search
Back to results

APAF: Assessment of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

Primary Purpose

Congestive Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Optimized echo-guided CRT pacing
normal RV pacing
Sponsored by
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Congestive Heart Failure focused on measuring Heart failure, Atrial fibrillation, Cardiac resynchronization, Cardiac pacing, Catheter ablation, Quality of life, Echocardiography

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patients with permanent AF in whom a clinical decision had been made to undertake complete AV junction ablation and ventricular pacing because of drug-refractory, severely symptomatic, uncontrolled high ventricular rate Patients with permanent AF, drug-refractory heart failure, depressed LV function in whom a clinical decision had been made to undertake left ventricular synchronization pacing Exclusion Criteria: New York Heart Association class IV heart failure, or systolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg Severe concomitant non cardiac disease Need for surgical intervention Myocardial infarction within 3 months Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia Primary valvular heart disease Sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation Previously implanted pacemaker Inability to obtain reliable RV and LV pacing and persistent AV block

Sites / Locations

  • Michele Brignole
  • Arcispedale S Maria Nuova

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Normal RV pacing

Echo-guided optimization of pacing

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Short-term clinical study (6 months): Quality of life (measured as Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Specific Symptom Scale and New York Heart Association classification) and exercise capacity at 6 months in the 2 study groups
Long-term clinical study (24 months): Composite end-point of: death due to cardiovascular cause, hospitalisation for worsening heart failure, worsening heart failure or failure to achieve a persistent subjective symptom improvement (clinical failure)

Secondary Outcome Measures

The evaluation of the predictive value of echo desynchronisation indexes (inter and intra-LV delays) for identification of clinical failure (see above)
Cost-benefit comparison of the 2 pacing strategies

Full Information

First Posted
May 20, 2005
Last Updated
March 22, 2010
Sponsor
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
Collaborators
Medtronic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00111527
Brief Title
APAF: Assessment of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Official Title
An Assessment of the Echo-guided Optimal Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients Undergoing 'Ablate And Pace' Therapy for Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS
Collaborators
Medtronic

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A suboptimal level of resynchronization (cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT]) achieved in many patients with actual standards and techniques based on tissue-Doppler echocardiography could be more effective to obtain better CRT results. Eligible patients who successfully received atrioventricular (AV) junction ablation and biventricular (BiV) pacing are randomised to a comparison between a strategy of right ventricular (RV) apical pacing with delayed CRT based on clinical indications with a strategy of early optimal CRT based on an echocardiographic stratification. End-points: Acute echo comparison (acute echo study) Quality of life and exercise tolerance (Short-term clinical study) Composite end-point of CRT clinical failure (Long-term clinical study)
Detailed Description
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients in atrial fibrillation (AF) seems to provide modest favorable effect compared with RV pacing. In the Optimal Pacing SITE (OPSITE) trial the results were heterogeneous. The situation was almost certainly one in which some patients are showing marked clinical benefit with LV-based pacing, balanced by other patients in whom RV was the best choice. Therefore with the actual standards, CRT pacing cannot be recommended as a first line treatment for all patients with AF and refractory heart failure and new criteria to identify the patients who might benefit are needed. Furthermore, a pre-requisite for CRT in patients with AF is the presence of stable 3rd degree AV block which usually implies the need for performing catheter ablation of the AV junction. Study hypothesis: We hypothesized that a suboptimal level of resynchronization is achieved in many patients with actual standards and that some techniques based on tissue-Doppler echocardiography could be more effective to obtain better (hopefully optimal) CRT results. Objective: The aim of the APAF+ heart failure (HF) trial is to compare, in patients affected by permanent AF and refractory heart failure, a strategy of delayed CRT based on clinical indications with a strategy of early optimal CRT based on an echocardiographic stratification. Study protocol: Eligible patients who successfully received AV junction ablation and biventricular pacing are randomised to a comparison between a strategy of RV apical pacing with delayed CRT based on clinical indications with a strategy of early optimal CRT based on an echocardiographic stratification. The optimal CRT is defined as the shortest intra-LV delay obtained with tissue-doppler echocardiography among RV, LV and BiV optimised VV interval. An acute echocardiographic evaluation is performed shortly after randomisation. A short-term clinical evaluation is performed after 6 months. A long-term clinical evaluation is performed up to 24 months. End-points: Acute echo comparison (acute echo study) Quality of life and exercise tolerance (Short-term clinical study) Composite end-point of CRT clinical failure (Long-term clinical study) Study size: The study will randomise 458 patients and will be conducted in 46 centres with an average of 10 patients per centre. Patient enrolment time is anticipated to last 2 years. As the study will continue for a period of 12 months after the enrolment of the last patient, total study duration will be approximately 3 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Congestive Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation
Keywords
Heart failure, Atrial fibrillation, Cardiac resynchronization, Cardiac pacing, Catheter ablation, Quality of life, Echocardiography

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
458 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Normal RV pacing
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Echo-guided optimization of pacing
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Optimized echo-guided CRT pacing
Intervention Description
Echo-TDI guided VV-delay optimization
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
normal RV pacing
Intervention Description
PM or ICD implant according to patient indication
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Short-term clinical study (6 months): Quality of life (measured as Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, Specific Symptom Scale and New York Heart Association classification) and exercise capacity at 6 months in the 2 study groups
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Long-term clinical study (24 months): Composite end-point of: death due to cardiovascular cause, hospitalisation for worsening heart failure, worsening heart failure or failure to achieve a persistent subjective symptom improvement (clinical failure)
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The evaluation of the predictive value of echo desynchronisation indexes (inter and intra-LV delays) for identification of clinical failure (see above)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Cost-benefit comparison of the 2 pacing strategies
Time Frame
24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with permanent AF in whom a clinical decision had been made to undertake complete AV junction ablation and ventricular pacing because of drug-refractory, severely symptomatic, uncontrolled high ventricular rate Patients with permanent AF, drug-refractory heart failure, depressed LV function in whom a clinical decision had been made to undertake left ventricular synchronization pacing Exclusion Criteria: New York Heart Association class IV heart failure, or systolic blood pressure ≥80 mmHg Severe concomitant non cardiac disease Need for surgical intervention Myocardial infarction within 3 months Primary hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia Primary valvular heart disease Sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation Previously implanted pacemaker Inability to obtain reliable RV and LV pacing and persistent AV block
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michele Brignole, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ospedali del Tigullio, Lavagna, Italy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carlo Menozzi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ospedale S Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Michele Brignole
City
Lavagna
State/Province
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16033
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Arcispedale S Maria Nuova
City
Reggio Emilia
ZIP/Postal Code
42100
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15618036
Citation
Brignole M, Gammage M, Puggioni E, Alboni P, Raviele A, Sutton R, Vardas P, Bongiorni MG, Bergfeldt L, Menozzi C, Musso G; Optimal Pacing SITE (OPSITE) Study Investigators. Comparative assessment of right, left, and biventricular pacing in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2005 Apr;26(7):712-22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi069. Epub 2004 Dec 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10715260
Citation
Wood MA, Brown-Mahoney C, Kay GN, Ellenbogen KA. Clinical outcomes after ablation and pacing therapy for atrial fibrillation : a meta-analysis. Circulation. 2000 Mar 14;101(10):1138-44. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.10.1138.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14744954
Citation
Auricchio A, Abraham WT. Cardiac resynchronization therapy: current state of the art: cost versus benefit. Circulation. 2004 Jan 27;109(3):300-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115583.20268.E1. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21606084
Citation
Brignole M, Botto G, Mont L, Iacopino S, De Marchi G, Oddone D, Luzi M, Tolosana JM, Navazio A, Menozzi C. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients undergoing atrioventricular junction ablation for permanent atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2011 Oct;32(19):2420-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr162. Epub 2011 May 23.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

APAF: Assessment of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Permanent Atrial Fibrillation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs