search
Back to results

A Comparison of the Visual Performance of Trifocal Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

Primary Purpose

Cataract, Lenses, Visual Impairment

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intraocular lens
Sponsored by
Hashmanis Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cataract focused on measuring Cataract, Intraocular lenses, Trifocal intraocular lenses, Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses, Presbyopia

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 30 years of age or older
  • Has bilateral cataracts with visual problems
  • Is motivated for vision correction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any ocular pathology that could impair vision, for example:

    • Pseudoexfoliation syndrome
    • Zonular weakness
    • Retinal or corneal dystrophies
    • Retinal pathologies like age related macular degeneration
  • History of trauma
  • History of ocular surgery
  • Individuals having trouble understanding written or spoken language
  • Those with dense cataracts causing problems with optical biometry
  • Average corneal powers outside the range of 41 diopters (D) to 46 D
  • Corneal astigmatism > 0.75 D
  • Irregular astigmatism index of 0.54 or higher

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Extended depth of focus intraocular lens

    Trifocal intraocular lens

    Arm Description

    Bilateral implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses.

    Bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Near Visual Acuity (Corrected and Uncorrected)
    40 cm
    Intermediate Visual Acuity (Corrected and Uncorrected)
    66 cm
    Distance Visual Acuity (Corrected and Uncorrected)
    4 m

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Defocus Curve
    Evaluating presbyopia correction
    Objective Automated Refraction
    Using a auto refractometer (Topcon KR-800, Tokyo, Japan)
    Contrast Sensitivity
    At 2.5 m
    Higher Order Abberations
    Using a Abberometer
    Halos and Glares
    Using custom software provided by SIFI

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 29, 2018
    Last Updated
    October 30, 2018
    Sponsor
    Hashmanis Hospital
    Collaborators
    SIFI SpA, Hashmanis Foundation
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03726606
    Brief Title
    A Comparison of the Visual Performance of Trifocal Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses
    Official Title
    A Randomized, Controlled, Two-armed, and Single Blind Trial Evaluating the Visual Performance and Quality of Vision After Bilateral Implantation of 2 Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lenses: Trifocal Versus Extended Depth of Focus
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2018
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    November 5, 2018 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 6, 2019 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    May 6, 2019 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Hashmanis Hospital
    Collaborators
    SIFI SpA, Hashmanis Foundation

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    We are conducting a trial evaluating the performance of trifocal versus extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. These lenses will be implanted in otherwise healthy individuals with visual problems due to bilateral cataracts. Patients must be seeking an improvement in their visual performance with a special focus on presbyopia correction.
    Detailed Description
    To compare the clinical performance, quality of vision and subjective outcomes between the extended depth of focus (EDOF) Mini Well Ready intraocular lens (IOL) and the diffractive trifocal PanOptix IOL, at 3 months following second eye implantation. Statistical analysis All data will be analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Graphs will be made using SPSS and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). Normality will be tested for using the Shapiro Wilk test. If the data is normal, an independent t test will be used for comparing the continuous variables between the groups. If the data is not normal, then we will utilize the Mann Whitney U test. Sample size calculation The sample size calculation was based on the mean binocular Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UNVA) tested at 40cm under photopic condition. A previous study on the same diffractive trifocal IOL revealed a binocular UNVA of 0.01 ± 0.087 logMAR (12). The anticipated mean value for Mini Well Toric Ready is 0.10 logMAR. Based on these assumptions, an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.8, it was calculated a number of 15 patients implanted bilaterally for each group. Assuming a dropout rate of 20% on the primary outcome measure, this resulted in a total number of 36 bilateral patients, 18 each group. Duration of the project: Six months to one year

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Cataract, Lenses, Visual Impairment
    Keywords
    Cataract, Intraocular lenses, Trifocal intraocular lenses, Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses, Presbyopia

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two arms: Trifocal or extended depth of focus intraocular lenses.
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    The patient and the examiner will be blinded to the arms.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    36 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Extended depth of focus intraocular lens
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Bilateral implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses.
    Arm Title
    Trifocal intraocular lens
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Intraocular lens
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Phacoemulsifcation
    Intervention Description
    Bilateral implantation of the same intraocular lens.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Near Visual Acuity (Corrected and Uncorrected)
    Description
    40 cm
    Time Frame
    3 months after bilateral implantation
    Title
    Intermediate Visual Acuity (Corrected and Uncorrected)
    Description
    66 cm
    Time Frame
    3 months after bilateral implantation
    Title
    Distance Visual Acuity (Corrected and Uncorrected)
    Description
    4 m
    Time Frame
    3 months after bilateral implantation
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Defocus Curve
    Description
    Evaluating presbyopia correction
    Time Frame
    3 months after bilateral implantation
    Title
    Objective Automated Refraction
    Description
    Using a auto refractometer (Topcon KR-800, Tokyo, Japan)
    Time Frame
    3 months after bilateral implantation
    Title
    Contrast Sensitivity
    Description
    At 2.5 m
    Time Frame
    3 months after bilateral implantation
    Title
    Higher Order Abberations
    Description
    Using a Abberometer
    Time Frame
    3 months after bilateral implantation
    Title
    Halos and Glares
    Description
    Using custom software provided by SIFI
    Time Frame
    3 months after bilateral implantation

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    30 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    70 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patient aged 30 years of age or older Has bilateral cataracts with visual problems Is motivated for vision correction Exclusion Criteria: Any ocular pathology that could impair vision, for example: Pseudoexfoliation syndrome Zonular weakness Retinal or corneal dystrophies Retinal pathologies like age related macular degeneration History of trauma History of ocular surgery Individuals having trouble understanding written or spoken language Those with dense cataracts causing problems with optical biometry Average corneal powers outside the range of 41 diopters (D) to 46 D Corneal astigmatism > 0.75 D Irregular astigmatism index of 0.54 or higher
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Nauman Hashmani, MBBS
    Phone
    00923212828062
    Email
    naumanhashmani@hashmanis.edu.pk
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Sharif Hashmani, FCPS
    Phone
    00923008255771
    Email
    yashhashmani@hotmail.com
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Sharif Hashmani, FCPS
    Organizational Affiliation
    Hashmanis Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided

    Learn more about this trial

    A Comparison of the Visual Performance of Trifocal Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs