search
Back to results

A Contralateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of Study Test Silicone Hydrogel Lens Against Enfilcon A Silicone Hydrogel Lens

Primary Purpose

Myopia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sapphire Lens
enfilcon A
Sponsored by
Coopervision, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myopia

Eligibility Criteria

17 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer
  • Has read and understood the information consent letter
  • Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule
  • Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/30 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction or the assigned study lenses
  • Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer (For the purpose of this study: Current lens wear at least 3 days per week, 8 hours each day.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study
  • Has any known active* ocular disease and/or infection;
  • Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable
  • Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable^
  • Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study
  • Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit). Rationale is that systemic changes over time due to pregnancy/lactating may adversely affect contact lens wear e.g. ocular dryness may increase.
  • Is aphakic
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.

For the purposes of this study, active ocular disease is defined as infection or inflammation which requires therapeutic treatment. Mild (i.e. not considered clinically relevant) lid abnormalities (blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, papillae), corneal and conjunctival staining and dry eye are not considered active ocular disease. Neovascularization and corneal scars are the result of previous hypoxia, infection or inflammation and are therefore not active.

Participants will be excluded with significant slit lamp findings (e.g. infiltrates or other slit lamp findings Grade 3 or above: corneal edema, tarsal abnormalities, and conjunctival injection) or active ocular disease (e.g. glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, and intraocular infection or inflammation of an allergic, bacterial, or viral etiology).

^ For the purposes of this study, participants will be excluded, if currently taking medication, such as oral antihistamines, antihistamine eye drops, oral and ophthalmic beta-adrenergic blockers (e.g. Propanolol, Timolol), anticholinergics, oral steroids and any prescribed or over-the-counter eye medication, except artificial tears or eye lubricants

Sites / Locations

  • Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Sapphire lens

enfilcon A

Arm Description

Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and control lens in the other eye. Both test and control lenses will be used in a daily wear modality for one month.

Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and control lens in the other eye. Both test and control lenses will be used in a daily wear modality for one month.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Subjective Ratings of Comfort
Subjective ratings of Comfort on a scale (0-100) assessed : 0= Cannot be worn, causes pain, 20=Frequently irritating, 40= Occasionally irritating, 60= Occasionally noticable but not irritating, 80= rarely noticeable, 100= cannot be felt ever
Subjective Ratings of Comfort
Subjective ratings of Comfort on a scale (0-100) assessed : 0= Cannot be worn, causes pain, 20=Frequently irritating, 40= Occasionally irritating, 60= Occasionally noticable but not irritating, 80= rarely noticeable, 100= cannot be felt ever
Subjective Ratings of Comfort
Subjective ratings of Comfort on a scale (0-100) assessed : 0= Cannot be worn, causes pain, 20=Frequently irritating, 40= Occasionally irritating, 60= Occasionally noticable but not irritating, 80= rarely noticeable, 100= cannot be felt ever
Subjective Comfort Preference
Subjective comfort preference Sapphire lens, Enfilcon A, no preference
Subjective Comfort Preference
Subjective comfort preference Sapphire lens, Enfilcon A, no preference
Subjective Comfort Preference
Subjective comfort preference Sapphire lens, Enfilcon A, no preference
Lens Wettability
Lens wettability was assessed on a Grading scale (0-4, 0.25 steps) (0=excellent; 4=severely reduced)
Lens Wettability
Lens wettability was assessed on a Grading scale (0-4, 0.25 steps) (0=excellent; 4=severely reduced)
Lens Wettability
Lens wettability was assessed on a Grading scale (0-4, 0.25 steps) (0=excellent; 4=severely reduced)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
August 27, 2015
Last Updated
October 26, 2020
Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02537717
Brief Title
A Contralateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of Study Test Silicone Hydrogel Lens Against Enfilcon A Silicone Hydrogel Lens
Official Title
A Contralateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of Study Test Silicone Hydrogel Lens Against Enfilcon A Silicone Hydrogel Lens
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 29, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Coopervision, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This will be a 1-month dispensing, double-masked, randomized, contralateral study comparing the test lens against the control lens. The assignment of lenses to eyes (i.e. which lens type is to be worn in which eye throughout the study) will be selected according to a randomization table.
Detailed Description
Both test and control lenses will be used in a daily wear modality for 1 month. It is anticipated that this study will involve the following visits: Baseline (screening and dispense visit combined), 2-week visit and 4-week visit.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myopia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
17 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sapphire lens
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and control lens in the other eye. Both test and control lenses will be used in a daily wear modality for one month.
Arm Title
enfilcon A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and control lens in the other eye. Both test and control lenses will be used in a daily wear modality for one month.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sapphire Lens
Intervention Description
Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control in either the left of right eye.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
enfilcon A
Intervention Description
Each subject randomized to wear either the test or control in either the left of right eye.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subjective Ratings of Comfort
Description
Subjective ratings of Comfort on a scale (0-100) assessed : 0= Cannot be worn, causes pain, 20=Frequently irritating, 40= Occasionally irritating, 60= Occasionally noticable but not irritating, 80= rarely noticeable, 100= cannot be felt ever
Time Frame
Baseline (After 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Subjective Ratings of Comfort
Description
Subjective ratings of Comfort on a scale (0-100) assessed : 0= Cannot be worn, causes pain, 20=Frequently irritating, 40= Occasionally irritating, 60= Occasionally noticable but not irritating, 80= rarely noticeable, 100= cannot be felt ever
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Subjective Ratings of Comfort
Description
Subjective ratings of Comfort on a scale (0-100) assessed : 0= Cannot be worn, causes pain, 20=Frequently irritating, 40= Occasionally irritating, 60= Occasionally noticable but not irritating, 80= rarely noticeable, 100= cannot be felt ever
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Subjective Comfort Preference
Description
Subjective comfort preference Sapphire lens, Enfilcon A, no preference
Time Frame
Baseline (after 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Subjective Comfort Preference
Description
Subjective comfort preference Sapphire lens, Enfilcon A, no preference
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Subjective Comfort Preference
Description
Subjective comfort preference Sapphire lens, Enfilcon A, no preference
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Lens Wettability
Description
Lens wettability was assessed on a Grading scale (0-4, 0.25 steps) (0=excellent; 4=severely reduced)
Time Frame
Baseline (After 10 minutes of lens dispense)
Title
Lens Wettability
Description
Lens wettability was assessed on a Grading scale (0-4, 0.25 steps) (0=excellent; 4=severely reduced)
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Lens Wettability
Description
Lens wettability was assessed on a Grading scale (0-4, 0.25 steps) (0=excellent; 4=severely reduced)
Time Frame
4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
17 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer Has read and understood the information consent letter Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/30 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction or the assigned study lenses Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer (For the purpose of this study: Current lens wear at least 3 days per week, 8 hours each day.) Exclusion Criteria: Is participating in any concurrent clinical or research study Has any known active* ocular disease and/or infection; Has a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable Is using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable^ Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study Is pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment (by verbal confirmation at the screening visit). Rationale is that systemic changes over time due to pregnancy/lactating may adversely affect contact lens wear e.g. ocular dryness may increase. Is aphakic Has undergone corneal refractive surgery. For the purposes of this study, active ocular disease is defined as infection or inflammation which requires therapeutic treatment. Mild (i.e. not considered clinically relevant) lid abnormalities (blepharitis, meibomian gland dysfunction, papillae), corneal and conjunctival staining and dry eye are not considered active ocular disease. Neovascularization and corneal scars are the result of previous hypoxia, infection or inflammation and are therefore not active. Participants will be excluded with significant slit lamp findings (e.g. infiltrates or other slit lamp findings Grade 3 or above: corneal edema, tarsal abnormalities, and conjunctival injection) or active ocular disease (e.g. glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, and intraocular infection or inflammation of an allergic, bacterial, or viral etiology). ^ For the purposes of this study, participants will be excluded, if currently taking medication, such as oral antihistamines, antihistamine eye drops, oral and ophthalmic beta-adrenergic blockers (e.g. Propanolol, Timolol), anticholinergics, oral steroids and any prescribed or over-the-counter eye medication, except artificial tears or eye lubricants
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lyndon Jones
Organizational Affiliation
University of Waterloo
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo
City
Waterloo
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2L 3G1
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Contralateral Dispensing Clinical Trial of Study Test Silicone Hydrogel Lens Against Enfilcon A Silicone Hydrogel Lens

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs