search
Back to results

Beta Blocker De-prescription Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (BEEFBURGER Trial). (BEEFBURGER)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Stenosis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
De-prescribe beta blocker therapy
Sponsored by
University of Saskatchewan
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring Beta Blocker drugs, coronary artery bypass graft, CABG, De-prescription

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years treated with index isolated CABG
  • Able to consent to study
  • On beta blocker therapy at the 6-8week visit
  • LV systolic function (≥45% assessed within 6months of CABG date)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF <45%)
  • Pre- or peri-operative atrial fibrillation or flutter
  • Peri-CABG stroke
  • Unable to follow-up

Sites / Locations

  • Royal University HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Continue beta blocker therapy

De-prescribe beta blocker therapy

Arm Description

Participants in this arm will continue their beta blocker therapy as per their usual clinical care

Beta blocker therapy will be de-prescribed in this arm

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rate of all-cause mortality
All-cause death includes death resulting from both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes.
Rate of spontaneous myocardial infarction
All spontaneous (type 1) myocardial infarctions as per the Universal MI definition. Typical rise or fall of biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis to greater than twice the upper limit of normal (ULN). If markers were already elevated, and have not reached their peak then further elevation of a marker ≥50% of a previous value and >2X ULN is required. If biomarkers are stable or decreasing then a re-elevation of ≥ 20% and > 2X ULN is required. All also require meeting at least one of the following criteria: Ischemic symptoms Development of new pathological Q waves (distinct from index STEMI) ECG changes of new ischemia or Pathological evidence of MI
Rate of stroke
On the basis of CT or MRI imaging or autopsy, stroke is classified as: Ischemic stroke (including hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke) Hemorrhagic stroke (including intracerebral / intraparenchymal hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage) Undetermined stroke (no imaging or autopsy available)
Rate of hospitalizations for heart failure
Physician decision to treat heart failure with intravenous furosemide, if already on oral diuretics (for an alternate indication other than prior congestive heart failure (CHF*), a 50% dose increase) with New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms plus at least one of the following: Presence of pulmonary edema or pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiograph thought to be due to heart failure Rales reaching above the lower 1/3 of the lung fields thought to be due to heart failure or Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) or left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) >18 mm Hg Patients with a prior history of heart failure are not eligible for randomization.
Rate of cardiac arrhythmia
Supraventricular (excluding atrial fibrillation) Includes all forms of Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) such as atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT), atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), atrial tachycardia Atrial fibrillation Any new finding of clinical atrial fibrillation lasting greater than 30 seconds plus at least one of the following: ECG Rhythm strip If ECG document or Holter report is unavailable, clear physician diagnosis Ventricular Non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation
Rate of syncope or need for permanent pacemaker
Syncope suspicious for cardiac etiology requiring either hospitalization for ≥ 24 hours or needing an implantable monitoring device (such as loop recorder) or permanent pacemaker
Rate of recurrent myocardial ischemia
Hospitalization or stay in the emergency department for ≥ 24 hours for myocardial ischemia or requiring unplanned revascularization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in patient reported quality of life (QoL) using Euro Qol (EQ) 5D questionnaire
Change in scores will be used to describe differences in the quality of life between the two study arms (Continuation Vs De-prescription). The EQ-5D is a patient self-reported questionnaire scored from 0 (being the worst health state imaginable meaning worse outcome) to 100 (being the best health state imaginable meaning better outcome).
Change in patient reported quality of life using Short Form (SF) 36 questionnaire
Change in scores will be used to describe differences in the quality of life between the two study arms (Continuation Vs De-prescription). The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability (meaning worse outcome). The higher the score the less disability (meaning better outcome) i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Change in the patient reported angina score using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is the most sensitive, specific, and responsive health-related quality of life instrument for coronary artery disease. The SAQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure for patients with CAD that is valid, reproducible, and sensitive to clinical change. Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life).

Full Information

First Posted
February 19, 2021
Last Updated
November 8, 2022
Sponsor
University of Saskatchewan
Collaborators
Canadian VIGOUR Centre
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04788186
Brief Title
Beta Blocker De-prescription Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (BEEFBURGER Trial).
Acronym
BEEFBURGER
Official Title
BEta Blocker dEprescription Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft sURGERy: Feasibility and Safety Pilot (BEEFBURGER Trial)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 23, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Saskatchewan
Collaborators
Canadian VIGOUR Centre

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Beta-blockers have the greatest cardiovascular impact in patients with reduced heart function/heart failure and in reducing the peri-operative risk of atrial fibrillation. In patients without these high-risk features treated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, their continued long-term role is unclear.
Detailed Description
This is an open-label, non-inferiority, randomized comparison of beta-blocker continuation versus de-prescription at the 6-8 week follow-up following isolated and uncomplicated CABG at Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon. Patients treated with isolated CABG (without valve repair/replacement) and discharged on a beta-blocker are eligible for recruitment if they have preserved systolic function (EF ≥45%) and no history of heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, or an alternate compelling indication for beta-blocker therapy. After obtaining informed consent, eligible patients are randomly assigned at 6-8 weeks to one of the two treatment groups: continued beta-blocker therapy per their usual clinical care OR beta-blocker de-prescription as per the study protocol. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate recruitment feasibility for beta-blocker de-prescription 6-8 weeks following uncomplicated CABG. Exploratory outcomes include the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmia, and cardiovascular-related hospitalization (congestive heart failure, recurrent ischemia, arrhythmia [supraventricular including atrial fibrillation, and ventricular], syncope or need for pacemaker) over a 3-year follow up duration. Other exploratory outcomes will include a change in the patient reported quality of life using the Short Form (SF) 36 and Euro Qol (EQ) 5D questionnaires and angina score using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Stenosis, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI)
Keywords
Beta Blocker drugs, coronary artery bypass graft, CABG, De-prescription

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
open-label, randomized pilot comparison
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Continue beta blocker therapy
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participants in this arm will continue their beta blocker therapy as per their usual clinical care
Arm Title
De-prescribe beta blocker therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Beta blocker therapy will be de-prescribed in this arm
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
De-prescribe beta blocker therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
De-prescription
Intervention Description
Participants will be de-prescribed for beta-blocker therapy. De-prescription will be performed as follows: Half of pre-randomization dose for the first 3 days, then Half of the above dose for the next 3 days, then discontinue
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of all-cause mortality
Description
All-cause death includes death resulting from both cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Rate of spontaneous myocardial infarction
Description
All spontaneous (type 1) myocardial infarctions as per the Universal MI definition. Typical rise or fall of biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis to greater than twice the upper limit of normal (ULN). If markers were already elevated, and have not reached their peak then further elevation of a marker ≥50% of a previous value and >2X ULN is required. If biomarkers are stable or decreasing then a re-elevation of ≥ 20% and > 2X ULN is required. All also require meeting at least one of the following criteria: Ischemic symptoms Development of new pathological Q waves (distinct from index STEMI) ECG changes of new ischemia or Pathological evidence of MI
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Rate of stroke
Description
On the basis of CT or MRI imaging or autopsy, stroke is classified as: Ischemic stroke (including hemorrhagic transformation of ischemic stroke) Hemorrhagic stroke (including intracerebral / intraparenchymal hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage) Undetermined stroke (no imaging or autopsy available)
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Rate of hospitalizations for heart failure
Description
Physician decision to treat heart failure with intravenous furosemide, if already on oral diuretics (for an alternate indication other than prior congestive heart failure (CHF*), a 50% dose increase) with New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms plus at least one of the following: Presence of pulmonary edema or pulmonary vascular congestion on chest radiograph thought to be due to heart failure Rales reaching above the lower 1/3 of the lung fields thought to be due to heart failure or Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) or left ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) >18 mm Hg Patients with a prior history of heart failure are not eligible for randomization.
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Rate of cardiac arrhythmia
Description
Supraventricular (excluding atrial fibrillation) Includes all forms of Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) such as atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (AVRT), atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), atrial tachycardia Atrial fibrillation Any new finding of clinical atrial fibrillation lasting greater than 30 seconds plus at least one of the following: ECG Rhythm strip If ECG document or Holter report is unavailable, clear physician diagnosis Ventricular Non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Rate of syncope or need for permanent pacemaker
Description
Syncope suspicious for cardiac etiology requiring either hospitalization for ≥ 24 hours or needing an implantable monitoring device (such as loop recorder) or permanent pacemaker
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Rate of recurrent myocardial ischemia
Description
Hospitalization or stay in the emergency department for ≥ 24 hours for myocardial ischemia or requiring unplanned revascularization
Time Frame
3 Years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in patient reported quality of life (QoL) using Euro Qol (EQ) 5D questionnaire
Description
Change in scores will be used to describe differences in the quality of life between the two study arms (Continuation Vs De-prescription). The EQ-5D is a patient self-reported questionnaire scored from 0 (being the worst health state imaginable meaning worse outcome) to 100 (being the best health state imaginable meaning better outcome).
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Change in patient reported quality of life using Short Form (SF) 36 questionnaire
Description
Change in scores will be used to describe differences in the quality of life between the two study arms (Continuation Vs De-prescription). The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability (meaning worse outcome). The higher the score the less disability (meaning better outcome) i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Change in the patient reported angina score using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)
Description
The Seattle Angina Questionnaire is the most sensitive, specific, and responsive health-related quality of life instrument for coronary artery disease. The SAQ is a self-administered, disease-specific measure for patients with CAD that is valid, reproducible, and sensitive to clinical change. Each scale is transformed to a score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life).
Time Frame
3 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years treated with index isolated CABG Able to consent to study On beta blocker therapy at the 6-8week visit LV systolic function (≥45% assessed within 6months of CABG date) Exclusion Criteria: Prior heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF <45%) Pre- or peri-operative atrial fibrillation or flutter Peri-CABG stroke Unable to follow-up
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jay Shavadia, MD
Phone
3069862260
Email
jss372@usask.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Natasha B Mostat, MSc
Phone
3063215708
Email
natasha.boyes@usask.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Haissam Haddad, MD, FRCPC
Organizational Affiliation
University of Saskatchewan
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Royal University Hospital
City
Saskatoon
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S7N 0W8
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jay Shavadia, MD
Phone
3069862260
Email
jss372@usask.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jay Shavadia, MD;MRCP(UK)
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Abbas Khani-Hanjani, MD;FRCSC

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27609430
Citation
Macle L, Cairns J, Leblanc K, Tsang T, Skanes A, Cox JL, Healey JS, Bell A, Pilote L, Andrade JG, Mitchell LB, Atzema C, Gladstone D, Sharma M, Verma S, Connolly S, Dorian P, Parkash R, Talajic M, Nattel S, Verma A; CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee. 2016 Focused Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;32(10):1170-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.07.591. Epub 2016 Sep 6. Erratum In: Can J Cardiol. 2017 Apr;33(4):552-553.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21329859
Citation
Gillis AM, Skanes AC; CCS Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee. Canadian Cardiovascular Society atrial fibrillation guidelines 2010: implementing GRADE and achieving consensus. Can J Cardiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;27(1):27-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2010.11.003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30037300
Citation
Thaper A, Kulik A. Rationale for administering beta-blocker therapy to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018 Aug;17(8):805-813. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2018.1504019. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25072904
Citation
Vaishnava P, Eagle KA. Surgery. beta-Blockers--still a trusted ally or time for retirement? Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Sep;11(9):502-3. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.112. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26361160
Citation
Rossello X, Pocock SJ, Julian DG. Long-Term Use of Cardiovascular Drugs: Challenges for Research and for Patient Care. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15;66(11):1273-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29502101
Citation
Park JJ, Kim SH, Kang SH, Yoon CH, Cho YS, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ. Effect of beta-Blockers Beyond 3 Years After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Mar 3;7(5):e007567. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007567.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27650822
Citation
Puymirat E, Riant E, Aissaoui N, Soria A, Ducrocq G, Coste P, Cottin Y, Aupetit JF, Bonnefoy E, Blanchard D, Cattan S, Steg G, Schiele F, Ferrieres J, Juilliere Y, Simon T, Danchin N. beta blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2016 Sep 20;354:i4801. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4801. Erratum In: BMJ. 2016 Oct 17;355:i5602.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28571635
Citation
Dondo TB, Hall M, West RM, Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Bueno H, Danchin N, Deanfield JE, Hemingway H, Fox KAA, Timmis AD, Gale CP. beta-Blockers and Mortality After Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Heart Failure or Ventricular Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jun 6;69(22):2710-2720. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.578.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31284739
Citation
Shavadia JS, Holmes DN, Thomas L, Peterson ED, Granger CB, Roe MT, Wang TY. Comparative Effectiveness of beta-Blocker Use Beyond 3 Years After Myocardial Infarction and Long-Term Outcomes Among Elderly Patients. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jul;12(7):e005103. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005103. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31715435
Citation
Shavadia JS, Zheng Y, Green JB, Armstrong PW, Westerhout CM, McGuire DK, Cornel JH, Holman RR, Peterson ED. Associations between beta-blocker therapy and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 2019 Dec;218:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28559400
Citation
Tsujimoto T, Sugiyama T, Shapiro MF, Noda M, Kajio H. Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus on beta-Blockers. Hypertension. 2017 Jul;70(1):103-110. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09259. Epub 2017 May 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23032550
Citation
Bangalore S, Steg G, Deedwania P, Crowley K, Eagle KA, Goto S, Ohman EM, Cannon CP, Smith SC, Zeymer U, Hoffman EB, Messerli FH, Bhatt DL; REACH Registry Investigators. beta-Blocker use and clinical outcomes in stable outpatients with and without coronary artery disease. JAMA. 2012 Oct 3;308(13):1340-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.12559.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30557046
Citation
da Graca B, Filardo G, Sass DM, Edgerton JR. Preoperative beta-Blockers for Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Dec;11(12):e005027. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005027. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31638654
Citation
Bjorklund E, Nielsen SJ, Hansson EC, Karlsson M, Wallinder A, Martinsson A, Tygesen H, Romlin BS, Malm CJ, Pivodic A, Jeppsson A. Secondary prevention medications after coronary artery bypass grafting and long-term survival: a population-based longitudinal study from the SWEDEHEART registry. Eur Heart J. 2020 May 1;41(17):1653-1661. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz714.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26517856
Citation
Kohsaka S, Miyata H, Motomura N, Imanaka K, Fukuda K, Kyo S, Takamoto S. Effects of Preoperative beta-Blocker Use on Clinical Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Report from the Japanese Cardiovascular Surgery Database. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jan;124(1):45-55. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000901.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24934977
Citation
Brinkman W, Herbert MA, O'Brien S, Filardo G, Prince S, Dewey T, Magee M, Ryan W, Mack M. Preoperative beta-blocker use in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: national database analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1320-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2356.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26071975
Citation
Booij HG, Damman K, Warnica JW, Rouleau JL, van Gilst WH, Westenbrink BD. beta-blocker Therapy is Not Associated with Reductions in Angina or Cardiovascular Events After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Insights from the IMAGINE Trial. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2015 Jun;29(3):277-85. doi: 10.1007/s10557-015-6600-y.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26403339
Citation
Goldberger JJ, Bonow RO, Cuffe M, Liu L, Rosenberg Y, Shah PK, Smith SC Jr, Subacius H; OBTAIN Investigators. Effect of Beta-Blocker Dose on Survival After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Sep 29;66(13):1431-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.047.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25908770
Citation
Zhang H, Yuan X, Zhang H, Chen S, Zhao Y, Hua K, Rao C, Wang W, Sun H, Hu S, Zheng Z. Efficacy of Long-Term beta-Blocker Therapy for Secondary Prevention of Long-Term Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery. Circulation. 2015 Jun 23;131(25):2194-201. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014209. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27892884
Citation
Allen JE, Knight S, McCubrey RO, Bair T, Muhlestein JB, Goldberger JJ, Anderson JL. beta-blocker dosage and outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2017 Feb;184:26-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Beta Blocker De-prescription Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (BEEFBURGER Trial).

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs