Adult Study / OROS Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (HCL) (OROS MPH) in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Primary Purpose
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OROS MPH
Placebo
OROS MPH Tablets
Placebo Tablets
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity focused on measuring Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS®) Extended Release Methylphenidate HCl, CONCERTA® (OROS MPH)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults
- ADHD diagnosis (any type: Combined, Predominantly Inattentive, or Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive)
- Patients with an Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score greater than 24 at screening/baseline
- Ability to read and understand English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any significant history of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease detectable via ECG
- History of diagnosis of substance or alcohol dependence or admission/hospitalization for rehabilitation for dependence
- Current neurologic or psychiatric diagnosis that would make patient inappropriate for participation
- Anxiety assessments of moderate or severe
- Depression assessments of moderate or severe
- History or current suicidal thoughts or attempts
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to OROS MPH
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
001
002
Arm Description
OROS MPH Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks
Placebo Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for Diagnosis
The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the investigator's rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Reaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)
Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The 1st part generates basic "reaction time" to colors. The 2nd part generates "complex reaction time score" to matching color names and font color. The 3rd part establishes a "Stroop reaction time" and an error score to unmatched color names/fonts. Reaction Time Domain Score = (Stroop Complex Reaction Time Correct + Stroop Reaction Time Correct)/2. Lower scores indicate better functioning (i.e. reaction time).
Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)
The Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The Shifting Attention Test (SAT) a computerized measure of the ability to shift from one instruction set to another quickly and accurately. The Continuous Performance Test (CPT) is a computerized measure of vigilance or sustained attention/attention over time. Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) Score = Stroop Commission Errors + SAT Errors + CPT Commission Errors + CPT Omission Errors. Lower scores indicate better functioning (i.e. sustained attention).
Cognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)
The Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The SAT is a computerized measure of the ability to shift from one instruction set to another quickly and accurately. The scores generated by the SAT are: correct matches, errors, and response time. The testing score is a measure of cognitive flexibility. Cognitive Flexibility Domain Score = SAT Correct Responses - SAT Errors - Stroop Commission Errors. Higher scores indicate better accuracy.
Processing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)
The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a computerized variant of the Wechsler Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), but the position of symbols and digits is reversed. Scoring is the number of correct responses generated in 2 minutes. Processing Speed Domain = SDMT correct responses - SDMT errors. Higher scores indicate better functioning (i.e. information processing).
Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)
The BRIEF-A is a self-reported measure (low=61, high=225, lower scores indicate higher executive functioning) capturing views of the subject's own functioning in the everyday environment. The BRIEF-A contains 75 scored items (1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often) in 9 non-overlapping clinical scales (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials). The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Metacognition Index (MI), and GEC are then derived.
Performance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)
The AIM-A is a subject-reported measure (low=0, high=100, a higher score is more favorable) to assess the overall impact and role that ADHD may have in the conduct of tasks that are expected of adults. The AIM-A is comprised of four global quality of life items, five economic impact items, and five multi-item scales that describe important concepts. Items include: Living with ADHD; General Well-Being; Work, Home and School Performance and Daily Functioning; Relationships; and Communication; and Impact of Symptoms (emotional, degree of daily interference).
Subject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)
The EWPS provides a measure of the subject's report of their overall productivity (low=0, high=100, a higher score indicates worsening work productivity and efficiency). There are 25 items (questions 15-39) on the scale that describe types of behaviors/ subjective feelings that are highly likely to reduce work productivity/efficiency. These 25 items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, to 4=almost always) indicating how often the behavior, feeling or attitude has been manifested in the past week. The total score is the sum of the 25 items.
Subject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) assesses the relationship satisfaction or adjustment of partners in committed couple relationships. The 32-question DAS includes 4 empirically validated subscales that measure: dyadic satisfaction, dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion and affectional expression. The response format varies across the entire scale and includes 5-, 6-, and 7-point Likert-scale questions and two yes/no items. The 10-question subset of the DAS, the Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale, was used in this study (low=0, high=50, higher score means better relationship satisfaction).
Subject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?
The satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (low=0, high=20, a lower score indicates lower satisfaction with treatment) requires subjects to answer 4 questions related to how much their ADHD symptoms have changed since starting the medication, how much benefit they received from the medication, the extent, if any, the advantages outweighed the disadvantages, and overall satisfaction with the medication. The responses for this question vary with range of satisfaction (e.g. extremely satisfied, very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied).
Responder Rate Using AISRS
AISRS responder rate is defined as the percentage of subjects with AISRS < 18 at endpoint.
Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated subscale (low=0, high=7, higher score indicates increasing illness). The clinician rates the severity of the ADHD symptoms in relation to the clinician's total experience with ADHD subjects using a 7-point scale (1=normal, not at all ill, 2= borderline ill, 3= mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5= markedly ill, 6= severely ill, 7= among the most extremely ill subjects) in response to the question "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how ill is the subject at this time?".
Significant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IV
The ADHD Rating Scale-IV (Significant Other) is an 18-item list of core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms. Each item is rated on a four point Likert type scale (0 = never or rarely, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, and 3 = very often). The subject's designated observer will complete this scale, with baseline assessment based on the subject's usual functioning when not on medication. The total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).
Designated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)
The BRIEF-A, as completed by the DO, is a measure (low=61, high=225, lower scores indicate higher executive functioning) capturing views of an adult informant familiar with the subject's functioning. The BRIEF-A contains 75 scored items (1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often) in nine non-overlapping clinical scales (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials). The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Metacognition Index (MI), and Global Executive Composite (GEC) are then derived.
Designated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) completed by DOs who were spouses or significant others assesses the relationship satisfaction or adjustment of partners in committed couple relationships. The 32-question DAS includes 4 empirically validated subscales that measure: dyadic satisfaction, dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion and affectional expression. Possible responses include 5-, 6-, and 7-point Likert-scale questions and two yes/no items. The 10-question DAS subset, the Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale, was used in this study (low=0, high=50, higher score means better relationship satisfaction).
Designated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?
The satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (low=0, high=20, a lower score indicates lower satisfaction with treatment) requires the subject's DO to answer 4 questions related to how much the subject's ADHD symptoms have changed since starting the medication, how much benefit was received from the medication, the extent, if any, the advantages outweighed the disadvantages, and overall satisfaction with the medication. Responses vary from extremely satisfied, very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, mildly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied.
Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over Time
The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the subject's own rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The ASRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score
The PSQI discriminates between good and poor sleepers. The self-administered scale contains 15 multiple-choice items concerning frequency of sleep disturbances and subjective sleep quality and 4 write-in items that inquire about typical bedtime, wake-up time, sleep latency, and sleep duration over the past month. The PSQI generates 7 scores corresponding to the different sleep domains. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3. Total sleep index is calculated by adding up the 7 component scores (low=0, high=21, the lower the score, the better in sleep quality).
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item self-rated questionnaire designed to assess the overall level of daytime sleepiness. Each item describes normal daily situations (i.e., watching TV, lying down in the afternoon, sitting inactive in a public place) and subjects rate the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in each situation. Responses use a 4-point rating scale (0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing). Item scores are summed to produce a total score (range of 0-24) with lower score suggesting more alertness.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00937040
First Posted
June 29, 2009
Last Updated
July 23, 2013
Sponsor
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00937040
Brief Title
Adult Study / OROS Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (HCL) (OROS MPH) in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
Official Title
A Placebo Controlled Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Individualizing Dosing Study Optimizing Treatment of Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder to an Effective Response With OROS Methylphenidate
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2010 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the ADHD symptom response of adults with ADHD treated with OROS MPH to those treated with placebo.
Detailed Description
The hypothesis is that Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS) Extended Release Methylphenidate HCL (OROS MPH) is safe and effective in improving Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms in adults with ADHD when compared to placebo as demonstrated using specific study measures. This is a double-blind (neither participant nor investigator knows the name of the assigned study drug), randomized (study drug assigned by chance), placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OROS MPH using the optimal dose for each adult patient in the study with ADHD. The primary efficacy variable in this study is the change from baseline to final evaluation using the Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) to measure patient ADHD symptoms. Participants will also be assessed for adverse events throughout the study. Patients will initiate treatment with oral OROS MPH 18 mg or matching placebo at baseline and continue morning dosing with increases every week until an optimal dose is achieved, up to the maximum of 72 mg/day of OROS MPH or matching placebo. Eligible patients will remain in the study for a maximum of 6 weeks.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity
Keywords
Osmotic Release Oral System (OROS®) Extended Release Methylphenidate HCl, CONCERTA® (OROS MPH)
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
357 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
001
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
OROS MPH Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks
Arm Title
002
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
OROS MPH
Intervention Description
Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily for 6 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily for 6 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
OROS MPH Tablets
Intervention Description
Optimal Patient Dose (18 mg-72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo Tablets
Intervention Description
Optimal Patient Dose (placebo to match 18 mg - 72 mg) once daily by mouth for 6 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) Over Time Using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) Fourth Edition for Diagnosis
Description
The Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Score (AISRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the investigator's rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The AISRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reaction Time Domain of the Stroop Test (Cognitive and Executive Function)
Description
Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The 1st part generates basic "reaction time" to colors. The 2nd part generates "complex reaction time score" to matching color names and font color. The 3rd part establishes a "Stroop reaction time" and an error score to unmatched color names/fonts. Reaction Time Domain Score = (Stroop Complex Reaction Time Correct + Stroop Reaction Time Correct)/2. Lower scores indicate better functioning (i.e. reaction time).
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 hour timepoint for extended days or last non-missing value for non-extended days on day 42 or early discontinuation (endpoint)
Title
Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) of the Stroop Test/Shifting Attention Test (SAT)/Continuous Performance Test (CPT) (Cognitive and Executive Function)
Description
The Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The Shifting Attention Test (SAT) a computerized measure of the ability to shift from one instruction set to another quickly and accurately. The Continuous Performance Test (CPT) is a computerized measure of vigilance or sustained attention/attention over time. Vigilance Domain (Complex Attention) Score = Stroop Commission Errors + SAT Errors + CPT Commission Errors + CPT Omission Errors. Lower scores indicate better functioning (i.e. sustained attention).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Cognitive Flexibility Domain of the Stroop/SAT Tests (Cognitive and Executive Function)
Description
The Stroop Test is a computerized measure of inhibition/disinhibition, executive function, reaction time, and information processing. The SAT is a computerized measure of the ability to shift from one instruction set to another quickly and accurately. The scores generated by the SAT are: correct matches, errors, and response time. The testing score is a measure of cognitive flexibility. Cognitive Flexibility Domain Score = SAT Correct Responses - SAT Errors - Stroop Commission Errors. Higher scores indicate better accuracy.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 hour timepoint for extended days or last non-missing value for non-extended days on day 42 or early discontinuation (endpoint)
Title
Processing Speed Domain of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDTM) (Cognitive and Executive Function)
Description
The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) is a computerized variant of the Wechsler Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), but the position of symbols and digits is reversed. Scoring is the number of correct responses generated in 2 minutes. Processing Speed Domain = SDMT correct responses - SDMT errors. Higher scores indicate better functioning (i.e. information processing).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)
Description
The BRIEF-A is a self-reported measure (low=61, high=225, lower scores indicate higher executive functioning) capturing views of the subject's own functioning in the everyday environment. The BRIEF-A contains 75 scored items (1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often) in 9 non-overlapping clinical scales (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials). The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Metacognition Index (MI), and GEC are then derived.
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Performance and Daily Functioning Scale of the Adult ADHD Impact Module (AIM-A)
Description
The AIM-A is a subject-reported measure (low=0, high=100, a higher score is more favorable) to assess the overall impact and role that ADHD may have in the conduct of tasks that are expected of adults. The AIM-A is comprised of four global quality of life items, five economic impact items, and five multi-item scales that describe important concepts. Items include: Living with ADHD; General Well-Being; Work, Home and School Performance and Daily Functioning; Relationships; and Communication; and Impact of Symptoms (emotional, degree of daily interference).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Subject's Rating of Endicott Work Productivity Scale (EWPS)
Description
The EWPS provides a measure of the subject's report of their overall productivity (low=0, high=100, a higher score indicates worsening work productivity and efficiency). There are 25 items (questions 15-39) on the scale that describe types of behaviors/ subjective feelings that are highly likely to reduce work productivity/efficiency. These 25 items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=often, to 4=almost always) indicating how often the behavior, feeling or attitude has been manifested in the past week. The total score is the sum of the 25 items.
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Subject's Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale (DSS)
Description
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) assesses the relationship satisfaction or adjustment of partners in committed couple relationships. The 32-question DAS includes 4 empirically validated subscales that measure: dyadic satisfaction, dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion and affectional expression. The response format varies across the entire scale and includes 5-, 6-, and 7-point Likert-scale questions and two yes/no items. The 10-question subset of the DAS, the Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale, was used in this study (low=0, high=50, higher score means better relationship satisfaction).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Subject's Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication You Are Taking for ADHD?
Description
The satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (low=0, high=20, a lower score indicates lower satisfaction with treatment) requires subjects to answer 4 questions related to how much their ADHD symptoms have changed since starting the medication, how much benefit they received from the medication, the extent, if any, the advantages outweighed the disadvantages, and overall satisfaction with the medication. The responses for this question vary with range of satisfaction (e.g. extremely satisfied, very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied).
Time Frame
Endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Responder Rate Using AISRS
Description
AISRS responder rate is defined as the percentage of subjects with AISRS < 18 at endpoint.
Time Frame
Endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness Subscale (CGI-S)
Description
The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated subscale (low=0, high=7, higher score indicates increasing illness). The clinician rates the severity of the ADHD symptoms in relation to the clinician's total experience with ADHD subjects using a 7-point scale (1=normal, not at all ill, 2= borderline ill, 3= mildly ill, 4=moderately ill, 5= markedly ill, 6= severely ill, 7= among the most extremely ill subjects) in response to the question "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how ill is the subject at this time?".
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Significant Other's (a Spouse, Significant Other or Other Adult in the Household, Described in This Study as the Designated Observer) Rating of Adult ADHD Rating Scale IV
Description
The ADHD Rating Scale-IV (Significant Other) is an 18-item list of core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms. Each item is rated on a four point Likert type scale (0 = never or rarely, 1 = sometimes, 2 = often, and 3 = very often). The subject's designated observer will complete this scale, with baseline assessment based on the subject's usual functioning when not on medication. The total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Designated Observer's (DO) Global Executive Composite (GEC) Score of the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function for Adults (BRIEF-A)
Description
The BRIEF-A, as completed by the DO, is a measure (low=61, high=225, lower scores indicate higher executive functioning) capturing views of an adult informant familiar with the subject's functioning. The BRIEF-A contains 75 scored items (1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often) in nine non-overlapping clinical scales (Inhibit, Shift, Emotional Control, Self-Monitor, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Task Monitor, and Organization of Materials). The Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Metacognition Index (MI), and Global Executive Composite (GEC) are then derived.
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Designated Observer's (DO) Rating of Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale
Description
The Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) completed by DOs who were spouses or significant others assesses the relationship satisfaction or adjustment of partners in committed couple relationships. The 32-question DAS includes 4 empirically validated subscales that measure: dyadic satisfaction, dyadic consensus, dyadic cohesion and affectional expression. Possible responses include 5-, 6-, and 7-point Likert-scale questions and two yes/no items. The 10-question DAS subset, the Dyadic Satisfaction Subscale, was used in this study (low=0, high=50, higher score means better relationship satisfaction).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Designated Observer's (DO) Rating of Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire - Overall, How Satisfied or Dissatisfied Are You With the Medication for ADHD Your Partner is Taking?
Description
The satisfaction with treatment questionnaire (low=0, high=20, a lower score indicates lower satisfaction with treatment) requires the subject's DO to answer 4 questions related to how much the subject's ADHD symptoms have changed since starting the medication, how much benefit was received from the medication, the extent, if any, the advantages outweighed the disadvantages, and overall satisfaction with the medication. Responses vary from extremely satisfied, very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, mildly dissatisfied, dissatisfied, very dissatisfied, or extremely dissatisfied.
Time Frame
Endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Over Time
Description
The Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) assesses 18 core ADHD symptoms corresponding to the DSM-IV diagnostic symptoms for adult subjects based on the subject's own rating for each of the symptoms using a four point scale (0=None, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe). If a single item is missing the score is imputed and if more than one item is missing, the total score is treated as missing. The ASRS total score is derived by summing the score assigned to each of the 18 symptoms (low=0, high=54, a higher score signifies a greater severity of symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Total Score
Description
The PSQI discriminates between good and poor sleepers. The self-administered scale contains 15 multiple-choice items concerning frequency of sleep disturbances and subjective sleep quality and 4 write-in items that inquire about typical bedtime, wake-up time, sleep latency, and sleep duration over the past month. The PSQI generates 7 scores corresponding to the different sleep domains. Each component score ranges from 0 to 3. Total sleep index is calculated by adding up the 7 component scores (low=0, high=21, the lower the score, the better in sleep quality).
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
Title
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Description
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) is an 8-item self-rated questionnaire designed to assess the overall level of daytime sleepiness. Each item describes normal daily situations (i.e., watching TV, lying down in the afternoon, sitting inactive in a public place) and subjects rate the likelihood of dozing off or falling asleep in each situation. Responses use a 4-point rating scale (0=would never doze, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2=moderate chance of dozing, 3=high chance of dozing). Item scores are summed to produce a total score (range of 0-24) with lower score suggesting more alertness.
Time Frame
Baseline, endpoint (42 days or early discontinuation)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults
ADHD diagnosis (any type: Combined, Predominantly Inattentive, or Predominantly Hyperactive-Impulsive)
Patients with an Adult ADHD Investigator Symptom Rating Scale (AISRS) score greater than 24 at screening/baseline
Ability to read and understand English
Exclusion Criteria:
Any significant history of cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular disease detectable via ECG
History of diagnosis of substance or alcohol dependence or admission/hospitalization for rehabilitation for dependence
Current neurologic or psychiatric diagnosis that would make patient inappropriate for participation
Anxiety assessments of moderate or severe
Depression assessments of moderate or severe
History or current suicidal thoughts or attempts
Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to OROS MPH
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27487193
Citation
Goodman DW, Starr HL, Ma YW, Rostain AL, Ascher S, Armstrong RB. Randomized, 6-Week, Placebo-Controlled Study of Treatment for Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Individualized Dosing of Osmotic-Release Oral System (OROS) Methylphenidate With a Goal of Symptom Remission. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jan;78(1):105-114. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10348.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Adult Study / OROS Methylphenidate Hydrochloride (HCL) (OROS MPH) in Adults With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs