A Study of Muscle Strength Maintenance in Older Adults
Primary Purpose
Sarcopenia
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Losartan
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Sarcopenia focused on measuring sarcopenia, frailty, losartan
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 70 and over
- Pre-frail as determined by frailty criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under age 70
- Robust or frail by frailty criteria
- Have other indications for use of any angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) such as myocardial infarction in past year, history of congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension
- Current use of ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
- Prior allergic reaction to or hyperkalemia with losartan or any ARB
- Chronic renal failure with a glomerular filtration rate of < 30
- Current daily use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents
- Current use of steroids
- Lower extremity disability that would prevent muscle strength testing
- Echocardiogram-diagnosed cardiac failure as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%
- Cognitive impairment with a Mini-Mental State Examination < 24
Sites / Locations
- Johns Hopkins Bayview Clinical Research Unit
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Losartan
Placebo
Arm Description
For those subjects randomized to the losartan group, they will receive losartan 25mg by mouth daily for 8 weeks, then increase to 50mg by mouth daily for another 8 weeks, then increase to 100mg by mouth daily for a final 8 weeks.
For those subjects randomized to placebo, they will receive a placebo to take for 24 weeks total.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).
The change in strength between baseline and week 8 (i.e., baseline minus week 8) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates that there was a decrease in isokinetic strength from week 0 to week 8.
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).
The change in strength between baseline and week 16 (i.e., baseline minus week 16) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates decrease in strength from week 0 to week 16.
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).
The change in strength between baseline and week 24 (i.e., baseline minus week 24) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates a decrease in strength from week 0 to week 24.
Fatiguability
Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.
Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to the total work in the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.
Fatiguability
Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.
Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to that of the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.
Fatiguability
Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.
Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to that of the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 8 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 16 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 24 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01989793
First Posted
November 5, 2013
Last Updated
May 14, 2018
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01989793
Brief Title
A Study of Muscle Strength Maintenance in Older Adults
Official Title
A Study of Muscle Strength Maintenance in Older Adults
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Aging (NIA)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This research study is being done to see whether losartan can prevent the decrease in strength associated with aging.
Muscle loss is associated with aging and has multiple symptoms such as weakness, slowness, and fatigue (tiredness). Older adults with muscle weakness have a higher risk of falls and disability. In addition, the loss of independence for older adults can lead to a poorer quality of life.
Recently, it was discovered that losartan, a medication commonly used to treat high blood pressure, had slowed the strength decline seen in older mice. In addition, it allowed injured mice skeletal muscle to heal faster. Therefore, we would like to see if losartan can do the same for older adults.
Losartan is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of high blood pressure, heart failure, and to protect the kidneys in diabetic patients. Losartan is not FDA-approved to prevent the decrease in strength associated with aging.
In this study, participants age 70 and older will be asked to take losartan or a placebo to see if losartan can help prevent loss of muscle strength. A placebo is a substance that looks like the study drug but that contains no active ingredients.
Detailed Description
The loss of independence in older adults is among the most costly and disturbing events in the life span. This loss is often influenced by multiple etiologies, including medical and neurological conditions, cognitive decline, non-supportive social/environmental settings and frailty. Frailty is a syndrome of multi-systemic, age-related decline characterized by weakness, weight loss, fatigue, low levels of activity, and slowness. Frail older adults have a higher risk for adverse outcomes including hospitalization, disability, and mortality.
Recently, Johns Hopkins University Older Americans Independence Center (JHU OAIC) investigators Burks and Cohn found that blocking angiotensin type 1 receptors with losartan, an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) in older mice markedly accelerated injured skeletal muscle healing and decreased vulnerability to disuse atrophy and strength decline. These findings provide potent rationale for testing the hypothesis that losartan attenuates strength decline and other-frailty related measures in older adults.
To prepare to test this hypothesis, a phase 2 randomized, placebo controlled pilot clinical trial of losartan in pre-frail adults over age 70 is proposed that aims to assess safety and tolerability, estimate dosing range, and estimate treatment effects using inter- and intra-subject variability of potential outcome measures. Losartan is a medication that is commonly utilized in older adults for the treatment of hypertension and is generally well tolerated in that condition and in other cardiovascular conditions.
The study will take place over 24 weeks in the Clinical Research Unit (CRU) on the Hopkins Bayview Medical Campus, where 24 pre-frail subjects will be recruited from the OAIC frailty registry. Successful completion of this study will provide the safety, dosing, and outcome measure data necessary to design the pivotal study needed to determine if longer term treatment with losartan can significantly improve frailty and related skeletal muscle phenotypes.
Interventions, such as losartan, that can prevent the decline seen in frailty have the potential to improve function and help older adults maintain their independence. This is of the utmost importance in maintaining good quality-of-life for older adults.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sarcopenia
Keywords
sarcopenia, frailty, losartan
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
37 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Losartan
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
For those subjects randomized to the losartan group, they will receive losartan 25mg by mouth daily for 8 weeks, then increase to 50mg by mouth daily for another 8 weeks, then increase to 100mg by mouth daily for a final 8 weeks.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
For those subjects randomized to placebo, they will receive a placebo to take for 24 weeks total.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Losartan
Intervention Description
Losartan will be given in increasing doses to those in the losartan arm.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo will be given to those in placebo arm
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Description
Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).
The change in strength between baseline and week 8 (i.e., baseline minus week 8) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates that there was a decrease in isokinetic strength from week 0 to week 8.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 8
Title
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Description
Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).
The change in strength between baseline and week 16 (i.e., baseline minus week 16) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates decrease in strength from week 0 to week 16.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Isokinetic Strength
Description
Isokinetic Strength was measured by knee extension exercises where bilateral knee concentric strength was measured using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer set at an angular velocity of 30deg/sec through a joint arc from 90 degrees to 30 degrees (0 degrees- full extension).
The change in strength between baseline and week 24 (i.e., baseline minus week 24) was the outcome of the analysis. A negative number indicates a decrease in strength from week 0 to week 24.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 24
Title
Fatiguability
Description
Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.
Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to the total work in the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.
Time Frame
Week 8
Title
Fatiguability
Description
Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.
Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to that of the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.
Time Frame
Week 16
Title
Fatiguability
Description
Fatiguability was tested using bilateral knee extension with an external load equal to 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction force.
Fatiguability was defined as the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the total work in the last 3 of the 10 repetitions to that of the first 3 of the 10 repetitions, where the total work for n repetitions is defined as the sum of peak torque (FT-LBS) over n repetitions (i.e., last three reps/first three reps). The maximum of the two sides was used in the analysis.
Time Frame
Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Description
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 8 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
Time Frame
from baseline to 8 weeks
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Description
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 16 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
Time Frame
from baseline to 16 weeks
Title
Number of Participants Experiencing Any Amount of Decrease in Frailty
Description
Number of participants experiencing any amount of decrease in frailty score from baseline to Week 24 (i.e., improvement in frailty status)
Time Frame
from baseline to 24 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 70 and over
Pre-frail as determined by frailty criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
Under age 70
Robust or frail by frailty criteria
Have other indications for use of any angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) such as myocardial infarction in past year, history of congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension
Current use of ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
Prior allergic reaction to or hyperkalemia with losartan or any ARB
Chronic renal failure with a glomerular filtration rate of < 30
Current daily use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents
Current use of steroids
Lower extremity disability that would prevent muscle strength testing
Echocardiogram-diagnosed cardiac failure as evidenced by left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50%
Cognitive impairment with a Mini-Mental State Examination < 24
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeremy Walston, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Bayview Clinical Research Unit
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21224
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21562229
Citation
Burks TN, Andres-Mateos E, Marx R, Mejias R, Van Erp C, Simmers JL, Walston JD, Ward CW, Cohn RD. Losartan restores skeletal muscle remodeling and protects against disuse atrophy in sarcopenia. Sci Transl Med. 2011 May 11;3(82):82ra37. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002227.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21852574
Citation
Abadir PM, Foster DB, Crow M, Cooke CA, Rucker JJ, Jain A, Smith BJ, Burks TN, Cohn RD, Fedarko NS, Carey RM, O'Rourke B, Walston JD. Identification and characterization of a functional mitochondrial angiotensin system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 6;108(36):14849-54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101507108. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
A Study of Muscle Strength Maintenance in Older Adults
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs