyzed with respect to the following patient characteristics: Pre-treatment prostate volume. Treatment strategy (focal, hemi or total ablation) Treatment history (primary or retreatment) Possible associated surgical procedures (TURP, incision, ...) Gleason score of the tumor
To assess of the tolerance
The tolerance of the treatment will be evaluated by recording the adverse events that occurred during the patient follow-up with regard to the prolongation of the anaesthesia (approximately 20 minutes) and the realization of the mp MRI with postoperative contrast injection

Full Information

First Posted
January 27, 2023
Last Updated
March 10, 2023
Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Collaborators
EDAP TMS S.A.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05714774
Brief Title
Evaluation of Different Methods of Ultrasound Image Analysis for Real-time Monitoring of HIFU Prostate Cancer Treatment
Acronym
ELASTO-US
Official Title
Evaluation of Different Methods of Ultrasound Image Analysis for Real-time Monitoring of HIFU Prostate Cancer Treatment Feasibility Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 9, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 14, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 14, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Collaborators
EDAP TMS S.A.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The ELASTO-US study is a single center feasibility study to evaluate 3 methods of analyzing real-time ultrasound images acquired during High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) treatment in patients with localized prostate cancer. Real-time ultrasound acquisitions will be programmed at specific times and recorded during HIFU treatment. At the end of the treatment, these recordings will be exported in an anonymized way and analyzed according to the 3 different methods. A multiparametric-MRI will be performed in addition to the usual practice within 5 days after the treatment in order to control the area necroticised by the treatment. The mp-MRI will be the reference method against which the results obtained by the 3 methods of ultrasound image analysis will be compared. Techniques capable of providing safe and robust information on the progress of HIFU-generated necrosis would greatly limit the risks of overtreatment that can lead to side effects such as urinary incontinence as well as the risks of under treatment that can lead to cancer recurrence.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostatic Neoplasms
Keywords
Prostatic Neoplasms, HIFU, Focal One, Prostate cancer, focal treatment, total ablation, hemi ablation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Patients with localized prostate cancer
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with localized prostate cancer for which focal treatment, hemi-ablation or total ablation of the prostate is indicated will be treated by HIFU applied by FocalOne device.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
HIFU treatment of prostate cancer
Intervention Description
HIFU treatment using Focal One (EDAP TMS) combined with the acquisition of additional ultrasound images before, between, and after HIFU shots will be performed.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The percentage of analyses that could be completed for each of the three HIFU necrosis detection techniques
Description
To determine the feasibility of implementing the Gray Level Histogram, The Nakagami imaging and proposed in this study, different factors will take into account : the quality of the acquired ultrasound images, the quality of the ultrasound image registration and the quality of the MRI image registration. The implementation of passive elastography, one of the three new methods proposed in this study, requires the presence of a sufficient wavefield in the tissue under study. An ultrasound expert will evaluate this aspect and determine whether or not the mechanical properties of the tissue can be assessed by passive elastography.
Time Frame
At day 0
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To determinate the threshold to differenciate the necrotic area from the non necrotic area
Description
The threshold of the necrotic area will be determined by optimizing the sensitivity/specificity between voxels (necrotic, partially necrotic or non-necrotic). On post-op MRI, the prostate volume will be cut into voxels where each voxel will be classified according to its level of necrosis (total, partial or non-necrotic) by an expert radiologist.
Time Frame
at the latest on day 5 after HIFU treatment
Title
To determinate the threshold to differenciate the partially necrotic area from the non necrotic area
Description
The threshold of the necrotic area will be determined by optimizing the sensitivity/specificity between voxels (necrotic, partially necrotic or non-necrotic). On post-op MRI, the prostate volume will be cut into voxels where each voxel will be classified according to its level of necrosis (total, partial or non-necrotic) by an expert radiologist.
Time Frame
at the latest on day 5 after HIFU treatment
Title
To compare the segmentation of the necrotic zone obtained with the studied parameter to the segmentation obtained with the post treatment MRI
Description
The Hausdorff distance, which evaluates the similarity with necrotic areas on post-op MRI, will be calculated for each parameter, for each patient and for each of the two segmentation modalities. A total of 12 Hausdorff distances per patient.
Time Frame
at the latest on day 5 after HIFU treatment
Title
To compare the segmentation of the partially necrotic zone obtained with the studied parameter to the segmentation obtained with the post treatment MRI.
Description
The Hausdorff distance, which evaluates the similarity with necrotic areas on post-op MRI, will be calculated for each parameter, for each patient and for each of the two segmentation modalities. A total of 12 Hausdorff distances per patient.
Time Frame
at the latest on day 5 after HIFU treatment
Title
To assess of the impact of patient characteristics and treatment history for prostate cancer.
Description
The segmentations obtained with the studied parameter will be analyzed with respect to the following patient characteristics: Pre-treatment prostate volume. Treatment strategy (focal, hemi or total ablation) Treatment history (primary or retreatment) Possible associated surgical procedures (TURP, incision, ...) Gleason score of the tumor
Time Frame
at the latest on day 5 after HIFU treatment
Title
To assess of the tolerance
Description
The tolerance of the treatment will be evaluated by recording the adverse events that occurred during the patient follow-up with regard to the prolongation of the anaesthesia (approximately 20 minutes) and the realization of the mp MRI with postoperative contrast injection
Time Frame
at the latest on day 5 after HIFU treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient who has been clearly informed of the study and has agreed, with sufficient time for reflection, to participate by signing the study informed consent form. Male aged ≥ 50 years, PSA ≤ 15 ng/mL diagnosis of localized prostate cancer (stage T1 or T2) with a Gleason score of ≤ 7 Focal, hemiablation or ablation HIFU treatment validated in Multidisciplinary Concerted Meeting Patient enrolled in Medicare or equivalent plan. Interpretable preoperative multiparametric MRI performed within 180 days prior to surgery Exclusion Criteria: an ASA score >3 brachytherapy for prostate cancer Person of full age protected by law (person under guardianship or curatorship). Contraindication to HIFU treatment as defined in the Focal One instructions for use : - Multiple intraprostatic calcifications inducing, on ultrasound, a shadow cone in the prostate preventing the penetration of ultrasound and therefore the realization of the treatment. Presence of permanent radioactive implants in the rectal wall. Presence of an implant (stent, catheter) located less than 1 cm from the treatment area. Fistula of the urinary tract or rectum. Anal or rectal fibrosis, anal or rectal stenosis or other abnormalities making insertion of the Focal One® catheter difficult. Anatomical abnormality of the rectum or rectal mucosa. Patient with an artificial sphincter, penile prosthesis or intraprostatic implant, such as a stent. History of inflammatory bowel disease. Current urogenital infection (infection should be treated prior to HIFU treatment). Patient allergic to latex with known severe reactionsCounter-indications to anesthesia
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sébastien Crouzet, Pr
Phone
04 72 11 03 25
Ext
+33
Email
Sebastien.crouzet@chu-lyon.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marjolaine Beaudoin, Msc
Phone
0472117494
Ext
+33
Email
Marjolaine.beaudoin@chu-lyon.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sébastien Crouzet, Pr
Organizational Affiliation
Service d'Urologie et Chirurgie de la Transplantation - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices Civils de Lyon
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Service d'Urologie et Chirurgie de la Transplantation - Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Hospices Civils de Lyon
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69003
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sébastien Crouzet, Pr
Phone
04 72 11 03 25
Ext
+33
Email
Sebastien.crouzet@chu-lyon.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marjolaine Beaudoin, Msc
Phone
0472117494
Ext
+33
Email
Marjolaine.beaudoin@chu-lyon.fr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sébastien Crouzet, Pr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc COLOMBEL, Pr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Olivier ROUVIERE, Pr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Different Methods of Ultrasound Image Analysis for Real-time Monitoring of HIFU Prostate Cancer Treatment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs