A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of CAF + Mucograft® Compared to CAF Alone in Patients With Gingival Recessions (MCT-Recession)
Primary Purpose
Gingival Recession
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mucograft
Coronally advanced flap (CAF)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Gingival Recession focused on measuring root coverage, gingival recession, keratinized gingiva
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient (male or female) must be 18 years or older
- The patient must be a candidate for bilateral root coverage procedure
- Recession defects are Miller Class I-II and do not vary more than 2 mm.
- At least one mm keratinized tissue is present.
- Patient shows sufficient plaque control (FMPS < 20%).
- If patient is of child-bearing potential, the patient confirms not to be pregnant and agrees to take contraception for at least 6 months after surgery.
- The patient is able to comply with the study-related procedures such as exercising good oral hygiene and attending all follow-up procedures
- The patient is able to fully understand the nature of the proposed surgery and is able to provide a signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is a heavy smoker (> 10 cigarettes per day)
- Patient is an insulin dependent diabetic
- General contraindications for dental and/or surgical treatment are present.
- The patient has a history of malignancy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy for malignancy within the past five years.
- The patient is pregnant or nursing
- The patient is taking medications or having treatments which have an effect on mucosal healing in general (e.g. steroids, large doses of anti-inflammatory drugs).
- The patient has a disease, which affects connective tissue metabolism (e.g. collagenases).
- The patient is allergic to collagen.
- Patients have participated in a clinical trial within the last six months.
Sites / Locations
- Prof. Mariano Sanz
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Mucograft + CAF
CAF
Arm Description
Mucograft in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF)
Coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
percentage of root coverage
Secondary Outcome Measures
gingival thickness
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00902876
Brief Title
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of CAF + Mucograft® Compared to CAF Alone in Patients With Gingival Recessions
Acronym
MCT-Recession
Official Title
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of CAF + Mucograft® Compared to CAF Alone in Patients With Gingival Recessions.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Geistlich Pharma AG
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this multi-center study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Mucograft® in combination with the coronally advanced flap (CAF) for the treatment of gingival recessions. It is assumed that the CAF combined with Mucograft® will result in improved outcome in terms percentage of root coverage and soft tissue thickness in comparison to CAF alone (control).
Detailed Description
Primary goals of mucogingival surgery have changed with time from maintaining gingival health and prevent further progression of the recession to providing predictable root coverage solving patients' esthetic demands.
Many surgical techniques have been utilized to restore gingival tissue dimensions including the use of autologous soft tissue graft. Longitudinal studies have shown that procedures using pedicle and free grafts are both effective for this purpose. However, since this technique uses epithelialized grafts, it generally results in compromised aesthetics ("patch-like area"). Alternatively free connective tissue grafts (CTG) are used providing similar predictability but resulting in better colour matching. Unfortunately, both techniques are associated with significant patient morbidity due to the wound at the palatal donor site. To avoid patient morbidity, acellular dermal allografts have been used as substitutes for palatal donor tissue, demonstrating the possible and promising use of allograft material. However, since the allograft material is derived from human cadavers; it is associated with ethical concerns and the risk of disease transmission.
In patients with a residual amount of keratinized tissue, the coronally advanced flap (CAF) - first introduce by Norber et al. (1926) - has been demonstrated to be very effective in treatment of multiple and single recessions with advantages in terms of aesthetics and morbidity. Although CAF is a safe and predictable approach for root coverage, the application of this surgical technique in conjunction with autologous or synthetic material was reported to enhance the probability to achieve complete root coverage in Miller Class I and II gingival recessions. A promising option to avoid patient morbidity and the use of autologous transplants or allografts is the use of collagen matrices from porcine origin, such as Mucograft®. Similar devices have been extensively used for guided tissue regeneration procedures. Mucograft® provides an ideal matrix for blood vessel and soft tissue ingrowth, which is likely to improve the results and the predictability of recession coverage procedure using the CAF.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gingival Recession
Keywords
root coverage, gingival recession, keratinized gingiva
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
45 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Mucograft + CAF
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Mucograft in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF)
Arm Title
CAF
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Mucograft
Intervention Description
Collagen Matrix for soft tissue regeneration
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Coronally advanced flap (CAF)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
percentage of root coverage
Time Frame
6 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
gingival thickness
Time Frame
6 month
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
The patient (male or female) must be 18 years or older
The patient must be a candidate for bilateral root coverage procedure
Recession defects are Miller Class I-II and do not vary more than 2 mm.
At least one mm keratinized tissue is present.
Patient shows sufficient plaque control (FMPS < 20%).
If patient is of child-bearing potential, the patient confirms not to be pregnant and agrees to take contraception for at least 6 months after surgery.
The patient is able to comply with the study-related procedures such as exercising good oral hygiene and attending all follow-up procedures
The patient is able to fully understand the nature of the proposed surgery and is able to provide a signed informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient is a heavy smoker (> 10 cigarettes per day)
Patient is an insulin dependent diabetic
General contraindications for dental and/or surgical treatment are present.
The patient has a history of malignancy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy for malignancy within the past five years.
The patient is pregnant or nursing
The patient is taking medications or having treatments which have an effect on mucosal healing in general (e.g. steroids, large doses of anti-inflammatory drugs).
The patient has a disease, which affects connective tissue metabolism (e.g. collagenases).
The patient is allergic to collagen.
Patients have participated in a clinical trial within the last six months.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mariano Sanz, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Periodontology, University Complutense Madrid, Spain
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Soren Jepsen, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Periodontology, University of Bonn, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jan Wennström, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Periodontology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Giovanni Zucchelli, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Periodontology, University of Bologna, Italy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lorenz Uebersax, Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bernd Heinz, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
Private practice Hamburg, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Massimo DeSanctis, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Private Practice Firenze
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Prof. Mariano Sanz
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
2804
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28304210
Citation
Jepsen K, Stefanini M, Sanz M, Zucchelli G, Jepsen S. Long-Term Stability of Root Coverage by Coronally Advanced Flap Procedures. J Periodontol. 2017 Jul;88(7):626-633. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.160767. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness of CAF + Mucograft® Compared to CAF Alone in Patients With Gingival Recessions
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs