search
Back to results

Patient Priorities Care Among Persons Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia (IN-TX-PPC)

Primary Purpose

Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Patient Priorities Care
Sponsored by
Indiana University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Dementia focused on measuring dementia, mild cognitive impairment, patient priorities care

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patient Inclusion Criteria Patients must meet all of the following criteria to participate in this study: 40 years or older English-speaking at both Indiana sites or English and/or Spanish speaking at the University of Texas site Receiving care with a participating physician Has a scheduled outpatient care visit within 1-2 months (60 days) Individual has a diagnosis of MCI or dementia Definition: To identify individuals with dementia and MCI, we will use two or more instances of use of an ICD-10 code for either diagnosis in the EHR within 24 months. Typically, we would include instances of these billing codes within a year of each other but, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, recognize that there may be less frequent clinical visits and less robust billing. Diagnostic codes include: • F01.50, F01.51, F02.80, F02.81, F03.90, G30.0, G30.1, G30.8, G30.9, G31.01, G31.09, G31.1, G31.2, F41.81, G31.84 and F03.91. Care Partner Inclusion Criteria Care partners must meet all of the following criteria to participate in the study: 18 years or older English-speaking at both Indiana sites or English and/or Spanish speaking at the University of Texas site A note about inclusion of care partners: Clinician determination of a patient's capacity to participate in a visit independently is part of a pragmatic approach. This means that clinic staff will determine when a care partner is needed. Generally, we act under the assumption that patients who require a care partner will have already included them in previous visits and/or provider communications (and we anticipate that this will be documented in the EHR), whereas patients who attend clinic visits independently and have no documentation indicating the involvement of a care partner in their medical decisions, or a need for one, will be determined to have the capacity to also participate in a PPC visit. Exclusion Criteria: Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study: Is not community-dwelling- e.g. lives in a nursing home Is enrolled in hospice Individuals who decline to receive the PPC intervention (i.e. decline to have the PPC conversation) will be excluded from the study. Note that declining to receive the PPC intervention will in no way impact the care that patients receive now or in the future.

Sites / Locations

  • Regenstrief Institute, Inc.Recruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Patient Priorities Care Eligible Persons Living With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Arm Description

Patients (and their care partners when available) will receive a packet of information about Patient Priorities Care, and when feasible, a trained facilitator(s) will initiate a Patient Priorities Care conversation with the patient or patient care partner dyad. This conversation will be documented in the Electronic Health Record.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of patients with documentation of Patient Priorities Care discussion in the electronic health record
We will use a previously established natural language processing model to identify patient medical records when a Patient Priorities Care discussion is recorded

Secondary Outcome Measures

Identification of a care partner
Identification of a care partner for 50% of eligible persons living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Care partners will be identified based on information provided by the patient, the electronic health record, and the clinical team.
Acceptability
We will utilize Sekhon et al's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to qualitatively assess acceptability, which includes meeting definitions outlined within the framework, represented by seven component constructs: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy.
Appropriateness
We will assess appropriateness via qualitative exit interviews with patients, care partners, and clinicians.
Feasibility of the intervention using Proctor et al as a guide
Feasibility will be assessed qualitatively using the description provided by Proctor et al as a guide.
Fidelity to the intervention
Fidelity will be assessed when select charts are reviewed for adherence to the protocol.
Potential for future adoption of Patient Priorities Care intervention
We will assess potential for future adoption of the intervention via qualitative exit interviews with patients, care partners, and clinicians.
Number of patient days at home
We will use the electronic health record to assess for hospital visits, emergency room visits, or nursing home admissions.
Number of total medications
We will use the electronic health record to assess the medication list total at 2 months pre and post baseline.
Number of new referrals to specialist physicians
We will use the electronic health record to assess referrals to specialists at 2 months pre and post baseline

Full Information

First Posted
August 7, 2023
Last Updated
September 6, 2023
Sponsor
Indiana University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06001775
Brief Title
Patient Priorities Care Among Persons Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Acronym
IN-TX-PPC
Official Title
Embedded Clinical Trial of Patient Priorities Care Among Persons Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 31, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Indiana University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this pragmatic, embedded clinical trial is to analyze the implementation of Patient Priorities Care in primary care and geriatrics clinics with patients living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment. This study aims are: demonstrate the feasibility of using the electronic health record to identify a diverse cohort of eligible patient and patient-care partner dyads who will engage in a Patient Priorities Care conversation with a trained facilitator. demonstrate feasibility of pragmatically assessing clinical outcomes using the electronic health record, including a) number of days at home, b) total medications, and c) new referrals to specialist physicians. examine key feasibility measures across racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic subgroups. Participants will receive a packet of information about Patient Priorities Care from their primary care clinic, in advance of their next upcoming clinic appointment. Individuals who receive a packet will have the opportunity to engage in a conversation about what matters most to them and what their priorities are, with trained facilitators at the clinic.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Keywords
dementia, mild cognitive impairment, patient priorities care

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
160 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Patient Priorities Care Eligible Persons Living With Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients (and their care partners when available) will receive a packet of information about Patient Priorities Care, and when feasible, a trained facilitator(s) will initiate a Patient Priorities Care conversation with the patient or patient care partner dyad. This conversation will be documented in the Electronic Health Record.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Patient Priorities Care
Intervention Description
According to patientprioritiescare.org a Patient Priorities Care conversation helps to align healthcare decision-making and care by all clinicians with patients' own health priorities. Patient Priorities Care involves not only the health outcome goals that patients want to achieve, but also their preferences for healthcare.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients with documentation of Patient Priorities Care discussion in the electronic health record
Description
We will use a previously established natural language processing model to identify patient medical records when a Patient Priorities Care discussion is recorded
Time Frame
Baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Identification of a care partner
Description
Identification of a care partner for 50% of eligible persons living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Care partners will be identified based on information provided by the patient, the electronic health record, and the clinical team.
Time Frame
2 months pre and 2 months post baseline
Title
Acceptability
Description
We will utilize Sekhon et al's Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) to qualitatively assess acceptability, which includes meeting definitions outlined within the framework, represented by seven component constructs: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to 2 months post baseline
Title
Appropriateness
Description
We will assess appropriateness via qualitative exit interviews with patients, care partners, and clinicians.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to 2 months post baseline
Title
Feasibility of the intervention using Proctor et al as a guide
Description
Feasibility will be assessed qualitatively using the description provided by Proctor et al as a guide.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to 2 months post baseline
Title
Fidelity to the intervention
Description
Fidelity will be assessed when select charts are reviewed for adherence to the protocol.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to 2 months post baseline
Title
Potential for future adoption of Patient Priorities Care intervention
Description
We will assess potential for future adoption of the intervention via qualitative exit interviews with patients, care partners, and clinicians.
Time Frame
Baseline and up to 2 months post baseline
Title
Number of patient days at home
Description
We will use the electronic health record to assess for hospital visits, emergency room visits, or nursing home admissions.
Time Frame
2 months pre and 2 months post baseline
Title
Number of total medications
Description
We will use the electronic health record to assess the medication list total at 2 months pre and post baseline.
Time Frame
2 months pre and 2 months post baseline
Title
Number of new referrals to specialist physicians
Description
We will use the electronic health record to assess referrals to specialists at 2 months pre and post baseline
Time Frame
2 months pre and 2 months post baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient Inclusion Criteria Patients must meet all of the following criteria to participate in this study: 40 years or older English-speaking at both Indiana sites or English and/or Spanish speaking at the University of Texas site Receiving care with a participating physician Has a scheduled outpatient care visit within 1-2 months (60 days) Individual has a diagnosis of MCI or dementia Definition: To identify individuals with dementia and MCI, we will use two or more instances of use of an ICD-10 code for either diagnosis in the EHR within 24 months. Typically, we would include instances of these billing codes within a year of each other but, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, recognize that there may be less frequent clinical visits and less robust billing. Diagnostic codes include: • F01.50, F01.51, F02.80, F02.81, F03.90, G30.0, G30.1, G30.8, G30.9, G31.01, G31.09, G31.1, G31.2, F41.81, G31.84 and F03.91. Care Partner Inclusion Criteria Care partners must meet all of the following criteria to participate in the study: 18 years or older English-speaking at both Indiana sites or English and/or Spanish speaking at the University of Texas site A note about inclusion of care partners: Clinician determination of a patient's capacity to participate in a visit independently is part of a pragmatic approach. This means that clinic staff will determine when a care partner is needed. Generally, we act under the assumption that patients who require a care partner will have already included them in previous visits and/or provider communications (and we anticipate that this will be documented in the EHR), whereas patients who attend clinic visits independently and have no documentation indicating the involvement of a care partner in their medical decisions, or a need for one, will be determined to have the capacity to also participate in a PPC visit. Exclusion Criteria: Participants who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study: Is not community-dwelling- e.g. lives in a nursing home Is enrolled in hospice Individuals who decline to receive the PPC intervention (i.e. decline to have the PPC conversation) will be excluded from the study. Note that declining to receive the PPC intervention will in no way impact the care that patients receive now or in the future.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Emily Burke, BA
Phone
3172749047
Email
esburke@regenstrief.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jennifer L Carnahan, MD
Email
jenncarn@iupui.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer L Carnahan, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Regenstrief Institute, Inc.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Regenstrief Institute, Inc.
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer L Carnahan, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer L Carnahan, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rafael Samper-Ternent, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Since this study is a pragmatic trial in a clinical environment, the majority of our outcomes will be determined via data that is already held in the EHR. Therefore a plan for sharing IPD seems unnecessary.
Links:
URL
http://patientprioritiescare.org
Description
Patient Priorities Care homepage

Learn more about this trial

Patient Priorities Care Among Persons Living With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs